Comments on: Stardust TC XviD-mVs

By: Marenubium

Marenubium — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:53:27 +0000

Well… I’ve been waiting for a more proper release, and mVs did had good TC releases. It’s as good as #43 says: just a TS.
Video/Audio are blurred/mono; I give it a 6/5 (if it should be stereo, well..mono just sounds better in this), but ok. It’s not a dvd rip.
BUT. According to the reviews I expected more of this movie. And believe me, I am a big fan of fantasy movies.

Although Pfeiffer and de Niro are part of the cast, I’m still disappointed.
For me, this movie belongs to the same category as ‘never ending story’, ‘harry potter’, ‘bridge to terabithia’ or ‘chronicles etc of Narnia’.
Childish, too much of romance and not much worth the downloading.
It looks to me it’s a lame copy of those ‘wannabe-adventure/fantasy’ movies which where actually ‘hits’.
Sorry, I deleted this one.

By: Mace

Mace — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:54:54 +0000

“Quality is good, nice picture with…”

“Video: 6.8/10″

Please…I’ve watched enough CAMS over the years and this doesn’t even come close to the quality that you can get, and IMO this isn’t a TC it’s a TS.

Personally I don’t think this release is worth the download as I don’t see how you can enjoy a film when you’re watching it in this quality.

I deleted it after I’d watched it for 5 mins!

By: willow

willow — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:18:09 +0000

corrupt.file

By: elevate

elevate — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:24:52 +0000

QUALITY (we need more posts about quality and less about people slagging each other off, just my opinion)

Video: 6.8/10
-Needs some adjustment in vlc, contrast saturation, bit washed out in parts, reasonably sharp picture for a TC, definately watchable.

Audio: 5.5/10
-generally OK but distorted during big orchestral moments

Overall: Worth the download if u cant wait for R5 or DVDSCR. Watchable and enjoyable but possibly worth the wait for better as this movie is awesome! Great acting, dialogue and sceenery! ENJOY

personally Id prefer this one if someone else had converted it to H264 mp4 then I wouldnt have used up 1.4gigs of monthly allowance, a 350meg version of this would have had roughly the same quality. I dont see the point in making a TC with video quality of 6-7/10 at 1.4gigs. there just isnt enough detail to warrant such a big file if ya ask me…

By: catapilla

catapilla — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:54:03 +0000

video is dark and a little blurry…it’s watchable… as long as you don’t go full screen…….

By: escobar

escobar — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:56:45 +0000

was informed that rar #14 of my previous post is corrupt, so here’s another one in case

http://rapidshare.com/files/60576199/sd.part14.rar

By: mano

mano — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 01:35:16 +0000

all you people complaining and whingin about quality. How about a thank you every now and then to the uploader and to the guy that uses up some of his spare time to write these reviews. Its free and you all expect dvd quality every time. if you want dvd quality go and spend 30 bucks and buy the dam thing when it comes out on dvd or even hddvd. Otherwise dont complain soo much

By: vampirescu

vampirescu — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:31:49 +0000

bah dont like quality, got it tryed to watch it, gonna wait!

By: fizzycakes

fizzycakes — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:11:53 +0000

@ 13,14,18,20 You guys obviously don’t know your movie piracy, this is most-definately a TC, not an especially good one at that, but notice how the picture virtaully never moves? and has a perfect shot of the entire movie? TC do look like TS sometimes, but it still has a lot more quality over a TS. Know your stuff before complaining.

By: Anon

Anon — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:37:23 +0000

@30
Only thing TC is different from TS is that TC uses a direct video source too.

TC = Direct video source + direct audio source.
TS = Any Video Source (usually a CAM video) + direct audio source.

Sometimes direct audio sources don’t come out that well, due to interference/static and so on. However overall it should sound pretty good.

R5’s are basically a EXTREMELY GOOD TC since they most likely have a lot nicer equipment, and isn’t as “underground” and shady. R5’s are just the film prior to “dvd mastering” where it doesn’t have any touch-ups or anything which is usually done for the “Retail release”.

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:33:20 +0000

Thanks my gf wanted me to download the TS rls, but now we are both glad we waited.

By: escobar

escobar — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:51:51 +0000

By: agentarsenic

agentarsenic — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:28:23 +0000

Been waiting for this. The book was awesome, but then again it was Neil Gaiman.

By: jgv115

jgv115 — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:16:14 +0000

Okay R5 on thursday…

everyone is saying this TC is bad sound??

isnt TC supposed to be better sound then TS??

By: Ant

Ant — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:39:38 +0000

good news Ton , i’ll wait till then