Releaselog

Study: girls have same math knowledge as boys

A U.S. study found that girls have closed the gender gap in math performance.Researchers from the University of Wisconsin at Madison and University of California, Berkeley, studied SAT results and math scores from 7 million students and found that girls are just as good at math as boys. “There just aren’t gender differences anymore in math performance,” study leader Janet Hyde, a psychology professor at UW-Madison, said in a statement. “So parents and teachers need to revise their thoughts about this.” The findings are published in the journal Science.

Hyde said cultural beliefs that women aren’t as good as men at math can have an impact on classroom performance. “Because if your mom or your teacher thinks you can’t do math, that can have a big impact on your math self concept.” She said there is no difference in innate ability that can explain why women are so under-represented in math and science careers. Currently, women make up only 15 percent of doctoral candidates in engineering programs, for example. Although girls take just as many advanced high school math courses today as boys and women earn nearly half of all undergraduate degrees in math, Hyde said many parents and teachers still believe girls struggle in math.

Source: Reuters, AP

Comments (58)

Feel free to post your Study: girls have same math knowledge as boys torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. Eric
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:34

    WHEW! At least that’s one less thing I have to worry about.

    BTW, is there a new poll coming soon?

  2. DannyTheDog
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:34

    I’m a boy … And i’m CRAP at maths

  3. The Obbie
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:35

    I love math

  4. The Original Geek
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:36

    Another study by the PC police.

  5. ★AnaI retentive ★
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:37

    math sucks more balls than a gigolo!!!

  6. sumo
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:38

    it’s difference between learning math and logicaly understanding math.

  7. animuslogic
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:38

    nice job, idiots. men are getting way to fn dumb.

  8. The Obbie
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:39

    There is a difference..not it’s difference

  9. angel9
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:40

    Must be nice to work as one of these dumbass researchers.

    “A U.S. study found eating to much hamburgers get you fat “

  10. Tim
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:41

    Yeah, yeah, I’m a dude who took BC Calc in high school and am currently an aeronautical engineer and it’s as much as a sausagefest as Oktoberfest is but that’s not important. What IS important is whether or not girls can get the Dark Knight screener.

  11. hoohoo
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:41

    so what does that make marcelli? an alien?

  12. Alexander
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:47

    Still dividing male and female????
    It’s all about learning, and understanding.

  13. ehem
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:49

    so they ARE just as stupid as i am
    ..well there’s no hiding from it now!

  14. Redline
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:50

    I wana burn these Researchers in hell!!

  15. Hmm
    July 27th, 2008 | 02:51

    I think this is false, to be perfectly blatant. What you must consider is that - statistically - high school boys are far less likely to actually put their full effort into subjects, whereas girls feel the need to study more. I think you’ll find that, in truly voluntary tests where subjects were trying their hardest, boys would own girls at math.

    =)

  16. SOMEGUY
    July 27th, 2008 | 03:00

    WHAT’S THIS GOT TO DO WITH SCENE RELEASES OR EVEN THE INTERNET?!?!?????????!?????????????!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THIS SITE?!?!?!?!?!?!

  17. Fat Labrador
    July 27th, 2008 | 03:00

    How do you teach math to a babe?

    Add her to the bed, subtract her clothes, divide her legs and start multiplying.

  18. WizArd
    July 27th, 2008 | 03:18

    At #17 Thats awesome.. lmfao

  19. Lisa
    July 27th, 2008 | 03:37

    re: nice job, idiots. men are getting way to fn dumb.

    Men aren’t dumb. Its just that resources have been redirected to young girls. Society as a whole is very misandric these days. There has been a gap with reading showing girls ahead of boys but no effort has been put in to help boys. Its reverse sexism and its sad.

  20. Neuromancer
    July 27th, 2008 | 03:53

    Men develop spacial understanding faster, so they are really only better at geometry. Women develop emotionally and socially faster. But by the time High School comes around it has evened out. My calculus teacher in High School was a woman and she pwned math. Just because someone is male or female doesn’t matter because not everyone has the aptitude for advanced mathmatics. There are plenty of dudes AND chicks who can barely balance their checkbooks.

