Releaselog

Windows 7 Loader 32Bit 64Bit v1.4-Orbit30 And Hazar

Newest 1.4 version of Windows 7 activator by well known guys Orbit & Hazar. Read NFO for more information. There’s also a paragraph about that blacklisted CD Key, so check it out.

For those concerned about any viruses inside of this release, check VirusTotal scan results.

Release name: Windows 7 Loader 32Bit 64Bit v1.4-Orbit30 And Hazar
Size: 5.46 MB
Links: NFO, Homepage
Download: HOTFiLE, Torrent Search

Comments (99)

Feel free to post your Windows 7 Loader 32Bit 64Bit v1.4-Orbit30 And Hazar torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. D
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:49
  2. www.NilnNilu.org
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:49

    Windows 7 Loader 32Bit 64Bit v1.4 Orbit30 And Hazar
    ===================================================

    untouch original scene release
    http://rapidshare.com/files/266901965/win7.act.1.4.rar

    source : NilnNilu.org

  3. mandooo
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:50

    www. scene tube .net

    remove the space s

  4. Loader
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:52
  5. common sense
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:53

    When are Orbit & Hazar going to understand that MS is on to them already and has a whole department of research and development ready to make a patch that will block any key made by these guys (source Steve Malkovitz MS Beta Test Supervisor Redmond Washington Campus) just like they have already done with the last keygens Orbit & Hazar made and already are working to block this one as well.

    It will be smarter to wait till closer to the national release date (Oct 22nd) and have a plethora of keygens and activators to choose from instead of depending exclusively on a couple guys that MS has already slapped silly and forced them to change the keygen at least five times. That way MS will be more concerned about these two guys and pay less attention to the other guys.

  6. David
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:54

    pointless, get the Preactivated x64 OEM version

  7. cdcs
    August 13th, 2009 | 11:59

    Microsof didn't block any key! i Have 7 activated with this tool and it works!

  8. CaptainShare
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:00

    Why is this bigger then the official release by Hazar himself?

  9. Netranger17
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:02

    It worked for me… a Acer laptop…

    Also, I have a new i7 quad core on the newest Intel motherboard. What do I chose for the OEM?
    Thanks for the help in advance… Jim

  10. Silence
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:06
  11. Sarge
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:19

    Release name: Windows 7 Loader 32Bit 64Bit v1.4-Orbit30 And Hazar
    Size: 3.46 MB

    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3BP0DLQ0
    No Pass

  12. wiggo
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:22

    @9 Can you give me some info on what you mean. I dont now whether I got the right version but ive only got 20 days left of the one I have installed. Could you provide me with the filename of the version you have so I can grab it from usenet. Thanks very much

  13. CaptainShare
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:36

    Theres 2 scene releases with the same name with two different sizes, both wrong from the official release. I would not recommend this!

  14. Guess what
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:37

    Guess What Guys , and im Not Joking , there is a hidden File(rar format but with different extension )that Contains a copy of Anton LaVey's Bible in Winodws 7 (Not the legal copy from M$).
    its up to you to believe me or not , but i assure u 100% that it would be all over the forms soon.

  15. Bob
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:39

    How come it says on the nfo that home premium would not work on the activation, but I installed 7 Home Premium on my laptop and it activated fine with the previos release of this 7loader. I removed the ei.cfg file from the ultimate iso and then burned it and boots up and letting me choose which windows version I want to install.

  16. Jax
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:52

    @10
    They have, but you are not likely to see it's effects until some time in the future when updates start checking for it.

  17. Derpost
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:55
  18. Silencor
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:56
  19. Guess what
    August 13th, 2009 | 12:57

    Guess What Guys , and im Not Joking , there is a hidden File(rar format but with different extension )that Contains a copy of Anton LaVey's Bible in Winodws 7 (Not the legal copy from M$).
    its up to you to believe me or not , but i assure u 100% that it would be all over the forms soon.2

  20. STFU
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:06

    They said the same with Vista, yet that still works fine.

  21. Well...
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:07

    I couldn't get any of their past releases to work. All it would do was make Win 7 unable to boot. I tried about 5 different OEM activations before I gave up.

