Comments (186)

1. RS Love
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:39

   You know number 3, I love RLSLOG too

2. seanb
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:40

   VERY NICE!

   What happened to that guy that said you were being sexist and demanded a male category?

3. sceptic
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:41

   I love Photoshop

4. HRUDKA
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:42

   Good choices, I like these pictures, a lot ! Keep doing this great competition stuff

5. okok
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:44

   Best of a Bad Bunch?

6. Jason
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:46

   Ya know, number 2 is photoshopped, not nearly convincingly either.

   Nice bum tho

7. Malcolm f(x)
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:46

   I gotta give props to seanb for the funny but cheap humor.

   Well, Martin. This is a pretty new low for you. And not to mention if this is the kind of results we get from chicks who read rlslog I might have to actually BUY movies. jk. Maybe that was too harsh.

8. Sven
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:47

   Wait where are the hot girls?

9. MdkUS
   November 13th, 2008 | 21:47

   JB JB JB JB JB JB JB JB

   I LOVE D:

10. tim
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:48

    i had no idea we could find pictures off the internet and then use one of our favorite tools such as paint shop pro or photoshop. if i’d known that i would have entered the contest ha

11. miscz
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:50

    all obviously photoshopped

12. woww
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:50

    Winner #1 i loved pls give me msn

13. doh
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:50

    Number 3’s name is probably Frank..

14. Martin
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:50

    well to all non believing nerds – all of these pictures included a proof they are not photoshopped as i mentioned in the original post so calm down, grab your dick and doubleclick.

15. ed
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:51

    Only the third pic looks convincing. The first two are so photoshopped it isn’t funny. The second definitely as others have pointed out.

16. stimpie
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:51

    didn’t know it was a photoshop contest

17. Matt
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:54

    Martin obviously made them all strip nude before they were allowed to win, shame on you non believers.

18. umm
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:54

    no girls on the internet

19. chinwe
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:58

    number 3
    didnt know rlslog catered to shemale pop. piss off
    holler

20. killPIE
    November 13th, 2008 | 21:58

    Well, Martin. It seems that you had a fap-fest, huh.

21. Perry
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:00

    3rd chick is hideous (probably just a bad head angle tho)

22. Redvex
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:01

    oh well, nice but
    google+photoshop sounds more like it
    what’s the proof, saw them irl?
    i guess not

    gg anyway

23. Xhoodlum
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:05

    What? I thought we would get to vote! So much for a benign dictatorship…

24. miscz
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:08

    Martin: I would like to see other proofs.

    1. Looks kind of authentic but the white piece of paper is to easy to shoop on.
    2. Heart is too intense in its colour. Contrast is pretty much off too.
    3. Too sharp – printed text is too easy to photoshop.

    Believe me, I’ve shopped too much stuff to take those seriously. Of course I might be wrong but those are my bets – all three aren’t real.

25. olv
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:09

    The only one that looks photoshoped is #3 due to the print on the paper she is holding up.

    I would like to hear why so many instantly say the other two are photoshoped without even giving a reason for thinking that.

    The first picture even has another pic with the same handwritten sign and I sure cant see any artefacts etc…

26. Mrquiteaguy
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:10

    Is a pity was no poll.
    I sent my entry unfortunately a hour after the closing deadline.
    I share my gf’s entry as i know how curious people are about what pics were entered.

    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?0cf7aa7d6e.jpg

27. Kwanto
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:10

    photoshop ftw!

28. The Mo
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:12

    Just so you know i did number 2 and yes the heart was photoshopped, only cos in real life it was more pink than red so i just made it a bit more red, if you want me to prove it and shut you up, i can send the original in

29. Nope nope
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:12

    Martim:

    “all of these pictures included a proof they are not photoshopped as i mentioned in the original post)”

    Well show em then, cos you can clearly see the dark patch on photo 1, where they have removed whatever the piece of paper actually said!!!!

    This is sooo bull, I actually think your lying Martin, and I call you on it!!

    P.s… photo 2 is also fake (look at the heart) and 3 is just… well… wrong

30. Bane
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:16

    Fake, Fake…
    I”ll wait for aXXo release of this news article thank you very much. ^_^.

    Rolleyes!! Rolleyes!! Rolleyes!!

31. olv
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:17

    @30

    Look closer at the two #1 pictures, you can see where the paper has been folded in both pictures.

    I agree on the #2 picture, but then again, it was not shot with a great camera so the colour red might just stick out more then other colours

    Personally, i think the task of photoshoping a picture is far more tedious than actually just asking you girlfriend to pose … Yes some nerds actually have made contact with woman-kind.

32. MattD
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:17

    How do we know #2’s not a dude?

