Releaselog

Zero An Investigation Into 9 11 2008 DVDRiP XviD Repack-SoSISO

Posted on 26.11.2008 at 21:09 in DVDRiP, Movies by Martin

It’s slightly unusual to see an ISO group to release dvdrips, but why not if the quality is okey. SoSISO pred a repack of documentary Zero: An Investigation Into 9/11. There’s no reason mentioned in the NFO. It’s also interesting to see that even years after the actual event, there are still new movies being filmed about the topic. I am sure this one will spur a bit of controversy as most of the others did.

ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis – that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true. This brand new feature documentary explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government’s account. Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Noble Prize winner Dario Fo, the film challenges assumptions surrounding the attacks. In the words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere de da Sera, “What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity.” The importance of this film can not be overstated, if its thesis is correct, the justification for declaring the war on terror is built on a series of outrageous lies.

Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO

1 CD, 700 MB, sos0911a
104 min, 640×352, 192 AC3
IMDB (5.8), Trailer, NFO, Torrent search

* Comments(220)

Comments (220)

Feel free to post your Zero An Investigation Into 9 11 2008 DVDRiP XviD Repack-SoSISO torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All
  1. Dazzle
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:11

    RS links !! gogogo

  2. Wei
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:18

    We all know Bush is an idiot. Nuff said. Anyone who believes the Bush administration is either a redneck or an uneducated person. God can bless America’s stupidity.

  3. cornholio
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:22

    Damn, I knew this site was run by a bunch of angsty teenagers, but you can’t even spell “okay” properly.. A new day, a new low

  4. birdflu
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:29

    Yawn… yet another conspiracy theory movie about 9/11. Can’t we move on and get out there to kill them terrorists! Yee-haw!!!

  5. jesus
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:42

    conspiracy theory’s ….. what a load of BS

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

  6. ADAMANSKA
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:44

    Its 1.38 GB…not 700 I guess. :/

  7. hub
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:47

    any single links plzz

  8. M
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:50

    @3 / Wei

    That’s a simple conclusion. I say that all of those who doesn’t believe the Bush administration is a redneck and/or uneducated.

    See how stupid it looks? Please log off teh interwebz.

  9. zysterx
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:50

    #5

    i’ve not looked into the towers and such but i have looked into the pentagon. think it’s all a load of rubbish?

    this is a bit off topic but still is tho

    take a look at what was found on the black boxes of flight 77

    Http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

    this is from what the government itself says was the black box from flight 77 which is supposed to have smashed into the pentagon.

    the site was created by pilots who know what all that data means.

    should we move on?
    if they perpetrated such an atrocity upon it’s own citizens should they retire to texas and collect a nice retirement check? or be brought to justice?

    peace

  10. D.G
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:52

    About time this has come to the scene listen, think what you like now. Read the facts now i mean read not listen to the media, the truth is out there at the end of your nose it is not a conspiracy any more its an investigation that will never hit the courts the big man has media in his pocket the media has you in there pocket. Seriously dig up the facts yourself you’ll be very shocked there are so so many question and no answers. Peace out.

  11. Fuzz
    November 26th, 2008 | 21:57

    My friend was in NY on the faithfull day he says he did’t see no planes and after watching a few dvds like september clues on you tube is this real life or have i just slip’t into serious paranoia

  12. mojo
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:01

    what happened to buildin 7 lulz

  13. mr meat
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:02

    anyone got a torrent :[ would really like to see this…

  14. bleble
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:03

    Could some of you uploaders out there kindly explain to us what is the point of uploading to rapidshare?

    I mean, ok, it was a great service before, but since the introduction of the 2.6GB/day limit I think it’s time to move on to megaupload or megashares or whatever.

    And I think that rlslog and similar sites have so much pull in the community that you could help shift the uploaders to other service that would quickly became a new standard.

  15. cinerus
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:08

    http://rapidshare.com/files/167704967/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167704948/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167705570/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167706357/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167706907/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167707274/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167708239/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part7.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/167707114/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part8.rar

    http://netload.in/dateiMzAzMDUwNj/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part1.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei60d1505c6b/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part2.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateiMzc5MzQxND/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part3.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei99423a5a2f/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part4.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateiNzAwNjAwNj/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part5.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateiMjEwOTk2Nz/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part6.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateiMjg2ODc1OD/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part7.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateiMTUyNDA5Nj/Zero_An.Investigation.Into.9.11.2008.DVDRiP.XviD.Repack-SoSISO.part8.rar.htm

    Interchangeable Links

  16. om-1
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:10

    @12 so what are you saying??? so what hit the trade center???

  17. partysan
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:15

    Bush: Yo Osama, G-dawg here. Listen, I need a favor. I kind of need you to take the blame for that WTC gig we talked about.

    Osama: No problem. I’ll take the blame, but you make sure you get the world after me, and destroy that cushy Taliban rule we have going on here in Afghanistan. Oh, and don’t forget to kill a bunch of my friends while at it.

    Bush: You got it man! I owe you one. I’ll make sure you get lots of CNN coverage too.

    If you believe in a 9/11 conspiracy theory, you’re simply an idiot.

  18. Cognitive Disassociation
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:17

    ‘@12 so what are you saying??? so what hit the trade center???’

    The government photochopped your eyesight!!!

  19. john
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:18

    This release was posted 98 days ago to newsgroups. That one was a 2 cd release though.

  20. Henrik
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:20

    jesus – funny site
    Fuzz – wach doc and you will find out :)
    Do you two get paid to be so stupid.

  21. 911 was fake
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:24

    more NWO propagander. anyone who beleives this or BushCos version is an uneducated mindless drone.

  22. mike
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:36

    9/11 was conceived and master minded on Clinton’s watch. Maybe if he had taken the time to stop getting blow jobs and paid closer attention to worldly affairs this wouldn’t have happen.
    At least Obama is putting hard liners in top military positions to finally slaughter the terrorist scum once and for all.

  23. hgh
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:44

    Its a smart plan,blame others,just like the nazis did in the thirties.
    Oh but the nazis are ruling america,so i guess its nothing new..

  24. fubarsmurf
    November 26th, 2008 | 22:47

    the biggest conspiracy theory is the official story.

  25. Pegasus
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:27

    9/11 was photoshopped!!111

    PS: I am not a crackpot.

