It was murder by gunshot and cyanide injection

Gristly and FUBAR

Before it was Jonestown, the surrounding area was used by the CIA to train black mercenaries for some beat down in Angola.

ReeGed: Fixed

And this is the crap the schools are turning out today. Half of these posters could not find the state they live in if you gave them a map and arrows pointing directly to it. Ask them who their Congressmember is or Senator and they look at you with a complete blank expression. Ask them about the Monroe Doctrine and they dont know. Ask them about the mayflower Charter and they think it was a cruise ship.

yet they spew the most idiotic and racist venom this side of the KKK, and let us not forget they can recite from memory the stats of a sports person.

someone has the priorities skewed way out of joint.

I want you to name 1 example in which a guy killed another claiming that atheism was the cause and he was doing it in its name…”
Wait a minute — you’re trying to “de-criminalize” the atrocities committed by atheists because they don’t do them in the name of atheism?

“That’s the cr4piest BS I’ve heard this year so far. Cell is not the buiding block of Genome rather the opposite is somewhat true. You don’t plan to make the car first without inventing the wheel. So now we have “wheel”, reseach in this new field is well set in motion and it is ONLY A MATTER OF TIME when we will have the “car” also. And yes they ACTUALY had created the synthetic genome from scratch! Not only that, they successfully embebbed secret messeges in the form of protein / amino acid structure in that genome! How cool! Read this to open your eyes: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/science/29genome.html?ref=science”
Seems like a big leap of faith to be taking considering that for about 2 and a half centuries we have been simply pioneering into an untreated waters and have recently accidentally progressed and are now basing our research mostly on educated post-guesswork. IMO, it’s too early to “set it stone” since there are so many obstacles that humans can only overcome. Not that I doubt the capability of man but we’re not without our limits. It was only a couple of decade ago that scientists were 100% sure that we’d have flying cars by the year 2000. But obviously I’m not enthusiastic about these kinds of things as you are.

“So do you suggest that we live the solical advancement behind and run off to jungle or something butt naked to embrace pre-historic lifestyle again? I bet it will make easier for the preacher kind of ppl like you then to start brainwashing ppl again bcoz as soon as they will try to comprehend the world around them out of curious human nature, you will start giving them lies, fantasies BS and what not, and say everything that they see around them is god’s creation – it’s raining from the sky bcoz god has something to do with it etc.”
That’s a major non-sequitur fallacy you have.

“If you are so dead against scientific advancements, then start ling the life of a caveman and then say it! Oh wait, cavemen also had invented tools – bcoz even then at the dawn of human civilisation, they understood / felt the importance of scientific study of nature with their limited capabilities.”
I never said I was against scientific advancements, unless it’s something like Dr. Mengele’s ‘mission for scientific advancement.’ I have a problem with the fallible presuppositions that you use to make a theory out of from fact.

“I don’t see the ones in your good book ever raise voice against the wrong doings of the bad ones. Makes me wonder what kind of secret understanding they have between them! With threir meaningful silence, they are just as harmfull as the bad ones imo. And they are also actively involved in brainwashing ppl with fairy tales in the same manner.”
That’s because you’ve never studied it or taken a class on history of religion. So it seems.

“Finally, this just in: Bush says, Stem cells from skin a “landmark,” refering to the experiment that accidentally resulted in creation of some cloned human embyos too (http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN28530969),”
I’d take his quote with a grain of salt.

“while the old fcuk-king b4stard, the sick papa at vatican says “some science shatters human dignity” just as expected as he is seeing his circus show is slowly moving towards the way out as the divine genesis theory is now clearly proven to be a mere fairy tale”
The last point you’re making here ends up as a infinite regression logical fallacy.

“(http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=pope-says-some-science-sh)”"
It appears to me that the pope is against scientific advancement ONLY if it’s unethical. But in this case it’d be like a form of abortion, killing an unborn human being, which is unethical.

“and it always turned out skewed in a way.” So do you suggest that we live the solical advancement behind and run off to jungle or something butt naked to embrace pre-historic lifestyle again? I bet it will make easier for the preacher kind of ppl like you then to start brainwashing ppl again bcoz as soon as they will try to comprehend the world around them out of curious human nature, you will start giving them lies, fantasies BS and what not, and say everything that they see around them is god’s creation – it’s raining from the sky bcoz god has something to do with it etc. If you are so dead against scientific advancements, then start ling the life of a caveman and then say it! Oh wait, cavemen also had invented tools – bcoz even then at the dawn of human civilisation, they understood / felt the importance of scientific study of nature with their limited capabilities.

“If you’re going to bring up the harmful effects of institutionalized religion,…” Nothing, yes I mean othing has harmed us more than “institutionalized religion”. And you also seem to somewhat reluctantly accept that when you say “True. Most religious institutions are like that” but intentionally we chose to look the other way intentionally may be bcoz as Johney666 said: “…so obvious but always kept from ppl’s eye by the formal religions, their followers (because we like to believe – just like we like to be thrilled!)…” . The mindless killing, the brainwashing, the plots to divide men and control their way of life all still continuing. Yes, you may say that the same thing is being done by politics also for example… well that’s where Johney666’s explanation comes in… thre are similarities between them.

“You mean like the Roman Catholic Church? Or Protestant denominations? Sure. But I hope you know that’s not true in all cases, for instance, non-denoms.” I don’t see the ones in your good book ever raise voice against the wrong doings of the bad ones. Makes me wonder what kind of secret understanding they have between them! With threir meaningful silence, they are just as harmfull as the bad ones imo. And they are also actively involved in brainwashing ppl with fairy tales in the same manner.

Finally, this just in: Bush says, Stem cells from skin a “landmark,” refering to the experiment that accidentally resulted in creation of some cloned human embyos too (http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN28530969), while the old fcuk-king b4stard, the sick papa at vatican says “some science shatters human dignity” just as expected as he is seeing his circus show is slowly moving towards the way out as the divine genesis theory is now clearly proven to be a mere fairy tale (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=pope-says-some-science-sh)

Name 1 case of an atheist killing someone in the name of atheistm. Please understand that “this guy was an atheist and he did this” will not do because we would then have to blame on religion every death caused by a religious person.

I want you to name 1 example in which a guy killed another claiming that atheism was the cause and he was doing it in its name…
———————–
Ok Einstein, How bout Stalin-Mao-Pol Pot-ETA-the Shining Path-FARC-Maoist rebels in Nepal-the LTTE and the Red Brigades, just to name a few names for you. Total combined deaths and murders by just these animals alone come close to almost 1 billion people since 1918. For your feeble intelligence to grasp a number that high according to world history and UN records, that would be the complete population of Europe three times over, or the complete population of the US 2 and 1/2 times over.

Want to remove the foot from your mouth now bunky? Or are you really that attracted to the taste of Dr.Sholes and Desenex?

Name 1 case of an atheist killing someone in the name of atheistm. Please understand that “this guy was an atheist and he did this” will not do because we would then have to blame on religion every death caused by a religious person.

I want you to name 1 example in which a guy killed another claiming that atheism was the cause and he was doing it in its name…