Releaselog

Woman convicted of p2p crimes given new trial

A Minnesota woman who had been convicted of violating copyright laws by downloading music files has been granted a new trial, after the judge said he made an error in his jury instructions that may have prejudiced the outcome. U.S. District Judge Michael Davis on Wednesday granted Jammie Thomas’ motion for a new trial in the case, brought by the Recording Industry Association of America that alleged she illegally downloaded copywritten material off the peer to peer site Kazaa. Additionally, the judge urged Congress to redefine the definition of peer-to-peer piracy and prevent exorbitant fines to be levied against other defendants in similar situations, according to his ruling.

Thomas was initially found guilty of downloading 24 songs and ordered her ordered to pay $222,000 to six record companies. That equates to $9,250 per downloaded song. With the order of the new trial, Davis declined to rule on the fine, instead deferring that decision to the next round of litigation. Davis’s declared the mistrial because he said he believes he misled the jury in the initial court case when he told the jury that sharing music was the same as distributing it.

Source: CRN

Comments (56)

Feel free to post your Woman convicted of p2p crimes given new trial torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. bob
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:08

    lolol a cd has about 15 songs 9,250 per song = very expensive cd.

  2. Denis
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:11

    Yeah right, this was probably all staged. Prosecuting someone for downloading 24 songs, funny one indeed…

    This was staged to put fear into people..Someone (not this woman) will pay this 222.000, but they will “profit” a lot more in the long run just by raising people awareness that things like this will no longer be tolareted…

  3. Socrates
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:18

    Good Lord! Hope they never get my stash of music! Chances are I would owe more than the national debt.

  4. mingu
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:24

    Surely sharing music IS the same as distributing it ?

  5. eyeshot
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:34

    Such exuberant fines cannot accord to any reasonable logic, and are transparent scare tactics, making a mockery of the american legal system.

  6. ok?
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:52

    only 24 songs?? lol they could of made up a more beleaveable number like.. 80-200??

  7. blah blah blah
    September 26th, 2008 | 11:59

    blah blah blah:P dont worrie they just blowing there bags:P

  8. tomtom
    September 26th, 2008 | 12:04

    new business strategy for music industry:
    make a new album, put them on p2p, find downloaders, sue them, big payment.
    just like Davenport Lyons….

  9. j
    September 26th, 2008 | 12:25

    @3

    I doubt anyone could pass Bush’s debt. He’s added over a Trillion every year.

  10. filler
    September 26th, 2008 | 12:27

    She should be given the lethal injection.

    P2P is for tardz.

  11. jiggaboo
    September 26th, 2008 | 12:46

    Yay piracy! But does she look like a nig? She looks kinda niggish to me.

    http://www.uberreview.com/wp-content/uploads/jammiethomas.jpg

  12. er
    September 26th, 2008 | 12:47

    blelehehelbhabhlalbalblabala FAKE

    this sounds like shes the only one who downloads a cd there are people out there who download everything they listen and thats about 95% of the poeple

  13. al
    September 26th, 2008 | 13:18

    lmaorofl..and ppl wonder why america is goin down the pan..GET OUT BEFORE ITS TOO LATE..STILL ROFL :)

  14. LOL
    September 26th, 2008 | 13:38

    total fckdup country, i have about 50000 songs now in my computer, FU RIAA catch me btches. Im rich b1atch hah x)

  15. Viper
    September 26th, 2008 | 14:33

    Can I borrow your CD so I can listen to see if I want to buy it?

  16. Cap'n Jack
    September 26th, 2008 | 15:04

    Good, RIAA has won zero cases now.

    MPA will face this reality, too.

    Activision is worst story I’ve heard so far.
    $100k for a downloaded COD3 iso!!!
    That games blows and can be had for $5 used.

    The abusive scare-tactics are just pitiful.

  17. Adi
    September 26th, 2008 | 15:37

    @14 LOL
    you will have to pay 462.5 million dollars ROFL!!!

  18. Bob
    September 26th, 2008 | 17:01

    Millions of people illegally download games, music and Movies ect everyday and the authorities have managed to catch one person!!? Ha ha ha i’m sooooo scared !

  19. brittany
    September 26th, 2008 | 17:03

    @15 Hahahahahahaha…your logic makes sense to me! :)

  20. Ron
    September 26th, 2008 | 17:08

    The lession here is, don’t use Kazaa. That’s just plain stoooopid.

  21. Bigdawg5005
    September 26th, 2008 | 17:12

    Achtung Baby!!