  26. #15 Rocks
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:29

    I agree with number 15. The RS limits are not good. I used to love RS, but maybe another service would be a better default.

    Also, any fellow American reading this…believing what our government says is the LEAST patriotic thing you could ever do. We’re the most hypocritical and corrupt government on the planet today. Period. It’s time to start thinking revolution again…like the founding fathers would have wanted us to.

  27. Bob
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:29

    I’m sorry, but all you conspiracy fanboys need to take off the tinfoil hats and get a life. Seriously. Some bad guys crashed some planes into some buildings. Get over it.

  28. s3n
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:30

    America still leads the world in gullibility.

  29. george dubbya
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:33

    Inside job….good video too….
    Not seem it??Get it…educate yourselves…irrefutable evidence….open your eyes..think…research…dont take my word for it…

    Check this out..then come back…
    http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

  30. sillyamericans
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:34

    Planes with no windows
    Building 7
    No footage of the plane @ the pentagon (with 100’s of cameras in the area)
    Blasts coming from the basement in the WTC, cops and fire reported.

    Clearly, many americans love to turn a blind eye to this.

    Enjoy your government, and crashing economy!

  31. BeeGee
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:53

    @25

    EXACTLY.

    It’s unfortunate that there remain Americans who actually believe the terrorists were trying to invade our country and spread Anthrax to flourishing areas like Podunk, Oregon.

    It’s this simple: The American government’s biggest weapon in this ridiculously false “War on Terrorism” is…the undying patriotism of the American people. The American people that are actually gullible enough to believe that a 737 jumbo jet crashed into the Pentagon and burned up, leaving so little a trace of it’s existence, that you can count the scraps on one hand….The same gullible Americans that listen to the firemen inside the WTC say that there were explosions coming from the bottom of the building (along with the other seriously incriminating evidence of explosions coming from the bottom of the building), and still scoff at people who think the buildings may have been rigged to explode.

    Metal buildings, that is, that were the first to of their kind in the history of metal buildings (lmao) to defy the laws of physics and be destroyed by fire. Not even possible.

    I could ramble on, but it’s no biggie. Those Americans who are brainwashed and those who have common sense but remain in complete denial, are the same ones that believe in ridiculous attempts at logic such as “The Magic Bullet Theory”. Nothing will change their mind because they don’t want their perfect worlds inconvenienced by the possibility that their beloved government operates under a selfish agenda that has nothing to do with the desires of the American people, and does so whenever it feels it has to. Which is pretty much what governments do – status quo. But not us perfect Americans, right?

    Anyways, thanks for the vid (like I need anymore proof that 9/11 was an inside job) and to each his own.

  32. stupid people deserves it
    November 26th, 2008 | 23:59

    @3 wei:

    actually there’s one more group who support bush, as you can see from the replies here.

    They are the ones in denial because if they admit, or even think about the possibility of it being an inside job, it’ll make them feel like an idiot (half of the american people voted for bush).

    people maybe stupid but they don’t want to feel like one.

    you just have to live with the fact that 90% of the population is stupid, and they have a defense mechanism that maintain their stupidity.

  33. Mike
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:05

    The teenybop/anracho-commie/anti-globalist truthers are at it again. “sillyamerican” takes the cake. I have a friend who was working at the freaking Pentagon the day the plane hit. it was no bomb fool. Unless, of course, you consider a fuel-laden passenger plane a flying bomb.

  34. Never@home
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:08

    This has been out since at least September.
    http://www.warez-bb.org/viewtopic.php?t=1529559&highlight=

  35. Mike
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:08

    “stupid people deserves it” said: “you just have to live with the fact that 90% of the population is stupid, and they have a defense mechanism that maintain their stupidity.”

    This of course, displays the perfect archetype of a conspiracy nut. A conspiracy nut feels like he/she is one of a privileged and enlightened few that have special access to the truth, no matter the evidence to the contrary.

  36. wsh
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:22

    any nzb (newsgroups) or well seeded torrent lying around for this release?
    tia

  37. usa = terrorist
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:23

    LOL!

    9/11 like 3000 people died.

    irak + afganistan more than 1 MILLION people died.

    USA is fighting illegal wars all over the world. Believe me I feel very sorry for those in the twin towers. But usa is the mass murder here let’s don’t forget that!

  38. Shlomi
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:28

    I have not watched this movie yet, not sure I will, however, being an awake person to this worlds reality has urged me to just remind all of you dimwitts! that:

    Disprooving a “Fact”/Story… is not prooving a different one… – means that even if the gov’ lied (which is actually really reasonable! – since they wouldn’t/shouldn’t reveal their weak spots to more… than those who knew them….)

    and claiming that let’s say, an aircraft couldn’t damage the pentagon as it was… hmmm….again…. hiding those weak points of one of the gov most important buildings!?

    and if it was a truck ?! or a fart?! does it matter?! what about those people who were one the plane which “disappeared… ” were they killed?! or paid to vansih?!

    who is stupid enough to belive the official story? most, but believing those idiotic BS instead?!

    know that you were probably not told the truth since its not good for ur country/gov/anyone over there…

    however that doesn’t mean that inventing BS to replace it is …

  39. MissingNo
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:34

    Just to put in my two cents:
    This documentary is horrible and all the guests
    look like they are crazy.
    Just watch Loose Change.

  40. hai
    November 27th, 2008 | 00:59

    My name is joe. I believe everything the media tells me. I love being stupid.

  41. WTC7
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:06

    does anyone have the italian version of this?

  42. a
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:06

    Mike @34:

    And here we have a boy scout trying desperately to get on the safe, glorified moral high horse.
    I bet Mike feels as superior as the “conspiracy nuts” he described.
    as they both share the same pattern: dismiss the other party and label them as inferior.

    Whatever side you’re on, the fact remains:
    Technology have advanced but the ratio between the leaders and followers has remained the same through out the human population.

    the 10% lead the lives of the other 90%.
    the 10% invented things that changed the lives of 90% of the people.
    the 10% control the wealth of the 90%.

    the 90% believe in fairy tales, the 10% doesn’t.
    the 90% is against/afraid of the truth. the 10% isn’t.

    in any given human herd 90% share the same pattern that the 10% doesn’t.

    so, MOST PEOPLE ARE STUPID.

    real world example: when the so called “sane” (as in people on the moral high-horse, who is against war and against blood), gets seriously ill, they’ll seek help from people in the 10% (doctors/surgeons/nurse/etc), and guess what, this 10% had to bypass a default “good people” mechanism that tells the brain to walk away from blood/bones as the fact of seeing them suggests a high probability of danger.

