Releaselog

Rumours: Microsoft Windows 7 in 2009

Microsoft Corp. has dropped two strong hints in the past two days that the next version of its Windows operating system will arrive in 2009, shaving up to a year off previous expectations. It could also be a signal that Microsoft intends to cut its losses with Windows Vista, which has been poorly received or shunned by customers, especially large companies. Microsoft has long said it wants to release Windows 7 about three years after Vista, which was released to manufacturing in November 2006 but not officially launched until January 2007. Given Microsoft’s recent track record – Vista arrived more than five years after XP — most outsiders had pegged sometime in 2010 as a safe bet for Windows 7’s arrival.

Microsoft is targeting the middle of next year for some sort of release milestone for Windows 7 — the only codename known at the moment — though whether that would be a final release to consumers or an RTM, which allows businesses and resellers to start installing it, is unknown. Gates also said that he was “super-enthused about what [Windows 7] will do in lots of ways” but didn’t elaborate. What could those be? Microsoft has divulged a few things. Responding to criticism that Windows has become unnecessarily bloated, the company has 200 engineers developing a slimmed-down kernel called MinWin that uses 100 files and 25MB, compared to Vista’s 5,000 files and 4GB core and is so small it lacks a graphical subsystem. Microsoft has also confirmed that the operating system will come in consumer and business versions and in 32-bit and 64-bit editions.

Source: Computer World

Comments (123)

Feel free to post your Rumours: Microsoft Windows 7 in 2009 torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
  1. dan
    April 7th, 2008 | 19:10

    sakuji
    April 7th, 2008 | 09:43
    Windows 7? Why 7?

    I mean, common windows usually include:

    1. Windows 3.1
    2. Windows 95
    3. Windows 98
    4. Windiws NT
    5. Windows 2k
    6. Windows ME
    7. Windows XP
    8. Windows Vista

    So even if you discount all the other OS’s, like 1.0 2.0 3.0, Server, CE, Mobile, and the 50+ types of vista/server/xp, MS should still at least be call it Windows 9 imo.
    —————–
    Dont worry Sakuji, the name will change five or six times between now and it’s official release date. Just remember…Vista started out being called “Longhorn”

  2. dan
    April 7th, 2008 | 19:14

    darkspirit
    April 7th, 2008 | 15:59
    its not called windows 7 guys. thats the 7th edition of windows to be released

    the codename is “black-comb” and the final product name
    will be “Vienna”
    —————————-
    You need to check with your source again darkspirit, my MS beta tester supervisor has stated that this will be called Windows Ultimate, not Windows Vienna. But then again that could change as well. You and the rest of us will know about a month before it hits the shelves, what MS has decided to call it.

  3. JonnyThunder
    April 7th, 2008 | 20:00

    OOoh, ok – so Windows Vista wasn’t as good as everyone expected. Just remember the team who brought you these fine products. Lets take a look back in history…. {insert dream sequence effect here}….

    Steve Balmer selling Windows 1.0 (ouch)
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=W6YgZc5th6g

    My personal favourite! (who said he was coked off his t*ts?)
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=EHCRimwRGLs

    Steve and his unhealthy love for developers…
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=oJLRwQMALT8

    And just for the hell of it, the classic live BSOD for Bill…
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=RgriTO8UHvs

  4. MelC
    April 7th, 2008 | 21:49

    Markuz, I don’t think very many people care tbh – for a start anything over 4gb of ram just won’t be utilised in a home setting so you wasted your time there. plus the overkill you have on your machine doesn’t help it play games back any better than other machines. nor does it help extend the life of your system, by the time games come out needing new hardware then your system will be as much use as a 386 with 256k onboard graphics. Your PC plays crysis at the same level as a PC that costs half the price – why would ANYONE be jealous of that?

  5. farket
    April 7th, 2008 | 22:51

    Same old song and dance

    When XP came out nobody was adopting it, especially companies because it was horrible garbage compared ot Win2K.

    At that time, they said they would boost the release of Longhorn (now named Sista)and everyne was happy that they were going to ditch XP, which they didn’t.

    So now, as expected, XP junkies ‘think’ XP rules the OS market and Vista sux. Same old story, not really worthy of discussion because we know it will all be changed news net week.

    For the people sighing relief, just because MS is talking about Win7, do you REALLY think a new OS from MS will make you happy? Even though you are joined at the hip to XP? Nah, you’ll just flame away and preach about how great XP is, what a joke. A world rife with hypocrisy.

  6. farket
    April 7th, 2008 | 23:01

    No they probably are NOT releasing Win7 in 2009.

    Microsoft recently addressed this rumour by saying they will be developing Windows 7 for 3 years, slating release for 2010 still, despite rumours to the contrary.

    “Microsoft : Windows 7 STILL in planning stage and will take approximately 3 years to develop.

    Contrary to all that is being said on the net, it clearly looks like Microsoft is NOT planning to release Windows 7 in 2009. Microsoft’s official response states that Windows 7 is still in the planning stage and will take approximately 3 years to develop. The following is the extract of the mail:

    Q. What is the expected timeline for the availability of Windows 7?

    A. We are currently in the planning stages for Windows 7 and expect it will take approximately 3 years to develop. The specific release date will be determined once the company meets its quality bar for release.

    Q. Is the schedule for Windows 7 being moved up due to poor Windows Vista sales?

    A. We’re not sharing additional information on Windows 7 at this time. However, we’re confident that many organizations are recognizing the value in Windows Vista. Of note, sales of Windows Vista licenses have now passed 100 million. In addition, Windows Vista is being adopted by businesses at a rate that is similar to past releases. In the business market there are early, mainstream and late adopters, with the majority of businesses falling into the category of mainstream. We’re seeing positive indicators that we’re already starting to move from the early adoption phase into the mainstream, and that more and more businesses are beginning their planning and deployment of Windows Vista.”

  7. LOL
    April 7th, 2008 | 23:45

    Bills super excited features. Vista with UAC disabled.

  8. ''3| Vandy''
    April 8th, 2008 | 04:05

    W0w ok a new OS for MS this is gonna be so f*cking ”awesome”, this is gonna be another Vista or just a sh*t? I hope it becomes a good OS…because the Vista OS is a sh*t, it’s so slow but XP OS is a good one…

  9. zhmus
    April 8th, 2008 | 09:23

    do you wnat to enjoy your life now?

    what do they do to relax theirselves?
    want to know,come here.ill show you what i search?
    look at the super star,listen some music,diy-t-shirt
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sfJhhN1rcA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V19SvSUYYOs

    http://www.diy-t-shirt.com

  10. genex3m
    April 8th, 2008 | 13:10

    # dan
    April 7th, 2008 | 02:36

    Yo, DWEEB! I am running a dual core 4GHz cpu with 3GB of memory and over 2 TB of hard drive space on my testing maching…and I could NOT get Vista to run correctly on it. Now since I have been testing programs longer then you have been out of diapers, you want to try to say that again?

    need i say more quys. a dweeb calling others a dweeb, and thinking he is been testing softwares longer than others. maybe he is been hiding in his test-a-software-fortress he lost touch with the rest of the world where intelligent ppl really exist. goodluck with ur 2TB

  11. dan
    April 9th, 2008 | 03:31

    #
    farket
    April 7th, 2008 | 23:01

    No they probably are NOT releasing Win7 in 2009.

    Microsoft recently addressed this rumour by saying they will be developing Windows 7 for 3 years, slating release for 2010 still, despite rumours to the contrary.

    “Microsoft : Windows 7 STILL in planning stage and will take approximately 3 years to develop.

    Contrary to all that is being said on the net, it clearly looks like Microsoft is NOT planning to release Windows 7 in 2009. Microsoft’s official response states that Windows 7 is still in the planning stage and will take approximately 3 years to develop. The following is the extract of the mail:

    Q. What is the expected timeline for the availability of Windows 7?

    A. We are currently in the planning stages for Windows 7 and expect it will take approximately 3 years to develop. The specific release date will be determined once the company meets its quality bar for release.

    Q. Is the schedule for Windows 7 being moved up due to poor Windows Vista sales?

    A. We’re not sharing additional information on Windows 7 at this time. However, we’re confident that many organizations are recognizing the value in Windows Vista. Of note, sales of Windows Vista licenses have now passed 100 million. In addition, Windows Vista is being adopted by businesses at a rate that is similar to past releases. In the business market there are early, mainstream and late adopters, with the majority of businesses falling into the category of mainstream. We’re seeing positive indicators that we’re already starting to move from the early adoption phase into the mainstream, and that more and more businesses are beginning their planning and deployment of Windows Vista.”
    ——————
    The reason they kicked it up was because of all the bad press VistaMe was getting and the cottage industry that sprang up removing VistaMe from new computers and replacing it with XP. Microsoft has taken a major bath on this and has spent more money trying to get people to accept this then they have made from sales.

    THAT is why you WILL see a new Microsoft OS next year.

  12. dan
    April 9th, 2008 | 03:42

    #
    genex3m
    April 8th, 2008 | 13:10

    # dan
    April 7th, 2008 | 02:36

    Yo, DWEEB! I am running a dual core 4GHz cpu with 3GB of memory and over 2 TB of hard drive space on my testing maching…and I could NOT get Vista to run correctly on it. Now since I have been testing programs longer then you have been out of diapers, you want to try to say that again?

    need i say more quys. a dweeb calling others a dweeb, and thinking he is been testing softwares longer than others. maybe he is been hiding in his test-a-software-fortress he lost touch with the rest of the world where intelligent ppl really exist. goodluck with ur 2TB
    ——————–
    Aww, whats wrong binky? mad because I have a better computer then you do? Most everyone here has a better computer then you do. I have beta tested every MS OS from 98 on…so when you say that you like any of them…you are thanking me and others like me. So go ahead and pop a blood vessel as if you are using a MS OS, I had a hand in creating it.

