Releaselog

uTorrent “announce” URL Handling Buffer Overflow

A potentially very dangerous vulnerability has been discovered in the latest version of popular BitTorrent client uTorrent. This could be exploited by attackers to take complete control of an affected system. This issue is due to a buffer overflow error when handling a “torrent” file containing an overly long “announce” URL, which could be exploited by remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by tricking a user into opening a specially crafted torrent file or visiting a malicious web page.

All version of uTorrent are affected, including latest version 1.6 build 474 and prior. There’s already a working exploit for this floating on the internet. No fixed version has been released, as this is really fresh stuff. Although this exploit could be very dangerous, you need to download the “infected” torrent first and use it with this client. I recommend waiting for a new version of uTorrent (should be available within few hours, max days) and downloading only from trusted websites such as NewTorrents.info where are all torrents checked.

Comments (36)

Feel free to post your uTorrent “announce” URL Handling Buffer Overflow torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. alex14n
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:29
  2. taz
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:33

    thanks for the info martin….it will be really helpful for Utorrent users……

  3. geeman
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:38

    474 is not the newest beta. 483 is, I am not sure if the exploit is fixed on that.
    http://download.utorrent.com/beta/utorrent-1.6.1-beta-build-483.exe

  4. gais
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:39

    Thanks for the heads up… as a utorrent user, this information is vital :)

  5. fca
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:42

    thanxs alot for the post martin my utorrent is reallly slow and weird today i was wondering why, until i check ur post now i see why!!!!lol usually im getting in th 300-500 kb/s now im getting only 10-20 kb/s
    haaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggg!

  6. rotten
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:43
  7. h4ns9l
    February 13th, 2007 | 18:51

    Ya, ill be checkin the “announce” url’s of my downloads closesly.
    Thanks for the heads up.

  8. R1pper
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:02

    Follow Follow we will Follow BitSpirit, everywhere, anywhere, we will Follow on !

    :-)

  9. Bitcomet
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:07

    Follow Follow we will Follow BitComet, everywhere, anywhere, we will Follow on !

    :-)

    lol

  10. February 13th, 2007 | 19:10

    Kick ass info M@ster thx for the heads up

  11. fca
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:12

    is bitspirit any good or bitcomet i tried azereus and u torrent azureus is crap and utorrent is acting up real bad right now (overflow)

    any comments on which bit clients i should use !!!??

  12. neohasse
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:12
  13. Stu
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:17

    If he fixed it in 483 I don’t see why he isn’t pushing it out through the auto-update feature.

  14. fca
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:24

    and even whit the beta version its sttioll all screwy io tried it and all my torrents are from good source

  15. fca
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:25

    and even whit the beta version its sttioll all screwy io tried it and all my torrents are from good source

  16. Transie
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:29

    yeah sure newtorrents, any public torrent site sucks

  17. welshboy
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:35

    the exploit only works on Windows xp sp1.
    So most people don’t have to worry.
    Welshboy

  18. dbcch
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:37

    To the uninformed people who mistakenly think this vulnerability is affecting uTorrent’s download speed. The two are in now way related. If you happen to have slow speeds downloading from torrents today, its just a coincidence. Everyone likes to blame poor download speeds on everything under the sun, when it is almost always just natural fluctuations in the health of torrents you happen to be downloading and the peers you happen to be connected to. For that matter, different clients don’t affect download speed much.

    What this vulnerability is — if you click on a torrent that has a specially crafted announce URL, it could cause a buffer overflow and result in code execution.

  19. fca
    February 13th, 2007 | 19:51

    @dbcch

    ok i see now ! im still learning all the how to use torrent properly
    there is alot of grey areas about torrent sharing that im learning everyday ! thanxs for the info!
    @dbcch

  20. February 13th, 2007 | 20:13

    Another reason to use only private trackers.

  21. darknessviking
    February 13th, 2007 | 20:54

    question: why even care if you have additional firewall etc?

    and who does p2p without those ?

  22. Jon
    February 13th, 2007 | 22:01

    lol darknessviking it is an exploit for a service already running on your box allowed by your firewall. So they would get a shell.

    Once they have a shell they can turn off your firewall and do what they like. I wouldn’t worry too much though i doubt many people will bother exploiting home user connections directly.

  23. supplex
    February 13th, 2007 | 22:14

    don’t use the evil commercial mpaa friendly utorrent =]

  24. st0rm
    February 13th, 2007 | 23:05
  25. ScytheNoire
    February 14th, 2007 | 01:05

    some firewalls, especially with allowed applications, has buffer-overflow prevention. it will shutdown the app before it allows a buffer over-flow. if your firewall doesn’t do that, time to change firewalls. ;)

  26. hibby
    February 14th, 2007 | 01:13

    Ta very much Martin for the heads up!

    I can now relax my sphincter.

  27. [deXter]
    February 14th, 2007 | 05:01

    Did anybody even RTFA?

    “* Works on XP SP1 and w2k sp1-4″

    It means XP SP2 and Vista aren’t affected. If you haven’t yet upgraded to SP2, you deserve to get infected.

  28. krushko
    February 14th, 2007 | 11:22

    Right. Hopefully my Win2k SP5.1 isn’t affected, but I’m already using the latest beta (483), just in case…

  29. tewe
    February 14th, 2007 | 11:32

    new µTorrent 1.6.1 Build 488 – Final is release

    http://download.utorrent.com/1.6.1/utorrent.exe

  30. kereoplxop
    February 14th, 2007 | 11:49

    deXter: if you read the bug report, it says:

    “”Koepi” (who first informed us on the channel) tested it on SP2, and supposedly, it did work.”

    Anyway, theres a official update out now:
    Latest Version: µTorrent 1.6.1 Stable build 488
    Download: http://download.utorrent.com/1.6.1/utorrent.exe
    Changelog: http://download.utorrent.com/1.6.1/utorrent-1.6.1.txt

    Changelog entry “Fix: Fix malformed .torrent exploit” applies to this one

  31. kereoplxop
    February 14th, 2007 | 11:49

    deXter: if you read the bug report, it says:

    “”Koepi” (who first informed us on the channel) tested it on SP2, and supposedly, it did work.”

    Anyway, theres a official update out now:
    Latest Version: µTorrent 1.6.1 Stable build 488
    Download: download.utorrent.com/1.6.1/utorrent.exe
    Changelog: download.utorrent.com/1.6.1/utorrent-1.6.1.txt

    Changelog entry “Fix: Fix malformed .torrent exploit” applies to this one

  32. madskiLL
    February 14th, 2007 | 16:49

    if i already have uTorrent is there any chance to get this virus???

  33. Jon
    February 14th, 2007 | 19:16

    Lol it is ironic that an exploit which will mainly be used by people to create ftp servers to spread warez on university networks will affect people using bit torrent which wouldn’t have torrents to download if it wasn’t for the exploiters in the first place.

    Having said that other than uni lans where students are running utorrent most users will be unaffected because there internet connections would be so relatively slow it wouldn’t be worth the hassle.

  34. peter
    February 15th, 2007 | 14:33

    well the chance to get virus is very-low if you download torrents from trackers that are checked, i mean from a secure trackers where uploaders will no put the expl. in the announce

  35. mannie
    July 30th, 2007 | 19:18

    still getting slow speeds downloading

  36. aarons bingo hall crack
    March 23rd, 2008 | 17:54

    Walgreen reputably shipwrecked McNally disbands:analyticities kittenish spouting

Leave a reply