RLSLOG’s Hottest Chick Competition: Results
The idea of our latest competition spurred a bit of drama in comments, when many people didn’t realize we did it just for pure fun. Anyway, the 3-day competition for 3 Rapidshare Premium accounts is now over and I bring you the results: three (actually four) hottests RLSLOG chicks! The amount of entries wasn’t that high after all so we won’t make the public poll and vote about the results – we will reward 3 clearly best competitors who submitted a real pictures before the official deadline.
There were few of you who sent us awesome pictures but without the RLSLOG tag or after the deadline so we couldn’t count that. I had the best laugh over the pics from a guy who sent some compromising photos of his exgirlfriend, who cheated on him, but I will rather keep this private. Anyway, authors of these 3 pictures will be emailed the prize, courtesy of iX! Big thanks to everyone.
Winner #1 (”JB”, pro photo models + bonus pic)
Winner #2 (”Mo”)
Winner #3 (”MalaPlava”)
Comments(186)
You know number 3, I love RLSLOG too
VERY NICE!
What happened to that guy that said you were being sexist and demanded a male category?
I love Photoshop
Good choices, I like these pictures, a lot ! Keep doing this great competition stuff
Best of a Bad Bunch?
Ya know, number 2 is photoshopped, not nearly convincingly either.
Nice bum tho
I gotta give props to seanb for the funny but cheap humor.
Well, Martin. This is a pretty new low for you. And not to mention if this is the kind of results we get from chicks who read rlslog I might have to actually BUY movies. jk. Maybe that was too harsh.
Wait where are the hot girls?
JB JB JB JB JB JB JB JB
I LOVE D:
i had no idea we could find pictures off the internet and then use one of our favorite tools such as paint shop pro or photoshop. if i’d known that i would have entered the contest ha
all obviously photoshopped
Winner #1 i loved
pls give me msn
Number 3’s name is probably Frank..
well to all non believing nerds – all of these pictures included a proof they are not photoshopped as i mentioned in the original post so calm down, grab your dick and doubleclick.
Only the third pic looks convincing. The first two are so photoshopped it isn’t funny. The second definitely as others have pointed out.
didn’t know it was a photoshop contest
Martin obviously made them all strip nude before they were allowed to win, shame on you non believers.
no girls on the internet
number 3
didnt know rlslog catered to shemale pop. piss off
holler
Well, Martin. It seems that you had a fap-fest, huh.
3rd chick is hideous (probably just a bad head angle tho)
oh well, nice but
google+photoshop sounds more like it
what’s the proof, saw them irl?
i guess not
gg anyway
What? I thought we would get to vote! So much for a benign dictatorship…
Martin: I would like to see other proofs.
1. Looks kind of authentic but the white piece of paper is to easy to shoop on.
2. Heart is too intense in its colour. Contrast is pretty much off too.
3. Too sharp – printed text is too easy to photoshop.
Believe me, I’ve shopped too much stuff to take those seriously. Of course I might be wrong but those are my bets – all three aren’t real.
The only one that looks photoshoped is #3 due to the print on the paper she is holding up.
I would like to hear why so many instantly say the other two are photoshoped without even giving a reason for thinking that.
The first picture even has another pic with the same handwritten sign and I sure cant see any artefacts etc…
Is a pity was no poll.
I sent my entry unfortunately a hour after the closing deadline.
I share my gf’s entry as i know how curious people are about what pics were entered.
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?0cf7aa7d6e.jpg
photoshop ftw!
Just so you know i did number 2 and yes the heart was photoshopped, only cos in real life it was more pink than red so i just made it a bit more red, if you want me to prove it and shut you up, i can send the original in
Martim:
“all of these pictures included a proof they are not photoshopped as i mentioned in the original post)”
Well show em then, cos you can clearly see the dark patch on photo 1, where they have removed whatever the piece of paper actually said!!!!
This is sooo bull, I actually think your lying Martin, and I call you on it!!
P.s… photo 2 is also fake (look at the heart) and 3 is just… well… wrong
Fake, Fake…
I”ll wait for aXXo release of this news article thank you very much. ^_^.
Rolleyes!! Rolleyes!! Rolleyes!!
