Comments on: Richard Dawkins The Enemies Of Reason Parts 1 & 2 DVDRip XviD-NOsegmenT http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/ Hot info about new scene releases! Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:24:42 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Andrew http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-521994 Andrew Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:17:14 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-521994 Here's a torrent: http://www.mininova.org/tor/1963549 Here’s a torrent:

http://www.mininova.org/tor/1963549

]]> By: timepassman http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-516110 timepassman Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:16:50 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-516110 faster torrent :D http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4028152/Answers_for__God_believers__Collection_for_Atheists faster torrent :D

http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4028152/Answers_for__God_believers__Collection_for_Atheists

]]> By: Max Payne http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-514217 Max Payne Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:43:52 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-514217 # TheReDnBlack1 October 23rd, 2008 | 16:21 What a painfull death he will have. --------- Maybe you'll have one too Enjoy your delusion Great series, had the Google tv rips on my pc for a while #
TheReDnBlack1
October 23rd, 2008 | 16:21

What a painfull death he will have.

———

Maybe you’ll have one too

Enjoy your delusion

Great series, had the Google tv rips on my pc for a while

]]> By: yeahhim http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-513541 yeahhim Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:10:37 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-513541 read half of the god delusion, it was so padded with quotes it was painful read half of the god delusion, it was so padded with quotes it was painful

]]> By: Tim L http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-513382 Tim L Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:23:50 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-513382 Throughout human history, as our species has faced the frightening, terrorizing fact that we do not know who we are, or where we are going in this ocean of chaos, it has been the authorities, the political, the religious, the educational authorities who attempted to comfort us by giving us order, rules, regulations, informing, forming in our minds their view of reality. To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform yourself. Think for yourself... Question authority. Throughout human history, as our species has faced the frightening, terrorizing fact that we do not know who we are, or where we are going in this ocean of chaos, it has been the authorities, the political, the religious, the educational authorities who attempted to comfort us by giving us order, rules, regulations, informing, forming in our minds their view of reality. To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform yourself.

Think for yourself… Question authority.

]]> By: whateva http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-512989 whateva Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:56:39 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-512989 @36 Boohoo. We're not 'printing' anything! This is the net. Go back to fairy studies @36 Boohoo. We’re not ‘printing’ anything! This is the net. Go back to fairy studies

]]> By: Casa.addams http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-512686 Casa.addams Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:33:03 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-512686 Richard.Dawkins.The.Enemies.Of.Reason.Part.2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT: http://rapidshare.com/files/157125090/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part1.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/157130708/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part2.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/157135719/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part3.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/157138487/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part4.rar No Pass Richard.Dawkins.The.Enemies.Of.Reason.Part.2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT:

http://rapidshare.com/files/157125090/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/157130708/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/157135719/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/157138487/EoR2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part4.rar

No Pass

]]> By: Casa.addams http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-512642 Casa.addams Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:52:45 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-512642 Richard.Dawkins.The.Enemies.Of.Reason.Part.1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT: http://rapidshare.com/files/157107239/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part1.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/157112729/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part2.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/157117717/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part3.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/157120206/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part4.rar No Pass Richard.Dawkins.The.Enemies.Of.Reason.Part.1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT:

http://rapidshare.com/files/157107239/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/157112729/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/157117717/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/157120206/EoR1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT.part4.rar

No Pass

]]> By: rlslogstinks http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-512287 rlslogstinks Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:39:49 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-512287 I always knew that rlslog was politically motivated, but refusing to print comments critical of Dawkins? Low, even for atheists. I always knew that rlslog was politically motivated, but refusing to print comments critical of Dawkins? Low, even for atheists.

]]> By: Shlomi http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-512043 Shlomi Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:29:52 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-512043 @34 - if you're talking bout #33.... conditioned state ? words of epicurus are against god, also and clearly those of dawkins... however in any case... Dawkins attacks religion since it has no base... however the things he accepts are those who work 99% of the time... and not 50% etc... if something works sometimes , can u count on it?! what about something that works all the time ? can u count on it?! @34 – if you’re talking bout #33….

conditioned state ? words of epicurus are against god, also and clearly those of dawkins… however in any case…

Dawkins attacks religion since it has no base… however the things he accepts are those who work 99% of the time… and not 50% etc…

if something works sometimes , can u count on it?!
what about something that works all the time ? can u count on it?!

]]> By: cannedangst http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-511836 cannedangst Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:04:25 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-511836 For GOD or against god. All part of the "conditioned state" or is it? For GOD or against god. All part of the “conditioned state” or is it?

]]> By: Griff http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-511803 Griff Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:23:23 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-511803 I read this recently in a motivational poster, and found it both funny and true. Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? (Then where did evil come from?) Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? ~Epicurus Atheist: Winning since 33 A.D. I read this recently in a motivational poster, and found it both funny and true.

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil? (Then where did evil come from?)
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?

~Epicurus

Atheist: Winning since 33 A.D.

]]> By: roach http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-511754 roach Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:21:57 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-511754 i love this kind of stuff im reading dawkins' "the god delusion" and i feel quite enlightened. way more so than i did after reading/listening to 13 years worth of catholic doctrine. religulous already came out, by the way! it had a limited release. i went to go see it in the theaters about 2 weeks ago and was quite entertained by it. i love this kind of stuff
im reading dawkins’ “the god delusion” and i feel quite enlightened. way more so than i did after reading/listening to 13 years worth of catholic doctrine.

religulous already came out, by the way! it had a limited release. i went to go see it in the theaters about 2 weeks ago and was quite entertained by it.

]]> By: SteinOnkel http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-511727 SteinOnkel Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:39:30 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-511727 Uninformed people tend to yell the loudest. By not discussing these things you are enabling them to embolden their misguided opinions. I'm all for letting stupid people be stupid, and in most cases allowing them to raise their children as morons. But, when these people open colleges for the sole purpose of flooding the American legal/political system with god-warriors, it's time to sit them down and have a big boy talk. Uninformed people tend to yell the loudest. By not discussing these things you are enabling them to embolden their misguided opinions. I’m all for letting stupid people be stupid, and in most cases allowing them to raise their children as morons. But, when these people open colleges for the sole purpose of flooding the American legal/political system with god-warriors, it’s time to sit them down and have a big boy talk.

]]> By: Shlomi http://www.rlslog.net/richard-dawkins-the-enemies-of-reason-parts-1-2-dvdrip-xvid-nosegment/comment-page-1/#comment-511721 Shlomi Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:33:55 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/?p=17183#comment-511721 @13 1001101001: Allthough 12 - Mark indeed aknowledged he made a mistake... It actually does not mean anything that you have said when you pointed it.... 1. You used (very loosley I might add!) the word PROVED in you're argument for irony.... Hmm... - the only thing that was made to happen from his mistake is, that he made a mistake and mistakes happen to people. Even to those with the right mind and right argument... it's a M i SS hap... u know it has nothing to do with logic at all! Irony can be stated here maybe if u ment that - since he's way of life is tied to logic which is a way of checking double checking and only undenyable results are accepted which is supposed to mean that with this way of life you can't make mistake... ?! :O which is unreal since 1. Logic and Reason or in a word "Science" is all those above however 1 fundmental rule which states that that even 99.9% is not a 100% and that science welcomes it's mistake since a mistake is new evidence and accepts new evidence and or misses are accepted on the way to the truth... in short, don't use someones irrelevant mistake(s) as a tool to PROVE! that he's Statement is not right... Logic and Atheisem are not connected to a persons focus.... One thing is right, it's funny since he was kinda saying that he is, shall we say on the right path on his own ... however he made a rookie's mistake.. ... Atheist people make mistakes like religious people, but their way of obesrving the world is of reason and logic, whice helps in solving and or understanding thing to the right or true way within the boundries of our knowledge... However religious people grasp is (ofcourse there's and argument but I'm not having it here...) of a world with god and spirits, spiritual... etc... and when u beleive in a story which is more fiction as a way of life, you have an unlogical base in you're base. and that can't help in solving problem which require a "I can understand this, the question is when... or how" instead their's is "God, works in mistyrious ways - some things cannot be understood... " - A very unopen and small way of thinking.... but it works also ... since there are so many comfy things in that way of life... and as for livig breathing and even understanding most things ... it is fine...:) @13 1001101001:

Allthough 12 – Mark indeed aknowledged he made a mistake…

It actually does not mean anything that you have said when you pointed it….

1. You used (very loosley I might add!) the word PROVED in you’re argument for irony…. Hmm… – the only thing that was made to happen from his mistake is, that he made a mistake and mistakes happen to people. Even to those with the right mind and right argument… it’s a M i SS hap… u know it has nothing to do with logic at all!

Irony can be stated here maybe if u ment that – since he’s way of life is tied to logic which is a way of checking double checking and only undenyable results are accepted which is supposed to mean that with this way of life you can’t make mistake… ?! :O which is unreal since 1. Logic and Reason or in a word “Science” is all those above however 1 fundmental rule which states that that even 99.9% is not a 100% and that science welcomes it’s mistake since a mistake is new evidence and accepts new evidence and or misses are accepted on the way to the truth…

in short, don’t use someones irrelevant mistake(s) as a tool to PROVE! that he’s Statement is not right…

Logic and Atheisem are not connected to a persons focus….

One thing is right, it’s funny since he was kinda saying that he is, shall we say on the right path on his own … however he made a rookie’s mistake.. …

Atheist people make mistakes like religious people, but their way of obesrving the world is of reason and logic, whice helps in solving and or understanding thing to the right or true way within the boundries of our knowledge…

However religious people grasp is (ofcourse there’s and argument but I’m not having it here…) of a world with god and spirits, spiritual… etc… and when u beleive in a story which is more fiction as a way of life, you have an unlogical base in you’re base. and that can’t help in solving problem which require a “I can understand this, the question is when… or how” instead their’s is “God, works in mistyrious ways – some things cannot be understood… ” – A very unopen and small way of thinking…. but it works also … since there are so many comfy things in that way of life… and as for livig breathing and even understanding most things … it is fine…:)

]]>