<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phenom: first quad core CPU from AMD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:36:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spaceb</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60790</link>
		<dc:creator>spaceb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60790</guid>
		<description>awesome but... cant it run DOOM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome but&#8230; cant it run DOOM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReelFiles</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60699</link>
		<dc:creator>ReelFiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60699</guid>
		<description>Why would anybody by AMD over Intel quad core?

Intel took the easy way out by slapping 2 dual cores on one die, resulting in a bottleneck. AMD took their time and came out with a true quad core package.  

Business will jump all over Barcelona if it delivers high performance/power efficiency as promised. Phenom  will no doubt be the new toy to have in the enthusiast market.  

Intel&#039;s price drop will force AMD to stay low priced as well which should open these chips up for the OEM and mainstream markets.

Phenom will work in current Socket-AM2/Socket-1207 motherboards with a BIOS update, but you won&#039;t be able to select individual voltages for the processor and northbridge  as opposed to the new AM2+ sockets which support this feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anybody by AMD over Intel quad core?</p>
<p>Intel took the easy way out by slapping 2 dual cores on one die, resulting in a bottleneck. AMD took their time and came out with a true quad core package.  </p>
<p>Business will jump all over Barcelona if it delivers high performance/power efficiency as promised. Phenom  will no doubt be the new toy to have in the enthusiast market.  </p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s price drop will force AMD to stay low priced as well which should open these chips up for the OEM and mainstream markets.</p>
<p>Phenom will work in current Socket-AM2/Socket-1207 motherboards with a BIOS update, but you won&#8217;t be able to select individual voltages for the processor and northbridge  as opposed to the new AM2+ sockets which support this feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MellowHexagon</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60689</link>
		<dc:creator>MellowHexagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60689</guid>
		<description>who gives 2 shits what it&#039;s called... who names a chip core? seriously.... though Clawhammer was a freakin&#039; awesome name....

Anyhoo, AMD may be the underdog in processers but ATI&#039;s graphics chips are more than capable of keepingthe company afloat... Every few years the processer trophy changes hands. Its just a matter of how long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who gives 2 shits what it&#8217;s called&#8230; who names a chip core? seriously&#8230;. though Clawhammer was a freakin&#8217; awesome name&#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyhoo, AMD may be the underdog in processers but ATI&#8217;s graphics chips are more than capable of keepingthe company afloat&#8230; Every few years the processer trophy changes hands. Its just a matter of how long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lastredeemer</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60684</link>
		<dc:creator>lastredeemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60684</guid>
		<description>STARS lmao sounds like someone has been watching to much resident evil. AMD has really dropped the ball on the naming of this stuff. phenom and stars, christ what next ken and barbie memory chips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STARS lmao sounds like someone has been watching to much resident evil. AMD has really dropped the ball on the naming of this stuff. phenom and stars, christ what next ken and barbie memory chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoiZ</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60680</link>
		<dc:creator>NoiZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60680</guid>
		<description>amd needs no rescuing did any of u read rewiew of r600 if amd use its arhitecuter for ther cpu intel can go and hang it self at this moment i perfer and have intel cpu but if things turn out the way it seems i think amd iz gona win this battle on quad cores but hey ther iz more octa core and so on and on and soon we are in sci -fi movies world ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amd needs no rescuing did any of u read rewiew of r600 if amd use its arhitecuter for ther cpu intel can go and hang it self at this moment i perfer and have intel cpu but if things turn out the way it seems i think amd iz gona win this battle on quad cores but hey ther iz more octa core and so on and on and soon we are in sci -fi movies world &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60653</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60653</guid>
		<description>oops just copy the url link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops just copy the url link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60652</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60652</guid>
		<description>well intel is going to cut quad6600 to $266 now why would you buy a phenom

heres a link 
[url=http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=789466&amp;starttime=0&amp;endtime=0]click here[/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well intel is going to cut quad6600 to $266 now why would you buy a phenom</p>
<p>heres a link<br />
[url=http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=789466&amp;starttime=0&amp;endtime=0]click here[/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tric</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60649</link>
		<dc:creator>Tric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60649</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with Dp. If these are competetively priced, and deliver on the hype, they will kick ass.

Even though I&#039;d buy Intel atm (cheaper and better), I&#039;m still an AMD fanboy. I usually root for the underdog, and here they are. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with Dp. If these are competetively priced, and deliver on the hype, they will kick ass.</p>
<p>Even though I&#8217;d buy Intel atm (cheaper and better), I&#8217;m still an AMD fanboy. I usually root for the underdog, and here they are. <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr0</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60642</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 13:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60642</guid>
		<description>#6 ... I AgreE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 &#8230; I AgreE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dp</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60641</link>
		<dc:creator>Dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 13:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60641</guid>
		<description>Imo, pricing will determine if this suceeds or fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imo, pricing will determine if this suceeds or fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaosmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60634</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaosmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 13:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60634</guid>
		<description>For some reason I dont think this will rescue AMD, as Intels chips are awesomely strong at the mom. And as I remember Intel is already working on new faster chips that are supposed to come out at the end of this year or beginning of next? If the chips do work on older boards, wouldnt that be the major flaw? As the chips will be too fast for the boards and therefore their full potential will not be used. In my opinion AMD should introduce a new chip with a new socket, just like they did with their A series. Therefore you would have to buy a new board with the chip that you buy giving you the full potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I dont think this will rescue AMD, as Intels chips are awesomely strong at the mom. And as I remember Intel is already working on new faster chips that are supposed to come out at the end of this year or beginning of next? If the chips do work on older boards, wouldnt that be the major flaw? As the chips will be too fast for the boards and therefore their full potential will not be used. In my opinion AMD should introduce a new chip with a new socket, just like they did with their A series. Therefore you would have to buy a new board with the chip that you buy giving you the full potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60632</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60632</guid>
		<description>I hope that the Phenom isn&#039;t as much of a flop as the quads were for Intel. I really like AMD, but unless this new chip really blows the C2D out of the water, I really fear that $611m deficit is going to only be a bi-annual loss. Intel&#039;s market share is an iron fist in the chip competition, and AMD&#039;s revenue from the X2s is bleeding thin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that the Phenom isn&#8217;t as much of a flop as the quads were for Intel. I really like AMD, but unless this new chip really blows the C2D out of the water, I really fear that $611m deficit is going to only be a bi-annual loss. Intel&#8217;s market share is an iron fist in the chip competition, and AMD&#8217;s revenue from the X2s is bleeding thin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReelFiles</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60631</link>
		<dc:creator>ReelFiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60631</guid>
		<description>I hope DFI or Abit bring out a nice enthusiast line of boards to run these chips like they did with socket 939.  

This should help AMD out a lot, they posted a lot of losses mostly because of the price war with Intel and their recent acquisitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope DFI or Abit bring out a nice enthusiast line of boards to run these chips like they did with socket 939.  </p>
<p>This should help AMD out a lot, they posted a lot of losses mostly because of the price war with Intel and their recent acquisitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasJ</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60630</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60630</guid>
		<description>Yeah...  let&#039;s hope AMD gains some ground - even if just to force more innovation out of intel.  Competition is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;  let&#8217;s hope AMD gains some ground &#8211; even if just to force more innovation out of intel.  Competition is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/comment-page-1/#comment-60629</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/phenom-first-quad-core-cpu-from-amd/#comment-60629</guid>
		<description>my last cpu update was october 2002, damn that&#039;s a long time! by the end of this year I think ill have a new one :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my last cpu update was october 2002, damn that&#8217;s a long time! by the end of this year I think ill have a new one <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
