Shrek The Third TELECINE NOT R5 READNFO XViD-Chr0mE
It’s amazing how humiliating may some groups on the scene become with one simple release. It happened to CANALSTREET lately, when they little fucked up the file names in their Surf’s Up release, so it’s obvious it’s the same group as CAMERA now. Now these noobs from Chr0mE wan’t to become even more stupid probably, so they release this shitty Shrek 3 release. The title says “telecine, not R5″ but the truth is somewhere else: it’s still the same maVen’s telesync, just reencoded with another stupid group which didn’t even bothered to remove maVen’s watermark (very good idea btw). The NFO of this Chrome’s release is really silly and the only good point I see is they decided to leave the scene. No harm, they haven’t released anything good anyway…
Shrek.The.Third.TELECINE.NOT.R5.READNFO.XViD-Chr0mE
1 CD, 700 MB, chr0me-shrek3
sample #1, #2
IMDB - NFO - torrent
haha funny
Shrek.The.Third.TC.SVCD-CANALSTREET
NUKED: stolen.video_not.tc_dupe.maVen.ts
^^ besides the fact that group tags or watermarks of any kind are forbidden as stated in the scene rules.
twats
And the reason for posting this is?… Come on guys, there’s nothing else to post so you just create zero-value posts? Shame on you.
there’re tons of reasons for posting this:
-it’s a new release, so we cover it
-it’s nuked, so we inform about it
-it’s not worth downloading, so we save your bandwith
etc etc
“-it’s not worth downloading, so we save your bandwith”
So why add the torrent link then? :s
Choice…
I can’t believe that there are like nearly 100 people downloading this shit
The last release Audio is very almost not audible.
Did anyone try this release, Hows audio quality?
It’s a shitty movie for kids anyway.
martin please learn this
they didnt little fucked it up they fucked it up a little
is this 1 in sync ppl and does it hav fixed audio at the end, is this the same copy that was rls on sunday
Shrek.3.TeleCine-XviD-CK
best version out at this moment in time
(not true tc quality)very good audio but video slightly cropped. they will probably use this audio for the r5
if not iwill use it myself(25 fps not 29 fps)
@madstan
where can i find this 1 den m8, n do u know when a screener or r5 wil b out
also READNFO in dir title forbidden in scene rules
i dont c anytin under that
OMG SO MANY VERSIONS OF TS/TC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is dis 1 in sync or is it like othere on and off sync probs and does it hav fixed audio at the end
arsenal
sorry about the delay in replying
new torrents or pirate bay(same one)
much better than maven’s
full credits at end of movie
arsenal
yes the audio at the end is perfect(for non dvdrip)
all the way through end credits
thanks and is it out of sync any way through ant is it the same rls as sundays 1 Shrek The Third TS XviD iNT-ZY
no
i think Shrek The Third TS XviD iNT-ZY was
mavens re-encoded to ac3 audio
this is a seperate source
try the sample first
but remember the sample is a diffferant aspect ratio to the film itself. the film is better
but you will be able to tell the improvement in audio
ok wel can u tell me if it goes out of sync during the film cos the other 1 did
not watched it as xvid
converted it to dvd for kids
seen only part of it
but seemed alright
cannot guarentee sych
but good enough for kids
will try and watch it tonight
ok thanks m8, can any 1 else confirm sync
never mind it is out of sync its the same cops as i think Shrek The Third TS XviD iNT-ZY
arsenal
sorry if i misled you
did Shrek The Third TS XviD iNT-ZY have the full
credits at end or just the maven logo
as i said before the sample of Shrek.3.TeleCine-XviD-CK is encoded different from the film
“Q
June 13th, 2007 | 11:52
martin please learn this
they didnt little fucked it up they fucked it up a little”
Yeah dude you really need to learn how to spell if you’re going to write articles in a website, this post almost didn’t make sense!
And for all your iNFO: Shrek.3.TeleCine-XviD-CK is actually the same as this, chr0me just stole it from CK!
Shrek The Third TS XviD iNT-ZY is a maven clone with no end credits
Shrek.3.TeleCine-XviD-CK is much better
ahahahahahahahhahhaahahahahaha…
…
………………………what?
this is outta fuxkin sync at 38 mins same as otha
Who cares how he spells? English is obviously not his mother tongue, but it’s all legible. I’d rather have someone with knowledge post brief and to-the-point bits, than someone thoroughly proficient in English filling pages with verbiage. You can read it, you can understand it, stop fucking complaining.
Totally agree 100% Willis, how many of the people on this site whose first language is English could write a single correct sentence in a foreign language, never mind several paragraphs.
Also, DG you arrogant git, you posted:
“Yeah dude you really need to learn how to spell”
Well Mr. Perfect, the part of Martin’s post you referred to has errors in grammar, not spelling.
As usual on this site it’s ‘Let he who is without brains cast the first stone’.
Now excuse me while I go and do my sister….
arsenal
just got home
have to agree you are correct about the sych fault at 38 min
but at least the the last few minutes are much better
looks like i will have to play in virtualdub again
sorry i let you down
arsenal
i owe you an even bigger apology
go to 44min 44.2 seconds and you will see the white maven logo. so i was completely wrong. this is just a recode with better but not syched audio.
virtualdub shows it as by FaMuS so don’t try that one either.
back to trying to sych it myself
So if it so bad and another groups release, why even POST THE FCUKING THING?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Why is there so much hatred towards groups other than the well established ones from releasing pirated stuff? Sure, I agree with commenting on the quality of releases, but why do we need to read a diatribe every day on how a certain group is shit and should stop releasing stuff? This is free, pirated stuff guys, that you do nothing to contribute towards, so I reckon you have no right to be heaping shit on groups or people that do contribute in some way. Even if it is something lame like stealing other group’s releases and relabelling / repacking the content, it’s still some effort that you aren’t doing
Scene groups (even the established ones) don’t release things for public consumption and they don’t want/need our “support” in terms of heaping crap on other groups. They certainly don’t need a whole bunch of fanboys strutting about saying how great they are and how crap the “competition” is.
So by all means, let’s have plenty of posts about the quality of releases, that’s the stuff we all love on rlslog. But can we leave out the senseless group bashing?
loco i have to agree with everything you said. I look at it this way, these films aint costing me anything to get, so i dont complain, i check the samples of everything before i download and read the usefull comments other people have to say on it. This way im hardly ever disapointed in what i download
Theres no real point in slaggin the groups off, you think they care anyway, its not as if your paying them for the service they provide and as my dad always says ‘if you can do it better, stop ya moaning and do it yaself’
Some 12 year old retard with a university 100mbit line probably posted this release…
well kid, you failed.
Shrek.The.Third.2007.DVDRip.XviD-FLAiTE
there’s also an R4 DVDR floating about.
Shrek 3 DVDRip sample:
http://anonym.to/?http://rapidshare.com/files/59919127/fl-shrek3-sample.avi
that’s all I’ve managed to find for now. looks pretty good.