Releaselog

Revealed The Da Vinci Shroud WS PDTV XviD-aAF

“Revealed” is a historical documentary series aired on channel FIVE. It explores the extraordinary stories of human endurance and experience. The latest episode is about the research for Da Vinci Shroud. Some of you might just like it, released by aAF.

This episode looks at fresh theories regarding the shroud of Turin. Long believed to be the cloth that was placed on the body of Christ, the shroud was exposed as a medieval fake in 1988. However, scientists continue to explore how the image of a man was scorched onto the fabric.

Links: HOMEPAGE

Revealed.The.Da.Vinci.Shroud.WS.PDTV.XviD-aAF
XviD | MP3 VBR | 350MB
NFONewTorrents Search
SiNGLE FiLE DOWNLOAD:  HOTFiLE

Comments (25)

Feel free to post your Revealed The Da Vinci Shroud WS PDTV XviD-aAF torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. MU or RS
    July 4th, 2009 | 19:32

    MU or RS link please

  2. MAXX
    July 4th, 2009 | 19:33
  3. Mario
    July 4th, 2009 | 19:42
  4. Mr Brooks
    July 4th, 2009 | 19:45

    Revealed.The.Da.Vinci.Shroud.WS.PDTV.XviD-aAF
    http://hotfile.com/dl/8006040/4ca1320/R.T.D.V-AAF.avi.html

    no password

  5. AQ
    July 4th, 2009 | 20:07
  6. Buster
    July 4th, 2009 | 20:07
  7. gigas
    July 4th, 2009 | 20:55
  8. bleeke
    July 4th, 2009 | 21:15

    great, thanks for the links

  9. kkk
    July 4th, 2009 | 21:38
  10. lefty
    July 4th, 2009 | 21:47

    without Tom Hanks it won´t be that great :mrgreen: :oops: anyway this episode is revealing a lot and it really goes deep into the history :shock: so have a look of you´re interrested in stuff like the Da Vinci Code :cool:

    Revealed.The.Da.Vinci.Shroud.WS.PDTV.XviD-aAF

    http://www.storage.to/get/DcMXn0cR/Revealed.The.Da.Vinci.Shroud.WS.PDTV.XviD-aAF.avi

  11. Jose
    July 4th, 2009 | 22:44

    More Zionist nonsense to hurt Jesus. Time to wake up people. Do your homework before you all end up slaves or dead! They control the world now. We must get it back.

  12. xyzzy
    July 4th, 2009 | 22:53
  13. Rubbish Propaganda
    July 4th, 2009 | 23:09

    Typical Zion propaganda to dispel Jesus' name in society through media. Lillian Schwartz was the first to claim that the shroud may have been Leonardo…but wait for it! She's a JEW. Of course….

  14. Don
    July 4th, 2009 | 23:28

    The description is wrong..yes the technology at the time in 1988 concluded it to be a fake. They did some more re-testing in the late 90s with better technology and found plant fibers found only in Judea and dated the shroud to the 1st century. did the media say anything? No..because its owned by Jew Rupert Murdoch. How do you explain how the blood got there before the image? I ask because the blood markings exactly correlate markings of the "photographic" image. This is an astounding technological achievement for 16th century science. What about the 1st century coins found on the eyes which was a tradition at the time of burying people? Think for yourself, Question Authority.

  15. Jab007
    July 5th, 2009 | 01:55
  16. common sense
    July 5th, 2009 | 02:11

    I agree with @14, but all the anti Jewish Racist postings need to be deleted as this is BS.

    Staff, which is worse? being rude as some have been or racist postings? Start banning these racists as you should have been all along.

  17. Doc
    July 5th, 2009 | 03:01

    @14 Don:
    Yeah. You're right. They did some re-testing lateron.
    1998: http://www.shroud.com/bar.htm
    2005: http://www.physorg.com/news4652.html
    http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,,2-13-1443_1724886,00.html

    Wiki about the plant fibers:
    "In the forehead area (..) they found traces of Gundelia tournefortii, which is limited to this period of the year in the Jerusalem area. (..) Skeptics point out that the available images cannot be seen as unequivocal support for any particular plant species due to the generally indistinct "blobiness," even under powerful microscopes, of these tiny, spotty impressions. Another problem is that the Catholic veneration of the Shroud by the faithful probably involved touching it. Public display of the Shroud in the past may have contributed to its contamination not only by bacteria, as described above, but also by pollen and other air-borne plant material."