  21. richard
    July 27th, 2008 | 04:04

    ok thats related to rapidshare?

  22. mranonymous333
    July 27th, 2008 | 04:18

    Either way, girls still have cooties.

  23. 2plus2
    July 27th, 2008 | 04:19

    Martin is a girls and a Troll. :P

  24. darkstar
    July 27th, 2008 | 04:20

    With any exam, you get the results the exam was designed to give. Want males to score better than females? Easy. Females better than males? Easy. Whites better than blacks? Easy. And so on. Everyone scores the same? Easy.

    You see there is amost never such a thing as a fair exam. Exams are designed for the purposes of giving a specific result, because that is how our society always works- raising some on an arbitary basis, and lowering others. The people at the top ALWAYS call themselves ’smarter’.

    For example, when priests ruled a nation, the priests were the ’smart’ people.

    Now the real problem kicks in when a real and important subject, like maths or the sciences, are ‘dumbed down’ to appear to show a politically correct ‘truth’. Force an equal number of women into subjects like programming or engineering, by fixing exams, and the end result is that nation will fall behind others at a very rapid rate.

    When this happens in a nation like the USA, then foreigners have to be brought in to do the skilled jobs, or the skilled jobs have to be farmed out to ’smarter’ places.

    Forget exams, and look at the true experts in any field of Human endeavor. If any category are massively under-represented without obvious explanation, then that category are significantly less naturally skilled in that area.

    Take the olympics. Believe me, there are events, like shooting, where no argument can be put forward for women not competing with the men EXCEPT that women are so naturally rubbish, even given theoretical identical body skills required by the discipline, that no woman could ever qualify in a fair fight.

    Men and women are different in incredible numbers of ways, including mental processes. Now this is a statistical fact, not one that applies to any given individual man or women. I would say that the average female is probably better in most ways (except raw physical strength) than the average male, but that the best males are so far ahead of the best females, it isn’t even funny.

    But then, females are hard wired, and chemically dosed each day thru their hormonal system, to think about finding a mate, having babies, and protecting their family. Maybe a car would like to fly, but no matter what it dreams, it is still designed for driving down the road.

  25. socks
    July 27th, 2008 | 04:34

    so where’s my sandwich.

  26. JC
    July 27th, 2008 | 04:45

    i can barely get the spam protection question right…. j/k :)

  27. e3m88
    July 27th, 2008 | 05:22

    rubbish news

  28. jonnyBoy
    July 27th, 2008 | 05:49

    Does this explain why I flagged my high school geometry course?

    I know the answer to that one- didn’t do the homework (like most HS boys…. fail)

    —————

    Fast: Men don’t feel the need to try as hard, on average, as women do.

    Fact: Women feel the need to be better in all aspects of life, than men- leftover sentiment from the feminist movement.

    —————

    When you take both of these little tidbits of information and add them together, you get the logical conclusion:

    Men can be better; but, on average, we don’t give a $h*t ;)

  29. Doodman
    July 27th, 2008 | 06:01

    Equal share for everyone! and then sum dimsum

  30. Tim
    July 27th, 2008 | 06:05

    NUKED: feminist.dyk3.bllsh1t

  31. anarchist
    July 27th, 2008 | 07:12

    The word is spelt maths, not math.

  32. JSR
    July 27th, 2008 | 08:01

    Yeah the result is the same, but girls take longer to get the result, they have to work harder (everybody knows that, at school, only girls work and do their homework).
    And what about computer science, they are dumb at it… they have to learn it and it take time. For man it’s almost instant.
    We can’t be equal.

  33. Sun_Tzu
    July 27th, 2008 | 08:12

    #24 wrote:
    “Take the olympics. Believe me, there are events, like shooting, where no argument can be put forward for women not competing with the men EXCEPT that women are so naturally rubbish, even given theoretical identical body skills required by the discipline, that no woman could ever qualify in a fair fight.”

    You’re quite spectacularly wrong about this, in fact so much so that it’s nearly the opposite of what you’ve just claimed. The tradition of female snipers is almost as long as that of snipers in general. During WW2 when women were a oddity in the army several hundreds of female snipers were fielded, including some of the most successful in all of history.

    Now there’s credible arguments to be made that this study as well as the current educational system isn’t balance equally to all students, but this thread hasn’t seen many of them being put forth. And it won’t.

  34. Roflcer of the Lawl
    July 27th, 2008 | 08:18

    Grats? Im tired of counting this spam protection on my fingers.

  35. Bliep
    July 27th, 2008 | 08:20

    *farts a smelly one. Oeh damn thats smelly…

    Dos a girl have the same capacity to fart just like that?
    Lets see what a random american university has proven on this unanswered question.

    Do girls fart and are they more smellier?

    Doctor MissesHatesMenAlot states: “Yes they do, and even smellier then 2 guys put together when farting.”

    Regretfully the docter died right after it because of massive constipation.

  36. Tokkie of Tok
    July 27th, 2008 | 08:23

    @ #35 Thats just.. LOL!!!

  37. The Pig
    July 27th, 2008 | 09:40

    They may now be able to add up their weekly shop, but it’s only going to be a distraction for them from washing the dishes or sorting the laundry. Is teaching them math really neccessary?

  38. Bill Goats
    July 27th, 2008 | 10:19

    Of course they need to be good at math. They need to be able to be able to do the shopping and count the babies! heehee

  39. Bill Goats
    July 27th, 2008 | 10:23

    By the way on a serious note this is supposed to be Tech News? Seriously this is pushing it. Must be written by a feminist…

  40. spar
    July 27th, 2008 | 10:50

    Please stick to releases, and not this crap.

    They looked at SAT’s, and voila, there you have your number. If only it was so simple.

  41. qwe
    July 27th, 2008 | 10:54

    darkstar: well said

  42. seb.so
    July 27th, 2008 | 11:20

    With the same amount of work / training and similar basic intelligence, men will always score higher in natural sciences than women, while women will score higher in social sciences and arts.

    There is no question that this relation can be distorted by a change in training - if you provide additional education to one of the groups in an area they usually archieve sub-standard results in, the gap between the two groups will diminish.

    My sister and I both took identical IQ tests when we were at the age of 12, and we both archieved exactly the same number of points. The distribution however was quite different, with me scoring way higher in maths and matrices, and my sister scoring way higher in the language parts.

    In our second tests, aged 16, the results were different. We had the same scores again (I had one point more, which can be attributed to chance), but this time we scored almost the same number of points in each part of the test. The reason for this development was that my sister, struggling with math, had invested a lof of time practicing her math and logic skills, while I had wasted a lot of time writing and reading (as of this day (aged 21) > 3.000 books since my 12th birthday and counting).

  43. mano
    July 27th, 2008 | 11:47

    more feminist propaganda. girls are not as good as men in MANY things….and we see this everyday in our lives right guys?

    so where do all these “researches” come from which say girls are as good or even better in this and that than guys?

    why dont we see it back in the real world where most girls seem crippled in many things.

    not a woman hater, just stating the facts. i just cant feminist propaganda especially when it is backed by interest aganecies like this one.

  44. skeev
    July 27th, 2008 | 12:58

    ..wow….who cares…

  45. Pilsu
    July 27th, 2008 | 13:10

    What the hell does this have to do with releases? Take your propaganda and shove it

  46. MelC
    July 27th, 2008 | 13:28

    I always knew the internet was full of woman hating kiddies, but this thread has shown just how much that is true.

    At least sun_tzu speaks some sense.

  47. Chri
    July 27th, 2008 | 13:44

    it’s funny how some people trash girls, but then when they need girls to have sex and stuff like that, they are so nice around them. these hypocrites should rot in their houses and keep wan—g on virtual girls.

  48. slx
    July 27th, 2008 | 13:52

    That’s good finally, there’s gonna be more girls in the math/science field. All i ever see girls in college majoring in nothing but art or business. Once in a blue moon i see a girl doing something else other then that.

  49. Affar
    July 27th, 2008 | 14:03

    So does this mean that Newten is a girl?

  50. some1
    July 27th, 2008 | 14:11

    POINTLESS

  51. Zlo
    July 27th, 2008 | 14:48

    relax this is USA study on americans, but we know already that they all are equaly dumb :D

    even president is dumb like my left shoe

  52. bocc
    July 27th, 2008 | 15:13

    Zlo: you’re 100% right. even monkeys are smarter than americans

  53. rftff
    July 27th, 2008 | 15:29

    @52 Thats why the Americans want one for president. lol.

  54. meatsteak
    July 27th, 2008 | 15:31

    Boobies!

  55. Peter Zhange
    July 27th, 2008 | 15:50

    The Top 10 reasons why a handgun is better than a woman

    #10 - You can trade an old .44 for two new .22s.
    #9 - You can keep one handgun at home and have another for when you’re on the road.
    #8 - If you admire a friend’s handgun, and tell him so, he will probably let you try it out a few times.
    #7 - Your primary handgun doesn’t mind if you have a backup.
    #6 - Your handgun will stay with you even if you’re out of ammo.
    #5 - A handgun doesn’t take up a lot of closet space.
    #4 - Handguns function normally every day of the month.
    #3 - A handgun doesn’t ask “Do these new grips make me look fat?”
    #2 - A handgun doesn’t mind if you go to sleep after you use it.

    AND THE NUMBER ONE WAY THAT A HANDGUN IS BETTER THAN A WOMAN . . . You can buy a silencer for a handgun.

  56. juju
    July 27th, 2008 | 23:45

    Re: Lisa

    America is a cesspool of hypocrisy in this day and age. It has a lot to do with the PC movement and overcompensating for slights because of lingering perceptions. There is an uneven allocation of resources and it definitely is reverse sexism. At the same time, there are many examples of reverse racism. All this is done because there is still the perception that the White man has a disproportionate amount of power in American society. This may be true, but they are punishing the wrong people. The fact is that a superrich class exists in America and it is a very small group, mainly comprised of rich white men. They are able to exert incredible influence and bypass many tax laws to continue to multiply their already ridiculous fortunes because of the way that capitalistic societies work. Instead of going after this small subsegment of society, a larger group is neglected by society as if they somehow benefit from being in the same demographic as the power elite. Of course this stratum of society couldn’t be happier that they are freed from scrutiny to be able to continue on their merry way.

  57. scottynx
    July 29th, 2008 | 00:08

    The results of the study can be interpreted as consistent with what Larry Summer said: That girls and boys have the same average achievement, but boys have higher variance, leading to an over-abundance of males at the higher (and lower) ends of the achievement spectrum.

    It seems that only the wall street journal reported on the “boys higher variance” part of the study with this headline: “Boys’ Math Scores Hit Highs and Lows”

    Here is Andrew Gelman of Columbia talking about the variance part of the study as well, and the contrasting parts that were emphasized by the WSJ vs the NYT (and virtually all other newspapers).
    http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2008/07/nyt_vs_wsj_on_g.html

    Also, here is Alex Tabarrok of marginalrevolution talking about how the study vindicates summers:
    Summers Vindicated (Again)
    http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2008/07/summers-vindica.html

  58. Hmmm
    July 31st, 2008 | 06:24

    Blah blah @ this study….. girl have the same math knowledge as boys big deal as if it was impossible as if they didn’t have the capacity before. I’m a girl and I’m awesome in math I do great in any advanced math course I take…I just despise math.

    @ 12 agreed.

Your Ad Here

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!