  22. ͭ̇̅̿͡l̶̝͓̳̗̮̻͍̯̋ͨ̅̊̅̾ĭ͕̬̥̥̾ͣ̓n̶̝̞̬̦̄̃g̥̖͇͙̠̽ͬ́ͯ̽ͫ̉ ̳͈̪́͛ͯͫ́ͬͯ̑o͔̰̪̰͒̎ͮ͘͢f͖͓͇̣ͨ͂ͤ̚̕
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:18

    ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T

    ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T

    ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠͇̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̿̿̿̕̚̕̚͡ ̒̓̔̕̚T

  23. Me
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:19
  24. Moshster
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:25

    As part of Windows Updates, the OS can download a utility to check the validity of the activation. If it thinks the OS has been hack activated, then Windows update can alert MS to block it. Do you really think Windows Updates does updates only? Of course not, it does more than you know.

  25. common sense
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:25

    And all of the faked RTM releases of Win 7 (before the official release of the RTM at 12 noon yesterday 8-12-09) ALL to a one have a timebomb in them and they will start activating them as of March of 2010, and by June of 2010 you either had better have a valid key installed or the OS WILL shut down and then you are screwed. Dont believe me? As MS themselves as it is clearly on their webpage.

  26. Jax
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:35

    @26
    Tables didn't get leaked early with vista so no MS did not say the same thing. And the first year of vista we had to update our cracks if you remember. You can look up the nfo's on nfohump to read about it. Eventually we had a working crack that seemed to last until the end of it's life, but not initially.

    @31 Rubbish, why do you still spew this crap?

  27. Jorge
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:49
  28. mustafa
    August 13th, 2009 | 13:53

    @30 you are a tool

  29. >windows 7
    August 13th, 2009 | 14:16

    Tͮ͊ͥ̓҉̗ͮ͊ͥ̓҉̗h̳̱͓͈̟̩̹̙̅͋ͥ͘͝ͅë̠̦̤̖̟ͯͮͭ͗́̀͒̀ ͇͇͙̖̠͇̮̓̐v̪̬̝̤̠̗̌ͪ̌̾͒̀ͅe̶͓̫̞͍̘̰͇ͫ̔̄͛i͚̗̅̆ͯͯ́͜͟͡l̎͋̎̑ ̳͉͓͇̪̜͕̤͈͛ͩ͝ ͙͇̐̌͒̀̽̀͊́͟ͅg͓̓̏̃̈͡r͔̥̙̮̺͉̼̳ͤ̌̚o̮͎̪̺̮͈̯̿͛̆̎ͥ͠w̷͔̓̆̓̂ ̣̞̹̝̯̜̦͍š̞͓̺̰̫̩͔ͨ͒ ̸̡̫̘̞͉̭̏̌ͯ̌̈́ͅt̲̻̹̯̟͖͖͑̒́ͩͦ̓̐h̭͍͙͎̥̙̙̭ͥ̽̚i̷ͦ͌͏̜̼̯̼̺̪͘

    ̰͔ń̴̡̥̹̗͉̻̖̥ͤͩ͠ ̨͈̞̰̞̌̃͗̊.̸̢̮͔̟̠͇ͯ̾̇̓ͩ̅̈́̐̍͠ͅ ̣̳̝̬͚͕̙͍̫̀̒̀ͯ̀́.͖̮̔͢ ̸̹͉̜̎̊̄̂͗͝.̸̬̱͗̏̇̃̄͜ ̢̠̫͎͚͙͓̮̘͊̓ ̠͚̙̹ͦ͋ͫ̀͘͠ͅk̭̼͔̦͕̘̗̄̿̇̑ͬ̃͊̇̕ĕ̡͑ͭ̈̄̀ͨ͏̟̟̙̳͚͎͎̦e̸̗ͦ͐͟

    ̺̹̞̱̯̰ͅͅp̳͍͔̳͖̭̋͠ ̡̟̫̠̝̮̖̪̙̅̆ͨ̃͛̂ͣ̚f̫͙͙͖̠ͤͧ̅̐͟͠ư͙̩̹̻̟̗̿c̮̱̻̻̙̫̦̰ͫ̊ͭ͐͜

    k̶̯ͭ̌̿ͮi̞̿̊̿n̢̪̳͍̙̗ͦ͢g̷̡̦̫̘ͬ͋ͦ͊́ ̵̧̮̪̰̟̪ͥ͗ͮ̃ͬ̾ͨ͊̓͜ͅĉ̰͓͉̰̤͖̻̲͋̉ͦ̋ͣ͘͜h̸͓̝̬͔͓̻͋̃̓̍ͦ̐ͤͬ a͕͚̟̙̤̱̔̉ͫͮ̒̅̑͛̓͘͢͞t̢̼̳̻͖̏̔̿ͬẗ̶́͐ͥͦ͏̙̣͠ị̛̣̫̰̿̋̃͠n̶̆͝

