Releaselog

Pirated version of Simpsons tracked to Australia

The first known pirated copy of “The Simpsons Movie” uploaded on the Internet was tracked to a home raided by Australian police Friday, a film industry group said. An international operation involving the movie’s owner Fox, Australian police, and the private investigation group Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft resulted in the copy’s removal from the Internet, the Motion Picture Association said in a statement. Police ordered a 21-year-old man in Sydney suspected of having uploaded the movie to appear in a Sydney court in October when he will be formally charged, the Australian Federal Police said in a statement. Details of the likely charge and penalties have not been made public.

AFACT said the illegal “Simpsons” copy was the first on the Internet and was recorded by a cell phone in a Sydney cinema on July 26 — hours before its release across most of the world. The movie was uploaded to a United States-based global streaming Web site before it was screened in U.S. theaters. “Within 72 hours of making and uploading this unauthorized recording, AFACT had tracked it to other streaming sites and P2P (peer-to-peer) systems, where it had been illegally downloaded in excess of 110,000 times, and in all probability, copied and sold as a pirate DVD all over the world,” AFACT executive director Adrianne Pecotic said. Similarly, Czech police announced today they busted another 19-year-old who made the very first copy of the movie which appeared on torrent networks worldwide. This young guy is facing up to 5 years in jail.

Comments (119)

Feel free to post your Pirated version of Simpsons tracked to Australia torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
  1. Sxualdv8
    August 19th, 2007 | 10:55

    For fucks sake!!! this guy should be molested in jail for uploading a CAM from his freakin mobile.

    He should upload some descent shit and get a life, hope he feels like some of the girls that make life so beautiful posing in front of a real camera taking it in the ass!

  2. Mr D
    August 19th, 2007 | 12:23

    i agree with fixed we need to get under 16s bodies copyrighted,then serious kiddy porn makers will get 5 years,,,at least then people who go inside for pirating simpsons etc will go inside knowing its not for nothing

  3. August 19th, 2007 | 12:55

    whats the danger of this sort of arrest to the people that download movies? do they worry about them or worry more about the uploader?

  4. Rohit
    August 19th, 2007 | 14:18

    Oh yeah, Hollywood may also have it’s first 4 billion dollar summer, to all you that think piracy is a problem.
    And everyone working hard with releases, keep it up.

  5. Nezzy
    August 19th, 2007 | 14:23

    This is fantastic…. tax payers money well spent here, imagine if this guy had been left to upload yet another phone recorded movie, the movie industry would go broke… but seriously, if you were to compare the amount of tax payers money spent to track this type of crap to what the movie industries supposedly lose, we basically already paid to see it :P

    Instead of worrying about tracking pirates etc. why don’t they spend their resources tracking people who place viruses and all that crap on the internet instead, which probably ends up costing individuals more (buying protection program’s, replacing hardware, re-buying lost software and data loss etc.) than the movie industries would lose…. Ok I’m tired and all that prolly made no sense… basically the situation is the same as the governments stance on marijuana, they don’t want it around cause they cant make money off it like they do alcohol (taxes) so they try and prohibit it as best they can when really it isn’t that much of a problem in the first place ^_^

  6. August 19th, 2007 | 14:37

    I agree with Nezzy. It’s all propaganda and bullshit. Fuck the society!

  7. August 19th, 2007 | 14:37

    Correction to my previous comment: Fuck the system.
    Whatever!

  8. feetix
    August 19th, 2007 | 14:46

    spider pig… spider pig

  9. Nezzy
    August 19th, 2007 | 14:49

    Oh and 1 more thing I forgot to mention is now as a tax payer I also have to contribute to this guy staying in jail for X amount of time… so thats just a little more money spent on nothing… sigh, where did we go wrong.

  10. August 19th, 2007 | 17:34

    Hi, I am from Czech Republic. In our ministry of culture politics are stealing movies in dvd quality !!before!! premiere and uploading it to P2P and they don’t pay nothing. But one young man recorder Simpsons and he can go to jail. It’s fucking bad!

    Sry for my bad english :(

  11. DDr
    August 19th, 2007 | 18:07

    2pecan987: It was DVDSCR and it was NOT before premiere. But i agree with you It’s fucking bad!

  12. fuck
    August 20th, 2007 | 12:46

    spiderpig, spiderpig, does whatever a spiderpig does, can he swing from a web? no he can’t he’s a pig, look outttt…. here comes the spiderpiggggg…..

  13. san
    August 20th, 2007 | 18:11

    what is an ip locker and how can i download one. any ideas

  14. san
    August 20th, 2007 | 18:12

    where can i download an ip locker. any ideas

  15. ACES HIGH
    August 21st, 2007 | 13:19

    @ pecan987 you’re english is best on here lol

  16. August 27th, 2007 | 12:28

    i hope the guy gets off with the lightest penalty, because although it was the worst copy of this great film, you guys and girls have to remember that if it wernt for these people, the warez industry on the web would not exist. Just think about it Pukka releases some great titles with great quality, but he also releases some pretty average ones aswell. think about that

    P.S sorry bout that Pukka group, it was just a example

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

Leave a reply