    The default mechanism is just a beginner’s guide to life. and the sheep always swear by that guide. (thus, most people are stupid, in any given field.)

    you can argue right/wrong all day but at the end of the day, there is really only one stick: survival.

    if someone chops up people on the street and gets them killed, that person is labeled as a psychopath.
    if someone chops up people in a hospital and helps them survive, that person is a hero.

    human is a biological machine designed to replicate. a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy who doesn’t even know what happened in the beginning.
    hot chicks are “hot” and will be “loved” by more people, because they have a higher chance of producing offsprings that has a higher chance of survival.

    so, you see, there is really only one value: survival value. everything else is just a form of marketing.

    If you have a gut reaction to this, then you, my sheep, are in the 90%.

    Have fun lying to yourself.

  43. common sense
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:17

    And all you dweebs who believe that the US did this to themselves have to be so very p^%$king proud that Popular mechanics has destroyed your stupidity theories with facts and actual experts who do work in metal and welding and physics and explosives and so on on a daily basis.

    You want something to ponder, then ponder this morons…in the bombing of the Empire State Building in NY they used the same kind of bomb that was used with supposed bomber Timothy McVie, IGNORING and FBI informant who warned them about this a good two weeks before it happened. Used the same make of explosives only in a bigger truck at the ESB then at the federal building…and what you need to ask yourself is this.

    1. The only damage to the ESB was chipping of the supports in the basement where as the whole front of the federal building was destroyed. Now since the ESB was a larger bomb it should have done more damage especially since it was in an enclosed space (same thing happenes on a smaller scale when you place an M80 under a tin can) So why did a bigger bomb cause no structure damage in an enclosed space that would amplify the explosiv force by a factor of 10, and yet you have a much smaller bomb made of the same things that was parked in an open parking lot a good 30 feet from the building, and it brought down the whole fromt of the building. 90% of the explosive force would have been sent AWAY from the building due to the “spread” factor of the concussion wave of the blast as it would have nothing to contain it like in the parking basement of the ESB.

    As for the WTC, any IDIOT with two brain cells to rub to make a spark knows that when you add heat to metal over time the metal softens and thus will lose its strength. And ANY IDIOT knows that when you have a four legged stool and one leg is removed and another leg is weakened, the stool cannot support it’s own weight nor anyone elses and WILL COLLAPSE. As for the other buildings..when you have tons upon tons of cement and steel, even weakened steel; falling on you it is going to cause structural damage, and the higher the object the harder it is going to hit. That you dumbarses is basic physics 101 and basic metalurgy 101.

    And the last thing is whoops…you have camera’s from all over NY clearly showing you that planes hit the WTC and you have recently relesed video tape from the gas station across the street from the Pentagon CLEARLY SHOWING A PLANE HITTING SAME!! And according to the experts in film and photography at the Kodak factory in NY, the tape has not been altered in any way.

    Strike 1-2 and three, you conspiracy numbnuts have struck out so go back and join your flat earth society and debate on if the moon landing is real and the rest of us will remain in reality while you and your ilk are in la-la land.

  44. Green finger
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:20

    Not seen film ?
    Brit here,not sure on topic but as for goverments covering things up,all you have to do is look at the Arms sold to Iraq to now that both goverments know exactly what govermants are capable of covering up.
    This has more to do with a war on islam than a war on terror and the towers ,reguardless of who did it are just casualties in that war,along with all the people and soldier’s that have died before and since that evil event.
    I personally know a few people from the services and there just following order’s as a true soldier/pilot should but i believe its a Crusade ,modern but crusade never the less on both side

  45. The Lumberjack
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:30

    Here you pigeons go
    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

  46. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:38

    i’ve not seen the movie and may not. and in fact nearly nothing of the rest (the towers and such). except for the newspapers and tv at the time.

    recently i saw a reference in a thread at an emule forum that mentioned the pentagon attack. so i did a search to see what years had produced. frankly i was taken aback. the first site (and only site) i went to was that pilots link i posted.

    guess what? they had gotten the black box from the NTSB itself and after analyzing the data it contained so many questions that conflicted with what the government says happened that it made me question what really did happen.

    those people knew how to track everything the flight recorders were showing and they worked the flight minute by minute….evening showing what the instruments showed when the NTSB said things were occuring. and guess what. impossible is the correct term.

    go to that link and see for yourselves. did you know that it was impossible for that plane to have sheared off those light poles from the data on the flight recorders?

    this isn’t some conspiracy theory but actual data from the flight recorders themselves. the flight recorders obtained from the NTSB thru the freedom of information act.

    deny it all you want. say the data has been falsified if you want. i’m not a conspiracy nut. i don’t go to those websites and haven’t even looked into it until a few days ago, but one thing is for certain. what the government maintains was happening is in conflict with what the flight recorders themselves show.

    at the least it deserves looking into, but won’t. like some say here move one and the economy is in bad shape and people have too many other concerns than hashing over old news…so it probably wont be. and that’s sad. sad that people’s minds are already closed to discovering the truth. that’s the saddest part of all.

    i don’t know what hit the pentagon. maybe it was flight 77? i don’t know, but what i do know is that what the government says happened is not backed up with the flight data. look at the evidence for yourselves. not this documentary, but the data from the flight recorders and then say there aren’t valid questions there.

    the NTSB refuses to decode the additional data still on the boxes too. now why is that? i think to protect themselves personally. it would be terribly embarrassing if it showed they put out data that was invalid…just as they have so far.

    look at the data for yourselves (again—not this movie–but the real flight recorder data) unless you’re like prespective jurors who’ve already come to a verdict even before seeing the evidence? that truly sad!
    :(

  47. abc
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:52

    @mike:

    LOL experts?

    “Experts” my arse, anyone with IQ above 90 would have noticed there are 2 different groups of “experts” stating “facts” calling each others liars.

    One group is getting paid more and gets more main stream media support tho.