    ̤͎̯͎̭̯̺͘ͅg̷͖̖͎̝̣ͤ̄̈́͛ͤ̀̎̍ͫ͟ͅ.̡̧͎̲̘͉̬̘͚͐̓̕

  30. horse9118
    August 13th, 2009 | 14:35

    people, you know you can get a legit version of Windows 7 Ultimate for free plus $10 shipping if u do quizs on Microsoft's expertzone.com, so why don't u stop using those unreliable cracks and activator and try to get a legit version that will work forever

  31. SQrL
    August 13th, 2009 | 15:15

    to stay informed about win7 and related scene release just bookmark this:
    http://forums.mydigitallife.info/showthread.php?t=7126

    screw these one off posts about activators… pfffft

  32. super0zero
    August 13th, 2009 | 15:22

    :D It really works! :D Thx for their continuous work on win 7! :D
    :) Windows 7 Loader by Orbit30 And Hazar 32Bit 64Bit v1.4 :)
    http://rapidshare.com/files/266923685/Windows_7Loader_by_Orbit30_And_Hazar_32Bit_64Bit_v1.4.rar

  33. LSD
    August 13th, 2009 | 16:14

    Rapidshare
    Windows.7Loader.32Bit.64Bit.v1.4-Orbit30.And.Hazar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/266980273/Windows.7Loader.32Bit.64Bit.v1.4-Orbit30.And.Hazar.rar

  34. Na
    August 13th, 2009 | 16:31

    @SQrL
    Thanks for the link. Seriously good information.

  35. ziggy
    August 13th, 2009 | 17:00

    Can anyone tell me how to dual boot Vista and Win7 both using an OEM BIOS hack ???

    When i activate Win7 it deactivates Vista, when i reactivate Vista it deactivates Win7

    Is this even possible ???

    Thanks in advance :)

  36. Moshster
    August 13th, 2009 | 17:42

    @34 Kid, I know more about Windows than you ever will. Grow up.

  37. mo
    August 13th, 2009 | 18:02

    ziggy having very same prob anyone got an answer cheers

  38. Daz
    August 13th, 2009 | 19:04

    To the guy posting as "common sense". You have no common sense at all because if you did you would have an understanding at what a loader is, what it does to your system and that Vista has been cracked the exact same way and is still to this very day running just fine.

    A loader boots BEFORE your OS, this tricks the OS into thinking you are on a specific type of BIOS even though your really not.

    This method of activating is done offline and is not something MS can detect and block. The only thing they can block is the serial — but guess what? More serials will leak around release time which MS can't block without pissing off a few thousand legitimate people running under the master serial and probably getting sued for doing so.

    Unlike Windows XP these "cracks" do not modify system files and since they are not installed on the primary partition they are undetectable.

    You have been schooled.

  39. c0ld
    August 13th, 2009 | 19:32

    lot of fud so far, either by shills or idiots.

  40. X
    August 13th, 2009 | 20:04

    Since this app can uninstall the loader, surely Windows should be able to do the same, or at least detect the loader by reading the same bytes?

  41. Win7Vista
    August 13th, 2009 | 20:31

    OK, to set EVERYONE clear on 7loader 1.4
    1: Orbit released 1.4
    2: Shortly after, Hazar made a change to 1.4, seems a bug got re-introduced, and the second release fixed that bug.
    3: The scan result (and checksums) of Orbit30's 1.4 is
    http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/7dd7207783832843271f07d03664bba2197e964905222748bc820817416f7b52-1250186636
    4: the scan result (and checksums) of Hazar's 1.4 is
    http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/3a83250c734bac29c836f1f0ff9fac391cf7c4b86c9ed473d755d293c60b7f55-1250183010

    5: If your 1.4 version has ANY flags on virus total, you do NOT have original 1.4 release.

  42. Thanks_horse9118
    August 13th, 2009 | 20:49

    Hey horse9118, thanks for the heads up. I've just reached veteran status (I've got 2400 points now) thanks to retailmenot.

  43. LockHead
    August 13th, 2009 | 21:00

    why is it that everyone is saying that this is blocked by MS. i got my win7 x86 activated with version 1.2 of this. if u dont want to get blacklisted, then do not update the OS. simple!

