<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SecurStar DriveCrypt Plus Pack v3.90G July Build READ NFO Cracked-F4CG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:46:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hack4U</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-297170</link>
		<dc:creator>Hack4U</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-297170</guid>
		<description>What a fuqin joke, this program does not work as its not cracked.  U losers!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fuqin joke, this program does not work as its not cracked.  U losers!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CryptoKid</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-124368</link>
		<dc:creator>CryptoKid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-124368</guid>
		<description>Using regedit check if the &quot;DCPPaid&quot; (C:\WINDOWS\system32\DCPPaid.exe /P) exist under &quot;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run&quot;. If existing try to delete this key and also delete the file &quot;DCPPaid.exe&quot; from windows\system32 to see if that remove the trial info box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using regedit check if the &#8220;DCPPaid&#8221; (C:\WINDOWS\system32\DCPPaid.exe /P) exist under &#8220;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run&#8221;. If existing try to delete this key and also delete the file &#8220;DCPPaid.exe&#8221; from windows\system32 to see if that remove the trial info box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crypt0r</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-124312</link>
		<dc:creator>Crypt0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-124312</guid>
		<description>mine works fine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mine works fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-121973</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-121973</guid>
		<description>About the 30 days..
This proggie is not cracked,ive tested several different plus packs on the internet,and no 1 works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the 30 days..<br />
This proggie is not cracked,ive tested several different plus packs on the internet,and no 1 works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crypt0r</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-110597</link>
		<dc:creator>Crypt0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-110597</guid>
		<description>n4ps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n4ps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marpszon</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-109227</link>
		<dc:creator>marpszon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-109227</guid>
		<description>I have the same problem - 30 days trial info box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same problem &#8211; 30 days trial info box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archibald</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-104086</link>
		<dc:creator>Archibald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-104086</guid>
		<description>I have problem with this program, 
after 30 days i&#039;have info box about end of trial
but i use cracked version.
Have anybody whats wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have problem with this program,<br />
after 30 days i&#8217;have info box about end of trial<br />
but i use cracked version.<br />
Have anybody whats wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crypt0r</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-96253</link>
		<dc:creator>Crypt0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-96253</guid>
		<description>WORD!!
and btw for those kids who says that there is a masterkey..
its absolutly wrong!!! i contacted the support a few days ago, and its just bullshit! securstar has no masterkey, and neiter the State!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WORD!!<br />
and btw for those kids who says that there is a masterkey..<br />
its absolutly wrong!!! i contacted the support a few days ago, and its just bullshit! securstar has no masterkey, and neiter the State!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CryptoKid</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-95117</link>
		<dc:creator>CryptoKid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-95117</guid>
		<description>Why do people post when they have no idea what they talk about and why do people start to talk about vmware and truecrypt. Drivecrypt pluspack or dcpp is not the same as truecrypt at all. Truecrypt create containers and is NOT a full disk encryption program. If you want to store some documents that should be encrypted or want to hide some porn from your mom truecrypt is a nice program. If you need to encrypt everything and it should be transparent (you won&#039;t notice any difference compared to no encryption software) dcpp can do that which truecrypt cannot.
Several people/companies have higher requirements then be able to store a couple of documents that have to be stored in a specific location to be encrypted. With dcpp you don&#039;t have to think about where you store things and what is encrypted since everything is encrypted. There are a lot of traces in windows as well in temp folders, history and stuff like that you have to worry about with truecrypt. Also bitlocker as some started to talk about have some requirements that don’t suit everyone like unless you thought about encryption during the installation of Vista you cannot use bitlocker (at least not without lot of hassle). Bitlocker require a 2 GB partition that is unencrypted as well to be able to boot. Also the requirements for TPM and the fact that most people don&#039;t use Vista yet is something to think about. Dcpp can be applied after OS installation without any hassle, data loss or partition change and the whole disk can be encrypted. If serious errors should occur dcpp have recovery tools as well since normal repair tools cannot read the encrypted volume, but I been using dcpp for several years and it&#039;s very stable and never caused problems for me.
When someone start to talk about vmware/truecrypt for encryption that is just silly. Dcpp have almost no performance loss.....I wonder how fast your applications in a vmware image that is stored inside a encrypted truecrypt container will run. Also it would require a lot of ram on that computer and the stuff inside vmware will run very slow. Also some apps just don&#039;t work very well under vmware. This would be useless and it&#039;s no rocket science to understand that. Using vmware and truecrypt like described in a post here is one of the silliest suggestions I ever heard. Only idiots can compare this solution to dcpp.
Also when some talk about backdoors.....there is no existing proof that someone managed to break the disk encryption used by dcpp. Securstar even had a contest and offered $100000 if someone managed to break into a system using dcpp. No one managed to break it. There is no masterkey or hidden backdoor....this is just bs from some really paranoid fools that choose to not trust anything, love conspiracy theories and talk about things they don&#039;t know anything about. They have no proof of those silly statements and unless you can actually show some proofs you should keep the silly theory to yourself.