  22. z3x
    September 26th, 2008 | 17:48

    this is most stupid case the RIAA could ever have done, seriously it was just a lame attempt to scare user into not downloading, if there were really wanted to prosecute people then they should atleast get someone who downloads more than 24 damn songs.. geez the funding put into the RIAA and all they come up with is a single user who downloads 24 tracks.

  23. Dave
    September 26th, 2008 | 18:05

    yo, here is a pleasent one, i have every album ever recorded by atleast 50 artists and a few one off albums here and there. all these are FULL albums not single songs from random albums.

    if i have to guess, id have a lending library of music.

    if these were downloaded i be able to pay for a new community for the homeless and rehab location for ex junkies.

    its nice that i have over 10,000 cds

    p.s. this is all thanks to the library and friends and pay download sites like allofmp3.com

  24. spacemonkey
    September 26th, 2008 | 18:12

    people still use kazaa?!? seriously?

  25. Beascener
    September 26th, 2008 | 18:53

    What really suck is now in america they can check any digital media (ipod, laptop, PDA ,ect…) crossing any border or flight for terrorist information, if they happen to find any copyrighted material on your media they can and will prosecute. there is plenty of examples, just google it.

  26. Lichen_King
    September 26th, 2008 | 18:58

    LOL Kazaa! LOL 24 songs! It sounds like that judge downloads a lot…

  27. kemar
    September 26th, 2008 | 18:59

    @14 i guess u owe them 4.6 billion

  28. 1ns0mn14
    September 26th, 2008 | 20:03

    they’re seriously nuts..
    you can download a track legally for less than 2$
    fine for illegal sharing should be 50$/song maximum.. which is 25 times (!) the price of the object.. doesnt that sound fair?

  29. Kazzidiot
    September 26th, 2008 | 20:04

    Kazzaa? shoul dthere not be a fine for using the worlds crappiest and most unreliable P2P system? What a tool!

  30. PT
    September 26th, 2008 | 20:57

    24 songs? LOOOL what do they do to the people that dl 10 albuns a month? 24 songs?? are you kidding me.. thats nothing! why dont they go after a person with 12 000 songs? :D

  31. John doe
    September 26th, 2008 | 22:08

    Stupid government for buying into RIAA argument that they are entitled to a ridiculous amount of money they are owed for someone who made available MP3 for sharing. What they are entitled to is 3 times the amount per music shared which I think is more reasonable.

    Ok, so what about those tens of thousands of people who downloaded the music from that person? Then go after those people who downloaded it and charge them 3 times the amount of the music they have downloaded. RIAA doesnt wan’t to do its work on going after the hundreds of thousands of people who illegally download music instead they are just going dump it on someone who they can easily target and bully their way through.

    Stupid is as stupid does.

  32. Jitters
    September 26th, 2008 | 22:18

    Lol ok She deserves to pay that much for still using kazaa

  33. haha
    September 26th, 2008 | 22:29

    you know whats SO funny. Women are the ONLY victims from these… seriously, its ALWAYS a woman.. haha i guess im lucky!

  34. Mandog
    September 26th, 2008 | 22:33

    Screw Kazaa! BearShare Pro (old version, 5.4.3.1) all the way! Don’t forget RapidShare and of course torrents.

  35. Nocturne
    September 26th, 2008 | 22:40

    Admin. please delete racist comments like @11 – it’s totally pointless and idiotic and rednecks like that should be skinned alive..

  36. steveke
    September 26th, 2008 | 22:55

    She was using KAZA when all of you were using it too. Her case is few years old. – Canadian judge says filesharing is equal to make photocopy of a book at the library. He says if it is no law against that he cannot have case against people who exchange notes instead of written materials. Case closed here, at least is quiet in the northern-front.

  37. martin
    September 26th, 2008 | 23:39

    @jiggaboo looks like she might be hispanic, i don’t think niggish

  38. common sense
    September 27th, 2008 | 00:10

    j
    September 26th, 2008 | 12:25
    @3

    I doubt anyone could pass Bush’s debt. He’s added over a Trillion every year.

    And you have failed math muh-boy, Bush has indeed added THREE Trillion (not a trillion a year as you say, according to the US Treasury) but he is paying off a major mistake of Bill Clinton for not accepting Osama when he was offered him six different times in the 1990’s. And Janet Reno should be charged with murder as she was the one telling him no over and over. Germany-Russia-Syria-and three other countries showed documentation that they could have offered OSama to Clinton, but Clinton refused to accept and now look at the mess he left us in. You really need to pay attention to history instead of the DNC.