    If I am the party behind this, for every 1 piece of the truth that leaked out, I’ll make sure 50 slightly different copies are released into the media by mixing the truth with lies.

    So the 90% sheep have something to support their fairy tale, they’ll feel so safe and when they spot the little lie in those distorted copies of truth.

    And by rejecting those lies they have something to reinforce their own assumption, so they can stop thinking and go back to grass eating. Eating grass safely is what they really want.

    Here, have some grass.

  48. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:57

    common sense

    lol

    that statement of yours saying that camera at that gas station clearly showed the plane hitting the pentagon? where is the clarity?

    lol

    do you all realize that the pentagon is the most secure most camera covered building in this country? and all they released were what ? 5 frames from a gas station camera across the street?

    that funny!

    and i’m not a conspiracist—-only a realist.
    and that’s absurd!

  49. pvt Langhouse
    November 27th, 2008 | 01:59

    I worked at the Pentagon at the day of the crash, and I still do.
    I’ve seen the plane. The PLANE. Not a missile, a passenger plane.
    The memories about the event don’t hurt half as much as people trying to convince people we’ve hit the Pentagon ourselves. You know who you are.

  50. sdbsbdsb
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:14

    @51 pvt laghouse

    the following statement has as much credibility as yours:

    I worked at the Pentagon at the day of the crash, and I still do.

    I’ve seen the banana. The BANANA, Not a missle, a banana. Some kid threw a banana towards the building then the building collasped.

    yawn, next!

  51. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:14

    pvt Langhouse

    i just as much as anyone mourn the deaths of our servicemen and defense employee, but if what you say is true? and i’ve no reason to doubt it. then you kow (or should know) how secure and well camera-ed that building is?

    and they release 5 frames froma gas station across the street?

    now what’s wrong with that picture?

    i’m not saying the plane didn’t hit it. what the evidence from the black box obtained from the NTSB does show is that what they put out as what happened is not what the flight indicator readouts showed. that alone is enough to question them.

  52. pvt Langhouse
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:31

    @53 zysterx
    As this is still a pending investigation, all evidence is witheld. That’s not weird, that’s standard procedure, in any case.
    I can’t say anything on the case of the black box as I’m not an aviator, nor do I know nearly enough of aviation to know such details.
    I can however give you a few facts to think about about the plane hitting us. I did not come up with them, but I found em in a rebutal to “Loose Change”, called “Scr*w Loose Change” (worth watching, particulary on the Pentagon case). It’s the lights at the lawn aswell as the damaged generator. If not an airplane sliding in, what damaged these?
    This clip, taken from “Scr*w Loose Change” will illustrate what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1n-rvG04pw&fmt=18

    @52 sdbsbdsb
    Enjoy your banana.

  53. james
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:32

    The governments own conspiracy theory that 19 hijackers some of which are still alive where able to hijack four commercial airplanes with boxcutters who went undetected for hours is the most ludicrous of them all.

    Those who just debunk it as a conspiracy theory obviously have not watched any good info on 9/11 challenging the official version of events which don’t even mention how building 7 collapsed in the official report.

    Why can’t the find evidence to charge Osama Bin Laden with 9/11 on the FBI’s on official website?

    Does it not bother any Americans that 5 Mossad agents working for an Israeli front company Urban Moving were caught filming the event cheering and flicking lighters and when arrested failed polygraph tests and found in there possession boxcutters, explosive residue and $3000 work of cash.
    Then Michael Chertoff intervened, a dual Israeli/US citizen whose mother helped create the Mossad had them released and deported to Israel.

    Maybe you should look at who actually controls the US the J people who dominated banking, media, academia and government posting who are dual citizens of country I.

    This is an excellent documentary.

    It covers every aspect including what the fake “Al-Queda” terrorist organisation is.

    The people they talk to are former FBI/CIA agents, former US ambassador for the US embassy in Saudi Arabia, and pilots and air traffic controllers. Not exactly crack pot conspiracy theorists.

    Something I didn’t know is that Donald Rumsfield changed the hijacking protocol shortly before 9/11

    @common sense

    “add heat to metal over time the metal softens”

    Then we should stop flying planes or driving cars.

    The WTC building was designed to withstand planes flying into it.
    The metal with which the WTC building was constructed would bend over a period of time with temperatures exceeding those capable of those used in Jet fuel hence way planes engines don’t melt and fall from the sky.

    As far as the Pentagon is concerned there was 85 separate cameras confiscated by the FBI including the Pentagons own perimeter CCTV cameras and what was released was 1 still image of an explosion.

    Do you believe that Atta’s passport survived the plane explosion but heat was hot enough to melt metal?

    The Pentagon has it own missile defence system why did that not respond?

  54. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:35

    langhouse lies…liar!!
    there was NO plane…it was a missile…look at my first post #30….a plane makes a hole 20 ft wide??
    If it wasnt such a criminal murderous act the “official” story would be laughable….

    Those who spoout anger to those who Q are at best ill informed, and at worst F!@#ing stupid beyond belief…

  55. james
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:36

    IMDB rating of 5.8 thats BS.

    Obviously people are voting who reject any notion of a possible 9/11 conspiracy.

  56. Kreotropic
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:54

    I all!! I’m an engineer here in Portugal! I make my living building Towers much like the twin towers…not that big though…but how we make it is very much the same…

    Well there is no way that those buildings fall on their on…there had to be demolition charges…

    I’m not saying that was bush who did it!! But someone did…

    One thing i think we all agree..we do not know all the truth and i’m pretty sure its not to protect us (you americans)…

    One more advice…keep an open mind!!!for all sides…There’s no master of the truth!!!

    Check this site http://www.ae911truth.org/ and see what the professionals from the area say!!!

  57. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:55

    “…19 hijackers some of which are still alive…”

    That nonsense had a shelf life of one week, more than 7 years ago.
    That one week being the delay between releasing the names of the hijackers (which were shared by many living people in the ME) and the release of the photos of their heads (which were shared by nobody). Nobody has claimed these people were alive since then.

    You have absolutely no interest in “truth” and “facts” if you are still peddling this nonsense.

  58. james
    November 27th, 2008 | 02:58

    @george

    I doubt its a missile I think thats black propaganda to weaken alternative theories to what happened just like those who claim there were no planes that hit the towers, that it was just explosions and the planes where inserted latter by SFX which can be easily debunked and used to discredit the whole 9/11 truth movement.

