Comments on: Short Circuit 1986 720p BluRay x264-SiNNERS

By: tha zul

tha zul — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:21:54 +0000

Short.Circuit.2.1988.DVDRip.XViD.AC3 with english subtitle

By: tha zul

tha zul — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:21:07 +0000

Short.Circuit.1986.DVDRip.XViD.AC3 with english subtitle

By: Convertanator

Convertanator — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:18:26 +0000

64 Is the only smart person to post so far.

By: addicted

addicted — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:03:39 +0000

pass = http://desiparadox.com

By: imp

imp — Sat, 24 May 2008 04:58:02 +0000

Full HD is 1920×1080. 2 Mpix.
35 mm has billions of billions of billions cells. Every pixel is made of millions of them. If you got good analogue>digital converter, you can make even Ultra HD which is 7680×4320 (33 Mpix). You can make it even better, the same way as you see it in cinema. But no more

About film: I liked it a decade ago. It’s nice. However, I don’t like the idea that pacifists are made by smiting one’s head.

By: bpr

bpr — Fri, 23 May 2008 18:38:17 +0000

i will get this

By: PF

PF — Fri, 23 May 2008 14:30:58 +0000

Does anyone know if there are/is an DVDRip release on this film?

By: Cheocaidh

Cheocaidh — Fri, 23 May 2008 14:16:25 +0000

Who would have thought that Johnny 5 would have created such heated debate?

‘More input, more input’!

By: HM

HM — Fri, 23 May 2008 14:00:49 +0000

Above links have been blocked under suspicion of illegal content .

@64, nice one, you probably made it easier for whatever automated script someone has put in place to identify RS links and submit them for copyright infringement.

By: Gaara

Gaara — Fri, 23 May 2008 11:35:16 +0000

Wow! Remember this movie
Thank You RLSLOG!

By: calibre

calibre — Fri, 23 May 2008 10:29:29 +0000

offifial subtitle seems to be: number five is alive

By: 213

213 — Fri, 23 May 2008 09:53:47 +0000

ahahahh yoy are a nerd

By: audio

audio — Fri, 23 May 2008 08:44:36 +0000

@38, Artifactz,

Ok, I’ll bite.

“Film studios are now selling their movies in HD and Blue Ray. Don’t be fooled it’s all a scam. it’s better just to buy the regular version of the DVD.”

It’s not. Unless you want a picture with way less detail and worse colors.

“I’ve take numerous film classes and have digital video experience. Basically, 97% of all films are shot using film, 16mm, 8mm. 35mm. etc. And this film is a celluloid and it captures light to form the shapes, but it’s basically a thin film composed of cells.”

This is correct. Except maybe the part about you taking numerous film classes.

“Film cannot be viewed in HD or Blue ray. it simply cannot, why? because HD and BR are based on pixels, tiny light emissions on the screen. Plasma or other LCD technology. So watching a film that was transferred from film, to HD cannot happen. You cannot ever, watch a film that was shot in cellular film..and watch it on HD or Blue Ray. Because they are different technologies. and they cannot match or relate to eachother. And actually transferring film to a computer destroys the original film image.”

This is technically correct, I guess. It’s would be the same as saying “you can’t listen to vinyl on a CD”. No, but you certainly can master a CD from a analogue source.

“Solution? well, George Lucas shot revenge of the sith with HD sony cameras. the first of films to be shot using high definition cameras. So when you have your HD TV and HD player, it will look as it was originally shot and intended to be seen.”

The camera Lucas used was 1080p. A 1080p image will contain (way) less detail than a good 35mm print.

“Studios will now be selling old films like Terminator, Die Hard, Aliens. And tell you that you are watching them on HD. And that is just not true, you are still watching a movie that was shot using original cell film.”

Of course I’m watching them in HD. They were shot on film, then converted to a digital master with twice or four times the resolution of Blu-ray through a process called telecine. Then it was _downscaled_ to Blu-ray resolution.

“So is HD good or bad? it’s good..for television shows that are shot in HD and broadcasted in HD. Or future films that will be shot in that manner in the future. But the premise remains, Celluloid, film cannot be sold as High Definition. Most movies are still being shot using traditional film and therefore should be watched at the movie theater.”

Most new Hollywood films use a digital intermediate before hitting the theaters. The film is shot on celluloid, but then it’s telecined. The editing and color grading is done to digital video and then it’s printed to celluloid again. Which means you’re actually watching film that comes from a video source a lot of the time. You whole argument then makes no sense. If you had actually paid attention during your film classes, you would know this.

“It would be funny to see studios trying to sell movies or TV shows from the 40’s and 50’s and say that they are in “HD” or “Blue Ray”. They will still look very blurry and lacking color. So, the question is..will you still buy product that is advertised as true, but you know it to be false? And I know that I will never see a film like “The Empire Strikes Back” in true High Definition as it was NEVER Shot in HD.”

Blu-ray is a storage medium. HD refers to video with higher definition than regular broadcast or DVD. 35mm celluloid can hold more information than 1080p. I guess that means 35mm is “true” true High Definition.

By: markelos

markelos — Fri, 23 May 2008 07:08:25 +0000

@61 LOL Stewie to Brian xaxaxaxa!!!!:D:D

By: CandyManObama

CandyManObama — Fri, 23 May 2008 04:49:43 +0000

“Los Lobos kick yo ass, Los Lobos kick yo face, Los lobos kick yo balls into outerr spacee”
err might be from short circuit 2.