Releaselog

Web Page Maker v2.5 Incl Keygen-CFF

This release is by recommendation from our very own editor Scit, so I thought I actually better install and give it a whirl, so heres is my genuine review!

Well in my 5 minute trial with the program, to start with I found the install easy to complete, and the keygen easy to use. Piece of cake I thought, as I opened the application, but I was surprised. We are greeted with a maximised window and big white square with generic looking taskbars. No little wizard to get you acquainted, not even a start page. Quite poor I thought. I had a look around the different tools and features. all looked quite routine, with nothing different jumping out at me. It doesn’t look to me that that you can do any individual coding, or anything of the sort, so I think this tool will be best served to beginners of the web business.

Scit: This application is very good for people that are new to web page making, and don’t know anything about HTML. It’s easy to use, because it’s a drag and drop program. When you know how to code HTML… skip it ;)

Web Page Maker is an easy-to-use web page editor that allows you to create and upload web pages in minutes without knowing HTML. Simply drag and drop objects onto the page and position them freely in the layout. It comes with several pre-designed templates that help you to get started. It also includes ready-to-use navigation bars that can be inserted into the page. Additional features include built-in colour picker, Java script library, image library and built-in FTP client.

Program Features:

  • No html coding is required and you do not need any web experience.
  • Drag and drop the objects. True WYSIWYG layout & design.
  • Create websites with multiple pages and easily manage your site at once.
  • Pre-designed website templates included.

Release Name: Web.Page.Maker.v2.5.Incl.Keygen-CFF
Size: 3.52 MB (3,696,036 bytes), cff0981a

HomepageNFO – Torrent (Soon) – Rapidshare

Comments (25)

Feel free to post your Web Page Maker v2.5 Incl Keygen-CFF torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. nem
    August 21st, 2007 | 14:17

    wrong category:)

    Scit: Can you be any quicker? the post was 8 seconds old, and you already posted a comment! Holy crap!

  2. qnr
    August 21st, 2007 | 14:57

    Scit, it’s rather rude messing with other people’s comments and posts, IMHO.

  3. crimson
    August 21st, 2007 | 14:59

    adding a comment is not messing and he deserves the credits for making a post within 8 seconds imo :p

  4. Bauer
    August 21st, 2007 | 15:08
  5. August 21st, 2007 | 15:11

    this post reminds me when i started creating websites with macromedia 7-8 years ago :D

  6. ELCouz
    August 21st, 2007 | 15:30

    OMG its still alive … i thought Frontpage was dead … kill this thing …if you kill it,,,, the web will be safe !!

  7. Wankstar
    August 21st, 2007 | 15:45

    WYSIWYG

    Look it up.

  8. nonamo
    August 21st, 2007 | 16:36

    Youre a faggot, Bauer. At least try to read the post and grasp the purpose of the software before opening your big sarcastic mouth

  9. August 21st, 2007 | 16:48

    Bauer, yea your a total dbag!! this software, however is very minimal and for TOTAL begginers… but cool if you have absolutely no idea about anything ;)

  10. Bauer
    August 21st, 2007 | 18:27

    1. I did read the review, although I don’t know why I visit anymore. The site is getting sloppier and sloppier.

    2. Too many people want to make web sites using awful software like this, and web sites such as MySpace and Facebook. This is taking away all of the business for true web designers who have spent their lives learning the skills they know, for people to step in and make it far too easy for people to code.

    3. ‘whatever’ @ spyaustin.com — nice site, it looks like you really got used to the ‘Web Page Maker v2.5′ and have a site up already. Nice going.

  11. tom
    August 21st, 2007 | 19:00

    wtf 2 more hours for suprnova

  12. demon
    August 21st, 2007 | 19:13

    Guys if this isnt a good program to learn how to make a website what is?

    Im thinking of doing some productive on the net…Please tell me some good beginner programs to learn the basics.

  13. john
    August 22nd, 2007 | 00:02

    to demon:

    pixel2life.com and notepad

    Should be your true way of learning HTML.

  14. aerowen
    August 22nd, 2007 | 01:38

    I agree with #10, on part 1 that is. Rlslog keeps posting more and more crap releases. It’s no longer that much different from being a simple list of releases like nforce.nl, including the crap. I liked how rlslog used to post about only the useful and interesting stuff.

    And seriously, don’t use this shit program. We don’t need more crap websites on the internet. :/ If you really want to create a site, learn how to do it.

    If only crappy designed sites weren’t the main part of the internet, browsers would be forced to better their support for standards faster, we’d have a web-technological boom. This kinda crap holds us back.

  15. August 22nd, 2007 | 02:02

    Suprnova has the torrent, btw :P

  16. August 22nd, 2007 | 08:53

    People need to realize that not everyone is k1337 and can write an entire webpage with notepad and internet explorer. People have to start somewhere. Once they realize how limited they will be with WYSIWYG editors, THEN they can move on to learning php, java, asp or whatever other type of scripting or content management they decide to implement.

    WYSIWYG editors are a great way to introduce more people into web development, because the fact of the matter is if it is just notepad and a 800 page manual then the web would be full of douchebags……wait maybe we are too late !

  17. aerowen
    August 22nd, 2007 | 10:53

    @#16: They shouldn’t move to php, java, asp or whatever after using a WYSIWYG editor. They should start with learning HTML, and perhaps then some CSS. It’s not hard, HTML is very simple. You don’t need any advanced scripting at all.

    That idea of “notepad and an 800 page manual” is what all the WYSIWYG-users seem to believe. They think it’s too hard so they don’t even try. WYSIWYG is not the answer, you’re not learning anything except how to click and drag. That’s what people need to realize.

  18. duD3
    August 22nd, 2007 | 11:43
  19. whatever
    August 22nd, 2007 | 16:31

    actaully bauer you douchebag, i made that with dreamweaver you fucking dick face!!! you dont know what the fuck your talking about so suck my dick! its my first site and sort of a practice one so very basic and simple, so once again stfu you douche!

  20. whatever
    August 22nd, 2007 | 16:33

    sorry for the outburst, ppl that are douchey and have no idea what their talking about kinda get me going… anyhow i checked this program out and like i said its very simple.. but also very minimal and restricted as far as what you can do… better off teaching yourself dreamweaver or using a combination of programs to get ya going.. thats what ive done…BAUER is a DBAG!!! :)

  21. great sayanman
    August 22nd, 2007 | 17:34

    i tried…the best for webmaster and not!

  22. 420
    August 22nd, 2007 | 19:28

    If you must use a WYSIWYG editor, Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 and Microsoft Expression Web are the best.

  23. August 23rd, 2007 | 03:43

    #17 I know how to hand code, and you are apparently missing the point i am making. Just because you use a WYSIWYG editor doesnt mean anything. You can still hand code in all html editors that i have seen. The point that i am trying to make is you dont have to be some badass “look at me i encode entire websites with notepad”, the fact of the matter is that WYSIWYG editors save time and you can still code by hand for the parts you want to and use templates or the smart command typing feature whenever you need to.

  24. dumpydooby
    August 24th, 2007 | 10:26

    #10, point 2: I disagree with this. Just because there is a WYSIWYG editor out there, that doesn’t meant that it will be reducing the need for web developers. WYSIWYG editors can’t do what an actual programmer can do. There’s no need to get all pissy over this.

    That said, I don’t really see anything special about this program. They all look the same to me. The WYSIWYG editors are all just … crappy.

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!