33. jpt
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:23

    I kinda don’t believe no.1 is real… Number 2 is photoshopped, no doubt bout it… no.3 is totally REAL. That is certain truth

    But no.1, well, It looked ‘I love rlslog’ is a real paper, but the girls, well… HOW THE HELL DID THE GUY PHOTOGRAPH THEM FOR A SITE^?

    FUC*IN’ AMAZING

34. bb
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:27

    FREAKIN’ REAL DUDE!

    I couldn’t believe it… but the guy is my friend. He told me that the girls are both his girlfriends…

35. Josh
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:27

    Hmm…it seems only SOME people are allowed to make fun of the way #3 looks.

    The earlier comments about her fug are still there but there was like 15 posts that were just deleted and half of them made fun of her.

36. stoner
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:28

    look at the copyright at the bottm ov pic 1

37. zepski
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:30

    Wow i really hate to see the loosers because none of those girls even make me look twice =/

    oh well

38. Chav
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:31

    dumb competition… mingers all round.

39. K
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:31

    Ok…

    Number 3: Thats just scary… I ain’t even gonna touch that one.

    Number 2: Is soo photoshop *CheckOut theHeart on it* i feel sorry for the dude that sent it in… Now thats one lonely guy… damn!.

    and Number1: Your telling me this is the best you could have gotten. 2 Crack Whores playing with eachother while a desperate dude with a camera takes some shots and tells them he’s buying first lines after the shoot if they hold up the sign. THATS AMAZING!

40. porno
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:32

    Zssiiro Poants

    )

41. ros
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:34

    @jpt

    “HOW THE HELL DID THE GUY PHOTOGRAPH THEM FOR A SITE?”

    He probably asked them, some people have no problems talking to girls.

42. marty
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:35

    theese girls are hot a hot mess that is what a bunch of crackheads!!!!!!

43. Zohan
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:37

    If I write “I <3 RLSLOG” on my schlong, can I win something?

44. phatprick
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:37

    yes pic no.1 has copyright in right corner… pfff

45. radphire
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:37

    Right click number one – image properties

    File change date and time: 2008:11:12 13:53:25
    Image input equipment model: Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
    Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows

    Right click number two –

    File change date and time: 2008:11:11 14:21:58
    Image input equipment model: K800i
    Software used: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows

46. bupkis
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:38

    sorry but martin you only have to open the photos up in photoshop and zoom in and can clearly see the “shopping” on two of those “original photos” 1 is 50/50 but id say real.

47. Cane
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:39

    Pic. No. 3 (Mala Plava)
    Mala plava je greza, i ima male cice.

    Mala plava is so ugly, and she have small tits.

48. me
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:40

    http://www.gimp.org/

49. trollop
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:40

    “proof they havent been photoshopped” lmfao! clearly you have no idea! totally stupid comp,totally stupid prizes and made rlslog the laughing stock into the bargain.

    now you compound that by showing your inability to spot “shopped” pics!

50. none
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:41

    girl on the left side of photo #1 is great… couldn’t care any less for the other girls/woman (in the last pic)

51. wuerg
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:44

    So long RLSLOG.

    Scared another custome away.

52. adriennesis
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:46

    So people on rslog only have tacky, cheap slutty girlfriends?
    Or is that just what the jury likes?

53. Obamaa is a prophet
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:46

    all 3 are photoshopped.

    if you zoom in close enough on 1 & 3 you can see artifacts on each writing, and if you zoom in close the brush tool is easily seen in number 2.

    so lame, and lazily photoshopped too.

54. woofwoof
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:47

    come on then martin-explain the comment @45 if you have PROOF theyve not been shopped.

    laughable!

55. duke4e
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:48

    Well I’m pretty shure that nr.3 isnt fake. Her nickname is malaplava (croatian mala=little, plava=blue (as in hair)

56. Mokkori_King
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:49

    I have lost my mokkori Power!! Black is uncool!!

    Kaori where are you ??

57. S.M.
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:50

    O.K. I would like to thank the girl (winner #3) with the “I love rlslog” (written on her butt) for advertising that she has v.d. I mean imagine if everybody with “vd” made sure to tattoo it downstairs, your messing around the time comes you take of the pants and then a bam.. plain as day the vd tattoo preferably in that new glow in the dark ink they have now .Then if you catch something it’s your own fault for not taking precautions so we dont have any way to not know they are infected. And yes I did realiize that it is a smiley face but given the circumstances it could just as easily be the truth right? anyways it started as a joke but I think I am on to something here, I mean if it is in that new glow in the dark ink its not able to be seen in daylight and if you put it down below on someone the only people to see it would be those who are getting to the point that they could be infected rightas a sidenote No I don’t have v.d. I just get off on a rant and can’t stop sometimes

58. memmeem
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:50

    The girl in the 1st pic one on left looks like the bird from knight rider series,hmmmmmmmmmm

59. Martin
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:50

    @45: it was obviously photoshoped to add the logo at the bottom. use brain.