    Maybe 1st century … or maybe not.

    And about the blood ?
    Take a look there, too:
    "No claims about blood typing could be confirmed. The blood appeared to be so old that the DNA was badly fragmented. Dr. Andrew Merriwether at SUNY said that "… anyone can walk in off the street and amplify DNA from anything. The hard part is not to amplify what you don't want and only amplify what you want (endogenous DNA vs contamination)."

    :) LOL. If Rupert "Jew" Murdoch didn't want to "tell us the truth", then you could be sure that some respectful scientist would do that ! Maybe you don't know exactly how science works. It doesn't need media or specific religions. If science works well, then it stands for itself.

    Take it easy… it's only a cloth made by old linen. It can't fly, it doesn't heal people and isn't able to produce food or water. It only has an image on it… and even that isn't totally proven to be made at the "given" date by the catholic curch. You can still continue to believe that the shroud is true. Maybe one day you will be given the one and only proof. But until then you have to accept that this shroud is one very mystical piece of linen… with a lot of questionable points to look at. Sceptics AND believers are both on it – maybe for the next 1400 years … ;)

    @16 common sense
    You're right. We don't need those racist postings here. Fact is… that thing is strange. But it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Jews or Muslims or Christians or Buddhists or any other "super-hidden-top-secret conspiracy" out there. It's simply one big mysterious piece of linen ;)

  18. lawl
    July 5th, 2009 | 03:49

    Hurray, a shroud with imprint of a face. Bow before it and worship it.

  19. BANG!!
    July 5th, 2009 | 05:45

    Follow-up analysis published in 2005, for example, claimed that the sample dated by the teams in 19988 was taken from an area of the shroud that was not a part of the original cloth. The shroud was also damaged by a fire in the Late Middle Ages which could have added carbon material to the cloth, resulting in a higher radiocarbon content and a later calculated age.

  20. Dan
    July 5th, 2009 | 06:01

    On April 6, 2009, the London newspaper The Times reported that official Vatican researchers had uncovered evidence that the Shroud had been kept and venerated by the Templars since the 1204 sack of Constantinople. According to the account of one neophyte member of the order, veneration of the Shroud appeared to be part of the initiation ritual. The article also implies that this ceremony may be the source of the 'worship of a bearded figure' that the Templars were accused of at their 14th century trial and suppression.[89]

    On April 10, 2009, the Telegraph reported that original Shroud investigator, Ray Rogers, acknowledged the radio carbon dating performed in 1988 was flawed.[90] The sample used for dating may have been taken from a section damaged by fire and repaired in the 16th century, which would not provide an estimate for the original material. Shortly before his death, Rogers said:

    "The worst possible sample for carbon dating was taken."[90]

    "It consisted of different materials than were used in the shroud itself, so the age we produced was inaccurate."[90]

    "…I am coming to the conclusion that it has a very good chance of being the piece of cloth that was used to bury the historic Jesus."[90]

  21. antizionist
    July 5th, 2009 | 09:54

    Fuc.king zionists. Rls, it was never determined, that the shroud is fake, some fiber may have been added later, but the original fiber and the Jesus form was never ruled fake. Fake is 70% of the holocaust.

  22. TopTorrents
    July 5th, 2009 | 11:27
  23. MEGASHARES MEGASHARES MEGASHARES
    July 5th, 2009 | 16:42
  24. silpe
    July 5th, 2009 | 17:20

    Jesus is a J@mbo!

  25. fail
    July 6th, 2009 | 08:32

    Lulz at crazy people. It is merely a facial imprint of a person who is and will remain unidentifiable.

Leave a reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Hot info about new scene releases!