Releaselog

Richard Dawkins The Enemies Of Reason Parts 1 & 2 DVDRip XviD-NOsegmenT

One more documentary release by NOsegmenT that features Professor Richard Dawkins. This time around he dives into the world of superstitions (black cat crossing the road in front of you, hiccups being caused by someone thinking about you, etc). I have always despised superstitions, but each to their own. Once again, top-notch DVDRip quality of what you see and what you hear :)

Part 1
Prof Richard Dawkins tackles the epidemic of irrational, superstitious thinking which is blotting the light of logic and evidence. After garnering tips on psychics’ entirely earthly trade secrets from the illusionist Derren Brown, Dawkins attends a seance and confronts the medium. Time and again, the interviewees appeal to personal revelation or second-hand anecdote to justify their belief.

Part 2
Prof Richard Dawkins looks at how health has become a battleground between reason and superstition. A third of us now spend a total of over 1.6 billion a year on superstitious alternative remedies, but 80% of them have never been subjected to properly conducted trials.

Links: HomepageWikipedia

Richard.Dawkins.The.Enemies.Of.Reason.Part.1.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT
XviD | 624×352 – 25 fps – 970 kbps | MP3 VBR – 132 kbps | 43:49 min – 349.53 MB
NFO – Screens: #1, #2, #3NewTorrents SearchUsenet Search

Richard.Dawkins.The.Enemies.Of.Reason.Part.2.DVDRip.XviD-NOsegmenT
XviD | 624×352 – 25 fps – 892 kbps | MP3 VBR – 122 kbps | 47:35 min – 349.65 MB
NFO – Screens: #1, #2, #3NewTorrents SearchUsenet Search

Comments (44)

Feel free to post your Richard Dawkins The Enemies Of Reason Parts 1 & 2 DVDRip XviD-NOsegmenT torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. TheReDnBlack1
    October 23rd, 2008 | 16:21

    What a painfull death he will have.

  2. RighteousHillbilly
    October 23rd, 2008 | 16:44

    No Heaven? No Hell? What!!? We actually are responsible for OURSELVES!! Well, I just can’t believe that *huffle puffle* this makes me sooo angry…

  3. js
    October 23rd, 2008 | 16:44

    he’ll be fine

  4. yessir
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:01

    Today, a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration — that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There’s no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we’re the imagination of ourselves. Here’s Tom with the weather.

  5. Mark
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:03

    Richard Dawkins is my hero. Finally someone who’s not afraid to speak up against the bullsh*t that is religion.

    Good day to you.

  6. x
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:06

    i like more penn and teller they actualy do funny shows about serious issues with serious approch

  7. Drummer_si
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:13

    Rapidshare links?… Please :)

  8. emiliukas
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:22

    It’s like a year old

  9. Hugh Jardon
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:32
  10. Hugh Jardon
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:37
  11. Count Spatula
    October 23rd, 2008 | 17:38

    @5 You read the Dawkins Delusion

  12. Mark
    October 23rd, 2008 | 18:14

    Acutally I’ve been an atheist long before that book. I don’t need a book to think logically.

  13. 1001101001
    October 23rd, 2008 | 18:29

    @12Mark You’re so logical that you didn’t even need to read Count Spatula’s question properly. He was referring to the anti-Dawkins book by McGrath, not to Dawkins’ book; “The God Delusion”. Kind of ironic that your attempt at boasting about your wonderful atheistic logic proved that you can’t even see what is in front of you.

  14. meee
    October 23rd, 2008 | 18:30

    FFS, RLSLOG, Post titles that have torrents.

  15. Mark
    October 23rd, 2008 | 18:42

    Fair enough, my bad.

    No I haven’t read The Dawkins Delusion but I guess I can see your point.
    I don’t care when Dawkins goes out and confronts those religious maniacs but I did hear somewhere that he blames Islam for 9/11 which does seem a bit harsh.

    At the end of the day, regardless of what Dawkins says, I never have, do not, and never will believe in a god or any of that crap.

  16. Heathen
    October 23rd, 2008 | 18:49

    Nature’s proof creationism is a joke and Eden (a no-death earth/garden with all of nature and humanity living as vegetarians) NEVER existed.

    Venus Fly Trap
    Great White Shark
    Spider Web
    Praying Mantis
    Parasites

  17. DudeyJ
    October 23rd, 2008 | 19:04

    @ 4, I think Bill Hicks was probably right… Class…

  18. BBBK
    October 23rd, 2008 | 19:06
  19. Darwin
    October 23rd, 2008 | 19:40

    Dawkins is one of the biggest geniuses of modern era.

    We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.

  20. 3iser
    October 23rd, 2008 | 19:58

    Dawkins is a NGRFGT that does little besides regurgitate what others have studied.

  21. Nick
    October 23rd, 2008 | 20:00

    when is religulous coming out damn it

  22. Alex
    October 23rd, 2008 | 20:38

    Anyone got a torrent link? Cheers.

  23. StvoyUnkleBaadTouch
    October 23rd, 2008 | 20:50

    I bow before a great mind!
    massive respect for all His dedication

  24. StvoyUnkleBaadTouch
    October 23rd, 2008 | 20:57

    @4 Dude! That’s Bill Hicks isn’t he

  25. Touchy
    October 23rd, 2008 | 21:14

    Can someone please upload to megashares?

  26. EmperorAtahualpa
    October 23rd, 2008 | 21:45

    Torrent please? Thank you.

  27. Hmmmm
    October 23rd, 2008 | 22:12

    SWEET….. yeah this time can we get some megashares or megaupload links?

  28. Daantje
    October 23rd, 2008 | 22:19
  29. SteinOnkel
    October 23rd, 2008 | 22:29

    Why oh why is everything like this in America? It’s so polarized that it hurts. Either you’re pro-dawkin or pro-some-other-dude. Just let the man speak and either you agree or not. It’s a personal choice and it doesn’t need to be debated and argued to death. Not everything is black and white.

  30. Shlomi
    October 23rd, 2008 | 22:33

    @13 1001101001:

    Allthough 12 – Mark indeed aknowledged he made a mistake…

    It actually does not mean anything that you have said when you pointed it….

    1. You used (very loosley I might add!) the word PROVED in you’re argument for irony…. Hmm… – the only thing that was made to happen from his mistake is, that he made a mistake and mistakes happen to people. Even to those with the right mind and right argument… it’s a M i SS hap… u know it has nothing to do with logic at all!

    Irony can be stated here maybe if u ment that – since he’s way of life is tied to logic which is a way of checking double checking and only undenyable results are accepted which is supposed to mean that with this way of life you can’t make mistake… ?! :O which is unreal since 1. Logic and Reason or in a word “Science” is all those above however 1 fundmental rule which states that that even 99.9% is not a 100% and that science welcomes it’s mistake since a mistake is new evidence and accepts new evidence and or misses are accepted on the way to the truth…

    in short, don’t use someones irrelevant mistake(s) as a tool to PROVE! that he’s Statement is not right…

    Logic and Atheisem are not connected to a persons focus….

    One thing is right, it’s funny since he was kinda saying that he is, shall we say on the right path on his own … however he made a rookie’s mistake.. …

    Atheist people make mistakes like religious people, but their way of obesrving the world is of reason and logic, whice helps in solving and or understanding thing to the right or true way within the boundries of our knowledge…

    However religious people grasp is (ofcourse there’s and argument but I’m not having it here…) of a world with god and spirits, spiritual… etc… and when u beleive in a story which is more fiction as a way of life, you have an unlogical base in you’re base. and that can’t help in solving problem which require a “I can understand this, the question is when… or how” instead their’s is “God, works in mistyrious ways – some things cannot be understood… ” – A very unopen and small way of thinking…. but it works also … since there are so many comfy things in that way of life… and as for livig breathing and even understanding most things … it is fine…:)

  31. SteinOnkel
    October 23rd, 2008 | 22:39

    Uninformed people tend to yell the loudest. By not discussing these things you are enabling them to embolden their misguided opinions. I’m all for letting stupid people be stupid, and in most cases allowing them to raise their children as morons. But, when these people open colleges for the sole purpose of flooding the American legal/political system with god-warriors, it’s time to sit them down and have a big boy talk.

  32. roach
    October 23rd, 2008 | 23:21

    i love this kind of stuff
    im reading dawkins’ “the god delusion” and i feel quite enlightened. way more so than i did after reading/listening to 13 years worth of catholic doctrine.

    religulous already came out, by the way! it had a limited release. i went to go see it in the theaters about 2 weeks ago and was quite entertained by it.

  33. Griff
    October 24th, 2008 | 00:23

    I read this recently in a motivational poster, and found it both funny and true.

    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
    Then he is not omnipotent.
    Is he able but not willing?
    Then he is malevolent.
    Is he both able, and willing?
    Then whence cometh evil? (Then where did evil come from?)
    Is he neither able nor willing?
    Then why call him God?

    ~Epicurus

    Atheist: Winning since 33 A.D.

  34. cannedangst
    October 24th, 2008 | 01:04

    For GOD or against god. All part of the “conditioned state” or is it?

  35. Shlomi
    October 24th, 2008 | 04:29

    @34 – if you’re talking bout #33….

    conditioned state ? words of epicurus are against god, also and clearly those of dawkins… however in any case…

    Dawkins attacks religion since it has no base… however the things he accepts are those who work 99% of the time… and not 50% etc…

    if something works sometimes , can u count on it?!
    what about something that works all the time ? can u count on it?!

  36. rlslogstinks
    October 24th, 2008 | 10:39

    I always knew that rlslog was politically motivated, but refusing to print comments critical of Dawkins? Low, even for atheists.

  37. Casa.addams
    October 24th, 2008 | 16:52
  38. Casa.addams
    October 24th, 2008 | 17:33
  39. whateva
    October 24th, 2008 | 22:56

    @36 Boohoo. We’re not ‘printing’ anything! This is the net. Go back to fairy studies

  40. Tim L
    October 25th, 2008 | 07:23

    Throughout human history, as our species has faced the frightening, terrorizing fact that we do not know who we are, or where we are going in this ocean of chaos, it has been the authorities, the political, the religious, the educational authorities who attempted to comfort us by giving us order, rules, regulations, informing, forming in our minds their view of reality. To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform yourself.

    Think for yourself… Question authority.

  41. yeahhim
    October 25th, 2008 | 11:10

    read half of the god delusion, it was so padded with quotes it was painful

  42. Max Payne
    October 26th, 2008 | 02:43

    #
    TheReDnBlack1
    October 23rd, 2008 | 16:21

    What a painfull death he will have.

    ———

    Maybe you’ll have one too

    Enjoy your delusion

    Great series, had the Google tv rips on my pc for a while

  43. timepassman
    October 27th, 2008 | 22:16
  44. Andrew
    November 1st, 2008 | 04:17

Leave a reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Hot info about new scene releases!