60. ffs!
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:53

    ok-my final visit to this once great site-the site owner is actually prepared to post calling people nerds for pointing out that these are shopped and then claims he has proof that they are not when doing a simple properties check on the pics give the game away.

    add to this the fact that we are being denied DOZENS of decent releases by his refusal to post non scene rips.

    im outta here!

61. dude
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:54

    the second one is a guy! And the third one is a russian whore! The first one is nice ^^

62. Robert Scott Gerity Jr.
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:56

    What’s so hard to believe? It’s easy in CA to find a couple girls holding something for free…in fact I know a girl that has no prob holding my c*ck while I snap away. No photoshop needed you geeks. Get away from your pc and find a girl instead of criticizing others. Stupid asses

63. Jasonix
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:56

    Oh gosh! Please, real or not… they are top notch Mingers mate with makeup (PS or not)! (or my standards are way too high in comparison!) I would seriously question first if they were anything to look at, before considering if the text was real or not. Only the girl in front on picture one is shagable! Even then.. just saying I would not throw her out of bed, at least not until I am done! =)

64. Jimmbo
    November 13th, 2008 | 22:57

    Seriously, you gave us the rules of the competition, you made your choices (not allowing us any say in the vote) and you told us you have PROOF that the photos are real, many people here are complaining that they have been cheated, so why not just post that ‘proof’ and be done with it?

65. radphire
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:01

    @Martin

    Provide us with an original then.

    if you have to touch up a photo of someone its meaningless

    You said no photoshop was to be used

66. Unfortunate
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:03

    as a chick it degrades the site. All the pics showing are all about sex. I feel like you think all thats on this site are 13 yr old boys.

67. Sarah
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:07

    @64 Robert Scott Gerity Jr

    Prove it! Add me on yahoo: jlodahoe

    and show me proof

68. vish
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:08

    Nuked for fakeness!

69. Kakkoii
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:09

    26. Mrquiteaguy: Gene Simmons called, he wants his hair back.

70. Raven
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:10

    #1 is extremely hot… Where can i meet girls like them?

71. brookstein
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:11

    a beginners guide to destroying a once great site.

    1.run a stupid competition,ignore the fact that over 90 percent of replies are negative,publish the results claiming to have proof that the entries are not photoshopped and then post calling your own readers nerds when they point out how blindingly obvious the shop jobs are.

    2.refuse to post anything by ths/stg/lynks etc ,even tho they are the only people releasing current cinema movies at the moment,thus depriving your readers of dozens of downloads.

    3.just simply refuse to contemplate ever that you are actually wrong and offer your loyal readers an apology for cheating them on a competition.

    remember when all those former staff members left claiming this site was too much of a one man band and they felt undervalued? remember the site owner said they were all lying? who you believe now?

72. Nixon
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:12

    #2 is a shop if you cant see that i think you need glasses look above the S you can see a line were it was shoped colors dont line up and neather does the thong

73. UnKnown
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:13

    nice nice , just when did this happed ?

74. HATER
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:14

    Excuse me while I gouge my eyeballs out of my head.

75. black_rider
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:14

    Proofs:

    1. Fake
    2. Fake
    3. Fake (look the “L” letters they are all completly the same, not possible)

76. To brookstein
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:17

    To brookstein:

    Well said mate. I believe them more over Martin. I bet he had these things and keep doing these things that are pissing us off which pissed them off.

77. thisgirl
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:20

    In my opinion this way to show gf started with the good intention, (showing real women, but I think… the final results were not the best.-

78. slash101
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:24

    Not saying that they have not been photoshopped, but just because they have USED photoshop doesn’t necessarily mean they have added the text. They could have been using it to resize the picture. I know I use photoshop to resize pictures and not alter them, it’s just easier that way for me especially when the size from the camera is huge. So just because it say’s it has been edited in photoshop does NOT mean that they actually have.

    But yeah I’d like to see this proof about them not being photoshopped.

79. mochol
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:26

    scam. the #3 aka MalaPlava wich means “Little Blond” on Serbian, is fake as the day is long. Also, crap. And I’m drunk, which means what i’m writing is sincere :]

    We demand a recount! :]

    kk, bb!

80. 421
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:26

    #1 looks extremely photoshopped, but congrats nonetheless

81. shadow_la05
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:27

    dam where r the HOT gurls?????

82. bupkis
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:29

    #78
    thats true but that wont explain why when you zoom in to the photos theres obvious manipulation of the image,

    seriously martin whats the proof?