  44. Moshster
    August 13th, 2009 | 21:05

    @47 Daz – Minor correction, MS can detect the loader code and if they decide to do so – (decision has not been taken yet) – MS could classify the installation is illegal (pirated) because of the presence of the loader code.

    It is the hard mods to BIOS that are near impossible for MS to detect. Soft mods or "BIOS emulations" are not detectable at boot up, but Windows can detect them post startup. I don't think there is much MS can do about hard mods at this stage, not until hardware vendors start to implement some form of verification for SLP/SLIC so that Windows can determine if the BIOS has been hacked or not.

  45. common sense
    August 13th, 2009 | 22:17

    Because it is fact @32, dont blame me if your too stupid to find it

    And @47, if you are going to try and "school" someone else with your spewings, at the very least get it right instead of showing that your as smart as snail s%^t. Does not say a whole lot about your statement when you have other posters correcting you right off the bat so I dont have to and make you look more of a fool then you do now. The "loader" code is there dumbarse, how else do you think for one tiny second in that atom you use for a brain that MS can tell you EXACTLY if you have a valid serial or not? Magic?! Jeeze, you are a bigger n00b then some of the other people who still seem to think they somehow have the RTM when it was not officially released until 8-12 according to MS. But that's ok, when March rolls around and their computers start rebooting and then refuse to boot at all in June 2010, then I can gleefully state "Told ya so moron!" just like I am doing to YOU right now!

  46. common sense
    August 13th, 2009 | 22:23

    Because it is fact @32, dont blame me if your too stupid to find it

    And @47, if you are going to try and "school" someone else with your spewings, at the very least get it right instead of showing that your as smart as snail s%^t. Does not say a whole lot about your statement when you have other posters correcting you right off the bat so I dont have to and make you look more of a fool then you do now. The "loader" code is there dumbarse, how else do you think for one tiny second in that atom you use for a brain that MS can tell you EXACTLY if you have a valid serial or not? Magic?! Jeeze, you are a bigger n00b then some of the other people who still seem to think they somehow have the RTM when it was not officially released until 8-12 according to MS. But that's ok, when March rolls around and their computers start rebooting and then refuse to boot at all in June 2010, then I can gleefully state "Told ya so moron!" just like I am doing to YOU right now! Oh and if you dont think for one second MS wont brick your machine, think again. I mean get real…who you going to complain to? You would have to provide your hard drive for proof and then they could easily see that you used a bios mod, and then nail your silly arse for having a pirated OS at $250,000. in fines per offense just like they did a silly little computer store called Best Price in Toledo Ohio.

    But if you think that MS cant brick your machine anytime they want, then package it up and return it to the store as unless you do not get ANY updates or not connected to the net; MS can nail you any damn time they want to and there is not one thing you can do about it

  47. Daz
    August 13th, 2009 | 22:36

    Your one big fail of a joke lol.

    The loader is just a modified version of the Linux loader that MS don't dare to mess with because ITS NOT INSTALLED ON THE SAME PARTITION AS WINDOWS.

    The serial that was "blacklisted" still works, because its not online based. If you apply a loader now all you have to do to do is pretty much change the serial with one simple command and then its working again. You really are dumb…

    You really think MS would brick (as in render it useless) peoples machines just because they may have been sold a pirated version of Windows 7 without them knowing that? Wake the hell up ffs, if they done that do you know how many people would sue them? THEY CANT BAN MASTER SERIALS BECAUSE THEY ARE LINKED TO TOO MANY MACHINES.

    FFS, you go on about everything like this is Windows XP cracking where its cat and mouse with crackers — its not, thats why the crack still works on Vista, get that into your bloody head.

  48. Daz
    August 13th, 2009 | 22:42

    Also I should note theres no timebomb in the final version like the RC versions so your whole "But that's ok, when March rolls around and their computers start rebooting and then refuse to boot at all in June 2010" is incorrect and proves you dont have a clue what the hell your going on about.

    You're just a lost troll.

  49. TheDLoader4U
    August 14th, 2009 | 00:47

    Daz you are the man and to the lamers above Daz Orbit30/Hazar are always a step ahead of Microsoft with serial less activation that work as well as W7 updates and WGA approved.

  50. TheDLoader4U
    August 14th, 2009 | 00:55

    And when SP 1 come out that will be another challenge.

  51. Volunteer
    August 14th, 2009 | 02:53
  52. tejo
    August 14th, 2009 | 02:56

    hail daz

  53. Darth Arcon
    August 14th, 2009 | 04:06

    I believe, if history is to repeat itself, that Hazar's crack is never going to not work simply because of the nature of the crack itself. Vista had a similar problem and I am still using Paradox's VistaLoader (which, coincidentally, this really is…just with the new Win7 Lenovo OEM keygen instead of the Vista Dell OEM keygen…though I do believe they rewrote the code for this new release). Even after Vista SP1 was released, which was suppose to finally start blocking the blacklisted keys, my Vista comp was and is still functioning perfectly fine, WGA passed and automatic updates still running beautifully.

    For the peeps saying it wont work, why dont you try it yourself. It is actually working, believe it or not…

    @common sense
    Dude, what are you still doing here? Nobody really cares what you think. Dont even argue with this dummsh11t Daz, it never does any good…

  54. Jax
    August 14th, 2009 | 06:31

    Daz, I do agree with what you say. But it is possible for MS to determine if the OEM information present in the bios actually belongs in there. We've already seen a proof of concept of this from outside MS.
    For the moment it's all *could*
    Who knows what MS will do in the future. For now, its completely safe.
    Worse thing that could happen is your windows turns into a trial. New SLIC pls etc..

  55. Chathum..
    August 14th, 2009 | 09:40

    can anyone tell me how to do this activation… step by step method… i have an acer laptop.. model 4736z

  56. AdiJay
    August 14th, 2009 | 09:45

    what if i already activated my windows with the 1.2 version of 7Loader…

    what should i do ??

  57. Chathum
    August 14th, 2009 | 09:52

    @ Netranger17 can u tell me the way u activated this ?? did u click dat SLIC 2.1 button ? send me a mail chathumac@gmail.com

  58. cms
    August 14th, 2009 | 12:55
  59. Daz
    August 14th, 2009 | 13:31

    @ Jax
    Correct, but would they risk doing that if it was a user that bought a pirated copy of Windows 7 without knowing it was pirated. It could cause them quiet a headache…

    Once Windows 7 goes out to the public and theres more master keys leaked most people should change their key used. Blacklisting of keys they can't do as such due to the people that do actually own Windows 7, so they would have to tackle this in such a way that it shows the user is definitely using a self-modded bios to trick Windows 7. Although it would be easier to scan other partitions for the loader, but if it comes to that there will be backlash from some people as its not installed on the main Windows partition and if MS start to incorrectly remove loaders — oh boy.

    What someone needs to do is create a loader that installs in such a way that its unique to your system. So that everyones loader has a different MD5/SHA-1.

  60. cdcover
    August 14th, 2009 | 15:47

    Windows 7 RTM ACTIVATOR final v 1.8!

    http://uploading.com/files/DKC2OYFZ/windows-7-rtm-version-7600-activator-final-crack.rar.html

    Working for all versions.

    ENJOY!

  61. common sense
    August 14th, 2009 | 18:38

    Daz, you have to be the dumbest most arrogant moronic twit on the planet. I can introduce you to three people right now that used a previous version of your "bios" crack on XP and all of them to a person just reported that every one of their 9 computers has received the exact SAME message from MS…that their copy of XP IS NOT GENUINE! So tell us oh sage of stupidity, just HOW did MS tell all three of them the exact same message when one lives in Michigan-One in California and one in Florida. Just HOW did MS place the EXACT SAME DAMN MESSAGE on all 9 of the computers in three different state more then 900 miles from each other? And just HOW did MS know exactly which of their computers had this "bios" crack on it when they never mentioned they even HAD cracked OS's or how many computers they had?

    The only way MS could have possibly done this you shagging shipwreck, is IF MS already knew of this crack or workaround and has a correction for it. And if they can do this to 3 people on 3 different sides of the country at the same time, then that does not hold out much hope for you now does it? And if they knew of this kind of crack or workaround for XP, dont you think for one second they would expect the same kind of crack for Vista or Win7? I mean use what little brains you have instead of using your head for a musical instrument every time the wind blows. I have seen some very stupid n00bs in here but Daz, you are at the top of the list in arrogance and stupidity. Did it ever pop into your little pea brain that if you can think of it, then there is a 100% chance that someone else has already had that thought and developed a work around AGAINST what you thought is a great idea?

    You are living proof that stupid people like you should not be allowed to own a computer. You have been shown your spewings are false by different people and yet you continue. You must be a glutton for punishment.

  62. Darth Arcon
    August 14th, 2009 | 19:16

    Ok, I am really getting sick of seeing your completely lackluster bulllshait comments that serve only in giving me the urge to gouge my eyes out just so I can quit reading. I feel my brain turning to mush whenever I see your name on here. It shames me to know there are actually people like you, and it sickens me in ways you couldnt possibly fathom to call myself a human being knowing that YOU occupy the same genus…

    Please, PLEASE leave. Please, go. Ill try to convince myself that I was tripping on acid for the last 5 minutes of my life.

  63. Daz
    August 14th, 2009 | 21:01

    "common sense" you really don't have a clue and should just give up on the whole internet thing as your one big FAIL. Really, your not even worth a full on reply any more… every time you reply its just more false trolling BS.

    Read from sources and learn how a loader system works, THEN come back here and have a chat.

    And incase you can't read there are clearly smart people on here that agree with me, so in actual fact your calling us all dumb which to me is hilarious as your probably the most r-tarded person I have seen here on rlslog.

    Don't feed the troll people.

  64. Daz
    August 14th, 2009 | 21:11

    In short for your mind XP uses a different system from Vista and Windows 7. The "cracks" aint even the same — cracking was done on Windows XP, cracking is NOT done on Windows Vista or Windows 7 as they DO get killed off, but loaders don't.

    Can MS block loaders? Not without pissing off Linux users as they can't 100% prove your using a specific loader to trick Windows Vista/7. And if you go by Vista's track record (2007 to the present day) MS will not do anything about the Windows 7 loaders either.

    It's my word against yours, except I got knowledge and facts. Windows 7 = not XP, understand that and get with the times.

  65. doz
    August 14th, 2009 | 22:08

    but ms already blocked a loader for vista, didnt they? that means they can propably do the same with the current loader for windows 7.

  66. Daz
    August 15th, 2009 | 00:36

    @ doz

    Nope, maybe an early loader when they was still experimenting but the loaders used in the last 2 years still work just fine.

  67. Daz
    August 15th, 2009 | 00:40

    Nope, maybe when Vista was just out and they was still experimenting… but the loaders released in the last 2 years still work just fine.

  68. Daz
    August 15th, 2009 | 00:56

    Doh, darn comment delay. Thought it had filtered something I said.

  69. B
    August 15th, 2009 | 10:21

    Can you activate x86 version with this activator???

  70. 3Rror
    August 15th, 2009 | 10:42

    Windows 7 Loader 32Bit 64Bit v1.4 Release 3

    Changelog:

    Better UI
    Much smaller (3.27mb)
    Better loader code
    Added More slic 2.1 certs for in bios option
    Music removed
    Fixed OEM branding removal
    added all OEM Registry info to vb GUI
    Tweaked GUI
    Added install code to vb GUI
    Added new Uninstall code to vb GUI
    Added new 7Loader status to vb GUI

    Re-Uploaded Coz Some Issues Were Fixed Like :

    Script not being executed properly
    Detector not working properly
    popup not closing on reboot
    loader not installed because of faulty script (directory mismatches)
    Spelling mistakes
    Unnecessary resources

    Those kind of bugs.

    Download: http://rapidshare.com/files/267612125/Windows_7_Loader_32Bit_64Bit_v1.4_Release.3.rar.html

  71. mofo
    August 15th, 2009 | 10:56

    Windows 7 RTM ACTIVATOR final v 1.8!!

    http://uploading.com/files/DKC2OYFZ/windows-7-rtm-version-7600-activator-final-crack.rar.html

    Working for all versions.

    ENJOY!:)

  72. 3Rror
    August 15th, 2009 | 11:17

    mofo,
    That fake how can you jumb from Windows 7 RTM ACTIVATOR final v 1.4 to Windows 7 RTM ACTIVATOR final v 1.8 ????

  73. Doomicle
    August 17th, 2009 | 04:23

    The download link (the hotfile one) is a file that is virus-infected… you can see the scan result here: http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/06633f6e47aa4d7d8f81561dcba1d91998a7aa688d8757eb719040a867646bbe-1250447152

  74. Doomicle
    August 17th, 2009 | 09:29

    This loader seems to have totally f–ked my win7 installation. Most programs will not start up. I suspect the loader has taken out some critical dependancy. Oddly enough, everything still works fine in safe mode.
    Next stop system restore, then backup and re-installing windows… sheesh!

  75. everal
    August 17th, 2009 | 14:21

    hello,

    now tested difference version of loaders, latest version 1.4 release 3 it isn't works on my system.
    i have tested all ways to implement the crack.
    when i start the prog and click on "7loader status" the prog display "7loader is not installed".
    try to implement the crack with "opatool" fail to.
    in system-control-center is displayed "not activated, 26 days… and less…", the product key is analysed by ms as a wrong key, so the only opinion is to insert an right key.
    the system is an old mainboard "elitegrop nforce4 a939".
    to test the crack on a second system "netbook medion akoya mini e1220" it fails to.
    i have only installed version 1.3 and win7 loader v1.0.0.9 before on the systems and before i have tested 1.4 r3 crack i have deinstalled all cracks-information from earlier versions.
    my recent computer is defect, so i must wait for testing…
    by my father the cracks work wunderful…
    so i have no idea what i can do anymore…

    thanks
    everal

  76. STFU
    August 18th, 2009 | 11:26

    Anyone know what the latest build is now? #87 link is scanned and safe but I found a release 5 at only 3.5Mb compared to the 5.5 of release 4. Also scanned as safe by Virustotal. Here's the link for those interested: http://www.mrzuo.com/index.php/tag/windows-7-loader/

  77. everal
    August 18th, 2009 | 11:43

    hello,

    @stfu
    latest version ist 1.4 r4 link 87

    @all
    version 1.4 r 4 status-information now works correct "7 loader is installed", but system is not cracked. (elitegroup nforce4 a939) and akoya mini e1210.
    by my father all 5 computers works great with 1.4 r3, by me no windows 7 version works.
    so i think that anything from earlier versions is (1.4r3 and 1.0.0.9) are not successfully deinstalled…
    the key is also not allowed for this version.

  78. John
    August 19th, 2009 | 08:39

    1.4 (first version) does NOT work on Compaq Evo N800c.
    will try 1.4r4 tonight

  79. everal
    August 19th, 2009 | 22:25

    hello,

    i have tested version 1.4 r5 from post 88 by stfu.
    the version doesn't work for my system.
    i think the version-number is a fake, becouse the "7Loader-Status-Bug" is not fixed in this version. i think this version must a release from 1.4 r 1 to 1.4 r3.
    so the latest version i think is now 1.4 r4, is this correct ???

  80. FreeRyde
    August 21st, 2009 | 00:19

    There is no Release 5 at this date!
    Check the Properties/date on your Loader.

  81. FreeRyde
    August 21st, 2009 | 00:28

    Post 88 by stfu is Windows 7Loader By Orbit30 & Hazar v1.4 Release 3
    Properties show build: Friday, August 14, 2009

    The download is also full of asia/adult/french/friendfinder/nudecards/.com etc and Rapidshare Premium Account sign up spam.

  82. chathum
    August 23rd, 2009 | 06:27

    this is not working in my acer laptop… pls help me guys

  83. WhatEver
    September 4th, 2009 | 19:09

    LOL no valid links :) )

  84. mofo
    September 13th, 2009 | 08:34

    Windows 7 activator & loader collection latest versions by orbit30!

    http://uploading.com/files/mmff4mmb/windows-7-final-activator-loader-collection-by-orbit30.rar

    Contains following:

    7loader 1.5*****
    Windows-7-Loader-eXtreme-Edition-3.007*****
    Windows 7 All versions PlusPatch 8 Final By Orbit30*****
    Windows-Toolkit-1.8-by-orbit*****

    One of them will definitely work for You!

    Enjoy! ;)

  85. mofo
    September 17th, 2009 | 14:23
  86. severedsolo
    October 13th, 2009 | 23:08

    Well this seems to work…. i will be using it until an “official” leaked key is available after oct. 22nd, and to the people saying windows update will block it, surely the simple answer is turn OFF updates? im kind of a noob at this (my first cracked OS) but surely if you dont let it update then it cant block you? failing that ill use the gf’s OEM serial when she gets her new Laptop

  87. Mat
    December 26th, 2009 | 04:41

    Where can I find the “windows 7 bible”. I cannot seem to get a working link to download it. Any help will be appreciated.
    Thank You!

Leave a reply