Releaselog

RoadRunner, the world fastest supercomputer

A US military supercomputer has broken the petaflop speed record by performing one thousand trillion calculations per second. The ‘Roadrunner’ machine was developed at the Los Alamos Laboratory and uses AMD Opteron chips and the Cell processors found in PlayStation games consoles. It will be used to model climate systems before being classified by the Army to work on nuclear explosion modelling. “We replace our high-performance supercomputers every four or five years,” said Andy White, leader of supercomputer development at Los Alamos.

“They become outdated in terms of speed, and the maintenance costs and failure rates get too high.” White explained that the use of two kinds of chips represents a revolution in supercomputing. ‘Roadrunner’ uses fewer than 20,000 processors while the next fastest computer, IBM’s Blue Gene/L, uses over 200,000 and runs at half the speed. The Los Alamos machine uses 7,000 multi-core Opteron processors and parses the data to 12,960 enhanced Cell processors using 57 miles of fibre-optic cabling. The device consumes three megawatts of power, enough to run 1,000 homes. Damn, can you imagine encoding a movie on such a machine? It would be done within few miliseconds. Warez scene dream. :)

Source: Vnunet

Comments (92)

Feel free to post your RoadRunner, the world fastest supercomputer torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. Pop006
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:05

    Yes, but can it run CRYSIS on full settings?

  2. name | email | Spam protection: Sum of X + Y ?
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:05

    i have this in my place! Don’t believe? Come and see with your very eyes!!!

    xD

  3. justa:G
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:07

    FU*K me thats power. i wander wat os they are using

  4. Jim Mcjim
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:08

    DOS4 most likely

  5. justa:G
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:09

    i run CRYSIS on full setting , i got a gtx8800 4 gb ram and xeon processor …. looks so sweat on my 40″ lcd on the wall

  6. your mom
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:09

    great. what’s the price?

  7. streetracerns
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:09

    OMG i want that :D

  8. your dad
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:10

    for 1,000,000 £ you can have it.

    cheap, isn’t it?

  9. Transcendent
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:14

    I doubt it’s that cheap.

  10. Bane
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:15

    i bet those supercomputers could completely destroy rlslog in a matter of seconds

  11. humdrum
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:17

    Wow design a car that gets 100 mpg and make it affordable then i will be impressed

  12. justa:G
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:19

    i did not pay tax too, so i saved a lot of money that way..computer is around £1000 not including hard disks lcd was £700 and CRYSIS….. well free; was download lol

  13. Shamalamadingdong
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:20

    What does it run on? Windows Millennium ?

  14. squeaky
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:23

    sample screenies dosent work :|

  15. Mitch Rapp
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:25

    lol @ 1 million euros…
    cell processors run at 100 bucks and opterons they use at 150

    add the racks, memory etc… you’re looking at 50+ million

    and the power bill must run them at a couple million a year

  16. mm23
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:26

    its an IBM machine, the built it for the US goverment, its will be used for national security and also such things as geology etc etc

  17. oddy
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:26

    Uhm… I don’t get it… Supercomputer… Isn’t it more or less “just” customized computer clusters?

    Anyway, lol @ justa:G

  18. HDpunk
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:38

    ha! take that Xbox

  19. anon
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:39

    woot AMD FTW…..

    where is your god now intel fanboys

  20. Modde
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:46

    I want one!

  21. Pro
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:47

    is there any video of this?

  22. Modsiw
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:47

    I want to play Age of Conan on that computer!

  23. Peter
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:50

    Probably AMD is so desperated that they gave those CPU’s for free to let everyone hear which company US chose hehe. Seriously, AMD Opteron might have something good that helps such big cluster work at highest efficiency. And THE CELL, it’s good CPU but hard to develop programs on it as it’s different “structure” than x86. Anyway i like such news in rlslog hehe

  24. xw0lf
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:50

    hey brainless kids…

    supercomputers is not for gaming, and games is not only matter nor only thing worth enough to buy best/fastest/highest_price computer…

    get a life, nerds…

    :)

  25. r1pper
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:53

    wonder how fast can it crack rar archive.

  26. intel
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:53

    lol at the AMD guy.. its not even a dispute anymore, intel is better. costs maybe 10% more for 30% more speed

  27. therapix
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:54

    I want to use that for my renders. :(

  28. therapix
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:55

    Oh BTW,

    WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'LIMIT 1' at line 1]
    SELECT ip FROM rls_democracyIP WHERE qid = 14 AND ip = LIMIT 1

  29. Tony
    June 9th, 2008 | 18:57

    What do they do with the ones they had been using?

  30. Lol_Gadaffi
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:06

    I want that in my basement.

  31. mbdc
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:06

    That Computer is for noobs!

    …Well isn’t that what everyone on here says about every computer going normally?:-)

  32. joop
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:08

    Stelletje mietjes ^^

  33. Lay-z-Boy
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:08

    <5 My system is a bit faster than yours by and cannot run Crysis maxed. I call bulls**t :)

  34. Pop006
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:14

    My school Laptop could run Crysis on max, but then again im in school for rendering alot of stuff and got a sick expensive lap top. Anyways i hope the next Xbox has processors like this, its the only way its going to get any hotter or louder then the 360….

  35. nsane
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:21

    @Martin – Encoding movies would require more than pure CPU power, each machine would need their own VPU(s) aswell. The largest of which is owned by Pixar and was built in 2003.

    http://www.hoise.com/primeur/03/articles/monthly/AE-PR-03-03-46.html
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetwilitekid/85940485/in/photostream/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetwilitekid/85940484/in/photostream/

    The machines, on top of the Xeons, have QUAD GeForce 8800 GTXs with a special OS to support them coded by Intel (was originally made by Sun). Now THAT thing would own for encoding. ;)

  36. kimochi
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:33

    I wonder how would MS Word run on these things.

  37. -PSZEMEK-
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:36

    Halo3 is definately better than that.

  38. cool
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:38

    lol…now thats a computer!

  39. blahhh
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:38

    @36 Or notepad for that matter :)

  40. snaggletooth
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:41

    Yeah yeah. One day that thing will be the size of a postage stamp. Happened before, will happen again 8)

  41. lmao
    June 9th, 2008 | 19:50

    @41 hahaha so true, give em 50 years and my fridge will be runnin on one of those

  42. vedon
    June 9th, 2008 | 20:05

    Anyone know if Circuit City has these in stock……..

  43. TheEnd187
    June 9th, 2008 | 20:15

    @34 you wish the next XboX to have a last generation processor? the CBE is already used in the PS3 and AMD opertons wouldn’t be ideal for Console use, however I hope the PS3 uses the next version of the Cell B roadband Engine which has more robust specs than the original CBE.

  44. Leroy Snape
    June 9th, 2008 | 20:31

    Yes, I know if Circuit City have these in stock……..

  45. Rapidshare is like Vista
    June 9th, 2008 | 20:31

    AMD Nuff said……. It must really suck!

  46. kriz
    June 9th, 2008 | 20:45

    Can we play Pong on that thing ?

  47. Dan
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:06

    Thats all fine and dandy, but can it run crysis?

  48. Jack_the_Ripper
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:21

    @25 or R1pper

    Wow, I feel like the incredible Hulk!,
    More Speed Captain MORE SPEED!
    ok too much speeed. STOP!!!!! I … CAN’T….
    TAKE….. IT!!!!!!!!!

    DONE: 8 multi Character Password cracked in less than a day

    Next Please

  49. Ken
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:25

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opteron

    AMD launched quad core Opteron chips on September 10th, 2007

    On the November 2007 TOP500 list, 15.8% of the world’s 500 fastest known supercomputer installations were AMD64 Opteron-based systems (down from 22.6% on 11/06), while 64.4% were Intel ia32e/EM64T/Intel 64 Xeon-based.

    Supercomputers based on Opteron mentioned in the top 10 fastest supercomputers in the world:

  50. MARC
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:28

    It runs on Red Hat.

  51. some1
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:29

    Stupid americans why would you need the biggest supper computer. This computer is pure ego why else would you take cheap hardware to build a cluster. There are way better and less power hungry chips in the world then AMD Opteron chips and Cell processors. And not just intel there is more in world then mainstream. Beacusse they use these rather cheap hardware componends they only prove this cluster is for a person with a big ego. C’mon people it’s 2008 quality is more important then quantity.

  52. Hmmz
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:41

    This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
    Result: Failed validation, 45 Errors

    BAD RLSLOG. BAD.

  53. Terrible one
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:44

    @11 I here that all this technology and were worried about nuclear bombs. What happens when I can’t afford to drive down the street…

  54. Paulo Falcao
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:52

    “can it run CRYSIS on full settings?”
    Everyone nows that the answer is… NO.
    Why? The directx software driver from DX10 or DX9 is damn slow, and only uses one core! So the the speed of Crysis full settings on that computer will be about 1 frame every 5 seconds…
    Sorry, this is reality….