83. Frankounrlslogian
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:29

    This is all just stupid…

    Martin isn’t going to ‘prove’ the photos are real, cos he can’t, probably arn’t even any RS accounts to give away.
    He won’t apologise to anyone cos all he cares (and has ever cared about) is the bucks.
    People have complained so loudly about the adds on this site (yes most of us don’t see them) but Martin does nothing because he makes A FORTUNE off his advertising.
    This site is full of stupid pointless posts designed purely to amass large numbers of comments and return visits to check said comments (for advertising bucks)
    This comp was a farce to begin with and this site is eclipsed in speed of posts, quality non scene posts and general decency by
    w w w . z e r 0 s 3 c . w s

    Goodbye

84. Azalin
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:30

    i´m with brookstein & with to brookstein on this one, everyday i log on to this site i feel it´s been a waste of time, and this feeling is coming often, way to often, i´m even thinking about deleting it from my Favs…
    I MISS THE OLD STAFF!!!!

85. jiggaboo
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:34

    #3 is a Russian whore. I guess we can get back to dozens of crap tv posts now huh Martin you c0cksucker?

86. Al
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:34

    damn #3 is ruff!

87. Pieter
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:36

    Some people do have serious issues here.

    What does photoshop mean? If you just crop your picture, or change the contrast, is that photoshop? So it make sense when they are modified with photoshop, it’s the most used picture-program in the world. Or do we have to use paint for such things. What will the comments be for that? “You painted it”?

    The first pic is absolutely the best, and why does everybody doubt if the pics are real? Not all the people here are students or whatever. As you can see above the pictures, the author has a studio (pro foto models), so if you have to take pictures from a model for a magazine, why don’t make some pictures with the “I love rlslog” on it.

    There are just to many wankers on here, with to much time.

88. bye
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:39

    right zero sec looks good, one bookmark added, one removed…

89. dspro
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:40

    fake fake fake what happend to a pic with rlslog up on screen in the back ground as prof
    and i think they have all been faked just to show that this comp and site is failing

    dspro

90. slash101
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:43

    @82

    I was not denying that they are most likely photoshopped. I was saying that people basising it solely on the fact they were edited in photoshop are just being dumb.

91. adam
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:44

    grime. 2 is a defo fake btw ( im a graphic designer ) 3 looks fairly real. 1 dunno could swing both ways.

92. aladin
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:44

    i guess martin has gone to sleep so we don’t have to worry about our posts being deleted for a while.

    this site has gone to pot… i miss the old days when it was a start-up.

    i stand behind my argument that piracy for profit is an evil thing and i hope martin’s profiteering catches up to him one day.

    i still visit because of nostalgia – but this site is absolutely gone to pot.

    finally – this competition sums it all up.

    how sad martin that you couldn’t even put up three real entries and had to resort to this load of bull.

    check #1 – the paper where it says rlslog is not only photoshop “white” but the poor git who did it forgot to edit it so there is an extra pixel on the edge of the paper – looks like it is bigger.

    the other two… well just no point to comment really – one is 2-D writing on a 3-D ass… good job… and the other must have a calligraphy major for a boyfriend… since it all looks so perfect.

    you sad sad KUNT… what have you done to our website… it belongs to all of us… hope the money you earn from this goes towards treating your wife’s terminal illness…

93. steve
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:47

    they all have been faked to show this comp and site is failing?

    thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard linking a Possibly faked picture with the downfall of a website youre bias against… youre problably one of the schmucks from scene (stealers) source

94. duped
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:48

    #2 is a guy #3 is a tranny

95. jiggaboo
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:50

    Martin I hope you get testicular cancer you punk f4ggot!

96. afanatic
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:52

    YOU PEOPLE NEED TO GET A LIFE. OH ITS PHOTOSHOPPED ITS FAKE ITS FAKE. GET A LIFE YOU F—— COMPUTER NERDS.

    BE MEN. HAVE A LOOK AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE. THIS WASNT CREATED SO EVERYONE CAN SAY ITS FAKE.

    NONE OF YOU GUYS HAVE PROBABLY SEEN DAYLIGHT IN A WHILE LET ALONE A GIRL. SERIOUSLY I HAVE NEVER SEEN SO MANY COMMENTS ON THIS SITE BEFORE.

97. random
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:54

    Martin, you shoulda made this “the ugliest chick competition”.

    That way it would be a win win situation.

    Bothers my mind why you would pick number 2 and 3, both hideous creatures. Number 1 to the right looks like a man.

98. liverpoolphil
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:54

    these birds are dog ugly where did u get them they look like trannies i feel dirty now im goin for a shower

99. BlackMass
    November 13th, 2008 | 23:56

    who judged the comp? mr blobby cos that is some real mooses right there

100. Josh
     November 14th, 2008 | 00:03

     What about a best MANISTON Competition?

     Users get Jennifer Maniston to write rlslog on her face and then post the picture here.

     The best picture wins an autographed picture of Angelina Jolie!

     Here is my entry:
     http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/1561/rlsmanistongq1.jpg

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply