Releaselog

Sony just dropped down to a whole new level of sucking. *Revised*

Does anyone remember when the PS3 was first announced? I do. The first time I saw those amazing graphics and extremely true to life gameplay I was almost converted to becoming a cross-platform gamer. That was two years ago. Today I’m still proud to be a PC gamer. Why is this you ask? Well, just 10 seconds into the Kill Zone 2 trailer I knew that there was something funny about that trailer… It was almost as if… As if it was all pre-rendered! What was worse was that the game developers actually stated that it was ALL 100% in-game footage. As did Sony’s genius PR department. “KillZone 2? Wha… In-game? Is that good? It is? Oh well in that case it’s all 100% in-game.”. And then it turned out that a lot of those PS3 trailers were pre-rendered. That’s when I started hating Sony for lying to all of their would-be-had-you-not-lied-to-them costumers.

The point I’m making is this: Sony lied, and now they’re being punished for it. You know how every company or brand or what ever, pretty much every commercial product has some sort of spoof made about it? Like the Mac VS PC ads? Yeah, well it’s bad enough when people make spoofs about your ad campaigns. This means that a lot of people really don’t like your product or your ad campaign. But when a song is written and performed, just to make your product look silly… That is the point where you, as a company, should really start doubting your super boosted ego and regret statements that basically come down to: “We are the market leaders so you’ll all buy our new product any way. Why? Because…. Ehm… YOUR GAY IF YOU DON’T! You don’t wanna be gay do you?”. I present to you, my favorite song of all time, the PS3 song!

Update: Some of you have clearly misinterpreted the gay bashing part. It was not me that was bashing gays it was Sony. But it’s all taken way out of proportion, Sony would never bash gay people in press conferences. By saying: “If you don’t, you’re gay!” I’m actually making it clear that only a homophobic, KKK associated retarded redneck would do it. I’ll be honest with you people, I did post this just to piss off the Sony fanboys. Why? Because the resulting flame wars are always hilarious and filled with misinformed fanboys teaming up as they desperately try to defend a product that they know in the back of their minds is crap. Sure MS lost a lot of money getting into the console wars but what they actually did was invest. Not lose, invest. Because right now the 360 is the most popular console for games, with the Wii being to most popular console for people who only game every now and then.

In the last console war the results were this:

  1. Sony Playstation 2
  2. Nintendo Gamecube
  3. Microsoft X-Box

But now they’re:

  1. Microsoft X-Box 360
  2. Nintendo Wii
  3. Sony Playstation 3

Just look at the damn statistics. Also, did you guys catch that hilarious “Behind the mask” news article about the PS3 actually being the 360 in disguise? These last few months of PS3 bashing have been some of the funniest news months ever. I do not own any console (’cept for an old skool SNES that I haven’t seen in many years) so I really don’t care about what console is best. Heck, I don’t even have any handheld consoles. But everyone loves these fanboy flamewars and that’s what I gave you, front row seats to the funniest thing on RLSLOG in a long time. Enjoy.

Comments (71)

Feel free to post your Sony just dropped down to a whole new level of sucking. *Revised* torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. fca
    February 24th, 2007 | 05:11

    FUNNY LILLTE SONG KEVIN LOL
    its true!! 360 RoYALY
    kick ass………………

  2. VGA
    February 24th, 2007 | 05:42

    WTF ?

    gay song, but I liked it,lol

    oh, almost forgot,PS3 suXxX a$$

  3. Basem
    February 24th, 2007 | 05:44

    Sony PS3 sucks. I love the PS2.

    I am waiting for the Wii to go down in price and I am buying it for the tennis game and the whole 6 axis game controls!

  4. February 24th, 2007 | 05:51

    Well, I got my ps3 and do like it. I’m not much of a gamer so it’s good enough. Just to make it fair, I’ll be getting a wii too (if Nintendo actually ships more soon) lol :)

  5. tz
    February 24th, 2007 | 06:25

    no matter wht.. PC is the best….compared to xbox or ps3 or wii

  6. February 24th, 2007 | 06:38

    You should remember, buying the PS3 is like having your own mini-super computer for the price. Once you install linux onto it you pretty much have bought an expensive computer for a cheap price.

  7. WestcoastStrangler
    February 24th, 2007 | 06:39

    Wow i almost clicked on that youtube link. come on anything is better than a PC. I enjoy playing with friends sitting next to me. Something bout being next to live people makes me feel good. Wii.. y not just actually play real sports? sorry im mad..

  8. NIN
    February 24th, 2007 | 06:56

    console gaming for TEH GAY! LOL!

    but this is coming from a LONG time, HARDCORE PC Multiplayer Gamer! :p

    the last “console” system i’ve owned was ATARI in 1982 LOL!

  9. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 06:58

    You are such an anti-fanboy jackass. Who cares? The PS3 is light-years ahead of any other console or PC setup, and will be for a long time. SHUT UP ALREADY. You’re making yourself look (more) retarded.

  10. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:03

    Oh, and they would probably say “you’re” not “your” there.

  11. John Shu
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:05

    I hear that using CAPS for complete sentences makes you look really cool on the internet, J.

  12. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:20

    CAPS = Cruise control to COOL, so STFU jackass. And if you give a shit so much, you should probably remind the author of this post too, and half of the anti-PS3 dipshits who’ve posted responses. Eat a D.

    Oh and Kevin, just to drive home the point what a dumbshit, you are, from Wikipedia: “SCEA’s Vice President, Jack Tretton, was quoted as saying that the Killzone footage “is definitely real” and “is real gameplay”, but it was later claimed that Tretton was referring to Resistance: Fall of Man , not Killzone. Sony’s Chris Ivester later stated the video was done “to spec”. They later revealed that the video presented at E3 was a CGI video created by Guerrilla and not gameplay footage.”

  13. Cim
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:20

    In terms of pure graphics power PCs have already gone beyond what the PS3 can do (hardware-wise that is).

    Regardless, everything comes down to games in the end though. The other consoles have tons of good games out there and the PS3 has pretty much nothing even worth mentioning yet.

    Even in the graphics department the 360 is well beyond anything the PS3 has shown so far, just look at Gears of War. They keep saying that the PS3 has the Cell processor and what-not but there is not not a single PS3 title out there that comes close to Gears on the 360.

    “light-years ahead”. Yeah. :P

  14. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:27

    Just because the game manufacturers haven’t caught up to the technology doesn’t mean that the potential isn’t there. What you’re saying is like “Well they have this Porsche that they SAY can go 200 mph, but I’ve only seen it go 40 mph, and I’ve driven my Chevy to over 80 mph already, so clearly it’s the better and faster car.”

    DEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

  15. sth
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:30

    “You are such an anti-fanboy jackass. Who cares? The PS3 is light-years ahead of any other console or PC setup, and will be for a long time. SHUT UP ALREADY. You’re making yourself look (more) retarded.”

    Wow, issues man, serious issues. Light-years behind maybe. Sticking a physical ps2 inside the ps3 to make it backwards compatible, microsoft just used software, which unlike the ps3’s interior ps2 is upgradeable with a simple patch. I won’t even mention the blu-ray issues. I’ll stick to technology that works thanks. J, I’m assuming the J stands for jack-a*&, you sound like a pathetic fanboy.

  16. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:38

    Most Xbox games STILL won’t play on a 360, so your point is pretty much moot. I’ve had several friends whose 360s took a big fat flying shit and crashed completely when they applied a MS SOFTWARE patch, so bad that they had to send them back to be repaired. Seems like their software patch plan is working REAL well. Sony did what they had to do to make it work for consumers even when they clearly don’t have to make the PS3 backwards compatible, and I don’t see anything wrong with that. I’m not a fanboy by any means, but this authors of this site seem to revel in alternately bashing Sony and Microsoft for really lame reasons when they should just shut the hell up (since they’re usually wrong or just over-exaggerating) and stick to torrents, which is the whole purpose of this site.

  17. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:44

    I suck fat dick.
    and yes…I LOVE PS3.

  18. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:46

    …did i mention i like dick?

  19. ScytheNoire
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:48

    I just love how Sony keeps shooting themselves. I’ve hated them for a long, long time now, and so these past few years have been golden for me. CD Rootkit attack, Exploding Batteries, their shitty Blu-Ray spec, Poor PS3 sales, and now just more evidence that the PS3 sucks.

    Sony, just go out of business already. You’re shit, always have been shit, always will be shit. Just fuck off and die already.

  20. sth
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:50

    J, are those two points related? Must you be a cocksucker to appreciate the ps3. This thoery would explain the ps3’s failure so far. A target market segment that prefers to karaoke show tunes to playing video games. Poor planning on sony’s part.

  21. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 07:56

    Hardy har har. Make posts pretending to be me, and then respond to them yourself because you can’t come back intelligently at me when I fucked your point straight in the ear. Wow, advanced interweb haxx0ring, dork. I bet all the other dumbshit losers with no friends are really impressed.

    I’m done with you kids.

  22. sth
    February 24th, 2007 | 08:02

    J, I didn’t make any posts pretending to be you. I had no need to; your responses to everything are pathetically inaccurate. As well, I can virtually assure you that I am older then you are, and not a “kid”. If people are pretending to be you, it’s probably because you come off sounding like such an ignoramus asshole!

  23. M®.E
    February 24th, 2007 | 08:16

    ps3 has the cell read about it and be amazed, its going to take a while for its potentioal to be shown, along with its blu ray that holds 20 gig more than a hddvd more space more content also to note is the operating system ps3 will eventualy blow all competition out of the water, give it another year or so…

  24. moog
    February 24th, 2007 | 08:20

    I’ve been following this site for a while, there’s some nice info on the scene. However this (straight) reader finds the homophobic remarks and in the post and the subsequent comments offensive, so this is getting deleted from my newsreader.

