Releaselog

SILKYPIX Developer Studio v3.0.24.2-TE

SILKYPIX Developer Studio 3.0 is awarded as the best RAW converter for digital images! I wouldn’t necessarily it’s another photoshop, or a photoshop wannabe. SilkyPix is for…actual photos where as photoshop is for graphics. In the description it says “SILKYPIX is specifically developed for enthusiastic photographers and professional users”. So is for you professional or up and coming photographers.

Nowadays consumer digital cameras are very popular because of their ease of use. Unfortunately, consumer digital compact cameras have limited functionality that reduce the quality of the image and therefore roduce inferior results. These shortcomings could be: unnatural jagged edges, unnatural colours, over saturation, over sharpening, pixilation and excessive colour noise from high ISO photos.

In order to achieve better quality images, RAW photography has become increasingly popular over the last couple of years. Many enthusiastic (semi) professional photographers are demanding the best quality from their cherished images. As a consequence, photographing in RAW format bypasses standard factory camera settings and enables you to creatively explore the full potential of your camera.

Release Name: SILKYPIX.Developer.Studio.v3.0.24.2-TE
Release By: TE
File Name: tsds324
Size: 25.5mb
Links: NFOOfficial Site
Download: UploadJockey

Comments (18)

Feel free to post your SILKYPIX Developer Studio v3.0.24.2-TE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. Haqq
    October 14th, 2008 | 01:16

    I’ll get it a try.

  2. hiro
    October 14th, 2008 | 01:55

    looks carp

  3. Fred
    October 14th, 2008 | 02:33

    Torrent please? Thanks.

  4. Fish???
    October 14th, 2008 | 02:34

    @2

    It looks nothing like a fish.

    :)

  5. piticu
    October 14th, 2008 | 02:34

    one of the best raw converters that i’ve ever used

  6. limbs!
    October 14th, 2008 | 03:00
  7. MattR
    October 14th, 2008 | 04:15

    “I wouldn’t necessarily it’s another photoshop, or a photoshop wannabe.”

    Wouldn’t necessarily WHAT?

  8. Choco
    October 14th, 2008 | 04:49

    @ 7 (MattR):
    Umm… probably “say.” I think most people figured that out.

    @ 6 (limbs!):
    Thanks for the RS link.

  9. al gonzalez
    October 14th, 2008 | 08:00

    Photoshop is for graphics?

    Really?

    If you dont know what are you talking about, please dont confuse people.

  10. Syrup
    October 14th, 2008 | 09:14

    Despite having the word ‘photo’ in the name, photoshop is apparently not for photos.
    Maybe it should be called Adobe Graphicshop.

  11. spermosh
    October 14th, 2008 | 09:36

    what`s the different between this and Lightroom?

  12. jinn
    October 14th, 2008 | 09:50

    there is a free developer version for Windows and OSX.
    http://www.isl.co.jp/SILKYPIX/english/download/

    Adobe CS3 and 4 can read RAW/NEF anyways, so can lightroom.

    Unfortunately SILKYPIX cannot read Nikon D90 or other new cameras.
    And since any photographer has bloated Adobe anyways there is no need for SILKYPIX. Photoshop/Imageready, Bridge and Lightroom do this way better.
    I wonder who made that statement on their startpage:”the best raw converter for digital images.”. The janitor?

  13. tutute
    October 14th, 2008 | 11:07
  14. Sir Topham Hatt
    October 14th, 2008 | 11:26

    “SilkyPix is for…actual photos where as photoshop is for graphics”

    FAIL

    ahh. always wanted a reason to say that.

  15. hf
    October 14th, 2008 | 12:10
  16. Sir Topham Hatt
    October 14th, 2008 | 12:11

    Ok, found a useful comparison between the results obtained from Silkypix vs Lightroom. Seems SP is more accurate in tonal balance and natural colour, whereas Lightroom is cleaner when dealing with high-ISO images (800+ I guess) from the camera.

    forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036&message=27117746

    Makes for interesting reading. SP sounds worth a try.

  17. Sir Topham Hatt
    October 14th, 2008 | 12:33

    Here’s another comparison but with actual photos processed with 4 different programs. My choice, from looking at these, would be Silkypix 3 for better high-contrast edges, yet Lightroom seems to render sharper images, but at the expense of those high-contrast sharp edges.

    http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=117904&forum_id=80

  18. JB
    October 15th, 2008 | 17:45

    so why don’t u let a try to rawherapee it’s a free windows dev i use it and with my canon raw is great [url=www.rawtherapee.com]

Leave a reply