but horse and bear is my favorite meat! never tryd dog yet, maybe some day. Not to sound like a complete dick thou, i do understand your views, just its way to easy to eat meat for my work i can only eat out for every meal, its hard to do being a vegetarian, i prefer a vegy burger over a real one. But ill still always eat meat.

the issue here is not eating meat but how that meat gets there in the first place. years upon years of literal torture just so some fat, mislead idiot can eat a meal is wrong by any standards.

if u idiots knew anything then u would know that most things in this shitty world now revolve around money and nothing more. poor treatment and low costs go hand-in-hand.

i don’t eat meat but wouldn’t be half as upset about doing so if the animals it came from were treated as they damn well should be before being slaughtered.

greedy, money-grabbing bastards, i hate them all.

good day.

Hope you know that every year rain forest the size of 50% of Germany’s surface are destroyed, and that 90% of the surface that was destroyed is used for meat production. How’s that for killing “field animals”, huh? Veggies are soooo useless, yeah, but if EVERYONE was veggie, then we could probably feed the whole fucking 3rd world since we wouldn’t be wasting so much space and ressources on meat production.

and to the guy who wrote:
“Those animals were provided for us by God.” oh man oh man you think like a 100 year old. In fact, i can’t find the words to describe your stupidity.

the only reason we eat meat is because we were forced to do so during our childhood. No kid would eat their own rabbit for example.

plus, I think it’s totally arbitrary to eat cows, pigs, fish, etc., but to cry out “cruel!!!” when it comes to eating horses, bears, dogs, cats. There’s no difference.

mhmmm steak!!!

The hypocrisy of claiming to be religious while adhering to a vision other that the one described above, is shown in this thought-provoking paper delivered to the Assembly of the World’s Religions.

“Because he cannot really sense his own soul, the mundane religionist, and the misguided spiritualist, cannot sense it in other creatures and so think nothing of feasting on their slaughtered remains.
Insisting that some living creatures have life but not soul, he inadvertently assumes the ideologic posture of the materialist, who reduces life to a mere biologic function.
Under the sway of this contradiction, he fondles one lesser creature and slaughters another, pampering one as his pet and cannibalizing the other as his dinner.
Devoid of even rudimentary consciousness of spirit, he remains blissfully unaware of his sin.”

“Belief in souls in animals aside, the mundane religionist lacks the moral keenness and simple compassion to be sickened by the bloody cruelty which he tacitly endorses as a human carnivore.
Due to dulness, he remains unaware that the creature he blithely eats had to endure unspeakable suffering in the slaughterhouse-suffering for which he himself as its chief beneficiary, is responsible.”