    Grow up Kevin.

  25. Arqentus
    February 24th, 2007 | 08:24

    http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/02/23/european_ps3_has_less_functionality_than_us_japan/

    Not only are European PS3 buyers getting gouged in pricing terms - paying as much as 40% more for the console than our brethren overseas - but it turns out that European consoles are actually going to have less functionality, too.

    How can this be? Well, in a bid to cut the cost of making the PS3, the hardware chips that enable PS2 backwards compatibility are being stripped out.

    Stripped out.

    The chips will be replaced with software emulation, with the result that backwards compatibility for European consoles will be, according to Sony, significantly less.

    According to Reuters, “The backwards compatibility is not going to be as good as the U.S. and Japan models,” a Sony spokesman said. “Rather than concentrate on PS2 backwards compatibility, in the future, company resources will be increasingly focused on developing new games and entertainment features exclusively for PS3.”

    Great. Most people probably wouldn’t mind about not having backwards compatibility, but the fact that US and Japan get it and we don’t is, frankly, galling. Let’s face it - Sony’s deal is getting worse by the day.

  26. MBT
    February 24th, 2007 | 08:46

    yeah, i was hoping this would be related to Arqentuss post.
    This is much bigger news as i wouldnt expect anything less underhand from sony regarding graphics.

  27. February 24th, 2007 | 09:14

    nice video

  28. Samppa
    February 24th, 2007 | 09:39

    Well, I’m gonna still buy PS3 anyhow. Even if they suck “now”. How you know that they suck after 6months or after 1 year when they have more exp from making games for PS3?

    Theres only one huge thing why I buy PS3 out of these 3 nice consoles = GAMES!

    GamePlatform:

    Wii for Sports
    X360 for FPS
    PS3 for RPG

    This is how I see it. Theres not even 1 good rpg game for 360 (That I like. Well maybe Oblivion but thats it ) and that’s really bad because I love RPG’s.

    Final Conclusion:
    Ok PS3 has bad starts… So what? PS2 had bad start also ( Late release as always ) but how about now? PS2 is still fighting. This fanboy writing is just annoying. Buy or not. I just typed my opinion and why “I” buy PS3 over 3 very nice consoles. Everyone console got their good and bad sides.

    But adding these videos just to diss fanboy’s = lame!
    I’m not PS3 fanboy. I even own Xbox myself currently. People can ofc say there opinion but do it without hurting fanboy PS3, X360 or even Wii.

  29. February 24th, 2007 | 11:15

    Qoute from J.
    “The PS3 is light-years ahead of any other console or PC setup, and will be for a long time.”

    Ok, you have a Pentium 2… right?

    all high-end systems are WAY better then the PS3.

  30. Samppa
    February 24th, 2007 | 11:36

    True, Scit. If you want the best looking game and you have tons of money = pc is the right choice.

    I just got new pc ( Well still waiting for parts )

    Core2 Duo E6600
    P5N32-E SLI, nF680i SLI
    2G DDR2
    Geforce8800 GTS / 640mb

    = Well should run some of the new games ^^

    But I think some of the games are better with consoles. And some are exclusive for some consoles.

  31. Samppa
    February 24th, 2007 | 12:30

    oh well, this turns to be another fanboy thread. So ill stop telling my opinions.

    I’m just gonna buy all consoles so nobody feel sad … =’(

    hehe, yippee!

  32. Beatdown
    February 24th, 2007 | 13:24

    what are you talking about this isnt a fanboy thread, these are some of the most influencial keyboard warriors on Earth!! hahaha

    PC games are good if you only have virtual friends, you can’t beat console gaming!!

  33. krl
    February 24th, 2007 | 13:41

    Very expensive, less functions in european versions(/US) for the same high price–> No PS3 for me

  34. josh
    February 24th, 2007 | 14:06

    killzone pre-rendered, wasn’t it obvious from the start? i mean if it wasn’t, it would mean ps3 has better graphics, not only compared to xbox but to a top-notch pc too.

    which i just dont see happening on a console.

  35. Benny
    February 24th, 2007 | 14:38

    I knew something was wrong when I read it, but it took me a good few seconds to realize it said ‘costumers’ instead of ‘customers’.

  36. me
    February 24th, 2007 | 14:39

    Well I am gay and want to be. I dont like being straight, it sucks. Why are you using this in your article?

    Anyway Nintendo rules in gaming, sony in music reproduction stuff..in my opinion.

  37. miscz
    February 24th, 2007 | 14:47

    Mr. X:
    It would be a cheap computer if Sony released specs or drivers for hardware. Right now with Linux it’s a 800Mhz single core PPC machine with 256MB of ram and no hardware graphics acceleration, even in 2D. So, forget about such simple things as smooth video playback or anything more advanced.

  38. dblmask
    February 24th, 2007 | 15:19

    if I remember well, Sega Dreamcast was better than even the PS2… where is it now?
    NO game.. NO gain. Is that simple, no mather how much hardware you may have, face it, the consoles are taking the game world now, game PC days are falling down. Just show me a “God of War 2″ or even “1″ for the PC. It’s quite possible to do such a game on PC, but it doesn’t exist.

  39. phishybongwaters
    February 24th, 2007 | 15:23

    Dreamcast wasn’t not better than the ps2 you are on crack, dreamcast was a little better than n64.

    Anyways, you’d have to be a retard not to see that ALL VIDEO GAME TRAILERS ARE PRE RENDERED. Not just ps3 fucko, 360 and the wii aswell.

    Other than that, funny to see them getting called on it ;)

  40. Jim power
    February 24th, 2007 | 15:40

    Man, i‘d like to -hear- this whole thread with south park voices. I think i would laugh so hard, my face would never go straight again…

    fanboys… hilarious… :D

  41. sh4dow
    February 24th, 2007 | 16:17

    best post ever (except for the gay-thing…), although i don’t really like that wii gets only mentioned once. after all, from sales so far it seems like it might surpass 360 in a year or so. also, while 360 is pretty nice, it’s only half-nexgen for me - technically speaking. that’s why this is the first generation in about 10 years where i didn’t get any of the consoles right at the release. and i still don’t plan on buying one of them (wii’s lack of accurate pointing sucks), perhaps any of those companies will create something better in the hopefully “real” next generation in 3-4 years…

  42. alex
    February 24th, 2007 | 16:47

    Well the ps3 with linux installed wont be able to use the same graphics that it uses for games, but who cares linux can run great on a pentium 3 or lower, the xbox 360 got some great games coming up i dont like is that hd dvd sold apart maybe they should make it has main console drive that could read hd movies and play dvd games as well, the wii is pretty much a more children based console but it is conquering a few adults because of some classic games beeing released.

  43. Markieman234
    February 24th, 2007 | 17:27

    How does Sony get away with this scandelous monopolistic behaviour?
    Here the EU should step in and enforce some serious consumer rights law suits on Sony or force them to drop PS3 prices and bring them up to spec with the japanese ones.
    Hell, they forced M$ to release “Windows Vista N” for the eruo market, so they should at least stop Sony shitting on euro consumers and force them to bring out a decent product.

    This is a fucking disgrace.
    Then again, the Europeans have always

    a) gotten everything console related later,
    b) paid more,
    c) had an inferior product

    compared to the rest of the world.

    Seriously, it’s time a higher body with authority stepped up and punched Sony in the face.

  44. Cim
    February 24th, 2007 | 18:22

    All the people praising the Cell processor is missing one thing… That’s just the CPU.

    Games is, as you clearly see on the PC, mostly about the GPU nowadays. Compare the 360 and the PS3 with just the GPUs and their pretty much the same… only the 360 manages it’s memory better.

    Also as stated in this thread, even if you install linux on the PS3 it does not allow you to do that much since it’s crippled. So you don’t get a super-computer “cheap” as some people say.

    It’s bad for computing purposes and it’s bad as a gaming console. It’s also had a huge amount of problems at launch, the 1080I problem, emulation issues, overheating, etc. So it’s no different from the 360 in that regard either.

    I just don’t get why people stick like flies on shit to what clearly is a horrible product JUST because of the brand. I guess Sony has done one thing right… marketing of the brand.

  45. nick
    February 24th, 2007 | 19:07

    Jesus christ, you people. Brand loyalty is a product of marketing and is not how the free market “should” work. You buy the best product and everything else dies off and thus the other companies are forced to compete through their products. All this fanboy bullshit is you falling into the hype. Don’t let that happen.

    Sony makes a lot of mistakes when all their departments get in on the one product (aka ps3, bending over for Sony’s movie company, in the form of blu-ray, ect).

    Nintendo has always had a weak spot in the more hardcore games department and has always been very “strategic” in their game release dates.

    Microsoft lost 4 billion on the first Xbox, they should be out of the game, but they aren’t. That’s pure capital reserve forcing themselves into the market. Nothing to be admired, nothing to be liked, the loser way of entering a market.

    Every company has their downsides, that shit doesn’t matter. Buy what suits you best and stfu please.

  46. SyntaxError
    February 24th, 2007 | 20:16

    I read an article last year that said Sony’s consumer entertainment division (or whatever the dept was called, it’s the dept in charge of the ps3) had an operating budget of between $55 million and $70 million USD. The article didn’t say if this was their total budget or their annual budget, but it’s probably annual. Either way, the other game console companies, including Microsoft, have annual budgets for their respective depts that are at least 10 times that of Sony’s.

    Also, Sony has been losing millions constantly for the last few years now mostly due to poor management. Combine this with the above and it’s easy to see that Sony is probably on their way out and may eventually close their doors.

    Given this info, it’s probably a small miracle that Sony was able to produce the PS3. If the PS3 doesn’t do as good as expected on the consumer market (and so far it’s not doing well at all), it could easily mean the downfall of Sony, at least in the game console market, as they will have lost a shitload of money.

  47. DaytonaUSA
    February 24th, 2007 | 20:19

    To me PC gamer’s opinions about consoles are even more funnier than those of any fanboys’. None of the consoles have won the console war yet because there was no war YET. And every hardware expert should know that PS3 has the greatest power of new generation consoles. Peace.

  48. Samppa
    February 24th, 2007 | 20:20

    If X360 gets more rpg games… I go for x360. ^^ I just like rpg games. If Final Fantasy’s would come to X360 that would be “dream come true” moment.

    Kevin, I’m kinda curious. If x360 would be at Sony place would you put this thread?

    But do anything you want… Free world, right? hehe, not so wise but well I’m not your mother, right? ^^ hehe

  49. Samppa
    February 24th, 2007 | 20:25

    And why the heck I’m still writing here to this pointless thread?

    Damn, I’m so stupid.

  50. J
    February 24th, 2007 | 20:32

    Just to correct you Kevin (yet again), the PS2 is STILL the most played console. 360 may be the most played NEW console, but it also has a year jump on the other two. Once all those PS2 users get around to upgrading their systems, they’re going to get a PS3 because they still want to play all their old games. That’s why Sony doesn’t have to spend a lot on marketing and advertising, because they have a built-in userbase that’s just taking their time getting on board. You’ll see. A year from now, this “article” will look straight-up ridiculous.

  51. sth
    February 24th, 2007 | 21:35

    i like J

    ))((

  52. Jim
    February 24th, 2007 | 21:44

    I don’t understand how some people can be so fanatic as to state that PCs are inherently superior to game consoles. PCs suck shit right out of an elephant’s dirty asshole when it comes to action, fighting, and adventure games, compared to consoles. Some of you PC lovers criticize the PS3 for costing so much, yet the true higher-end computer systems you so adore cost around 3-4 times what a PS3 does. If all you like to play are those MMORPGs, then sure, a PC certainly outperforms a console in THAT arena, but there are many other types of games (such as third-person action and fighting games) that consoles handle much better than your precious PCs.

  53. jsux
    February 24th, 2007 | 22:10

    Ok jim I will Throw my pc’s away if you can name those games that are better on consoles.

  54. Secular Fist
    February 24th, 2007 | 23:06

    Goodness me, it appears lots of people are suffering wikipedia syndrome. Sony didn’t lie, they told the truth from their perspective. Realize that Sony is just the pulisher for many of these titles, which means they’re responsible for manufacturing, advertising, and marketing. They didn’t make the game trailers in question. So when Guerilla tells Sony that Killzone is legit, Sony has to give them the benefit of the doubt.

    What you guys should be doing is riduling Sony for being a grade-A sucker.

    And if anyone thinks I’m a PS3 fanboy, you can eat my ass because I happen to be a proud Xbox 360 owner.

  55. Fist Crusher
    February 24th, 2007 | 23:15

    sony ownz guerilla games, you queef.

  56. February 25th, 2007 | 00:55

    I don’t know if anyone will read this since it’s so far down such an uninteresting flame war, however I would suggest deleting those comments who give no insight only call each other names. I’ve got nothing against swearing, nor am I any kind of purist, I simple found this discussion very degrading and bad publicity to this great site. If someone can not write five words without offending someone else, their opinion could easily be discarded!

  57. like anyone cares
    February 25th, 2007 | 02:26

    Guess what? You’re all wrong! If any console manufacturer wins, we all lose. So no matter how much you bash any console, the only reason why we’re not paying for a console just as much as we would for a full brand new gaming PC is because of that competition. On a sidenote, I’m a PS2 fan but the PS3 is a _MAJOR_ let down. Useless features nobody really wants/needs, a price that’s through the roof, screwing over Europe and STILL expecting their sales to be magically great is NOT a great strategy. Sony will probably not go down, but will certainly not be as successful this gen. (even though I’m a Sony fan)

  58. jorge
    February 25th, 2007 | 04:20

    damn….u are talking about 2 consoles that released all over the world and 1 that its only released in JP & US…..

    get a life and dont mesh with things that u dont have, will never have :D

  59. Jim
    February 25th, 2007 | 05:32

    jsux, I wasn’t suggesting people should throw away their PCs–hey, I love my PCs for various reasons, including all the classic-video-game-console-system emulation one can do with them, but PCs aren’t ALWAYS better than consoles when it comes to EVERY type of game. Examples, you ask? Mortal Kombat games, Devil May Cry 3, Resident Evil 2, Onimusha 3… I think PCs have virtually NOTHING to offer these days in the fighting-game arena because, for whatever reasons, the game controls nearly always wind up being shitty compared to console versions, and combining that with the fact that I’ve never found any particularly good third-person action/adventure games (like God of War & God-Hand) for the PC, I think it’s absurd for PC fanatics to try to suggest that PCs are unquestionably always better than consoles.

