Spiderman 2002 720p BluRay x264-SiNNERS
All Spiderman fans can once again enjoy watching their favorite movie in HD, first part of Spiderman franchise is brought to you by group SiNNERS. This time SiNNERS decided to cut video bitrate and put this release on regular DVD 5, so PQ quality must suffer due to lower bitrate. Comparing this release with earlier HDTV rip you can notice that this one has better colors (due to Bluray source) but HDTV rip got much more details (2x higher bitrate). Grab this release if you don’t want to wait for ESiR or any other encode with higher bitrate and DTS sound, I know I will. And it is really sad to see that most of scene HD groups don’t care about quality they just want to pred first.
A rather odd thing has just occurred in the life of nerdy high school student Peter Parker: after being bitten by a genetically modified spider, his body chemistry is altered mutagenically. He can now scale walls and ceilings, he has superhuman strength and super-fast reflexes, and he develops a precognitive sense that warns him of approaching danger. Adopting the name Spider-Man, Peter first uses his newfound powers to make money, but after his uncle is murdered at the hands of a criminal Peter failed to stop, he swears to use his powers to fight the evil that killed his uncle. At the same time, scientist and businessman Norman Osborn, after exposure to an experimental nerve gas, develops an alternate personality himself: the super-strong, psychotic Green Goblin! Peter Parker must now juggle three things in his life: his new job at a local newspaper under a perpetually on-edge employer, his battle against the evil Green Goblin, and his fight to win the affections of beautiful classmate Mary Jane Watson, against none other than his best friend Harry Osborn, son of Norman Osborn! Is this challenge too much for even the Amazing Spider-Man to handle?
Genre: Action / Fantasy / Sci-Fi
IMDB Rating: 7.4/10 (111,970 votes)
Directed by: Sam Raimi
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Willem Dafoe, James Franco, J.K. Simmons
Release Name: Spiderman.2002.720p.BluRay.x264-SiNNERS
Size: 4.41 GB
Runtime: 121 min
Samples: #1, #2, #3, #4
Video Quality: 720p (1280×688), x264 4520 kbps
Audio Quality: AC3 5.1, 640 kbps
Filenames: spiderman.2002.720p.bluray.x264-sinners
Comments(50)
I need new HD
Nice! Keep the HD releases coming, please.
cock end axxo does HD rips now?
ha cock
@2
you truly are a typical cocksucking axxo fanboi ^_^
awesome!
bring on spiderman 2
I don’t understand. Why would they reduce the bitrate of an HD version of a video? Isn’t the idea of HD video to get the best quality?
Why do they care what size the file is, its not like anyone burns these files to CD’s or DVD’s anymore, isn’t everyone just storing these on hard drives now? A 750GB hard drive is under $200 now, so there is no storage method that is cheaper.
Great. HD movies are here..but does it bother anyone people’s heads are always cut off? So what if it doesn’t fit on a dvd it’s friggin annoying!
my prefrence;
dvdrips fit on CD(s)
hdrips fit on DVD
or if my laziness kicks in just store on backup HDD.
26.09.07 – Spiderman.3.2007.720p.BluRay.x264-SiNNERS – 6.6 GB
er… feck that, dvdrip will serfice
Size does matter.
I’m not into downloading these new high quality rip..just seems like tooo much for me..700~mb good quality rips are good enough for me. If there’s a movie worth having in superb quality, I would buy it, since it offers so much more. I got a media player (dueple. storage+dvd) and I’d rather fill it with 6-7 good quality movies (~~700mb) instead of 1 4.4gb high quality movie. I’m thinking about the long run…
@Sum of 1+9
Get yourself a real TV, with some size to it. Then you’ll be crying about how horrible those 700MB rips look on it.
13 is right, 700mb rips look like shit on my tv and i’ve only a 32 inch!
@Alfred
haha … looks pretty good on my TVs…
if any movie deserves to be seen in best quality possible, I would buy it and add it to the other 200+dvds..
if not, I would obtain it an other way and add it to the collection of 600+ movies burnt or stored…
I’d rather stick to
++good quality/space efficient
instead of
superb quality/–massive space consumption
we all have our own preferences…
how can i get this movie?
Torrent: N/A
@Sum of 2 + 4 ?
Life is too short to accept good quality when superb quality is available.
this movie sucked – it was outright boring
As stated before many a times size matters, not everyone has the 200+ to spend on HDD storage or 3000+ on a nice 42″+ lcd/plasma tv, let alone for the area or money for an ISP to support thous 4gig and up downloads so at the end of the day the smaller and “decent” rips like those of axxo and diamond tend to win out over there HD counterparts.
If you want the best quality your better off paying the 20 for the disk and be done with it.
@Sum of 8 + 9
Sorry to break it to you, but the world, and the televisions in it, are changing quickly. You’ll need to upgrade or else prepare to be left behind.
im almost positive hd dvd/bluray movies cost more than 20 dollars
@Sum of 8 + 9
what is wrong with your mind. everyone knows that hard drives are a cheaper form of storage than cd’s or dvd’s. so if you have less money, you should store your movies on hard drives
Welcome to the future
im waiting for HDDVD recorders for pc drop out to around 120$ to get one or bluray, it seems better to storage data on those 30gb discs than in hardrives, since i only record the movies i liked the rest goes, i have to agree if u have a 30+inch HDTV its better to watch it at least in 720 and with a good sound for better experience, for pc use only with small screens those 2 cds releases are good enough.
@ Alfred
By this analogy you have does it mean my “old” 1997 Pontiac Bonneville SSE with 75,000 miles on it needs to be upgraded because its so old and dosent have a fancy mp3/dvd player in dash or a built in hdd storage for my music and will make me just so socially awkward I’ll be an outcast and will just fail to be useful because new cars will be the only ones allowed on the road?
Yes the technology keeps changing but why does one have to jump to it so soon? The format wars still arent over yet so no point in picking out a player to make use of that HD 42″+ lcd/plasma tv now is there? Nor will there be an imminent need to switch out my 32″ crt tv once its figured out what format will be here to stay.
@ HD ROX
Ok you got me there plain ol’ dvd’s go for around 20, hd/bluray go for 25-30 range, sorry for lack of clarification.
@ lee welton
Whats wrong with your reading and comprehension skills? No where did I say it wasnt more cost affective to use HDD for storage just simply that not all have that extra 100+ to put up for that 200gig+ HDD to store all the content more over the ISP to download a 4gig+ file in a timely manor be it to the cost or location.
I just don’t understand why D/L this it won’t even fit a standard Disc [4.36] its 4.41.At 4.41 you are better off getting the original and burning it in its entirety 8 gigs or what ever.
I’m confused – since when is HDD space cheaper than DVD-Rs…
I can buy a 50 pack of Sony DVD+R (or DVD-R, whichever you prefer) for 20 bucks. That’s about 200 gigs for 20 dollars. I’m not sure 750 gigs for 200 dollars is cheaper than that…
Okay, dumb question: is an HDrip of DVD size likely to be better quality than a straight DVDR?
I guess I can see that if you drop all the extras from the normal DVD, the resulting file size of the movie would be bigger, but would that be mitigated by the skills (or lack thereof) of the HDrip maker?
@deaf audiophile
You’re correct.
so…
anyone found a torrent link?, stuffed if i can.
YOUR QUOTE:HDrip of DVD size likely to be better quality than a straight DVDR?
They are by far a lot better Quality.But U gotta have a 400.00
DVD Player and a HD TV with HDMI Cable hook-up,because HD is supposedly all Digital,and without the cable your TV isn’t receiving the Digital signal,on top of all that for true surround 5.1 Audio U need a Audio amp with speakers another 500.00bucks
@31
or u could just plug a vga cable from ur pc into the back of your lcd for nothing.
Oh yea, I hadn’t thought of that. Thanks!
@28 – deaf audiophile,
the whole difference between SD and HD is picture resolution, so yeh a HD version will look better than a SD of the same size. However like cindy said it depends greatly on the quality of the encoding, because even with a higher resolution if its been squashed down to much u could end up with a final result less nice than the SD rip.
Peace out.
YOU Divide the average Disc cost by the amount of GiGs on ea Disc,not the amount of Discs by the amount U payed.
If a 4.36 gig disc 0.75
If a 20.00 gig disc 1.50
Gig for gig which is cheaper
@36
keeping the noobies on their toes ay, cruel.
Well, I am using projector with 120″ picture and I love HD-versions. But about the size, if possible, I will always get a version which fits into single layer DVD. Dual layers are just still too expensive to my taste. The quality (at least for “normal” 1h30m movie) is enough for me…
I`ve been listening to/watching the HD/SD debate going on for a while when it comes to rips…
…i have a 36″ Samsung LCD conected to my pc with a Nvidia GF5800 with my secondary desktop (the tv) set to 720p and i`m pleased with the quality of 700mb rips when played back on my tv. YES you can notice the quality difference of the HD material….but if a 700mb rip is done well/correctly then it is “almost” standard SD-DVD quality so until isps start to play nice and give “truly unlimited” downloads then i`ll stick with TDX or AFR rips as while not affected by this myself i know some people whould be approaching thier monthly limit downloading one HD release alone.
In my opinion the cons of (downloading) hd rips outwiegh the pros at the minute (except possibly for our CHN or KOR friends that down suffer the same up/down ratios that i find the English and Americans do)
on the subject of size i would myself still prefer rips regardless of content HD/SD/Whatever to fit on a CD/DVD for archiving purposes as i`ve never trusted just keeping something on a hardrive, at least with a DVD then if it “fails” while in storage the its 4.7gig thats gone not 200, or 500 or 750gig…..
…and thats not even counting brownouts or hardware failure, i prefer my data to be safe rather than just BIG!
@Bob Dole
Don’t know where you are living, or what worl you are living in, but in the U.S. just sign up for internet through your cable company of Verizon FIOS. You’ll have plenty of d/l bandwidth…Millions are already doing it.
If you’re a cheap fuck and only paying for a $14.95/mnth DSL account then you get what you pay for. Hell, if you have to, order a T3 to your house for $1000/mnth!
@lee welton
Despite what you may have heard, not everyone in the U.S. is wealthy. The reason DSL exists for people without the means to purchase high speed bandwidth. Some parts of the country are also very remote, like farmland and mountain regions, and may not be serviced by high speed bandwidth.
Do you expect all of those people to move to cities just to experience hig speed bandwidth? For some, their jobs may force them to live out of the reach of civilization. Should they not be entitled to high speed bandwidth and also to enjoy a movie or two?
anybody know where i can find this torrent?
I got a 60″ TV & my 700 meg DivX look good
Now a CAM looks like a CAM on any TV
But DVD Rs,DVD Rips,Scrnrs,etc really look good
Its all up to the person who Converts their movies
My friends bring me Movies all the time to make back-ups for them.I put them on my computer in their original size,then I shrink them for my friends,to fit their Disc.
Then I make myself a DivX 1.4gig..This way I can store 3 Movies on 1 Disc
My personal preference is 1.4 gig [AVI],as truly ya can’t tell the difference in the DVD & THE CONVERSION.No pixelation,no ghosting,even 5.1 if available,absolute true image
or u could just plug a vga cable from ur pc into the back of your lcd for nothing.
These cables do deliver HD..Even off a computer,Some people try regular Audio,Video Cables.Which work fine for Standard signal.But for true HD U definetly need[VGA]DVI or HDMI Cables
I put a DVI Splitter on my Computer,with a DVI to HDMI Cable
http://www.svideo.com/dvihdmi2.html
But I needed the 15 footer 65.00
or just get a DVI to HDMI Adapter for about 20 bucks
@rick5446
So what size can you shrink an HD-DVD or a Blu-Ray DVD down to? I would think 1.4GB is not enough, especially using an older format such as DivX.
I am looking for about 4-5GB versions of HD-DVD’s, hopefully using x264.
Torrent:
http://www.newtorrents.info/torrent/27512/Spiderman.2002.720p.BluRay.x264-SiNNERS.html
please rapisdshare links
yeah rapidshare links would definitely help!
Um see that 264 in the name? that means its encoded in h.264, which is a compression standard for HD video. Think divx only with bigger files. Thus why it is not a full blown 25-30gb release. I have several of these to play on my Xbox 360 and they look just as good as the real thing in hd.
@Montavious
How were you able to get your XBox360 to play these x264 files?
There are a lot of clueless people here.
1. DVDs are cheaper than hard drives, on a GB/$ basis.
500GB / 121.5$ = 4.1 GB/$
50 * 4.7GB / 24.88$ = 9.4 GB/$.
A good sale on e.g. 100 pack of Verbatim for 30$ can bring the price to 15.6GB/$.
(GB = 10^9 bytes, for hard drive sizes and 4.7GB DVDs).
I found a sale on DVD+R DL discs that was a 15 pack for ~20$, IIRC. That’s 6GB/$, which is still better than hard drives. They’re not great discs, though. I’m still hoping holographic or something new will come along and redefine storage.
Also, HDs don’t scale very well. They use electricity (and require cooling) just sitting there idle. Although they can spin down if you don’t have any live data on a given drive. I guess if you have external drives you can just plug in the one that has the movie you want. Still, I don’t find my DVD collection too inconvenient. The worst part is figuring out which 3-6 movies to put on a disc together, so I can sort my collection in some kind of order. And so I can copy the disc for a friend who liked one movies, and might like the others. This problem goes away with HD rips that fit on exactly one disc. (I don’t like these 1.5DVD rips at all.)
HD storage has a lot of advantages (and I would like to just have all my movies online), but DVD is cheaper unless you are buying expensive dual-layer discs.
2. video quality: video on HD-DVD, Blu-Ray, and DVD is at very high bit-rates to look good even given the restrictions of the format standards. e.g. the video actually includes the black bars at top and bottom, so the codec has to spend lots of extra bits on the sharp edges, and it interferes with motion compensation for things entering or leaving the picture.
x264 takes a lot of CPU time to make highly compressed h.264 video. I have no idea what kind of encoder settings commercial HD-DVD and Blu-Ray use, but I imagine they just throw a lot of bitrate at it, instead of cranking up frameref and so on.
It’s my guess that a lot of movies could look good in 4.4GB 720p, instead of 6.6GB. The major factor in compressibility is film grain or other noise. That’s why Pixar-style animation compresses so well, because there’s no noise. Still parts of the picture can be predicted perfectly from the previous frame, so it doesn’t cost any bits to do it. This is a major reason why downscaling to 720p helps compressibility so much: the random noise goes down with the number of pixels. A slightly less detailed picture that’s free of compression artifacts is much preferable to a 1080p that looks swimmy or blocky or something.
H.264 allows multiple reference frames (e.g. frameref=8) so in a scene with bright flashes of light (e.g. muzzle flashes), the picture after the flash can reference the picture before the flash, instead of having to spend enough bits to reproduce all the details from scratch. That’s another reason h.264 kicks so much ass on animation, because animation is often repetitive. (I’m surprised pr0n rips don’t use h.264 more often…)
3. I download HD rips from my ISP’s news servers, with fills from octanews. This way I don’t need to use any upload bandwidth, and I only have to pay octanews for ~1/10th of the size of a typical movie. My ISP has terrible retention and completion, but much better than nothing. I only torrent movies I really want, and in that case I’d spend the time/bandwidth for an HD rip. I generally only burn movies to DVD if the quality is worth archiving. So generally xvid rips don’t qualify unless they’re made with a recent xvid and/or high bitrate. Most copies of old movies floating around are scene releases made right around when the DVD first came out, and usually suck. I have ~500GB of hard drive space for movies, some of which is 6.6GB HD rips that I haven’t dealt with yet, or HD rips that I’m planning to recode to a smaller size to fit on one DVD, or whatever. And a bunch of DVD copies that I’m going to transcode eventually… When I find a good copy of a movie I can burn, I delete the xvid rip. (Yes, I’m addicted to collecting maybe more than watching movies.) h.264 is wonderful for dvd rips, not just HD. I have a binder with ~200 DVDs in it, and a couple spindles of dvds. e.g. one for all of MST3K.
I have a computer with a nice LCD and nice speakers (Logitech Z-5500), so I don’t use my TV at all anymore except when multiple people are watching. (Mainly because computer isn’t set up for many people to sit in front of it).
Spiderman.2002.720p.BluRay.x264-SiNNERS.mkv
http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=7a4b9f5
I am a big fan of spiderman and i recently watch spiderman 3 that was amazing film now the film is available with blueray so do not need to buy individual cds and dvds. The quality is far batter than others.
<a =”http://www.zoombits.co.uk/bluetooth/”>bluetooth mouse</a>