Dcpp have no internal masterkey, but have an optional masterkey that can be used. That optional masterkey is for IT departments if the user forgets the password so the data can be retrieved. Without that masterkey and forgotten user password the contents of the disk is lost. But this is optional to use and not a known internal static masterkey as some idiot here claim. The masterkey is basically just another user defined password for the IT department to use in addition to the user password that the user of the computer uses.
A company like securstar would never risk their reputation by creating a backdoor and such a backdoor would be a huge security hole that someone will find out how to use sooner or later.
Dcpp also got several other feature like central management, keylogger protection, brute-force protection and other stuff that make dcpp a very good encryption program that is known to be very secure by people that know what they talk about.
Truecrypt and vmware is nice products, but it&#039;s used for a different purpose. Before someone claim that dcpp is useless, got backdoors, cannot compare to truecrypt and other silly statements they should check the facts first and actually know something about the software.
For those that still don&#039;t understand why people could buy dcpp or similar products when truecrypt is free this is two products used for different purpose and has different features. If that is not possible to understand you shouldn&#039;t try to tell other people what software to use since that requires some knowledge you just don&#039;t have.
The usage of encryption software doesn&#039;t always have to do with paranoia. It&#039;s about securing your data and for a lot of companies it&#039;s critical to protect. Especially since that data is often stored on a laptop that could easily be stolen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people post when they have no idea what they talk about and why do people start to talk about vmware and truecrypt. Drivecrypt pluspack or dcpp is not the same as truecrypt at all. Truecrypt create containers and is NOT a full disk encryption program. If you want to store some documents that should be encrypted or want to hide some porn from your mom truecrypt is a nice program. If you need to encrypt everything and it should be transparent (you won&#8217;t notice any difference compared to no encryption software) dcpp can do that which truecrypt cannot.<br />
Several people/companies have higher requirements then be able to store a couple of documents that have to be stored in a specific location to be encrypted. With dcpp you don&#8217;t have to think about where you store things and what is encrypted since everything is encrypted. There are a lot of traces in windows as well in temp folders, history and stuff like that you have to worry about with truecrypt. Also bitlocker as some started to talk about have some requirements that don’t suit everyone like unless you thought about encryption during the installation of Vista you cannot use bitlocker (at least not without lot of hassle). Bitlocker require a 2 GB partition that is unencrypted as well to be able to boot. Also the requirements for TPM and the fact that most people don&#8217;t use Vista yet is something to think about. Dcpp can be applied after OS installation without any hassle, data loss or partition change and the whole disk can be encrypted. If serious errors should occur dcpp have recovery tools as well since normal repair tools cannot read the encrypted volume, but I been using dcpp for several years and it&#8217;s very stable and never caused problems for me.<br />
When someone start to talk about vmware/truecrypt for encryption that is just silly. Dcpp have almost no performance loss&#8230;..I wonder how fast your applications in a vmware image that is stored inside a encrypted truecrypt container will run. Also it would require a lot of ram on that computer and the stuff inside vmware will run very slow. Also some apps just don&#8217;t work very well under vmware. This would be useless and it&#8217;s no rocket science to understand that. Using vmware and truecrypt like described in a post here is one of the silliest suggestions I ever heard. Only idiots can compare this solution to dcpp.<br />
Also when some talk about backdoors&#8230;..there is no existing proof that someone managed to break the disk encryption used by dcpp. Securstar even had a contest and offered $100000 if someone managed to break into a system using dcpp. No one managed to break it. There is no masterkey or hidden backdoor&#8230;.this is just bs from some really paranoid fools that choose to not trust anything, love conspiracy theories and talk about things they don&#8217;t know anything about. They have no proof of those silly statements and unless you can actually show some proofs you should keep the silly theory to yourself.<br />
Dcpp have no internal masterkey, but have an optional masterkey that can be used. That optional masterkey is for IT departments if the user forgets the password so the data can be retrieved. Without that masterkey and forgotten user password the contents of the disk is lost. But this is optional to use and not a known internal static masterkey as some idiot here claim. The masterkey is basically just another user defined password for the IT department to use in addition to the user password that the user of the computer uses.<br />
A company like securstar would never risk their reputation by creating a backdoor and such a backdoor would be a huge security hole that someone will find out how to use sooner or later.<br />
Dcpp also got several other feature like central management, keylogger protection, brute-force protection and other stuff that make dcpp a very good encryption program that is known to be very secure by people that know what they talk about.<br />
Truecrypt and vmware is nice products, but it&#8217;s used for a different purpose. Before someone claim that dcpp is useless, got backdoors, cannot compare to truecrypt and other silly statements they should check the facts first and actually know something about the software.<br />
For those that still don&#8217;t understand why people could buy dcpp or similar products when truecrypt is free this is two products used for different purpose and has different features. If that is not possible to understand you shouldn&#8217;t try to tell other people what software to use since that requires some knowledge you just don&#8217;t have.<br />
The usage of encryption software doesn&#8217;t always have to do with paranoia. It&#8217;s about securing your data and for a lot of companies it&#8217;s critical to protect. Especially since that data is often stored on a laptop that could easily be stolen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-92910</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-92910</guid>
		<description>@ droblmenan

with default settings vmware saves some temp info in the temp-file of the main OS which may be enough to get you busted. This can easily be deactivated, but you first have to know about the issue. 
But appart from the lack of decent 3d Performance in the VM, the hole thing is in no way as comfortable as a sollution using tools like drivecrypt.

S

PS: If you are really paranoid you have to use PGP to encrypt the OS, since appart from some code of the installer everybody can dl their entire sourcecode (PGP is nearly as OS as Truecrypt)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ droblmenan</p>
<p>with default settings vmware saves some temp info in the temp-file of the main OS which may be enough to get you busted. This can easily be deactivated, but you first have to know about the issue.<br />
But appart from the lack of decent 3d Performance in the VM, the hole thing is in no way as comfortable as a sollution using tools like drivecrypt.</p>
<p>S</p>
<p>PS: If you are really paranoid you have to use PGP to encrypt the OS, since appart from some code of the installer everybody can dl their entire sourcecode (PGP is nearly as OS as Truecrypt)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droblmenan</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-92708</link>
		<dc:creator>droblmenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-92708</guid>
		<description>if your paranoid &amp; wanna encrypt the OS, use vmware and put the vmware virtual HD on a truecrypt partition,preferrably on your usb drive

and off you go.

ps, use truecrypt instead of this program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if your paranoid &amp; wanna encrypt the OS, use vmware and put the vmware virtual HD on a truecrypt partition,preferrably on your usb drive</p>
<p>and off you go.</p>
<p>ps, use truecrypt instead of this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lool</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-92657</link>
		<dc:creator>lool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-92657</guid>
		<description>how tell&#039;s u that there is a backdoor?
proof?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how tell&#8217;s u that there is a backdoor?<br />
proof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rami</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-92598</link>
		<dc:creator>Rami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-92598</guid>
		<description>its wrong that there is no backdoor.
the tool has an internal masterkey although its prohibited in several countries, cause of its nice encryption - but that masterkey suxxs. so, don&#039;t feel as secure as it wants you fell :)

the only nice aspect is the preBoot-Passwordprotection, when you have annoying little brothers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its wrong that there is no backdoor.<br />
the tool has an internal masterkey although its prohibited in several countries, cause of its nice encryption &#8211; but that masterkey suxxs. so, don&#8217;t feel as secure as it wants you fell <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>the only nice aspect is the preBoot-Passwordprotection, when you have annoying little brothers <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rico</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-92358</link>
		<dc:creator>rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-92358</guid>
		<description>Also a Truecrypt  fan. Have used it for 2 weeks and its working great. just mount and go.
Not sure about the OS though. I really dont need to encrypt my OS so never though about that.
Anyway i cant figure out how Vista is suppose to do it. When i go to the bitlocker it says i need to have 2 partitions and there are no programs in windows that can do it for me unless i reinstall i think which i dont want to do. Although i have 2 disks so if it was smart it could have encrypted C and put what it needs without encyption on D.
---------
One partition is for the operating system drive (typically drive C) that BitLocker will encrypt, and one is for the active partition, which must remain unencrypted to start the computer. The size of the active partition must be at least 1.5 gigabytes (GB).
---------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also a Truecrypt  fan. Have used it for 2 weeks and its working great. just mount and go.<br />
Not sure about the OS though. I really dont need to encrypt my OS so never though about that.<br />
Anyway i cant figure out how Vista is suppose to do it. When i go to the bitlocker it says i need to have 2 partitions and there are no programs in windows that can do it for me unless i reinstall i think which i dont want to do. Although i have 2 disks so if it was smart it could have encrypted C and put what it needs without encyption on D.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
One partition is for the operating system drive (typically drive C) that BitLocker will encrypt, and one is for the active partition, which must remain unencrypted to start the computer. The size of the active partition must be at least 1.5 gigabytes (GB).<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supertoke</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/comment-page-1/#comment-92328</link>
		<dc:creator>supertoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/securstar-drivecrypt-plus-pack-v390g-july-build-read-nfo-cracked-f4cg/#comment-92328</guid>
		<description>How the hell do you extract this, used winrar, no joy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the hell do you extract this, used winrar, no joy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