    And unless my math is pretty much gone, I suspect that my WD Caviar 400GB C drive and my 4 500GB WD hard drives do in fact equal over 2TB as I said. And add that to my 3GB of memory with a Sound Blaster X-FI audio card and my 3d graphics card with 256mb on board memory and my 4GHz dual core cpu with 1200 front side bus….does indeed whip your commodore computer to shame. Toss in my 18 to 20MBPS download business account from Road Runner that I get for $80 a month and we now see exactly how jealous you are of this machine. And Binky, I dont have the fastest one on this board as there are others that have faster machines then mine.

    So please go back and play on your commodore 64 that you got from goodwill and leave the rest of us with decent machines to talk with each other as it is way past your bedtime.

  13. moosh
    April 10th, 2008 | 09:40

    The official release date has been set to June 2010.
    can’t wait since windows 7 as its pretty much the same as vista with more to offer.

    windows FTW!

  14. TeSTNg
    April 11th, 2008 | 00:07

    Hardware has surpassed software 3 fold. Its time for a software revolution something different. Not just a normal boring O.S. Linux, windows(Cracked,never pay for s.h.i.t),Unix/all shells and Macz. All more or less the same, there must be 1000 different o.s’s all do the same.

    A boring GUI and run some programs………..

    In 10 years O.S’s will be no more. Mere Sub systems!!

  15. Strav
    April 11th, 2008 | 01:54

    Have now had Vista Ultimate 64bit for 6 months. Have not had a problem in the world. In my opinion, is more stable than xp ever wil be but yes, Vista does take up more resources and space.
    My machine:

    E6550 2.33ghz @ 1333 fsb
    2gb ram
    DSL gigabyte M/B
    250 g/b harddrive.

    Has not crshed once. Only qualm I have is that Creative have not written up new code for their X-Fi cards to run applications in 64 bit. They have the drivers but thats about it.

  16. saint
    April 11th, 2008 | 04:43

    #
    sakuji
    April 7th, 2008 | 09:43

    Windows 7? Why 7?

    I mean, common windows usually include:

    1. Windows 3.1
    2. Windows 95
    3. Windows 98
    4. Windiws NT
    5. Windows 2k
    6. Windows ME
    7. Windows XP
    8. Windows Vista

    So even if you discount all the other OS’s, like 1.0 2.0 3.0, Server, CE, Mobile, and the 50+ types of vista/server/xp, MS should still at least be call it Windows 9 imo.

    —–

    7 is going back to the original system numbering. counting 1,2,3 (3.1), i think 95 & 98 were 4, maybe nt too.. then XP is 5, and vista 6, now 7..

    this means it is “supposed” to be a different opertaing system, not a tweaked vista…well, as different as vista was from xp or xp from 98…you get the idea…

    —-

    and anyone saying that complaints about vista are due to bad hardware, is stupid.

    Microsoft doesn’t care about personal customers, so they don’t listen to our complaints. they listen to big businesses, who don;t buy vista, because it sucks.

    vista has horrible compatibility, all around. it’s not because it’s for next-gen, it’s because microsoft screwed up.

    I bought a $1000USD Acer laptop less than a month ago, and have already uninstalled vista for XP. I built my desktop and ran vista for 3 months(pirated) , thought the legit might be better, but no.

    Vista sucks. get over it.

  17. gman
    April 11th, 2008 | 09:00

    once you go mac you never go back.

  18. saint
    April 11th, 2008 | 14:38

    not true gman. I started on PCs 15 years ago, then went to make for 2-3 yrs, then back to pc.

    if you just want something that works. you get online, watch a movie, do work, and it works. no crashes, no problems. get a mac.

    now that sounds definitive. but mac is not as open as pc. software, hardware, and periphs’ that work on pc don’t work on mac. mac has few good gaes, and they always come out late.

    if you enjoy the scene, and you enjoy screwing around and learning more from your machine, you enjoy playing games, and aren’t SCARED of fixing a problem when it arises, go pc.

    games + expandability + software + hardware + perips + FUN = PC

    work + plainness + basic computer use + security = MAC

  19. Fatal Error
    May 21st, 2008 | 05:09

    @122 (saint)

    I believe you forgot Digital Rights Managment … so it should be work + plainess + basic computer use + security + your computer saying “no, sorry DRM isn’t going to let you do that” = MAC

    I used to swear by mac’s… now I hate them, I won’t go into the reasons as they are long and have been covered numerous times.

    I’d say “yay… another ms operating system” if I knew they werent going to embed DRM software into every possible aspect of the OS. Even now, Vista is riddled with drm restrictions. Hopefully in the future Microsoft and Apple will see the error of their ways pushing DRM software down every body’s throats. This is the only plus I have for Linux flavours… but other than that… Linux is slightly more stable than Windows XP/Vista and Mac X but you cant really do anything with it except run opensource programs (I have nothing against opensource.)

    But on the other hand… you can run alot of opensource programs on Windows as well as Mac… So for now I’ll stick with my XP pro boxes… and wait to see what microsoft will try with they’re new OS, maybe they’ll put it on a bit of a diet…..

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

Leave a reply