Comments on: RAID Reconstructor v3.03-YAG

By: El Duderino

El Duderino — Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:23:36 +0000

grab it from usenet, been there for over 2 days:
http://www.binsearch.info/?q=RAID.Reconstructor.v3.03-YAG&max=250&adv_age=

By: Mikey566

Mikey566 — Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:34:13 +0000

Still need password please.

By: CooperTrooper

CooperTrooper — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:26:17 +0000

AWWWW c’mon PLEASE…what is the password?

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:58:40 +0000

i had a problem with my raid 0 array before and i was able to recover every file with this tool.

Very usefull

By: mr_marcus

mr_marcus — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:35:31 +0000

Hi,

.rar pass is shown in comment (for ReleaseLog RS link)
something like that “www.somesite.url” (without quotes)
I don’t remember what, sorry. ^^

Bye.

By: hikaricore

hikaricore — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:06:10 +0000

russellnash: stop being a troll?

By: Sicon

Sicon — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:00:48 +0000

Kanuki & Russellnash try Kermiac
July 11th, 2007 | 07:36 Link

By: russellnash

russellnash — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:21:09 +0000

PLEASE, ENOUGH WITH THE UNLINKED THREADS!!! POINT US TO TEH TORRENT OR STOP TEASING US!!!

By: Kanuki

Kanuki — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:28:25 +0000

.rar is password protected

what’s the password for that rar?

By: hikaricore

hikaricore — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:28:55 +0000

I wasn’t about to go quoting on ya lol.

But to be honest the same thing can happen to the NTFS MFT, but it’s just as rare.
In most cases you have to physically and forcibly remove the root i-node for what you mentioned to happen, and in that case inbreeding is usually to blame on one level or another.

^_^

I love how we just turn this into a file system showdown. Should we discuss the finer points of ReiserFS or ZFS next? rofl

By: Mr. X

Mr. X — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:16:55 +0000

yeah but there is this thing called i-nodes, and, andreas dilger made it a special way:
“In order to ensure that ext3 can safely resume an unlink after a crash, it actually zeros out the block pointers in the inode, whereas
ext2 just marks these blocks as unused in the block bitmaps and marks the inode as “deleted” and leaves the block pointers alone. ”

there are a few ways to recover your ext3/2 FS – findsuper tool from e2fsprogs and gpart, and a modified version of debugfs, but what happens if you hose your root inode, you lose directory information and things become difficult to recover from.

By: hikaricore

hikaricore — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:03:44 +0000

Mr. X: You can recover data from ext2/3 partitions quite easily these days, assuming the data in question hasn’t been overwritten already. The difference between the way data is “deleted” on ntfs vs. ext2/3 file systems is like night and day, and I won’t go into specifics, but due to the nature of the “easy to undelete” ntfs filesystem disk fragmentation is a nightmare. On my 320gb media server (ext2 filesystem) which has been running torrents constantly for over 6 months, I have about 0.2% fragmentation. I consider this a fair trade off for the ability to recover my files. I just take more care to pay attention to my surrounding and my data.

By: nayab9

nayab9 — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:43:24 +0000

lol @ Nick, same here!

By: The Guy

The Guy — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:36:01 +0000

@ nick
i thought the same dude

By: Mr. X

Mr. X — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:00:45 +0000

Ive read lots of stories where people delete files in ext3 fs and can’t get them back, and sort of raid failures as well.