Comments on: Top 10 Movie Releases of 2007

By: fabio

fabio — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:06:34 +0000

you are all crazy

have a nice day…………………later

By: Kim

Kim — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:15:30 +0000

1.Downloaded – Mehh, alright I guess
2.Bought HD-DVD – Ace film
3.Downloaded – Keira Knightly – King Of The Pirates LOL – Lame
4.Downloaded HDRip – Good, better than 2nd not as good as 1st
5.Downloaded BluRip – Good film, definitely worth downloading
6.I loathe Harry Potter
7.Didn’t see it, didn’t look that funny
8.Downloaded BluRip – Not as good as 1st but better than 2 + 3
9.Didn’t see it, looked pretty bad
10.Downloaded it – Pretty good movie but the dog thing made me cry

By: joe

joe — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:48:01 +0000

Knocked Up UNRATED DVDRip XviD-DiAMOND

top 10

Are you smoking crack? Yu call it “Top 10 Movie Releases of 2007″ Then you say… “It wouldn’t be fair to omit DiAMOND in this list”…

So which is it, a top 10 movie or a top 10 ripping group????

Cause that movie should have made the worse 10 list…

IMHO

By: welitis

welitis — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:00:12 +0000

Martin you have 3 releases from FLAITE in your top 10.. coincidence???

By: reflexive

reflexive — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:12:57 +0000

For those into Top 10 lists, here are the Top 10 Box Office Films Worldwide 2007:

1 Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End $961.0m
2 Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix $938.5m
3 Spider-Man 3 $890.9m
4 Shrek the Third $795.0m
5 Transformers $704.2m
6 Ratatouille $614.3m
7 The Simpsons Movie $525.5m
8 300 $456.1m
9 The Bourne Ultimatum $441.1m
10 Live Free or Die Hard $382.1m

By: leishman161

leishman161 — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:03:16 +0000

Downloaded: 100 %
Theater: 80 %
Ignored: 10 %

You can please some people some of the time but never everybody all of the time. Good list but my favorite movie this year was 3 10 to Yuma.

By: BlueBow

BlueBow — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:58:58 +0000

1. Didn’t see it.
2. Didn’t see it.
3. Saw it in the theater, good, but a little too long for my tastes.
4. A guy made me and my friend watch it with him. It was kind of funny.
5. Didn’t see it.
6. Saw it in the theater, I’m a big Harry Potter fan. I really liked it.
7. Downloaded it, thought it was pretty funny.
8. Didn’t see it.
9. Downloading right now!
10. Downloaded it, didn’t like the ending.

So:

Downloaded: 30%
Theater: 20%
Ignored: 40%
Other: 10%

I’ve no complains about your list, as my favorite movies of the year aren’t liable to end up on many other lists, I think. It’s a big subjective thing.

By: Cedge

Cedge — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:00:08 +0000

@henderson:
Hi, I’m a film student. I’ve seen damn near every kind of film on the planet, I’d say.

No matter how deep it’s fans try and make it out to be, SAW is nothing but shallow, worthless cinematic filth. You’re just applying depth and aesthetics to a film where there simply is none, and no matter what I do, you’ll always think this, because you’re a SAW fan, and SAW fans are just like that, I guess.

By: Mr.Monocle the Chimp

Mr.Monocle the Chimp — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:27:07 +0000

Oren are you smoking crack? American Gangster looked fine on my 22in w. All the colours were fine, I use digital vibrance at 10%.

By: Oren

Oren — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:15:08 +0000

also, 300 Neptune “DVDSCR” – Blurry as hell. VHS source FOR SURE. it was released very fast, i’ll give you that.
but as far as quality is concerned – i waited to see this movie as a REAL DVD RIP, surely it deserved at least that?

By: Oren

Oren — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:12:39 +0000

oh, and American Gangster “DVDSCR” had HORRID Video. the Dynamic Range was less than 50%! that made the picture EXTREMELY dark, and basically means that about 50% of the color and brightness range was missing.
DVDSCR my ass. at best, it was a bad analog capture of a VHS source.
even after passing the entire 2cd film thru a Contrast and Levels filter (having a Quad Core is nice!) it looked so bad i decided to delete it.
it’s not “just a bit dark, turn the brightness up and it will be fine” , half the color range is MISSING.

By: Oren

Oren — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:05:13 +0000

if i understand it correctly – this list is about QUALITY RELEASES,
NOT quality MOVIES.
in that case, everyone’s personal opinions about films’ quality is moot. we should be talking about quality audio/video, time-to-market and the such.
Transformers, FLAiTE – #1?
this release had AWFUL video!!! so much, that i had to d/l a non scene release to watch it. it was REALLY BLURRY!
Bourne was FANTASTIC
so was Ratatuille.

By: B

Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:52:34 +0000

I agree with most of the list and i do accept it as top 10 for 2007
If I had compiled the list then surely harry potter and shrek 3 would not be there. reason for that are my children who watched Ratatouille multiple times, but left while watching shrek 3

AS for people arguing about Knocked up and/or super bad then there is a simple solution if u are 15 to 25 yrs old single, then super bad is better film or u. if u are 30 or above or have a family then chances are u liked knocked up more than super bad.

for people who do object at Transformers being at No 1, if they have an alternative title in mind.

I would just say that movies are about having fun and entertainment, each person has its own definition of it. it will be better if ppl put their own lists forward instead of criticizing others.

By: conan

conan — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:35:56 +0000

Transformers is a horrible movie. A piece of trash.

By: rossiko

rossiko — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:34:11 +0000

interesting list, its probably closer to my worsed 10 films.

this is my top ten.

no country for old men
Atonement
control
american gangster
3:10 to yuma
this is england
eastern promises
The Bourne Ultimatum
superbad
before the devil knows your dead