    It is most likely a fighter jet that hit the Pentagon.
    That would explain why the Pentagons radar system did not pick up the aircraft and a number of jet fighters were scrambled from the nearby air force base near the Pentagon.

    If you look at the image closely of the Pentagon ataack you see a white stream just before the explosion at the bottom right that looks like a fighter jet stream.

  59. Terrorist
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:06

    For a good compilation of facts please donate 15 minutes to this:
    http://whatreallyhappened.wikia.com/wiki/9/11

    It is hard to start to believe such atrocities being organized by government and secret services, but once one gets over the first shock and starts to put pieces together, eventually understanding comes…

    False flag operations have been practiced a very long time. The recent two worth to mention are:
    1) Terrorist act by German intelligence agency BND in Kosovo (in order to get European Union police force into the country); luckily those agents were caught by local police.
    2) Terror act in Mumbai, India which leads back to Mossad organizers in order to prevent closer relationships between India and Iran (which is also under serious threat of Israel/US attack).

    The point is – these things really happen! Killed people and global panic makes good excuse for expanding police and military influence, shrinking democracy, etc.

  60. Don't ignore the truth
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:07

    Of all the lies that the American government told the world, this one is the funniest: Hijackers’ paper and plastic passports magically surviving a 650 degree inferno and safely landing on the pavement below.

    MAGIC PASSPORTS:

    http://www.rense.com/general68/pass.htm

    http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/passport.html

    Oh btw, 2 more points:
    1) During the cold war era (which most of you teenage kiddies wouldn’t have a clue about), the main aim of both superpowers was to control Arabian petrol resources either by befriending them or by threatening them or by creating conflicts involving them or, simply, by invading them. Guess which country succeeded ?

    2) You give too much credit to the terrorist side. You see terrorism is much like sniping in its core aim: “one shot, one kill”. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the terrorists would have chosen more than one target at a time. I believe that, even though the attack on twin towers was performed by terrorists, the other two were planned, coordinated and carried out by people other than terrorists.

    I also believe that at least CIA had prior knowledge of the attacks and that they actually left the terrorists alone to finish the job. There is so much evidence against the official version of events that one can’t ignore anymore.

  61. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:08

    “Check this site http://www.ae911truth.org/ and see what the professionals from the area say!!!”

    What does it matter what your profession is if you are saying “there’s no way they fell on their own” ?

    Tell me how credible a JFK conspiracy theorist is who would avoid mentioning the fact that he was shot and went around saying “there’s no way his head exploded on it’s own”. Must have

    Then realise this has to be a hypothetical since, after 40 years, nobody has been stupid or crazy enough to try on the kind of intellectual dishonesty you are.

    How did OJ’s wife die ? There’s no way her head separated itself from her shoulders. Some big thinkin going on here.

  62. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:13

    No James…sorry, i beg to differ….missiles also have vapour trails…how does a missile theory “weaken alternative theories??All it does is, if anything, is weaken the official word, not the other way round…

    The pentagon knew the plane was coming…we know this as fact….it wasnt “hidden” from view…Cheney ordered the “standdown”….WHY??
    I say missile based on the size of the hole in the building BEFORE it fell down…no more than 20ft across….huh??20ft??Thats impossible!!

    Not if you believe the official word…
    Its not a case of wearing tinfoil hats blah blah….this is said to besmirch the folks(including family members, spouses of the murdered etc)who want another investigation into the biggest Coverup the world has ever seen….. a F!@#ing disgrace…

  63. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:20

    “I think thats black propaganda to weaken alternative theories … used to discredit the whole 9/11 truth movement.”

    Except you need to pretend anyone but the same “9/11 truth movement” has been peddling what they know to be these same easily debunked lies for years.

    After 4 years they were all still claiming there were no photos of the hijackers at airports. A google search for “hijacker airport” turned up a dozen pictures, 8 of which were of the hijackers. They probably still are.

    Who do we blame for a lie that lame, peddled by nobody other than these people supposedly interested in “research” and “truth” ?

    Where’s the lie in the “official version” that compares to nonsense like this or “the hijackers are still alive” ? Did I miss something and Bush claimed there was no Pentagon despite the photographs of it ?

    This is the lamest fraud the internet has seen so far and won’t be topped until boner pill spammers promise to grow you 2 d*cks.

  64. james
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:24

    @s3n

    Some of the alleged hijackers have come to the US embassy in Saudi Arabia to clear there name it’s in the documentary.

    Why won’t they release the airport CCTV footage that they have when boarding flights?

    The one they released of Atta at New York was actually Portland.
    Why the cover-up if they have nothing to hide.

    I have a question why has the US not arrested Abdullah Bin Laden?

    In the official lawsuit filed by the victims against Saudi Arabia names his organisation The Benevolence Foundation as a terrorist front NGO who financed the hijackers stay in the US.

    Scandinavian intelligence officials have named Abdullah with financing terrorism in the Balkans and like various terrorist front organisations like the mentioned above Benevolence Foundation and World Muslim Youth.

    In 2002 a document was discovered by Bosnian investigators from pressure from US and western intelligence officials to investigate terrorist activities called the Golden Chain a list which the terrorist themselves listed as there major financiers dating back to 89 which included Abdullah Bin Laden.

    Also in the same a Bosnian court charged Abdullah with running terrorist camps in Bosnia.

    Abdullah is a senior shareholder in the Carlyle Groups which also has senior former politicians like British PM John Major and George Bush Sr he was also I former Harvard graduate so it would not be hard to get background info on him and arrest him.

    So why are we going across the world to fight terrorism yet letting the perhaps the biggest financial backer of Islamic terrorism to conduct business transactions in the US?

  65. fawfw
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:28

    s3n:

    so all you’re saying is both the government and some people did infact talked nonsense.

    now I can understand why some people talk nonsense.
    but the government?

    if you have the logic to spot nonsense from people then why do you shut the logic down when you face the government’s official story?

    if you’re not stupid, are you afraid?

    i mean if you’re so “factual” as you’re trying to look, then why talk like the government’s version is the truth?

  66. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:30

    pvt Langhouse

    ===

    the generator?

    think if you’ll look at the actual data from the flight indicator at that pilots link i posted you’ll see that it was impossible for that to have happened.

    what was given by the NTSB to account for that generator damage was a direct opposite in turn (left/right) from what the flight indicator actually showed.

    so how did the eg==generator get dameaged if that plane followed the flight path put forth? answer they put out false data and it couldn’t have.

    here is the site to check for yourself. these are professional pilots (listed) who know how to analyze flight data indicators. not conspiratists.

    here are the questions the pilots group would ask after analyzing the flight data….notice the reference to the generator?

    why not check the data for yourselves? instead of closing off any indications contrary to wthat the government has put forth as truth?

    read this and then actually go to the link below it and then ask yourselves if what your government officials are giving false info contrary to the facts?

    =-==========

    Questions For NTSB/FBI Regarding Flight Data Recorder Information
    The current FDR shows 480′ MSL True Altitude, too high to hit the light poles. What are your findings of True Altitude at end of data recording 09:37:44. Why did you provide a Flight Data Recorder that shows the aircraft too high without a side letter of explanation? How did you come to your conclusion.
    What is the vertical speed at end of data recording :44. How did you come to your conclusion.
    What is the Absolute Altitude and end of data recording? How did you come to your conclusion.
    Why does the csv file show the altimeter being set in the baro cor column on the descent through FL180, but the animation altimeter does not show it being set?(This is a blatant cover-up to confuse the average layman in hopes no one would adjust for local pressure to get True Altitude. Too bad for them we caught it).
    Why do the current G Forces for the last minute of data correspond to the changes in vertical speed, yet at end of data :44-:45 it shows an increase in vertical speed never accounting for any type of level off to be level with the lawn as shown in the DoD video?
    Do you have any video showing a clear impact and/or of the plane on its approach to impact?
    Why does your animation show a flight path north of the reported flight path?
    Why are there no system indication of any impact with any object up to and after :44?
    Why does the csv file and animation show a right bank when the official report requires a left bank to be consistent with physical damage to the generator?
    How did you come to the conclusion of 09:37:45 as the official impact time?
    What is the exact chain of custody of the FDR? What date/time was it found? Where exactly was it found? Please provide documentation and names.
    Why does the hijack timeline show a 3 min interval for hijacking to take place? Why was Capt. Burlingame reported to have not followed protocol for the Common Strategy prior to 9/11?

    -=————-

    Http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

  67. lol
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:32

    s3n above is an idiot

    he’s saying just because there’s some nuts with holes in their theories, the government’s version suddenly become believable.

    why are you focusing on the idiots and not the government?

    if anything they are just as “lame”

    you’re the one pretending that the government is the angel

  68. dude
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:36

    dude, leave them alone

    stop trying to wake them up.
    they’re like the fat ugly chicks in high school that doesn’t get any attentions from the guys.

    stop telling them they’re ugly, they already know, let them pretend they are too pretty for the guys and the world is fine.

    they’ll understand eventually.

  69. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:36

    #63
    WHAT??
    Degreed people, with doctorates and phd’s who are prepared to dispute the USA ’s official word….it is because of their professions and their specialization in civil engineering fields that leads them to disagree with the official word….
    Your remaining ramblings made NO sense at all…JFK has FA to do with this…..
    you need to read more ….

  70. james
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:44

    @Terrorist

    Haven’t heard about the Mossad incident in India I would be grateful if you could post a link to news story.

    If you want to research the history of US/Western backed terrorism that we are fighting now I suggest you visit http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/ and read the trial transcripts of the farcical Milosevic show trial at http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/hague.htm

    The only one who could have pulled of 9/11 and influence in the US media and government is Israel and the Mossad who are the only ones to gain from the 9/11 terrorists attacks.

    Neo-conservatism is just another Jewish political movement read Professor Kevin MacDonald historical research and work on the issue.

  71. aaaaaaaa
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:45

    for some unknown reason this page is hidden from rlslog’s main page (you can still find it in movies category tho)

    save a copy before this gets deleted

  72. wheres your line in the sand
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:47

    LOL @ 51..nice to see government personnel using rlslog!! Don’t you mean on the day of the crash?? we’ve all seen the plane man!! it’s clearly seen on that 1/5th of a second clip they released!! LOL

  73. eer
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:51

    @51

    how fast can you seed torrents from the pentagon?

  74. wheres your line in the sand
    November 27th, 2008 | 03:55

    LOL @75

    51 is just another blinded by the media..

  75. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 04:00

    @ Terrorist

    you can also add the US government CIA planning an attack on florida to kill (that’s kill folks) american citizens to get support for an invasion of cuba.

    and not to mention releasing bacteria…radiation…and other virulent things into the subway systems to determine if it would show up in the population? and the black guys with syphilis. withholding a cure so they could be studied? you government loves you america!

    lol

  76. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 04:03

    disinfo agent i say….that or definately deluded….

    http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

    Whats your take on this langhouse??

  77. james
    November 27th, 2008 | 04:14

    @george

    But wouldn’t the Pentagons own radar system detect a missile and the missile defence system they have stationed there shot it down?

    The radar would detect a jet to but it would register as a friendly and not consider it as a threat to violation of airspace.

    I’m surprised 9/11 researchers don’t focus more on the alleged hijackers themselves there background, contacts, etc.

    @s3n

    I googled in “hijacker airport” in Google and did not come up with anything.
    If there’s a specific website your referencing that I could look at that you could post I would appreciate it

    If you are talking about the passport headshot photos then that proves nothing.

    The government would have them when they submitted there Visa application to enter the US.

    Why are the hijackers not listed on the flight manifesto you the hijacked planes?
    you could post I would appreciate

  78. Never@home
    November 27th, 2008 | 04:32

    @44
    That was wonderful. You are very off subject to the lot, but to a few of us that was deep. I like the way tou think, and i wish that way of thought made sense to so many more, as clear written as it honestly seemed. To dig deeper you could say that the very reason that the 90% are stupid is because the 10% need them there though. How would the 10% be able to exist if they didn’t have a “90%” to feed off of. As much as I distrust my country, i am awake enough to realize they need me more then I need them. Balance shifts under great shifts. What we need is not to worry about the’truths’ in detail, but come together as a 90% ( much larger then 10%) and understand that the 10% are given the power that they have from our negligence\complacency. On a grand scale, as dire as our existence is, it’s not to late to jump the fence and shift the balance. Never give up on the human race. As diseased as we are, and a threat to the existence of evry other form of life on earth, we have the will to adapt and the numbers and strength to overcome. Don’t give up. Teach, inform, respect, heal, and make a difference to the best of your abilities.

    And no. I am not religious.

  79. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 05:03

    @ James

    “Some of the alleged hijackers have come to the US embassy in Saudi Arabia to clear there name it’s in the documentary.”

    No, they didn’t. Read what I wrote again.
    You think after 7 years nobody followed this up ? Der Spiegel did.

    “Why won’t they release the airport CCTV footage that they have when boarding flights?”

    One would guess that they assumed the footage of them checking in to the flights was enough. But all you really want is a diversion from acknowledging what is available. If there was CCTV of them boarding (would there be?) then you would be asking for footage of them in their seats.

    The one they released of Atta at New York was actually Portland. Why the cover-up if they have nothing to hide.

    Nobody on either side has ever claimed anyone boarded a plane in NY. Nobody but you has ever claimed he was photographed boarding anywhere but Portland. I guess they are covering up his Alaska flight too.

  80. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 05:08

    @ James

    I’m surprised 9/11 researchers don’t focus more on the alleged hijackers themselves there background, contacts, etc.

    Really ? I would have thought the reason they were avoiding that would have been kind of obvious. Books like “Perfect Soldiers” have been available since 2002. Why don’t you do that research, read the families talking about their not-alive children and figure it out for yourself.

    “@s3n: I googled in “hijacker airport” in Google and did not come up with anything.”

    Then you are doing it wrong.

    If there’s a specific website your referencing that I could look at that you could post I would appreciate it

    Take your pick of any of the 9/11 conspiracy theory websites.

  81. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 05:11

    @ george
    “JFK has FA to do with this…..you need to read more ….”

    You need to read what I wrote.
    I didn’t say JFK had anything to do with it.
    I pointed out that after 40 years nobody has been dishonest enough to suggest JFK must have had undetectable explosives implanted in his head, just because they wanted to avoid the obvious cause of his head exploding.

    Are you saying you are really not bright enough to figure out the comparison I am making ? Wow.

  82. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 05:32

    james
    November 27th, 2008 | 04:14

    @george

    But wouldn’t the Pentagons own radar system detect a missile and the missile defence system they have stationed there shot it down?

    The radar would detect a jet to but it would register as a friendly and not consider it as a threat to violation of airspace.

    ============

    would the radar have?

    that seems to be in question>

    there was a white jet flying over the pentagon that day, but it seems nobody has any record of it. nobody but the public who took pictires of it that is.

    Http://rense.com/general76/e4boverWhiteHouse.jpg

    Http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=483&st=0&

    lol

  83. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 05:55

    s3n
    yeah mate still dont know what your talking about….whose being dishonest here???

    I suggest people do their own research, watch this film and make their own minds up….

    s3n
    So do you support the official story,including wtc7?//

  84. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 06:24

    yeah mate still dont know what your talking about….whose being dishonest here???

    Well the 9/11 conspiracy theorist pretending he’s never heard of planted explosives in connection with 9/11 would be obvious suspect.

  85. a
    November 27th, 2008 | 06:29

    @79 Never@home

    thank you, it’s good to see someone else in the 10% group on rlslog

    however, trying to change the 90% is pointless, 1/9 is the norm of the universe, atleast in this dimension

    if you look at the atomic level, it’s particles orbit relatively far away from the nucleus.
    if you look at the universe level, trillions of stars orbit around super black holes

    small particle dust (friendly, innocent powerless people) become stars (close groups), stars become star systems (community), a star become black hole under high pressure (someone decided to become a strong leader), this black hole now controls the star systems and form a galaxy ( a government)

    you can watch a government destroy itself, you can watch a government gets taken over by another, but you don’t ask the government to give power back to the people, the same way you can’t make a star turn back into dust without making it explode.

    gravity is one way only — towards the center.

    if you look at human history, all the governments ever existed either destroyed itself and lose everything (blackhole sucked everything down and evaporates after releasing particles as quasar) or got taken over by another (one galaxy consumed by another stronger galaxy)

    and peace? no war? that’s funny, take a drop of your own blood and place it under a microscope, what do you see? bacteria killing healthy cells, white blood cells killing bacteria. aka WAR.

    anyone who truely believe in peace, should demonstrate by infecting themselves with the AIDS virus. That way their immune system will break down and they’ll stop killing bacterias, aka “stop wars”.

    life comes with war, the only time when there was no war is when there was no life.

    either you move towards the center and ultimately self destruct, or you orbit around the center thinking you’ll last forever.

  86. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 06:30

    OK…and what of wtc7?????

  87. Mike
    November 27th, 2008 | 06:38

    WTC 7 dropped in it’s own footprint like all good controlled demolitions do.

  88. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 06:44

    Mike, that would sound better if we hadn’t had 7 years of nutbags claiming that WTC1 and 2, which fell from the top and destroyed many surrounding buldings, were also classic examples of controlled demolition which fell in their own footprint.

    Something everyone involved knew was a lie.

  89. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 07:11

    Which buildings were destroyed??
    The only damage done to surrounding buildings was caused by the massive concrete and steel sections which in some cases were propelled 500ft away from the building, such was the force of the explosion…no other buildings fell that day, just wtc1,2 and 7,yet no plane hit 7, making it the Worlds first and only tall building (47 stories)made of steel to ever fall down, perfectly into its own footprint as a result of a few SMALL fires burning on a few floors…

    And you want people to believe this crap??YOU believe this crap….
    Have a look here…

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=58h0LjdMry0

    OR..

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=F8XBxw7k8rk

  90. I believe
    November 27th, 2008 | 07:38

    #6 / jesus

    Jesus H Chirst jesus, that site is pathetic. Take a look at his logic. The video is fake because the guy who made it is still alive. That would mean that if the guy was dead, it would add credibility to the claims made in the video. So his own logic answers his question. They wouldn’t want to kill the makers of any 9/11 conspiracy video, because if they did, it would add credibility to the video.

    I think there’s no denying US government involvement in 9/11. Given Bush’s admission that he watched the first plane hit the Nth tower live, while there was no live footage of that incident, there’s only one conclusion to be made. He knew it was coming.