  60. crimson
    February 25th, 2007 | 06:08

    i still don´t care about kevins opinion …

  61. whome
    February 25th, 2007 | 06:25

    I really don’t understand all these console bashers.

    I appreciate every console ever made.
    Each one has it’s strengths and weeknesses, which makes
    them different, just imagine if there was only Nintendo,
    how boring and lame would that be. Personally I enjoy the
    differences in Nintendo, M$, and Sony, it makes for an interesting gaming world!!

    Just my 2cents

  62. Al
    February 25th, 2007 | 07:13

    Is this a review of a torrent, or is the original poster just ranting about his video game console?

  63. Stephen
    February 25th, 2007 | 07:14

    I have to say I have heard good things about the Xbox 360 and a couple of my friends have bought it and are constantly raving about it’s amazing online gameplay. BUT there is one big problem with it, it costs money. Sure, u might get a certain period free when you purchase the console but after your times up u have to pay for the use of it. Not only are you paying to have the hardware to facilitate online gameplay but then u have to pay to be able to use it! That’s ridiculous and just another way that Microsoft are gonna try and sponge back the money they will lose from the drop in sales of the 360 after the ps3 full scale launch. Why did Microsoft feel the need to rush their console onto the market in the first place? Because they know that their console has nowhere near as much processing power as the ps3 and that their graphics and gameplay can’t compete. Anyone who buys a 360 and considers themselves to be a next generation gamer is only fooling themselves. This is why I am buying a playstation 3 instead of an xbox 360.

  64. aussiebear
    February 25th, 2007 | 07:29

    You wanna know why PS3 is a big fuckup?

    (1) The pre-sale overhype.

    A whole year before it was released, they showed all these wonderful demos. (was it CES 2005?). It was fucking mind blowing!…Too bad most were pre-rendered. :(

    ie: The audience feels cheated and doubts about the capabilities of the PS3 itself are questioned … All that PR momentum is lost by 2006. (You know it, I know it, Sony knows it).

    So far, MGS4 has lived up to the hype in terms of eyecandy demos which aren’t pre-rendered. But we still have no idea of how it will play. You can’t say much about it, because its not out yet. (I wanna know what happens to Snake!)

    That Gundam game on the PS3 was SHIT. You can tell the developers have no fucking idea how to write apps for the Cell processor.

    (2) Cost.

    From past history of consoles, if you exceed a certain threshold of price, the consumer won’t be interested. (That’s fact). This is why the Wii is well accepted. Its affordable. Bloody obvious.

    (3) Competition.

    Sony was too busy knocking on MS’s Xbox 360 in their early presentations. (Boasting how powerful their PS3 is, etc).

    They shouldn’t have said anything, just show brief glimpses of the PS3 concept demo box and nothing else. They became obsessed with beating MS, wasting time & effort in countering MS PR with their PR. This is exactly what MS wants, and Sony fell for it! (Its the OLDEST trick in the MS Playbook!…This is why you remember MS’s history!)

    Here’s a trick about MS if they’re gunning for your ass. You ignore them and produce the best damn product you can muster.

    The most surprising thing is Nintendo pouncing out in popularity, while MS and Sony were in a dick measuring contest. See what I mean? Ignore MS, and focus on your product!

    (4) Production and Design issues.

    PS3 is too radical and too new. The infrastructure wasn’t well in place yet…Result? Not enough Blu-Ray diodes! Europeans and Aussies like me don’t get our PS3 release until March. (Is it March? I think I stopped caring about consoles at the end of 2006). This also has issues with (5), see below.

    And what about the initial control design? “The Boomerang”! Wow, I wonder how much they spent on that?! Here’s a hint. People like a balance of simplicty, looks and usability…They don’t like over the top BS. It must be practical. Someone was smoking some “funny stuff” when they were designing that!

    (5) Development tools.

    Along with being too radical, the dev tools provided aren’t making life easier for game developers. PS3 is a whole new platform, requiring time to understand and optimise for. Both John Carmack (Id Software) and Gabe Newell (Valve) have clearly indicated that MS’s dev tools for the Xbox 360 are better. (When you write games for consoles, you actually do it on a PC and cross-compile the code to run on the architecture of that game console…I mean the dev kit of that console!)

    MS kills Sony in this regard. Their experience in software development is one up on Sony.

    Hell, even the infamous developer of the MGS series, Hideo Kojima, has hinted that its difficult to do, but he wishes to exploit it in MGS4. Which is why its taking a long time!

    Now, IBM is stepping into it by providing engineers to tutor and help game developers in exposing the Cell processor’s potential.

    (6) PR screwup by the music branch of Sony.

    Officially, they called it “Extended Copy Protection”. Unofficially, its the infamously named “Sony Rootkit”.

    The issue turned out to be equivalent to a dirty old peverted man (Sony), trying to fondle a 15yr old girl, and got caught red handed!

