Comments on: RLSLOG on new servers! http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/ Hot info about new scene releases! Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:12:58 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: cynthiahootoo http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-1179986 cynthiahootoo Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:14:35 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-1179986 http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4230-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15214.html http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4330-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15213.html http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4530-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15215.html http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4930g-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15216.html http://www.hootoo.com/acer-mp07a23u46981-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15217.html http://www.hootoo.com/acer-pk130470200-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15218.html http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4230-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15214.html
http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4330-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15213.html
http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4530-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15215.html
http://www.hootoo.com/acer-aspire-4930g-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15216.html
http://www.hootoo.com/acer-mp07a23u46981-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15217.html
http://www.hootoo.com/acer-pk130470200-laptop-keyboard-matte-p-15218.html

]]> By: Zen http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-639324 Zen Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:55:32 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-639324 sites flying today :) sites flying today :)

]]> By: Joe http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-636990 Joe Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:35:36 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-636990 Might want to consider raid drive setup. With a high traffic site like this, if the drive goes bad it will take hours to put in a new one. with raid one can go bad and the site keeps chumming. But the real issue isn't how strong the servers are, it's wordpress lol. It's not very good for thousands of articles. I have a wordpress site with 50,000 articles and it's slower than molasses on a quadcore 8gb ram server. Might want to consider raid drive setup. With a high traffic site like this, if the drive goes bad it will take hours to put in a new one. with raid one can go bad and the site keeps chumming.

But the real issue isn't how strong the servers are, it's wordpress lol. It's not very good for thousands of articles. I have a wordpress site with 50,000 articles and it's slower than molasses on a quadcore 8gb ram server.

]]> By: Mr.Curious http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-634214 Mr.Curious Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:15:26 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-634214 More nfo! :P What kind of mobo are your servers using? (Would also be interesting to know what chassis you are using, if you have redundant psu's etc.) ** Do you store entire articles in the sql-database? How large is your SQL-database? Would be nice with some SAS-drives for the SQL-server, too bad its so expensive. ;| (Would be cool if you could load the newest additions to the SQL-database to the RAM(since the whole database would be to large), and move it to the HDD when it gets for example over one week old... (Damn, I'm smart..)) But, really not even software-mirroring. *afraid* :O More nfo! :P What kind of mobo are your servers using? (Would also be interesting to know what chassis you are using, if you have redundant psu's etc.) **

Do you store entire articles in the sql-database? How large is your SQL-database?

Would be nice with some SAS-drives for the SQL-server, too bad its so expensive. ;| (Would be cool if you could load the newest additions to the SQL-database to the RAM(since the whole database would be to large), and move it to the HDD when it gets for example over one week old… (Damn, I'm smart..))

But, really not even software-mirroring. *afraid* :O

]]> By: onehappynegro http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-632653 onehappynegro Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:03:37 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-632653 if you're from ghana and have low bandwith don't complain about speed issues downloading pictures here. turn off picture downloading and only load the ones you need to see. if you're from ghana and have low bandwith don't complain about speed issues downloading pictures here. turn off picture downloading and only load the ones you need to see.

]]> By: Nils http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631485 Nils Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:29:09 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631485 Quite a setup for a small site like this. Quite a setup for a small site like this.

]]> By: im http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631463 im Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:34:59 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631463 what are u talking guys i have 6MB DL link and i have about 1-2sec load time what are u talking guys i have 6MB DL link and
i have about 1-2sec load time

]]> By: jamie http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631460 jamie Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:27:21 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631460 5 secs max to load page, what u lot talking about? 5 secs max to load page, what u lot talking about?

]]> By: STIG http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631430 STIG Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:11:32 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631430 Congratulations - many thanks for the ongoing service!!! Congratulations – many thanks for the ongoing service!!!

]]> By: sammy232 http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631422 sammy232 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:00:23 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631422 im in Asia the site is much faster.. just use firefox+addblock+no script.. everythings gonna be fine.. peaqce! im in Asia

the site is much faster..

just use firefox+addblock+no script..

everythings gonna be fine..
peaqce!

]]> By: william http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631408 william Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:27:09 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631408 Site is slower than before. 1.5mb line! US Site is slower than before. 1.5mb line! US

]]> By: switchPitch http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631397 switchPitch Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:12:08 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631397 Where did all the Aplication posts go? I NEED APP POST!!! These days there are only TV Show posts :( I Mean, ecery1 knows when their TV show will hit the bay. love AppFreak Where did all the Aplication posts go?

I NEED APP POST!!!

These days there are only TV Show posts :(
I Mean, ecery1 knows when their TV show will hit the bay.

love AppFreak

]]> By: thrawn http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631384 thrawn Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:00:30 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631384 speed is good from germany (32mbit cable) stripe set SCSI should be standard by now... speed is good from germany (32mbit cable)
stripe set SCSI should be standard by now…

]]> By: anon http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631287 anon Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:49:39 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631287 A good website/blogsite takes the onus off it's editors staff etc by utilising good methods and built-in functions to handle and optimise where necessary all submitted content A good website/blogsite takes the onus off it's editors staff etc by utilising good methods and built-in functions to handle and optimise where necessary all submitted content

]]> By: Mr. Perv http://www.rlslog.net/rlslog-on-new-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-631284 Mr. Perv Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:45:03 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=29952#comment-631284 My only complaint is about the loading of images. I don't reside in the US or any other first world country and so my bandwidth is limited to less than 1 Mbps. This should be enough for browsing, but your editors don't seem to care about <strong>optimizing</strong> and <strong>proper linking</strong> of images. As a result, my experience (user experience) browsing through your site diminishes over time mainly due to those images not loading or taking too much time to load. I propose that the site owner at least hold a conference to its editors and its upcoming editors on how to optimize and place or hotlink images properly. Photoshop's "Save for Web" feature should be a good start. I hope editors would take the extra effort of optimizing and double-checking their linked images. My only complaint is about the loading of images. I don't reside in the US or any other first world country and so my bandwidth is limited to less than 1 Mbps. This should be enough for browsing, but your editors don't seem to care about <strong>optimizing</strong> and <strong>proper linking</strong> of images. As a result, my experience (user experience) browsing through your site diminishes over time mainly due to those images not loading or taking too much time to load.

I propose that the site owner at least hold a conference to its editors and its upcoming editors on how to optimize and place or hotlink images properly. Photoshop's "Save for Web" feature should be a good start.

I hope editors would take the extra effort of optimizing and double-checking their linked images.

]]>