@30
Look closer at the two #1 pictures, you can see where the paper has been folded in both pictures.
I agree on the #2 picture, but then again, it was not shot with a great camera so the colour red might just stick out more then other colours
Personally, i think the task of photoshoping a picture is far more tedious than actually just asking you girlfriend to pose
… Yes some nerds actually have made contact with woman-kind.
How do we know #2’s not a dude?
I kinda don’t believe no.1 is real… Number 2 is photoshopped, no doubt bout it… no.3 is totally REAL. That is certain truth
But no.1, well, It looked ‘I love rlslog’ is a real paper, but the girls, well… HOW THE HELL DID THE GUY PHOTOGRAPH THEM FOR A SITE^?
FUC*IN’ AMAZING
FREAKIN’ REAL DUDE!
I couldn’t believe it… but the guy is my friend. He told me that the girls are both his girlfriends…
Hmm…it seems only SOME people are allowed to make fun of the way #3 looks.
The earlier comments about her fug are still there but there was like 15 posts that were just deleted and half of them made fun of her.
look at the copyright at the bottm ov pic 1
Wow i really hate to see the loosers because none of those girls even make me look twice =/
oh well
dumb competition… mingers all round.
Ok…
Number 3: Thats just scary… I ain’t even gonna touch that one.
Number 2: Is soo photoshop *CheckOut theHeart on it* i feel sorry for the dude that sent it in… Now thats one lonely guy… damn!.
and Number1: Your telling me this is the best you could have gotten. 2 Crack Whores playing with eachother while a desperate dude with a camera takes some shots and tells them he’s buying first lines after the shoot if they hold up the sign. THATS AMAZING!
Zssiiro Poants
@jpt
“HOW THE HELL DID THE GUY PHOTOGRAPH THEM FOR A SITE?”
He probably asked them, some people have no problems talking to girls.
theese girls are hot a hot mess that is what a bunch of crackheads!!!!!!
If I write “I <3 RLSLOG” on my schlong, can I win something?
yes pic no.1 has copyright in right corner… pfff
Right click number one – image properties
File change date and time: 2008:11:12 13:53:25
Image input equipment model: Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Right click number two –
File change date and time: 2008:11:11 14:21:58
Image input equipment model: K800i
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
sorry but martin you only have to open the photos up in photoshop and zoom in and can clearly see the “shopping” on two of those “original photos” 1 is 50/50 but id say real.
Pic. No. 3 (Mala Plava)
Mala plava je greza, i ima male cice.
Mala plava is so ugly, and she have small tits.
http://www.gimp.org/
“proof they havent been photoshopped” lmfao! clearly you have no idea! totally stupid comp,totally stupid prizes and made rlslog the laughing stock into the bargain.
now you compound that by showing your inability to spot “shopped” pics!
girl on the left side of photo #1 is great… couldn’t care any less for the other girls/woman (in the last pic)
So long RLSLOG.
Scared another custome away.
So people on rslog only have tacky, cheap slutty girlfriends?
Or is that just what the jury likes?
all 3 are photoshopped.
if you zoom in close enough on 1 & 3 you can see artifacts on each writing, and if you zoom in close the brush tool is easily seen in number 2.
so lame, and lazily photoshopped too.
come on then martin-explain the comment @45 if you have PROOF theyve not been shopped.
laughable!
Well I’m pretty shure that nr.3 isnt fake. Her nickname is malaplava (croatian mala=little, plava=blue (as in hair)
I have lost my mokkori Power!! Black is uncool!!
Kaori where are you ??
O.K. I would like to thank the girl (winner #3) with the “I love rlslog” (written on her butt) for advertising that she has v.d. I mean imagine if everybody with “vd” made sure to tattoo it downstairs, your messing around the time comes you take of the pants and then a bam.. plain as day the vd tattoo preferably in that new glow in the dark ink they have now .Then if you catch something it’s your own fault for not taking precautions so we dont have any way to not know they are infected. And yes I did realiize that it is a smiley face but given the circumstances it could just as easily be the truth right? anyways it started as a joke but I think I am on to something here, I mean if it is in that new glow in the dark ink its not able to be seen in daylight and if you put it down below on someone the only people to see it would be those who are getting to the point that they could be infected rightas a sidenote No I don’t have v.d. I just get off on a rant and can’t stop sometimes
The girl in the 1st pic one on left looks like the bird from knight rider series,hmmmmmmmmmm
@45: it was obviously photoshoped to add the logo at the bottom. use brain.
ok-my final visit to this once great site-the site owner is actually prepared to post calling people nerds for pointing out that these are shopped and then claims he has proof that they are not when doing a simple properties check on the pics give the game away.
add to this the fact that we are being denied DOZENS of decent releases by his refusal to post non scene rips.
im outta here!
the second one is a guy! And the third one is a russian whore! The first one is nice ^^
What’s so hard to believe? It’s easy in CA to find a couple girls holding something for free…in fact I know a girl that has no prob holding my c*ck while I snap away. No photoshop needed you geeks. Get away from your pc and find a girl instead of criticizing others. Stupid asses
Oh gosh! Please, real or not… they are top notch Mingers mate with makeup (PS or not)! (or my standards are way too high in comparison!) I would seriously question first if they were anything to look at, before considering if the text was real or not. Only the girl in front on picture one is shagable! Even then.. just saying I would not throw her out of bed, at least not until I am done! =)
Seriously, you gave us the rules of the competition, you made your choices (not allowing us any say in the vote) and you told us you have PROOF that the photos are real, many people here are complaining that they have been cheated, so why not just post that ‘proof’ and be done with it?
@Martin
Provide us with an original then.
if you have to touch up a photo of someone its meaningless
You said no photoshop was to be used
as a chick it degrades the site. All the pics showing are all about sex. I feel like you think all thats on this site are 13 yr old boys.
@64 Robert Scott Gerity Jr
Prove it! Add me on yahoo: jlodahoe
and show me proof
Nuked for fakeness!
26. Mrquiteaguy: Gene Simmons called, he wants his hair back.
#1 is extremely hot… Where can i meet girls like them?
a beginners guide to destroying a once great site.
1.run a stupid competition,ignore the fact that over 90 percent of replies are negative,publish the results claiming to have proof that the entries are not photoshopped and then post calling your own readers nerds when they point out how blindingly obvious the shop jobs are.
2.refuse to post anything by ths/stg/lynks etc ,even tho they are the only people releasing current cinema movies at the moment,thus depriving your readers of dozens of downloads.
3.just simply refuse to contemplate ever that you are actually wrong and offer your loyal readers an apology for cheating them on a competition.
remember when all those former staff members left claiming this site was too much of a one man band and they felt undervalued? remember the site owner said they were all lying? who you believe now?
#2 is a shop if you cant see that i think you need glasses look above the S you can see a line were it was shoped colors dont line up and neather does the thong
nice nice , just when did this happed ?
Excuse me while I gouge my eyeballs out of my head.
Proofs:
1. Fake
2. Fake
3. Fake (look the “L” letters they are all completly the same, not possible)
To brookstein:
Well said mate. I believe them more over Martin. I bet he had these things and keep doing these things that are pissing us off which pissed them off.
In my opinion this way to show gf started with the good intention, (showing real women, but I think… the final results were not the best.-
Not saying that they have not been photoshopped, but just because they have USED photoshop doesn’t necessarily mean they have added the text. They could have been using it to resize the picture. I know I use photoshop to resize pictures and not alter them, it’s just easier that way for me especially when the size from the camera is huge. So just because it say’s it has been edited in photoshop does NOT mean that they actually have.
But yeah I’d like to see this proof about them not being photoshopped.
scam. the #3 aka MalaPlava wich means “Little Blond” on Serbian, is fake as the day is long. Also, crap. And I’m drunk, which means what i’m writing is sincere :]
We demand a recount! :]
kk, bb!
#1 looks extremely photoshopped, but congrats nonetheless
dam where r the HOT gurls?????
#78
thats true but that wont explain why when you zoom in to the photos theres obvious manipulation of the image,
seriously martin whats the proof?
This is all just stupid…
Martin isn’t going to ‘prove’ the photos are real, cos he can’t, probably arn’t even any RS accounts to give away.
He won’t apologise to anyone cos all he cares (and has ever cared about) is the bucks.
People have complained so loudly about the adds on this site (yes most of us don’t see them) but Martin does nothing because he makes A FORTUNE off his advertising.
This site is full of stupid pointless posts designed purely to amass large numbers of comments and return visits to check said comments (for advertising bucks)
This comp was a farce to begin with and this site is eclipsed in speed of posts, quality non scene posts and general decency by
w w w . z e r 0 s 3 c . w s
Goodbye
i´m with brookstein & with to brookstein on this one, everyday i log on to this site i feel it´s been a waste of time, and this feeling is coming often, way to often, i´m even thinking about deleting it from my Favs…
I MISS THE OLD STAFF!!!!
#3 is a Russian whore. I guess we can get back to dozens of crap tv posts now huh Martin you c0cksucker?
damn #3 is ruff!
Some people do have serious issues here.
What does photoshop mean? If you just crop your picture, or change the contrast, is that photoshop? So it make sense when they are modified with photoshop, it’s the most used picture-program in the world. Or do we have to use paint for such things. What will the comments be for that? “You painted it”?
The first pic is absolutely the best, and why does everybody doubt if the pics are real? Not all the people here are students or whatever. As you can see above the pictures, the author has a studio (pro foto models), so if you have to take pictures from a model for a magazine, why don’t make some pictures with the “I love rlslog” on it.
There are just to many wankers on here, with to much time.
right zero sec looks good, one bookmark added, one removed…
fake fake fake what happend to a pic with rlslog up on screen in the back ground as prof
and i think they have all been faked just to show that this comp and site is failing
dspro
@82
I was not denying that they are most likely photoshopped. I was saying that people basising it solely on the fact they were edited in photoshop are just being dumb.
grime. 2 is a defo fake btw ( im a graphic designer ) 3 looks fairly real. 1 dunno could swing both ways.
i guess martin has gone to sleep so we don’t have to worry about our posts being deleted for a while.
this site has gone to pot… i miss the old days when it was a start-up.
i stand behind my argument that piracy for profit is an evil thing and i hope martin’s profiteering catches up to him one day.
i still visit because of nostalgia – but this site is absolutely gone to pot.
finally – this competition sums it all up.
how sad martin that you couldn’t even put up three real entries and had to resort to this load of bull.
check #1 – the paper where it says rlslog is not only photoshop “white” but the poor git who did it forgot to edit it so there is an extra pixel on the edge of the paper – looks like it is bigger.
the other two… well just no point to comment really – one is 2-D writing on a 3-D ass… good job… and the other must have a calligraphy major for a boyfriend… since it all looks so perfect.
you sad sad KUNT… what have you done to our website… it belongs to all of us… hope the money you earn from this goes towards treating your wife’s terminal illness…
they all have been faked to show this comp and site is failing?
thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard linking a Possibly faked picture with the downfall of a website youre bias against… youre problably one of the schmucks from scene (stealers) source
#2 is a guy #3 is a tranny
Martin I hope you get testicular cancer you punk f4ggot!
YOU PEOPLE NEED TO GET A LIFE. OH ITS PHOTOSHOPPED ITS FAKE ITS FAKE. GET A LIFE YOU F—— COMPUTER NERDS.
BE MEN. HAVE A LOOK AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE. THIS WASNT CREATED SO EVERYONE CAN SAY ITS FAKE.
NONE OF YOU GUYS HAVE PROBABLY SEEN DAYLIGHT IN A WHILE LET ALONE A GIRL. SERIOUSLY I HAVE NEVER SEEN SO MANY COMMENTS ON THIS SITE BEFORE.
Martin, you shoulda made this “the ugliest chick competition”.
That way it would be a win win situation.
Bothers my mind why you would pick number 2 and 3, both hideous creatures. Number 1 to the right looks like a man.
these birds are dog ugly where did u get them they look like trannies i feel dirty now im goin for a shower
who judged the comp? mr blobby cos that is some real mooses right there
What about a best MANISTON Competition?
Users get Jennifer Maniston to write rlslog on her face and then post the picture here.
The best picture wins an autographed picture of Angelina Jolie!
Here is my entry:
http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/1561/rlsmanistongq1.jpg
Number 1 is nuked for photoshop, I’ll wait for proper.
Wow, #3 leads me to believe there must have been some real howlers entered in this sh%& comp
nice photoshoping for 1st =P
i thought this was a hottest chick and not
cheapest crack-hooker(#3)/
photoshop(#1)/
guys posing as girls to get free rapidshare premium account (#2)
competition!
Torrent of all submitted entries PLOXXX!!!111!!
I was interested in the first photo of the 2 chicks.
Then I was more interested. . .
Then even more interested. . .
Then CRAZY interested. . .
Then, all of a sudden, not so interested anymore.
what’s up with nr. 3…it’s not Christmas yet…
bloody aweful! doesnt anyone have a hot girlfriend?
they should ATLEAST fotoshoped hot girls,
cum on rlslog staff
couldn’t find any better looking girls???
The paper in picture 3 is obviously a print. Nobody said it had to be handwritten. So calm down, all you would-be photshop experts who can judge based on a highly compressed low-resolution jpg.
ok i agree with #1 winning but think #2 is ok nd #3 looks like a dude
What a lousy competition, not even a member vote to decide the winners. Anyway, you cant really expect any good pictures coming in by offering such cheap prizes.
Heres a great contest, Martin-slit your own throat and have the blood run down a box thats drawn like a football field. Then we can all wager on how far the blood will trickle down! Awesome right? Winner gets a free 1Kb RS download of their choice!
What is with all the prudes on RLSLOG? I mean, I know this isn’t 4chan or anything, but wow! Are 50% of the people commenting evangelical christians and the other 50% fundamentalist muslims??
The ethics of internet pirates constantly astound me.
is there a link to see the entries, i’d so like to see the rest for a laugh.
or was the 3 winners the only entries?
:/
2ND PIC :- WHAT A ASS!!!!!!!!!!!
2nd is the ass of a guy, the other two were photoshopped
Who cares if they’re photoshopped or not, the point is all 3 aren’t great, but my vote goes to #1 for this round I guess.
hey, how about a link of all the contestants. i would like to see who the runners up were.
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Iam done with this site.
This stupid thing was the last straw for me.
Found this site about 5 months ago, it was good, made it my homepage, unfortunately all good things come to an end.
Anyone have links to new site under better management?
all ugly
Well you competition attracted the entries it deserves. Take that however you want…
Not Hot. SLUTTY!
@120 dsd
Yes. Looks like z e r o s e c.ws and s c n s r c.net are doing a good job so far. Like this site used to be. Usefull comments without all the bs. I used to love this site too. Did you guys really have to downgrade your web hosting plan? It takes forever to get to page 2.
no 1, without a doubt!
some of these comments are so dumb thats all i got to say :\
you guys are idiots. The first picture is of some mannequins posed to look real . If you can’t tell that right of the bat, u need to be shot. Look at the hands. watch the movie also, Man not one of you got that at all. Totally gullible, you guys must not have had lots of experience with women. Look at the skin tone, and that isn’t just a filter being used. The third is obviously a tranny. So it only leaves #2.
@127 i hope you are kidding. those are not mannequins… YOU must not have had lots of experience with women.
I sent a pic of my schlong with “I love RLSLog” on it… it didn’t end up on the site, wth.
Everyone just right click on each pic and click on image properties and read software used. It clearly states photoshop.
Proof there Real! Heres the originals before any photoshop.
Number 1 the same nothing we didn’t just don’t want to think about.
http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num1th7.jpg
Maybe a litte bit of cropping in number 2.
http://img519.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num3ds1.jpg
No surprises in number 3!
http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num2ea1.jpg
So there!, RLSLogs is as real as it gets!
LOVE LOVE number 1… good choice MARTIN!!!
Messed up my post edit.
Proof there Real! Heres the originals before any photoshop.
Number 1 the same! nothing we didn’t know already, just don’t want to think about:
http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num1th7.jpg
Maybe a (little) bit of cropping in number 2.
http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num2ea1.jpg
No surprises in number 3!
http://img519.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num3ds1.jpg
So there!, RLSLogs is as real as it gets!
We could use more photos from #2
@133
Funniest thing I’ve read in days.
.
MINGERS
.
Who posted the MalaPlava picture? I gues he is sortof a “neighbour”, becouse I live in the same part of tje world
WARNING!! NUMBER 2 IS A GUY!!!!
i reckon number 1 is fake becoz of the papers’ edge doesnt match up/crooked. and number three becoz the head looks WAAAY too big for the body and the angle doesnt seem right. and with the second im not too sure, but i think it might as well be shopped like the rest.
@133 Christchild
you rule
@ 133 christchild
dude,
i laughed so hard i think i peed a little.
!!!!
http://www.jb-models.com
Number 3 is a BLOKE!!!!
Look at the hands amd how the head is positioned so we can’t see it’s adams apple…
Also note the cross legged, I bet if that he-she uncrossed them a massive dong would flop down!
Nice to know that wankey little coksucka Martin (sssh, not his real name incidentally) is not only a sad little perv, but can’t spot a shoop to save his life!!!!!!
Perhaps time that the loser’s dox were dropped to the chans?
Run the contents again and make the girls have to hold a sign in one hand while throwing up a specific hand sign ( an R in sign language or something ) so we know its real…
Plus, these girls aint fly anyways.. Where was the votes?
#3 looks like a dude.
No rapidshare to give away. Average girls. Photoshopped. Traffic generation.
hm where are the hot girls?
Number 3 looks like my parents dog.
@143: nice digging, the rest of the shoot will be available there in a couple of days…
Confirmed…everyone who visits rlslog is a nerd if that’s the best girlfriends they can get. Most likely their sisters
*dualing banjo’s*
Messed up my post edit.
Proof there Real! Heres the originals before any photoshop.
Number 1 the same! nothing we didn’t know already, just don’t want to think about:
http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num1th7.jpg
Maybe a (little) bit of cropping in number 2.
http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num2ea1.jpg
No surprises in number 3!
http://img519.imageshack.us/my.php?image=num3ds1.jpg
So there!, RLSLogs is as real as it gets!
MAN YOU ARE AMAZING… THANKS FOR A FEW REAL LAUGHS!!!
I WANTED TO SUGGEST A COMPETITION FOR EDITING THESE PHOTOS TO DEATH>>> BUT YOU WIN THE PRIZE FROM THE START
GREAT JOB MATEY
UUUUGGGGGHHHHH this is the best???? 3 makes me gag, blackeye’d crack ho!
#2 is martin trying to add in fill cuz he only got two people that actually sent in pics. so his shemale az$ dont count.
#1 left is alright but borderline and the one beside her -> ur a gagger too.
images are photo’d no doubt.
rlslog doesnt have one fokable chick I see, unless you like martin’s ass for #2 and bag his face.
yay, what a great idea this competition is, a real highpoint in the history of rlslog! now let’s have a “Hottest Dude Competition”. looking forward to see lot’s of hunks in front of their laptops…
Hi Martin,
Ignore the haters man, as far as competitions go it was amusing! I am willing to bet that most of the people who post negatives have lots of girlfriends, albiet all with the surname .jpg
You run a good site, with quality contributors and it stays up!
Keep up the good work and ignore the hatemongers.
In fact, I bet Martin ran this just to have some fapping material. He won’t let us see the rest of the pics due to the fact they’re all eiher underage or mingers. I mean seriously, these three were the best? Two photoshopped pics and a shemale?
how the hell could those “girls” win a competition? oh i know why, maybe because they were the only 3 contesters… even then they shouldnt win… i cant believe this sh*t
I find it hard to believe those are the prettiest girls you got sent, rlslog…
Waiting for the dvd rip.
SERIOUSLY? NUMBER 3?
There must have been hotter girls than her. There just must have been. She is awful.
Congrats on 1 & 2 though. Very good.
Can’t believe anyone would think any of these gorgeous ladies would be hideous. What’s wrong some of you!?!
Shame #2 wasn’t more in focus and showing her face. Cute bum though
Here’s the original and unphotoshopped image:
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/5474/dsc00143rb0.jpg
And the proof that I’m real, as requested by the rules:
http://img356.imageshack.us/img356/5744/dsc00146hj3.jpg
Apologies for the naff blurriness
My flatmate wrote I <3 RLSLOG and drew the face on.
I think the entry # 3 is a barbie doll of someone’s little sister. Look at the hair and face, they sure look like a mannequin but perhaps it is mannequins or barbie doll. Or could this be a life size doll for lonely dudes?
#3 makes me vomit.
jesus they were all ugly looking women
is third picture man or woman
?
“SceneSource – We don’t want to see your girlfriends naked”
AMEN!
What happened to the rest of the pictures that aren’t “winners”, the whole gallery? Could we see it?
Fake. No girls on the interwebs.
all photo shopped I bet…the only convincing one is the 2nd one…but even that one looks like a male’s backside so it shouldnt count..:))
torrent plz?
3 fake pictures, …. GRRRReat
You can tell in pic 3 he’s using his left hand to keep his c0ck and balls from slipping out.
#66: True.
How embarassing. What an idiot thought of this competition?
What a weak pile o’ crap. Keep it up, you guys. You’ll have no one left to read your site. Too bad, too – RLS used to be good…
show us the rest u tight *^£!E”
i wonder when no 3 waxes is it back sack and crack? or just the tache?
all fake and photoshoped, RLSLOG staff = losers
2 and 3 are guys, and where is this so called proof any of the pics are real…??? they all looked like photoshop has been used on them and pretty badly too.
Its funny, cause everyone is saying these chicks are ugly but none of none of them culd get a girl half as decent as this.
Really?? these are the hottest chicks!!! the first although not a bad shot is jus to 18yr nasty chicks… the second come on! lame… and the third looks like a hooker you can get on the f’n street… booooooooo
All hail the hypocritical irony of RSLOG comments flaming over media being legit or not.
yes, we all want proofs
photoshop galore. 3 obviously. 1 looks doubtful. 2 may be real or not, for all i care (someone said he did it and did recolour in photoshop, but doesn’t really matter since its pretty crappy).
but that’s not the point – what happened to this site? it used to feature good scene release. now its just about the adbucks. sickening, really.
sorry, Martin, i used to be against the haters, but now im one of them. this site is so completely irrelevant now… too many posts, too much crap. full marks for making the money, but as of now, im out. there’s plenty of other (better) places for scene releases.
this is the straw that broke the camel’s back. and god knows ive defended you for a long time, while watching the site get worse and worse. there used to be a community here, what happened? it ends here – goodbye rlslog.
After reading martin say “Just plain fun”, is there any further doubt that Martin is a 10 year old looking for pics to add to his circlejerk collection?
Martin (and Mr X, R.I.P.) are quite possibly THE single most re7@rded bunch to ever go on the internet.
File properties says that photshop saved the images therefore they have been digitally modified so you CANT say that they havent been photoshoped.
Proof from pics.
PICTURE 1:
Orientation of image: 1
File changed date and time: 2008:11:12 12:54:51
Image input equipment manufacturer: Canon
Image input equipment model: Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Person who created the image: unknown
Exposure time: 0.008
F number: 4.5
Exposure program: 3
ISO speed rating: 400
Shutter speed: 6.96578
Aperture: 4.33985
Exposure bias: -1
Metering mode: 5
Flash: 16
Lens focal length: 33
Focal plane X resolution: 3954.23
Focal plane Y resolution: 3958.76
Focal plane resolution unit: 2
Custom rendered: 0
Exposure mode: 0
White balance: 0
Scene capture type: 0
PICTURE 2:
Orientation of image: 1
File changed date and time: 2008:11:11 14:21:58
Image input equipment manufacturer: Sony Ericsson
Image input equipment model: K800i
Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
Exposure time: 0.125
F number: 2.8
ISO speed rating: 500
Exposure bias: 0
Metering mode: 3
Light source: 0
Flash: 16
Custom rendered: 0
Exposure mode: 0
White balance: 0
Digital zoom ratio: 1.2
Scene capture type: 0
Subject distance range: 2
Are those best chicks you got? If so, close competition immediately.