  39. Rich
    September 27th, 2008 | 00:23

    Ha, gutted

  40. DeerDance
    September 27th, 2008 | 00:37

    #38

    what a douche…
    The fault that america is what it is now, is a guy who left 8 years ago with sulprus $550 bilion
    and its mith about offering Osama to Clinton, israel would jump him instantly

    btw read this you moron
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200406220008

  41. LOL
    September 27th, 2008 | 00:53

    @ 27
    nah they owe me that much, not really but i take it anyways. :p Sorry.

  42. ragincajun
    September 27th, 2008 | 03:14

    She wasn’t convicted of a P2P “crime”. No criminal charges were ever brought against her and I do not believe that anyone has ever been criminally convicted for pirating material for personal use as opposed to selling copywrited material. The RIAA brought a civil suit against her which has a much different burden of proof and legal standard.

    Once the RIAA and the MPAA get reasonable and stop demanding tens of thousands of dollars per download, one of these judgments might actually stick.

  43. A.Bundy
    September 27th, 2008 | 06:56

    lol! thats what happens when u use torrents! LMAO!

  44. Wireless Networking
    September 27th, 2008 | 14:47

    Hey, someone could have connected to her Wireless Network and downloaded those songs! Anything could have been possible here and a simple IP address cannot be the final verdict on someone.

  45. DanielPK
    September 27th, 2008 | 18:14

    OMFG, dude..i download 100GB a week & still typing this comment lol, i know ppl out there who download more, actually a lot more ;) and they only cough the poor lady, they definitely need to update their DATABASE..lmao

  46. banem
    September 27th, 2008 | 19:41

    24 songs? Kazzaa?

    Yeah, and I am from Jupiter.

  47. BARCA
    September 28th, 2008 | 00:18

    LOL. I wonder if she still listens to her CD….ROFL!

  48. Josh
    September 28th, 2008 | 01:03

    It’s so weird how every forum ends up talking about the American elections, this video says it best for sure:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRkeYKFtmXA

  49. Mr X [rlslog.net]
    September 28th, 2008 | 02:20

    The woman deserves life imprisonment.

    P2P sux mega.

    If you want it, buy it.

    You are all a bunch of cheapskates. Go get a job and earn some $$.

  50. THe kNIghT
    September 28th, 2008 | 03:01

    so for this I don’t downlooding any music files , just movie , games , software , Ebook,……

    LOOOOL

  51. JV
    September 28th, 2008 | 08:51

    Comment 11: “Yay piracy! But does she look like a nig? She looks kinda niggish to me.”

    You should be ashamed of yourselves for even allowing this to be posted RLSLOG

  52. JV
    September 28th, 2008 | 08:54

    I can’t believe what a sad bunch of freaks leave comments here… oh yeah, you’re all SO much better than those who use P2P.

    Take a good look at yourselves, you’re as sad as the next person.

  53. Stryk-9
    September 28th, 2008 | 10:50

    Keep this in mind. She downloaded bits off many people. They should not be able to prosecute because she never got the full songs off them, and they can’t bust you for just connecting to their P2P Client. As with torrent files, the more indirectly linked you are… the less chance they can shut you down. AM I RIGHT GOOGLE?

  54. Stryk-9
    September 28th, 2008 | 10:57

    Hey call me crackerish….. I think #11 had the best comment I’ve ever seen. Then I clicked the link and though..HOLY CRAP I think he’s right…

    Question tho….Is she black? Maybe Blackinese?

    It’s only a word people….. only a word…

  55. al
    September 28th, 2008 | 11:07

    lol “@ 48 =might be a little off topic but who gives 1 ..funny:)

  56. Again
    September 28th, 2008 | 13:26

    #40

    Read this…. Clinton WAS offered bin Laden.

    The government of Sudan, employing a back channel direct from its president to the Central Intelligence Agency, offered in the early spring of 1996 to arrest Osama bin Laden and place him in Saudi custody, according to officials and former officials in all three countries. .

    The Clinton administration struggled to find a way to accept the offer in secret contacts that stretched from a meeting at a Rosslyn hotel on March 3, 1996, to a fax that closed the door on the effort 10 weeks later. Unable to persuade the Saudis to accept bin Laden, and lacking a case to indict him in U.S. courts at the time, the Clinton administration finally gave up on the capture.

    http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm

    http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/rminiter/?id=95001289

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/sudan_offered_to_arrest_bin_laden.html

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/weeklyupdate/2008/34-new-information-clinton-administration-osama-bin-laden

    Don’t believe those left wing wacko sites like MediaMatters, Huffington Post, and DailyKoz.

Leave a reply