Releaselog

Ratatouille PROPER DVDRip XViD-MDP

Posted on 15.10.2007 at 01:43 in DVDRiP, Movies by RLSLOG

Ok, this seems to be a third luck (let’s hope so). Previous ones are nuked. As you can see, proper is here so grab it.

Note from NFO: “Sadly the previous SPiRAL release had a bad ivtc. The subtitles were not splitted as well. Enjoy this fully working release.”

Plot: Remy is a young rat in the French countryside who arrives in Paris, only to find out that his cooking idol is dead. When he makes an unusual alliance with a restaurant’s new garbage boy, the culinary and personal adventures begin despite Remy’s family’s skepticism and the rat-hating world of humans.

Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP
2CDs, 1.38 GB, mdp-ratasp-a, mdp-ratasp-b
XviD, 672 x 272, 874kbps, 23.976fps, (Dolby AC3) AC3, 48000Hz 448 kb/s, 6 chnls
Samples: #1, #2, #3, #4, Video Sample
IMDB 8.4/10, Homepage, NFO, Torrent soon

* Comments(115)

Comments (115)

Feel free to post your Ratatouille PROPER DVDRip XViD-MDP torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
  1. Inevitable
    October 15th, 2007 | 01:45

    OMG! What will be wrong with this one?

  2. KaasKop
    October 15th, 2007 | 01:48

    dang, been canceling downloads every time some1 posts a proper/ repack… this better be worth it, imdb can make false promises too, like the sc3n3… ;-)

  3. john
    October 15th, 2007 | 01:50

    *sigh*

    Thank Science I didn’t start downloading this movie :)

  4. downloader
    October 15th, 2007 | 01:52

    lolllllllllllll FINALLY
    im getting this 1 da PROPER version :)
    gd thing i didnt download
    any of SPiRAL releases!!!

    but i was patient though :p
    excellent post rlslog! :D

  5. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 01:55

    Unfortunately, still not 720×304 and not the proper aspect ratio: 2.47:1. But if that’s the only tiny “problem”, that’ll do it.

  6. jason
    October 15th, 2007 | 01:57

    what does it mean when they say the previous ones have been nuked?

  7. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:00

    @ Jason #6
    “what does it mean when they say the previous ones have been nuked?”

    Nuked is the term used to indicate there’s somethnig wrong. In this particular case, in the 1st one there was 6 seconds missing, and the 2nd one had a video problem called “bad IVTC”.

  8. NJ
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:08

    lool the 1st was ok for me im nt arsed its a childs film anyway lmafo

  9. sam
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:11

    There is a new Rls Go Get It :
    Ratatouille.Real.ReRip.ReBack.PROPER.ReadINFO.DVDRip.XViD.WTF

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    Just Kiddin’ .. Have a Nice “rlslog” Day :D

  10. Victor
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:16

    To all of u guys… the first release was just fine!! Dont bother with them proper(s) if u had been downloading the first release, finish it. That 6 secs part that is missing isnt all that important nor funny! Movie was great by the way, great animation again by PIXEL!

  11. Eoghan
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:16

    Ok screw this, I’m waiting for a 1CD version, there’s no point downloading 6% of these things with my crappy line.

  12. Assassin
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:19

    Oh come on ….
    I have downloaded the first spiral and the repack
    and now this ..
    I cannot beleive this ..
    A word to spiral if you are not up to it leave to the others who deserve it ..

  13. Rorschach24
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:22

    I downloaded the first one…and have no intention of getting another one for 6 fraking seconds.

  14. therocka
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:25

    anyone got torrent please!

  15. RapidDownloader
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:31

    RS Link?

  16. Bubu
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:35

    Torrent on

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3842528/Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP

    (loder’s account)

  17. download
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:36

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3842528/Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP

  18. divo183
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:37

    Rapidshare links any1??

  19. s0t
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:37

    Why aren’t groups interested in releasing good quality instead of releasing first?

  20. QuadrupelQ
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:40

    Sheez…I think I’ll just wait for the retail-DVD, rent it, and rip it myself like I used to do two years ago. I’m really sick with all this proper-shaite. Why don’t these groups check their own releases? Is it more important to release something 2 hours sooner than to check (watch) it for mistakes so everybody can enjoy a good DVD-rip?

    How about banning scene-groups that produce a lot of nuked movies from rlslog? There are certain groups that mess up all the time, so why not just ignore them from now on? Nodbody will miss these ‘waste of bandwith-releases’.

  21. tony
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:41

    thanks igot broadband back tomorrow,just as well i didnt download the other 2 lol.

  22. ArucarD
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:53

    I have yet to start to any of the torrents to these releases, hopefully this one will be the one and I dont have to stop it and start a new one as others have.

  23. Assassin
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:57

    http://rapidshare.com/files/62608770/mdp-ratasp-a.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62608871/mdp-ratasp-a.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62608964/mdp-ratasp-a.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609051/mdp-ratasp-a.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609120/mdp-ratasp-a.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609199/mdp-ratasp-a.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609271/mdp-ratasp-a.part7.rar

    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609390/mdp-ratasp-b.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609457/mdp-ratasp-b.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609549/mdp-ratasp-b.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609610/mdp-ratasp-b.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609676/mdp-ratasp-b.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609760/mdp-ratasp-b.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609822/mdp-ratasp-b.part7.rar

  24. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:58

    Are the English subtitles intended for deaf English-speaking people or are parts of this movie not in English?

  25. Assassin
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:59

    There must be a Master Gruop to manage the releases and check it before releasing it ..

  26. Tim
    October 15th, 2007 | 02:59

    @#11

    I agree. What is the point of downloading a release where the video is as big as the audio itself. Lowering this to something more realistic could easily make a decent 1CD release. After all, it’s animation.

  27. sean
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:01

    I think you dl what you want, so don’t complain about wasting bandwidth.
    just wait some time before begin downloading, to see whether it got nuked or not ;)

  28. Rohit Sidhu
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:02

    stick with the spiral release if you won’t be using subtitles… the spiral has a higher video bitrate, meaning better video quality

  29. Jaques
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:02

    can someone post on filefront like was done for world’s end? more accessible than rapidshare.

  30. goob
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:04

    What does bad ivtc mean? I don’t wanna stop dling the previous repack for a small insignificant issue. Thanks.

  31. jeez
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:05

    jeeezus. and there isnt even a link to the torrent….imagine that. :(

  32. cd
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:05

    my apologies about going off subject, but does any1 know when why did i get married is going to post. if this is the the wrong place to ask please forgive me.

  33. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:06

    Sorry if I’ve interupted anything but if you think about it this is a serious question. Does anyone know if the English subtitles are intended for deaf English-speaking people or are parts of this movie not in English?

    Thanks :)

  34. divo183
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:09

    thanks for rapidshare links..

  35. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:10

    Bad ivtc is bad inverse telecine. This means that you will see little judders in the picture.

    You might not mind from a free download. Or you may think this isn’t good enough. Unless you’re not very alert you will notice it.

  36. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:11

    Are parts of this movie not in English?

  37. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:11

    @ 11 and 27.

    People like aXXo are there for you guys. In my opinion there should always be big releases (2 or 3 CDs with ac3 5.1 or DTS, in fact CDs shouldn’t be the current standard in 2007, we all have DVDs now) and small releases (1 CD with mp3 stereo) for everyone’s expectations to be fulfilled, just as we can find for TV series (one release in 350 Mo, another in 700 Mo with higher definition, and one in 1.xx Go in HD). They really should update their rules or not having rules at all. After all, these are illegal videos. Ain’t the point of illegality to break the rules? Rules, laws, hello, same thing. Because of these rules, groups stick to CDs and 624, 640, 656 or 672 horizontal pixels instead of the maximum playable by DVD/DivX players, ie 720. That makes no sense. But, hey, that’s just me.

  38. Assassin
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:12

    mdp-ratasp-a.avi
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=29f9cd6

    mdp-ratasp-b.avi
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=3bac478

  39. goob
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:14

    thanks for clearing that up bob :)

  40. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:20

    You are welcome goob. I wish someone could answer my question about whether the subtitles are needed – if part of the film is not in English?

  41. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:22

    @ Bob

    Apparently, they’re for the hearing impaired.

    http://www.divxsubtitles.net/page_subtitleinformation.php?ID=91812

  42. Bubu
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:38

    @ beber

    I think 1/2 or full DVD-5 size should replace the 1CD – 2CD size XviD rips. We can start downloading in the morning and by the time we come back home it’s ready to be seen. Imagine the quality of a DVD-9 ripped at the size of a DVD-5 in XviD !!! Modern DVD/DivX players can go even beyond the 720 horizontal pixels, you know…

  43. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:46

    @ Bubu

    But DVDs themselves are limited to 720×480 in NTSC and 720×576 in PAL, so there would be no point for Xvid DVDrips to have higher definition, they would create pixels artificially. That doesn’t make any sense to give a full DVD size to an Xvid, you might as well download the DVD-R.
    I think 700 Mo should be replaced by 1/6 DVD, 2 CDs by 1/3 DVD and 3 CDs by 1/2 DVD. That would make more sense nowadays, and give us the original ac3 or DTS sound even for short films. Even short films deserve multichannel sound. They also have sound designers sound mixers doing a great job.

  44. lilman
    October 15th, 2007 | 03:52

    on vcdquality some1 says

    “This should be nuked for stolen!
    CD2 its the exactly same file of the SPiRAL 1st rip.”

    Can some1 comfirm if its true!!!

  45. Cap'n Chronic
    October 15th, 2007 | 04:12

    Does anyone know if a DVD-R was released of this yet?

    why dosnt rls log cover DVD-R rlses??

  46. Couves
    October 15th, 2007 | 04:15

    SUB (ENG):
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62628115/pack.rar.html

  47. zerone!
    October 15th, 2007 | 04:48

    Whatever to the nuke wars. It’s a good film, best Pixar movie I’ve ever seen. Wish there was more synaesthetic food tasting though.

  48. Bubu
    October 15th, 2007 | 04:48

    @ beber

    If you watch a 720 x something XviD, a 720 x 480 NTSC DVD and a 720 x 576 PAL DVD on a software player you will notice that the window size differs. When making the DvDrip you can keep intact the vertical resolution and increase the horizontal beyond the 720 pixels the same way as the software player does. Anyway, I agree that the original 5.1 studio sound is a must if you want to feel the movie the way its creators intended.

  49. Bubu
    October 15th, 2007 | 04:58

    Working .nfo link:

    http://image.bayimg.com/pahhcaabj.jpg

  50. Couves
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:00

    Sry
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62632558/Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP.rar

  51. Billy Bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:11

    people from the u.k. have bad teeth

  52. jeez
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:22

    damm..all this and only 2 seeders. this movie isnt even *that* good. now, if there was some nekkid jennifer anniston it would be worth a 11 day download. :P

  53. parisjetaim
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:23

    i just want to know whether they add those 6 sec back to CD2 or recut a totally different timeframe… in the first case, I might only have to dl CD2…save lot of time…

  54. Xyu
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:33

    this release should get nucked for skipping frames (choppy moving picture) and bad interlace (or bad de-interlaced method used)
    just take a look at this screenshot of the same frame:
    on top is the frame from this “proper” release and bottom is the previous release
    http://img463.imageshack.us/img463/5499/spiralratb029548002109vdv4.png

  55. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:53

    @ Bubu #51

    That’s because DVDs have native anamorphic definition (720×480 NTSC, 720×576 PAL), it’s your TV screen (or computer player software) that gives you back the proper proportion of the picture. So you think you reach 1024×576 PAL, but you actually don’t. The picture is just stretched horizontaly by your player software or widescreen TV. Thanks anyway for backing me up about the audio; I wish the “rules guys” read us.

  56. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 05:57

    @ Xyu

    Indeed, you’re right. Thanks for the comparison of those 2 frames. The so called “proper” is not as clean as the previous one. That’s clearly noticeable on the head shot and the lines on top of the newspaper page.

  57. zorrin
    October 15th, 2007 | 07:02

    Is this the real deal… the final thing, or is it NUKED as well???????????

  58. Larris
    October 15th, 2007 | 07:11

    @ Xyu, Why are the framesizes different????
    The Image became like that due to resizing maybe??
    The Spyral rlease was 672×272 so was this relase but the two comparisons show to different sized images there fore the smaller 1 was resized and change the picture quality.
    Any can prove me wrong???

  59. dymas
    October 15th, 2007 | 07:39

    this is “nuked” for xvid, where is x264?

    xD

    and while we’re at it, let’s nuke some nukewars-groups too.

  60. Ross Gellar
    October 15th, 2007 | 07:47

    i agree with 39.we must have 5.1 ac3 as standard. but 4 gigs for a movie is too much. 2 cds is fine… those guys who want 1/2 and full DVD5’s shus go for x264 HDs and blueray rips.

  61. Larris
    October 15th, 2007 | 07:48

    @ dymas Wtf U on about nuked for being xvid lol hahah, how can you be nuked for xvid lol dvdrips are supposed to be either XViD or DiVX

  62. Zero
    October 15th, 2007 | 08:01

    Does it have those missing six seconds?. How is the quality of this movie?.

  63. Mike staff member
    October 15th, 2007 | 08:20

    stupid…

    i would prefer to wait for DIAMOND that would release this 2 weeks before official dvd release date…

  64. BAD_BOY
    October 15th, 2007 | 08:20

    According to the two samples of the movie:

    ############Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP#############
    [Video]
    Resolution : 672×272
    Codec : XviD MPEG-4 codec
    FPS : 23,98
    BitRate : 885 Kbps
    Quality Factor : 0,21 b/px
    [Audio]
    Codec : ATSC/A-52 Dolby AC3
    Number of channels : 6
    Sample Rate : 48000 Hz
    BitRate : 448 Kbps

    ############Ratatouille.REPACK.DVDRip.XviD-SPiRAL##########
    [Video]
    Resolution : 672×272
    Codec : XviD MPEG-4 codec
    FPS : 23,98
    BitRate : 1329 Kbps
    Quality Factor : 0,31 b/px
    [Audio]
    Codec : ATSC/A-52 Dolby AC3
    Number of channels : 6
    Sample Rate : 48000 Hz
    BitRate : 448 Kbps

    SO WHY IS THE PROPER RLS BETTER???….F**k, and what should I download??….

  65. Larris
    October 15th, 2007 | 08:39

    Because the ivtc is fixed

  66. ikeaboy
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:01

    How can this release have a video bitrate of 874kbps when the spiral release had a video bitrate of 1317kbps and both spiral and mdp are 2cd and have same audio bitrate.

  67. BAD_BOY
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:09

    2ikeaboy

    Donno…Video Inspestor info…Does it lie?

  68. STG
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:15

    ivtc is fixed and picture quality is ruined why can’t anybody get it right damnit we have all been wasting our time waiting for propers and now that also has something wrong might as well wait for the retail dvd I have waited this long I can hold out a for few more days.

  69. cazzie_s
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:30

    DVD released in USA on Nov 6. No doubt someone will post it around that time and hopefully no one will complain.

  70. sa ma cac
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:32

    what happend with quality releases? SPiRAL is pissing me off with their crap releases on Ratatouille and Pirates Of The Caribbean – At Worlds End. go do something else lamers. you are number 1 ripping it wrong so go in the forest and shoot yourself.

  71. Gibbons
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:39

    http://www.newtorrents.info/torrent/28741/Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP.html

  72. Bubu
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:47

    @ BAD_BOY

    That 874 kbps is only the average for that video sample, for the whole movie is around 1300 kbps for both SPiRAL and MDP, lol! And the size is 672×272 for both so why in the XYU “comparison” they differ?

  73. jgv115
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:53

    LOL..

    MAN IF EVERYONE IS ARGUING LIKE THIS no one can choose which one to download

    so..

    the solution…

    GO BACK TO THE MVS TC NOT NUKED JUST A LITTLE QUALITY AND AUDIO LOSS NO ARGUMENTS!

    thats what i did

  74. ReaLITY
    October 15th, 2007 | 09:58

    First of all I AM TURKISH citizen and Living in TURKEY.

    This word related with >>> GERMAN NAZi Massacre.
    During World War II, German soldiers killed millions of JEW in the GAS CHAMBERS.

    Well
    What about the World War I story ? >>> This is TOTALLY DIFFERENT !
    History:
    Government of the Young Turks in the Ottoman Empire takes decision,
    This was Deportation + MIGRATION for ARMENIANS.

    MASSACRE Is NOT TRUE! IT IS A POLITICAL >>>SLANDER>> PEOPLE & GOVERNMENTS DID NOT DO ANYTHING >>> WITHOUT REASON !

    SO WHAT WAS THAT REASON ? IF YOU ARE ARMENIAN, ASK YOUR SELF..WHY?
    BECAUSE OF BAD GUYS! (ARMENIAN GANGS, BANDITS, THIEFS, CRIMINALS, TRAITORS)

    THIS GANGS, BANDITS, THIEFS, CRIMINALS, TRAITORS (Armenian BAD GUYS)
    started to REBEL + started to REVOLT AGAINS Ottoman Empire.
    THEY ATTACKED Ottoman-Turk villages, ATTACKED AGAINS Ottoman-Turk soldiers
    Killed innocent Ottoman-Turk civilians during WORLD WAR I.
    AND THEY HIDE THEMSELFS IN ARMENIAN CIVILIANS.
    THIS IS WAS CONFUSE Ottoman Empire Government AND THEY SEARCHED SOLUTION FOR THAT SITUATION.

    DURING THE =WAR= HAS NO TIME FOR INVESTIGATIONS.
    FOR THAT REASON Ottoman Empire HAS NO CHOICE EXCEPT Deportation + MIGRATION.
    DURING THE WAR, =BETRAY= IS UNFORGIVABLE.
    >>> Ottoman Empire’s SOLUTION WAS Deportation + MIGRATION for ALL Armenians.

    SO, GENOCIDE is DIFFERENT WORD!
    Ottoman Empire NEVER KILLED INNOCENT PEOPLE of ARMENIANS, Empire forced MIGRATION.

    MASSACRE Is NOT TRUE! IT IS A POLITICAL >>>SLANDER>> WE HAVE TO LOOK FORWARD

  75. Burtia Poealina
    October 15th, 2007 | 10:13

    @81 Jeez how intreesting.. :S

  76. Pytt
    October 15th, 2007 | 10:17

    i believe that was a little off topic, ReaLITY.. go somewhere else. (:P)

    So, is this release going to be nuked as well? Or not? The sample is oos, don’t know if anybody else has noticed that… At least the first 3 seconds.

  77. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 10:57

    Not to mention the Armenian massacre, not something you normally expect in a Pixar film.

    What does “oos” mean?

  78. ikeaboy
    October 15th, 2007 | 11:57

    oos = out of sync. DUH!

  79. Lakatos
    October 15th, 2007 | 12:01

    ReaLITY,

    YOU ARE bombing and killing kurds everyday as a NATO country, so just STFUP.

    Kepop on dreaming about joining the EU as well.

  80. W8
    October 15th, 2007 | 12:25

    wow…thats WAY off topic. lets see if admins ban him

  81. Zero
    October 15th, 2007 | 12:50

    @81 ReaLITY :- What is your topic got to do with this?. Seriously you should really shutup. You really have no idea how many people have died in world war 1 and world war 2.

  82. gav616
    October 15th, 2007 | 12:57

    @81

    0.0001% of ppl give a crap about that spam on here, ta.

  83. KSA
    October 15th, 2007 | 13:21

    @81 go away
    So which one to download and ist true DIAMOND will rip this

  84. Jacky Cheung
    October 15th, 2007 | 13:48

    ALternative download links :

    http://rapidshare.com/files/62608770/mdp-ratasp-a.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62608871/mdp-ratasp-a.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62608964/mdp-ratasp-a.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609051/mdp-ratasp-a.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609120/mdp-ratasp-a.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609199/mdp-ratasp-a.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609271/mdp-ratasp-a.part7.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609390/mdp-ratasp-b.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609457/mdp-ratasp-b.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609549/mdp-ratasp-b.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609610/mdp-ratasp-b.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609676/mdp-ratasp-b.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609760/mdp-ratasp-b.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62609822/mdp-ratasp-b.part7.rar

    http://www.sharelinkz.com

  85. Rolly
    October 15th, 2007 | 14:48

    Video is great with though some choppy parts. What I do not understand is the audio loss. The audio is like a roller coaster ride, goes from high to low volume throughout the movie. Am I the only one experiencing this? Thanks

  86. Tony
    October 15th, 2007 | 15:02

    CD 2’s sub is not sync for this one

  87. Gunslinger
    October 15th, 2007 | 15:05

    oh brother …. i see pixar have got some new help with their dvd protection then …. it’s called “OMGS” — Outbreak of
    Mass
    Group
    Stupidity

    :-)

    mVs must be sat there laughing their asses off at this, they probably never expected their release to be the best available after 3 attempted dvd rips !

  88. dymas
    October 15th, 2007 | 15:17

    @68 Apparently you didn’t get the joke…

    everything is so nuked nuked… I watched the spiral release and didn’t notice anything wrong with it EXCEPT that the quality could be a lot better if it was x264. I know that these 1337rox0rpwn-scenerules say it has to be xvid but xvid isn’t the best there is.

    so if you ask me, the scenerules are nuked a.k.a f**ked up. who made them anyways

  89. gav616
    October 15th, 2007 | 15:30

    the scene seems to be soo anal that a tiny unnoticeable thing, nukes it.

    aww gotta lov um :D

  90. andorra
    October 15th, 2007 | 16:11

    CD1, until frame 78906 is the SAME as first spiral release. So, what MDP did? They used the both sources from spiral to make their “own” release.
    mdp cd2 is the SAME as spiral: 731.547.648 bytes
    http://i23.tinypic.com/ndonix.jpg

  91. beber
    October 15th, 2007 | 16:30

    @ desperado

    The gain would be 45 Mo on compression for the current 700 Mo standard release (actually 46, but leave 1 Mo for each one so you still can add some Subrip (.srt) files). 90 Mo for the 2 CDs current release and so on. So you still could burn 6 mp3 movies on one DVD5 or a trilogy ac3 5.1 on one DVD5. Haven’t you noticed that you always have some vacant space when you burn your DVD? About 280 Mo wasted that could be used on gaining some quality on compression, on some higher definition than the usual 624 or 640, etc. or for 192 kbps Mp3 instead of the usual 128 kbps. It’s really time that they update their rules. The HD era has already started and yet DVDrips still stick to ancient rules based on CDs, that makes no sense. DVDs have what, 5 or 10 years left on their “life expectancy”? They’ll eventually disappear because of HD, so it’s really time to benefit from quality DVDrips based on updated “DVD rules” and no old fashioned CDs rules.

  92. xabhijitx
    October 15th, 2007 | 16:48

    x264 is not used for obvious reasons!
    XviD will rule for a while.
    Dont download this one, better rips will be out soon.

  93. Nuke
    October 15th, 2007 | 18:01

    http://windowsaddict.blogspot.com/

    CD1
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687033/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.001
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687043/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.002
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687049/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.003
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687063/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.004
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687085/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.005
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687119/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.006
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687086/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.007
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62686694/mdp-ratasp-a.avi.008
    CD2
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687014/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.001
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687046/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.002
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687098/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.003
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687016/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.004
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687042/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.005
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687076/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.006
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62687037/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.007
    http://rapidshare.com/files/62686656/mdp-ratasp-b.avi.008

  94. bob
    October 15th, 2007 | 21:38

    This sort of comment, “oos = out of sync. DUH!” when someone doesn’t recognise an abreviation is a bit stupid. “Don’t you even know that” is a child’s attitude.

  95. zorrin
    October 16th, 2007 | 01:03

    RLSLOG.net should take this issue more seriously and take stringent actions against new groups like spiral etc., who are more interested in releasing the movie first than concerned about the quality and the type of scene they release. which ultimately burdens us fans. After two fatal mistakes, with this and Pirates, there’s hardly anyone here who’s a fan of Spiral now. RLSLOG should screen before they post anymore from independent groups.

  96. brizzel
    October 16th, 2007 | 01:35

    Resident Evil 3-(3-Resident Evil) 25/10 /07 r5

  97. mikey
    October 16th, 2007 | 02:13

    DVD-R here for those like me who have been waiting and looking!
    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3843698/Ratatouille.DVDR-ThP

  98. danielgc
    October 16th, 2007 | 06:14

    what’s the difference between this: http://btjunkie.org/torrent/Ratatouille-PROPER-DVDRip-XViD-MDP/43338c54bded75326e7e682543f093321dd906ed2b3a/download.torrent
    (1 GB)

    and this:
    http://btmon.com/Video/Movies/Ratatouille.PROPER.DVDRip.XViD-MDP.torrent
    (1.4 GB)

    Same name, different size… which one should I download?

  99. Gaz
    October 16th, 2007 | 08:10

    Is there any reason why I have no sound on this dowmnload?

  100. slimak
    October 16th, 2007 | 19:51

    I dont get it. If this is so obviously stolen source from SPIRAL rip, why wasnt it nuked yet? Does it mean if you break the rules three times in a row you will get away with it?

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply