Comments on: The Heartbreak Kid TS XViD-mVs

By: Playap

Playap — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:14:59 +0000

I like Ben stiller alot so I’ll have to download that one. Thanks MVS…

One question: Can we expect a better quality release any soon ? thanks

By: Cris

Cris — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:53:07 +0000

^^ Yea…

The quality was good enough for me I’m not that picky.

I enjoyed it.

By: zaf_4

zaf_4 — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:14:53 +0000

i am so bored to see that you didnt like the movie! lets us to have our opinion!
Total waste of time. and etc… OMG!! JUST LET US WATCH IT!

By: Tito

Tito — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:23:27 +0000

http://friendlyfiles.net/download/dab0a3192223/mvs-hk-www.thegenius.us.by.Iago527-.avi.html

http://sharedzilla.com/en/get?id=100459

http://www.yastorage.com/download.php?id=144782&key=62d12ana875161d7c822fcd7768nf758

http://share.bol.bg/download/mTThqu8676

Enjoy

By: Slam Jaxxxon

Slam Jaxxxon — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:30:36 +0000

This movie was a total waste of time…the quality as decent…but the movie was total ass! read a review or two before you waste your time downloading this one…like the following:

http://www.moviecynics.com/item/833

you’ll probably want to use their drinking game as well

http://www.moviecynics.com/item/834

By: 111111

111111 — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:25:59 +0000

Good Copy Well Done Mvs
Verry Funny Film

By: willow

willow — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:05:49 +0000

corrupt.file
ERGGG

By: Tim

Tim — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:08:22 +0000

This movie is pretty good, quality isnt too bad but would love to see a R5 soon

By: marconius

marconius — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:38:00 +0000

looks a funny film but quality not all that good wait for a better release,3:10 to yuma coming out next thursday on R5 cant wait

By: spidermonkey

spidermonkey — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:25:41 +0000

having trouble with avi files first file will load in covert x but second file wont please help?

By: b3

b3 — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:55:51 +0000

@my last post “Two indicators good” should read “Two good indicators”.

By: b3

b3 — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:54:26 +0000

@18 Thanks for the further info
@22 If we judge on group names alone then we must also assume that maVensupplieR/mVs is in fact the supplier of maVen. There is also the delay of less than a week between maVensupplieR’s last and mVs’ first. Two indicators good that they are the same group, none that they aren’t. Not enough to make it a hard fact, but it’s probably reasonable to talk about them as the same group anyhow.

By: the-real-p2p

the-real-p2p — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:45:12 +0000

why has half of my last post went missing?

By: the-real-p2p

the-real-p2p — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:43:44 +0000

mavensupplier is mvs, i will point it out in capitals MaVenSupplier

By: mVsgroupie

mVsgroupie — Sun, 07 Oct 2007 07:46:38 +0000

@ 18 B3 “What connection mVs/maVensupplieR/maVen have or ever had to each other I don’t know.”
maVen had some misty transactions, word was they were selling.
maVenSupplier took a piss at them, making them out for sellers, so ’stole’ their grp name.
on it’s turn rumours were maVenSupplier offered money for sources- but they didn’t admit buying sources, although they offered money in their nfo’s.
this was regarded within scene as lame, so they stated in their nfo’s that the joke was done, and they were to use a real ‘own’ name.
nevertheless they seem to have some early sources, most likely bought from Russian mob.
all to all they make a childish impression to me with their vaul language, tough words and their flaming to VCDQ.
get.a.life

This rls is okay. Sound is better than quality of pic. Still very nice and early flick.