  91. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 07:46

    “Which buildings were destroyed??”

    30 West Broadway was damaged to the point where it was not salvageable. The Verizon building required $1.4 billion (with a ‘B’) worth of repairs. WTC3, WTC4, WTC5, WTC6.

    Let me guess, you’re using a definition of “destroyed” which would disqualify the OKC building from having had anything bad happen to it. Was that not destroyed because it didn’t fall over on the same day ?

    The only damage done to surrounding buildings was caused by the massive concrete and steel sections which in some cases were propelled 500ft away from the building

    I’ll take that as agreement that you too are aware people have been lying about these buildings falling in their own footprint in classic controlled demolition conditions for the past 7 years.

  92. I believe
    November 27th, 2008 | 07:48

    #44 / common sense
    “As for the WTC, any IDIOT with two brain cells to rub to make a spark knows that when you add heat to metal over time the metal softens and thus will lose its strength.”

    Yes, that’s why steel framed buildings fall over all the time due to fire…

    Oh wait, no they don’t. Clearly your hypothesis is not supported by the observational evidence.

  93. george
    November 27th, 2008 | 08:00

    destroyed+WTC1,2 and 7….
    Because the buildings were exploded to smithereens the debris travelled more than 500 ft..
    What caused this effect??
    If “softened steel ” caused it, why the massive explosions, which are VERY CLEARLY HEARD ON THE CLIP POSTED ABOVE??
    500 ft is a long way to toss sections of the WTC weighing upwards of 120 tonnes 500 ft…..how?/
    What caused all the secondary explosins???
    To many Q’s unanswered if you ask me…
    INSIDE JOB…

    Your defence of the official story speaks volumes for your ignorance…
    Answer my Q’s if you have all the answers s3n…

  94. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 08:14

    “Answer my Q’s if you have all the answers s3n…”

    You mean your questions like “how did debris travel as far as it clearly did given that nobody anywhere is stupid enough to dispute this, since they can all see the photos of the damage” ?

    Why would I bother answering that. You don’t even understand why you are writing it. The only thing you’ve said here is that you are completely dishonest, given that you are willing to dispute photographic evidence nobody else on earth has a problem with.

    The stuff that not even the nutters blaming alien attack will dispute is questionable for you. Wow.

  95. s3n
    November 27th, 2008 | 08:21

    Yes, that’s why steel framed buildings fall over all the time due to fire… Oh wait, no they don’t. Clearly your hypothesis is not supported by the observational evidence.

    You mean observational evidence like planes crashing into buildings, causing structural damage none of these other building fires had at the point from which the collapse originated ?
    Of course you don’t.

    It really is hard to summarize just how stupid and dishonest you people are, but everyone on earth saw the 9/11 attacks and only one bunch of people decided to say “nothing to see here” when it came to the planes crashing into the buildings part.

    Under what circumstances did you think people would forget that tiny, little detail ?

  96. GuySmiley
    November 27th, 2008 | 08:23

    Popular Mechanics has a great article online scientifically debunking each & every one of these crazy 9/11 conspiracy theories:

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

    Its a good read.

  97. Wah
    November 27th, 2008 | 08:50

    These theory conspiracy theorists have a very good reason to distrust the government, as do I, but they’re going about it the wrong way with their theories.

    Do your research in quiet for another X years or so, and when you have something more “concrete” and “irrefutable” then come back to us.

    Kind of reminds me of the ID movement.

  98. ahaan
    November 27th, 2008 | 09:15

    Even if your in a minority of one truth is still the truth

    Ghandi.

    i havent seen no evidence to disprove this film probably never will watch it ;)

  99. I believe
    November 27th, 2008 | 09:33

    # 96 / s3n
    “You mean observational evidence like planes crashing into buildings, causing structural damage none of these other building fires had at the point from which the collapse originated ?
    Of course you don’t.”

    These buildings were designed to withstand such an impact. And WTC7 didn’t sustain such impact, yet it went down as well.

    The official report estimated that the steel reached a temp of around 700 deg (I can’t remember the exact value), which weakened the steel, causing the collapse. But then they couldn’t find any examples of steel that had reached anywhere near that temperature. This indicates that their estimates were flawed, probably because they failed to allow for the heat sinking effect when they calculated the estimate. They still posted the obviously flawed estimate in the official report. WHY?

    But that’s all irrelevant. How could GWB have seen the first plane hit the Nth tower, as he has claimed? He specifically stated that he saw it on a TV monitor prior to entering the classroom in Florida, and that was prior to the second plane hitting the Sth tower. There was no known footage available that day, so the only way he could possibly have seen it at that time, is if he knew it was going to happen, and had a camera pointing at it.

    Clearly,

  100. zysterx
    November 27th, 2008 | 10:04

    i have a question
    =======
    GuySmiley
    November 27th, 2008 | 08:23

    Popular Mechanics has a great article online scientifically debunking each & every one of these crazy 9/11 conspiracy theories:

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

    Its a good read.”
    ===
    a good read—-? really??

    in no where in that article does it explain the presence of molten steel found in the lower levels of the towers.

    the lead header says molten steel, but the reading of the details has no mention of molten steel. only that the temperatures could not have reached sufficient degrees to actually cause the steel to become molten.

    what it does is it does use the temperatures as causing a weakening of the steel sufficient enough to cause the collapse but nowhere in that article does it explain the presence of molten steel in the lower levels. which is attested to by eyewitnesses. or have those claims now been rejected?

    i’m asking that seriously. has it now been proven to be false….cause i really haven’t been following 9-11 at all and only recently the pentagon debacle.

    so if someone says the claim of molten steel in the lower levels is a false claim and shows me a reliable source then fine, but that article doesn’t explain it.

    it only uses the term molten steel in the lead header and actually affirms that nothing in that fire was capable of producing it.

    so if there was molten steel in pools in the lower levels as have been reported by firefighters how is it explained?

    high explosives are capable of causing it but nothing in the plane nor any combination of the plane or the building could have.

    was there molten steel in the lower levels or not?

    if there was what caused it?

    eyewitness testimony from experts say they saw the molten steel.

    all that report explains is the capability of a weakening of the structure sufficeint to cause a cascading effect, but the molten steel is never explained and cannot be.

    so much for popular mechanics!

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!