    Rule 1 : Get it through your thick skulls you content providing dim-wits, DRM does NOT work.
    Rule 2 : Follow Rule 1.

    People don’t realise that Sony Music and Sony Computer Entertainment are two different branches. (Same with their mobiles, TVs, Car audio, etc).

    What people see, are that it all falls under the banner of Sony, and hence, its all the same level of suck factor.

    Currently to some, Sony is BAD.

    (7) Linux support?

    Cool idea. Probably desperate move by Sony (in a marketing perspective).

    As a Linux user, I see this as a complete and utter belly flop to the MAX.

    Why?

    * You can’t access the Nvidia GPU. They won’t let you (prevent you via hypervisor) or provide the facilities for it. Way to go ass-wipes! So what’s the point then?

    …so PS3 with Linux, no graphics acceleration. Whooopi-friggin-do! Slow ass VESA mode! No cool desktop eyecandy effects! No OpenGL love. Well, fuck you too, Sony.

    * Memory is too little. You need to double the system RAM here Sony. Its not a computer when it runs slower than a PC! At least 512MB of system RAM in addition to the existing video memory.

    * Cell processor isn’t suited for regular computing work. (I personally think they should have gone with a dual-core processor design). So a dual-core with 7 or 8 SPEs.

    * Geeks need time to understand how the heck to take advantage of the Cell. That’s gonna take a while. They’ve managed to port the code over without too much issue. (as the Cell is PowerPC architecture)…But its not optimised

    * Its FAR more cheaper to build a low-noise PC than it is a to buy a PS3. PS3 is also less flexible in the hardware sense. What you can do is restricted by Sony and Nvidia. (At least on the PC, an open 3D driver is being worked on!)…Hell, its cheaper to hack an Xbox 1 and turn that into a MythTV frontend!

    So all this snowballs into a huge mess for Sony.
    They really should learn these lessons.

    They were unfocused, distracted and over-confident because of their past success with the PS2.

    I don’t doubt Sony makes great hardware and electrical goods when done right…But no one is gonna fall for marketing any longer. (to cover up deficiencies)

    Everyone is starting to wisen up to all forms of marketing.

    Just look at the response to Windows Vista, and how MS is using the excuse of “piracy” for a reason of poor sales! They spent millions on a world wide launch for Vista, and at best, the consumer reaction was: “Meh”.

    Simply put. If you make a great product, you don’t need marketing to hype it up. The product will speak for you. All you do is demonstrate it to the rest of the world.

    You can copy other company’s ideas, just make sure you are actually making it better and improving the fundamental concept that the consumers like. Not just repeating someone else’s crap.

    …And lastly, focus on giving the consumer fun and entertainment. Wasn’t that the original point of the Playstation concept?

    Apparently, somewhere along the way, this was lost on Sony…

    If Sony wants to get user confidence back, bring out a “PS3 Plus” with seriously beefed up specs at a generous, affordable price.

    I’m talking 512MB RAM, dual-core variant of Cell, 120GB HDD, fixing issues with HD output limitations, fully MPEG2 capturing of video, etc.

    Otherwise, there’s really no hope in hell.

    I’m not a gamer, but I do keep an eye on technology itself. Its not hard to figure out why something became unpopular and f**ked up completely. The real question is: Will they learn from it?

  65. 01
    February 25th, 2007 | 16:43

    the prospects for the ps3 look worse every week

  66. coops
    February 25th, 2007 | 17:55

    PS1 was the only deascent console from SONY, PS2 and PS3 are for sheep, I cant even think of a game I’ve enjoyed playing on a PS2 bar GTA!!! Xbox is a DREAM with games such as Max payne, GTA, and Motha Fukin HALO!!! Xbox deliverd better Graphics and unquestionably addictive gameplay! Sony fans are Desperate…… they should wake up and smell the smell of Gates rubbing his hands!!! HALO3 HALO3 HALO3 HALO3 HALO3 HALO3 HALO3!!!!!!!!! that games gonna eat PS3 for breaky alone! Save £300 and buy a 360 sony fools! there the dogs! ALSO before i leave xbox pads are the best, my wireless 360’s are Perfect! ps3 havnt even changed there pad…. how wakk is that… boooooo!

  67. syphe
    February 25th, 2007 | 22:14

    man i feel as if i got dumber reading this fanboy article, seriously. this article didn’t even have a strong hard facts anyways. they just saw what someone might’ve heard from what they heard from their fifth cousin who heard it from their girlfriend who heard it from her best friends boyfriends… i mean somewhere along the way something gets lost in translation. unless i see cold hard evidence of something i won’t believe it.

    besides, fanboys are so one-track minded that it’s sickening that the MAJORITY (not all fanboys mind you) don’t even respect the opinions of others on why they like one particular console. they act as if, if you don’t like the product i’m loyal to you’re nothing but a “FUKIN RETURD BITCH” or whatever. although he’s not a gamer, all gamers should be as opinionated and non-one-tracked-minded as aussiebear is.

    also, hasn’t anyone noticed why the ps3 is doing bad right now. it’s because of the games, not the hardware (although i realize that you cannot play games unless the tech issue is addressed). the ps2 won this generation’s console war because of their gigantic library of great, good, and decent games. xbox was clearly the hardware winner and gamecube (if i remember correctly, it’s been a while so i could be wrong on this) isn’t that far away. yet consumers didn’t care for that because ps2 had a better library of games that people enjoy playing. xbox 360 is winning right now because it had a head start before the others and has a lot of games in its library right now (gears of war anybody?), wii is doing well too because it had that killer app in zelda and wii sports. ps3 has no games yet, until i guess gran turismo (the same killer app that sold a lot of ps2’s when it first came out) or metal gear solid 4. btw, i’m not going to address the pc issue because i haven’t really play pc games to see what’s its strong points and weak points other than the obvious upgrades for strong and “have to play with others” for weak.

    every console has its strong points, 360 is great for fps a la gears of war or halo, wii is great for party games, and ps3 is good for its rpgs (and god of war 3… maybe). every console has its deficiencies too, 360 isn’t backwards compatible to its fullest, the wiimote horror stories, and the pr/tech fuck ups of the ps3. personally once i graduate next year and get that job i’m going to buy all three because each console has both its strong and weak points, but in the end its all about the games.

  68. dracaan
    February 26th, 2007 | 04:03

    net nerds. so funny how some peoples lives revolve around this crap

  69. phishybongwaters
    February 26th, 2007 | 15:28

    Lol i stopped caring about 4 posts in. It helps if you back up some of your claims, but I do agree, sony “lied” with their demos.

    Well dumbfucks so did 360 and wii so who cares? Really i think the point of this post should be to ban anyone flaming or posting up lame useless comments.

    All 3 consoles suck compared to PCs so whatever suck it and grow up.

  70. phishybongwaters
    February 28th, 2007 | 20:08

    I just re-read some of the comments, i was bored. Some of you are just plain retarded.

    First the ps3 is ahead of the wii but behind the 360 in power, it’s a fucking FACT.

    Second, it’s completely the line up of games, and the fact that the ps3 hit a YEAR after the 360 and the wii was out first. It’s pretty simple, 360 with a line up of games for 500, wii with like 8 games for 200, ps3 with barely a game in site for 900.

    Like I’ve been saying for awhile now, give sony the same time in the market as their competition and THEN you can bash them all they want.

    No ,I’m not done. The ps2 had PS1 hardware built into it for backwards support, as does the ps3. Why? Simple you morons, it’s better to run the game on the hardware than in emulation. Find me a *good* ps2 emulator and of course it will be that same lonely 1 working ps2 emulator. Take a look at the PC requirements of running that, and compare that to the hardware the ps2 actually has. There’s a HUGE gap, cause it’s takes ALOT MORE POWER to run ps2 emulation than simply dumping the old hardware in it.

    Didn’t hear you bitching about the ps2 working flawlessly for all but a handful of ps1 games.

    Again, sony didn’t lie about anything, they showed you ingame videos running o nthe SDK as they always do, all game companies do this. They never once claimed it was real time console playing, just ingame video.

    But that’s beside the point, 60 some posts and they are all the same lame crap showing the rest of us most of you are either 12 years old, or have the mental capacity of a 12 year old.

    When the 360 hit the market it was AHEAD of pc games in terms of power. Not anymore, no console can steal the lead for long, and as it is now, the money spent on a ps2 can get you a monster gaming rig without the LCD.

    Anyone trying to argue console gaming is better than PC gaming is young and has to be under 15, it really is that simple. Don’t argue points you don’t understand, don;t come here quoting bullshit as fact, some of us actually do RESEARCH these products.

    Out of the 3 next gen consoles the ps3 is, unfortunately, the weakest. Why do i say unfortunately? CAuse I’ve owned a ps1 and ps2 and still use my ps2 alot. Sony runs lines of games I like, always has always will.

    It’s not even about prodcut loyalty, it’s about games. Traditionally the games I like come out on ps2 and 6 months to a year later on the xbox, and I’m not willing to wait that long.

    The 360 is riddles with problems, just go to your local retail store and jsut ask how many they had to send to microsoft after x-mas, you’ll be amazed.

    I personally saw a game that was left in the drive over night that now has RINGS BURNT INTO THE DISK!

    I’ve used a Wii and it’s fun, for awhile. I’ve played on the 360 extensively and it’s not all that. Neither is the ps3. The fact that this subject can’t be broached without the ensuing bitch match is pathetic.

    Grow up and discuss your complaints like adults. I’d honestly hate to see what the rlslog forum would be like.

  71. August 27th, 2007 | 20:30

    The PS3 is a big and overpriced SHIT!! I am on the way to get a free Wii!!

Your Ad Here

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!