  55. fredwest
    June 9th, 2008 | 21:59

    so where do i download a copy of this new supercomputer, any rapidshare links. :S
    but seriously im gonna start stealing peoples ps3’s and rob a few pc worlds for some INTEL’s and make an even more powerful one with a few less wires.

  56. what about
    June 9th, 2008 | 22:27

    Try opening a PDF with adobe and it still CRAWLS

  57. superaktieboy
    June 9th, 2008 | 22:46

    Skynet is born!

  58. Ondego
    June 9th, 2008 | 22:57

    You’re worried about running Crysis?!
    This is ‘War Games’ the live-real life-real time version. *points to description* See, where it says “Nuclear modelling”. I’d think that meant differently if not for “Army” instead of “Physicists”. Great, with commenting on RLSLog & my unpatriotic sentiments I see that laser satellite is turning towards my home. Goodbye cruel world! RIAA & SPA will be happy…

  59. J3ph_42
    June 9th, 2008 | 23:04

    Wow, I guess the ’scene’ can’t produce people who know anything about processors or operating systems.

  60. sybull
    June 9th, 2008 | 23:38

    I’ll wait until they dismantle it and AXXO re-builds it…..will be a lot smaller and better then…..

  61. indiglo
    June 10th, 2008 | 00:07

    ^^^ LOL !!! (All of it) Keep it Up Guys!

  62. jackketch
    June 10th, 2008 | 00:11

    #58

    superaktieboy
    June 9th, 2008 | 22:46

    Skynet is born!

    ————-

    Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner!

  63. name (required) email ( will not be shown ) (required) Spam protection: Sum of 1 + 9 ?
    June 10th, 2008 | 00:16

    how many latinos do they have to kill to build this computer?

  64. douchebag
    June 10th, 2008 | 00:22

    looks like my grandfathers print shop

  65. Old Commie Pinko Degenerate
    June 10th, 2008 | 00:28

    When this one gets redundant the boss takes it home to replace his furnace.
    Jeez imagine how hot 7000 amd chips all overheating at once is gonna be.

  66. Petabyte size torrents?
    June 10th, 2008 | 01:01

    Now that would make a great seedbox. :P

  67. Artifactz
    June 10th, 2008 | 01:23

    @ 61.sybull

    “I’ll wait until they dismantle it and AXXO re-builds it…..will be a lot smaller and better then…..”

    Thanx for the laugh.:)

    On another note, what OS the ‘Roadrunner’ runs on and is that compatible with Crysis. I mean really various OS version that take full power of hardware and code written for them. Ranging from firmware,bios,FSB,HyperTransport (1,1.1,2,3), Chipset (ATI, NIVDIA, INTEL, AMD, REALTEK,ETC…) too. Thats the questions i would ask. lol

    But anywayz thanx sybull. You made me laugh:)

  68. OneQuick
    June 10th, 2008 | 01:34

    Will this work with a Mac?

  69. QuickReply
    June 10th, 2008 | 01:49

    It probably doesn’t run on any operating system its probably all custom build and internal. I have a friend that hires out supercomputing to private firms and the fact is all the run are dummy terminals. So if anything it will run Linux or a customised version of Linux.

  70. Titan
    June 10th, 2008 | 01:51

    lol @ 60.sybull

  71. beaver eater
    June 10th, 2008 | 02:16

    WOW ill have to have a wank now.

  72. m0
    June 10th, 2008 | 02:34

    Honestly I think that in the current socio-economic climate that this is wasteful. I think that if technology wasn’t (firstly) repressed by government(s) for the sake of our/others “security”, and also limited by the potential for capital gain….that we would have clean/renewable energy, and technology would be a lot farther along- but alas capitalism/government holds us back.

    IE- they could have wireless technology FAR beyond what it is now…but the FCC (whom is influenced by big business and who else knows) won’t free up the frequencies without lengthy arguments/petitioning…therefore delaying the inevitable reality of free phone calls with de-centralized P2P-type technology. Thats just a small example (maybe not the best even, but I hope you get my point)

  73. AlexCull
    June 10th, 2008 | 03:31

    Not worth it, can’t get max FPS on Putt Putt Adevntures.

  74. lumberg
    June 10th, 2008 | 04:03

    can it crack 1028 bit encryption? I bet thats what its intended goal is……

  75. nighthawk
    June 10th, 2008 | 04:42

    @74

    that will depend on which encryption algorithm was used in the first place.

    “The ‘Roadrunner’ machine was developed at the Los Alamos Laboratory and uses AMD Opteron chips” – yay for AMD!

  76. SuperComputer
    June 10th, 2008 | 05:10

    India’s got the world’s fourth fastest Supercomputer (http://www.megaleecher.net/Indian_SuperComputer) clocking at 117.9 TFlop/s, I guess it should be now on fifth place.

  77. dinosors
    June 10th, 2008 | 06:52

    nuclear explosion modelling
    Just imagine Nagasaki modeled in 3D and imagine the power of the computer to calculate how much time the last tree will be exploded by the nuclear reaction, the tree next to the motorcycle ;) just WOW……………..
    but why they need to model that and spend all this money… maybe this supercomputer will take care of managing the microchip that US government want to implement in each citizen s body so you don’t need a passport or a credit card or cash with you….
    this US government’s really crazy more than the hollywood movies show it :D

  78. pussfilledwelts
    June 10th, 2008 | 07:20

    XP SP3 kicks its ass!!!

  79. M
    June 10th, 2008 | 08:13

    My guess is that it runs on XP 64-bit.

    But come on! You guys that make those supercomputers, check out new GPU’s next time. Here you have an article to check:
    http://www.digi.no/php/art.php?id=773884 (Norwegian)
    http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digi.no%2Fphp%2Fart.php%3Fid%3D773884&hl=no&ie=UTF8&sl=auto&tl=en (translated to English)

  80. Mr D
    June 10th, 2008 | 10:28

    well i want it,but i don’t think i got the income to support such a beast,,i can confirm it CAN run crysis on full setting,as they are using the cry engine to do the nuclear explosion modelling believe it or not.

    http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/227807.html

  81. favor
    June 10th, 2008 | 13:30

    sadly marcelli was in charge of the maths algo for the nuke simulation and the supercomputer gave the answer as 22.5%

  82. Alexander
    June 10th, 2008 | 14:59

    Wow! Nuclear bombs……..they have no other things to do than make nuclear bomb simulation.
    How about they give us some other simulation than war sims.

  83. xBradx
    June 10th, 2008 | 16:16

    I’d like to overclock one. =\

  84. Kenny
    June 10th, 2008 | 21:34

    Wow, how excellent. So now they can run benchmark tests on it all day. Hope they put in a nice Graphics cards.

  85. NYC
    June 10th, 2008 | 22:02

    according to wikipedia, it cost $133 million and runs Red Hat Linux

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Roadrunner

  86. J3ph_42
    June 11th, 2008 | 01:48

    The wiki link surprised me, I was sure it would be running a clustering OS, either one of the existing ones, or a proprietary one, not RedHat.

  87. mammothman
    June 11th, 2008 | 01:57

    Its times like these that make me a proud employee of the big blue.

  88. Jack
    June 11th, 2008 | 03:31

    Hand that machine to Microsoft. They’ll develop a new bloatware application that will make the machine crawl.

    MS Office 2009 !!

  89. DLW
    June 11th, 2008 | 04:18

    In ten years it will be on Ebay for $5.99 Buy It Now! Can’t wait!

  90. the speller
    June 11th, 2008 | 06:22

    LOL @5! Does it look so sweat that it makes you sweet? And yeah isn’t there a better application for this than a nuke? Weather modeling is fine, but come on. No need for a nuke model. Here’s the outcome modeled by me…nuke=death.

  91. Ryan
    June 13th, 2008 | 07:39

    Folding @ home already beat 1 petaflop of calculations like a year ago.

    “In early May, 2008 the project attained a sustained performance level higher than two petaFLOPS, again being the first computing system of any kind to do so.” >> Wikipedia

    So a community open source project has beaten the US military supercomputer. By the way not just beaten it, F@H does 2x as many calculations. Thats impressive.

    pfft supercomputer, why waste all that money. The US military could have spent the money on developing their own client to just run on all government/military PCs and im sure they could have beaten their own supercomputer. Plus it would have be much cheaper then changing supercomputers every 3-4years. What a waste of US dollars.

  92. Korvis
    June 13th, 2008 | 17:10

    The scene totally needs to hijack this.

Leave a reply