<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPod Shuffle rejects 3rd party headphones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:36:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666877</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666877</guid>
		<description>report of drm chip in headphones is wrong get your facts right this story was found to be incorrect hours ago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>report of drm chip in headphones is wrong get your facts right this story was found to be incorrect hours ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTruth</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666874</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666874</guid>
		<description>This has now been confirmed incorrect by MacWorld magazine and Apple. The chip in the earbuds is merely a &apos;Made for iPod&apos; software chip and does NOT prevent any third party headphones from being used or created. This is the reaction when ASSUMPTIONS are made. Good god..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has now been confirmed incorrect by MacWorld magazine and Apple. The chip in the earbuds is merely a &apos;Made for iPod&apos; software chip and does NOT prevent any third party headphones from being used or created. This is the reaction when ASSUMPTIONS are made. Good god..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antiseptic</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666843</link>
		<dc:creator>Antiseptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666843</guid>
		<description>unbelievable. but my decision to buy non-Apple wan&apos;t based on this blunder. no iPods have built in FM radio! currently I own a Sony MP3 player and it looks far slicker than iPods, and it comes with builtin FM, no need for external add-ons - and of course it works with any 3rd party headphones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unbelievable. but my decision to buy non-Apple wan&apos;t based on this blunder. no iPods have built in FM radio! currently I own a Sony MP3 player and it looks far slicker than iPods, and it comes with builtin FM, no need for external add-ons &#8211; and of course it works with any 3rd party headphones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigma957</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666511</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigma957</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666511</guid>
		<description>Cowon have the best MP3 players, Creative Labs and Apple, not even Zune can touch for reliability, quality and playback life.

Apple are twits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowon have the best MP3 players, Creative Labs and Apple, not even Zune can touch for reliability, quality and playback life.</p>
<p>Apple are twits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Te</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666292</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Te</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666292</guid>
		<description>This sort of sneaky business practice is why I never bought an Apple product since 1985.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of sneaky business practice is why I never bought an Apple product since 1985.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Bundy</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666241</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Bundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666241</guid>
		<description>wow, not 1 praise for the new product? apple must be doing something right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, not 1 praise for the new product? apple must be doing something right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sartre</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666150</link>
		<dc:creator>Sartre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666150</guid>
		<description>http://i.gizmodo.com/5168153/do-you-use-apple-earbuds

as i said, adapter coming soon y&apos;all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168153/do-you-use-apple-earbuds" rel="nofollow">http://i.gizmodo.com/5168153/do-you-use-apple-earbuds</a></p>
<p>as i said, adapter coming soon y&apos;all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FtonDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666135</link>
		<dc:creator>FtonDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666135</guid>
		<description>I&apos;m glad &quot;iLounge&quot; did a review and made these problems known to consumers before they buy.  I thought the VoiceOver options was a cool concept (since it doesn&apos;t have a screen) as when shuffling a 4GB device you may never otherwise know what the song you are listening to is called.

&quot;iLounge&quot; has good headphone reviews, I was looking for some Sony MDR-EX75 Stereo Headphones today: http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/sony-mdr-ex75-stereo-headphones/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&apos;m glad &quot;iLounge&quot; did a review and made these problems known to consumers before they buy.  I thought the VoiceOver options was a cool concept (since it doesn&apos;t have a screen) as when shuffling a 4GB device you may never otherwise know what the song you are listening to is called.</p>
<p>&quot;iLounge&quot; has good headphone reviews, I was looking for some Sony MDR-EX75 Stereo Headphones today: <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/sony-mdr-ex75-stereo-headphones/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/sony-mdr-ex75-stereo-headphones/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cpt. Obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666126</link>
		<dc:creator>Cpt. Obvious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666126</guid>
		<description>The EFF is going after it now, too.

http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/16/eff.attacks.ipod.shuffle/

I still think it&apos;s funny how they say on their website that iPods support .WAV files, yet, I&apos;ve never been able to play one on mine..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EFF is going after it now, too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/16/eff.attacks.ipod.shuffle/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/16/eff.attacks.ipod.shuffle/</a></p>
<p>I still think it&apos;s funny how they say on their website that iPods support .WAV files, yet, I&apos;ve never been able to play one on mine..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666116</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666116</guid>
		<description>&quot;If this were microsoft people would cry monopoly.&quot;

&quot;Exactly. In fact, if this was MS they&apos;d probably by fined millions of pounds by the European courts. Apple get away with murder when it comes to DRM. MS get fined for shipping Windows with their own browser in it, while Apple can sell an OS that only works on their overpriced hardware. The Mac zealots will no doubt write this one off though, as they write off all of Apple&apos;s wrongdoings.&quot;

AGREED! And anyone wonders why they only have a small market handle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;If this were microsoft people would cry monopoly.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Exactly. In fact, if this was MS they&apos;d probably by fined millions of pounds by the European courts. Apple get away with murder when it comes to DRM. MS get fined for shipping Windows with their own browser in it, while Apple can sell an OS that only works on their overpriced hardware. The Mac zealots will no doubt write this one off though, as they write off all of Apple&apos;s wrongdoings.&quot;</p>
<p>AGREED! And anyone wonders why they only have a small market handle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E71</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666112</link>
		<dc:creator>E71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666112</guid>
		<description>Booo... Apple Blows!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booo&#8230; Apple Blows!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joijaodijf</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666092</link>
		<dc:creator>joijaodijf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666092</guid>
		<description>@Sartre 

Sweat doesn&apos;t ruin earbuds. I&apos;ve been running for years with my earbuds. No problem at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sartre </p>
<p>Sweat doesn&apos;t ruin earbuds. I&apos;ve been running for years with my earbuds. No problem at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeebus</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666088</link>
		<dc:creator>jeebus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666088</guid>
		<description>&quot;Other 3rd party headphones aren&apos;t going to work on this shuffle ...&quot;

That&apos;ll be remedied soon enough.

http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/12/klipsch.3g.shuffle.earbuds/
http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/13/v.moda.avc.ipod.shuffle/
http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/12/scosche.3g.shuffle.audio/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Other 3rd party headphones aren&apos;t going to work on this shuffle &#8230;&quot;</p>
<p>That&apos;ll be remedied soon enough.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/12/klipsch.3g.shuffle.earbuds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/12/klipsch.3g.shuffle.earbuds/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/13/v.moda.avc.ipod.shuffle/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/13/v.moda.avc.ipod.shuffle/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/12/scosche.3g.shuffle.audio/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/03/12/scosche.3g.shuffle.audio/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPods_AOK</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-666064</link>
		<dc:creator>iPods_AOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-666064</guid>
		<description>The reason for this is that from the vary beginning, Apple wants there products used with there hardware.  (ie wireless apple keyboards only work with apple computers)  Again with iPods... just about everyone has one.. when someone says MP3 they automatically think iPod.  Yes there overly priced, but with this high-tech device, what other mp3 player has as much functionality as iPods do.  This iPod speaks to you, yes its annoying because you can&apos;t see the songs, and if you have a lot of music files as I do.. it&apos;s probably best to stick with the iPods with screens.  Back to the point.  
Other 3rd party headphones arn&apos;t going to work on this shuffle because that fact that the headphones that come with the device are the navigation buttons as well.  Watch the videos on the apple website.  Its all there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for this is that from the vary beginning, Apple wants there products used with there hardware.  (ie wireless apple keyboards only work with apple computers)  Again with iPods&#8230; just about everyone has one.. when someone says MP3 they automatically think iPod.  Yes there overly priced, but with this high-tech device, what other mp3 player has as much functionality as iPods do.  This iPod speaks to you, yes its annoying because you can&apos;t see the songs, and if you have a lot of music files as I do.. it&apos;s probably best to stick with the iPods with screens.  Back to the point.<br />
Other 3rd party headphones arn&apos;t going to work on this shuffle because that fact that the headphones that come with the device are the navigation buttons as well.  Watch the videos on the apple website.  Its all there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adama_bill</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/new-ipod-shuffle-rejects-3rd-party-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-665993</link>
		<dc:creator>adama_bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/?p=33731#comment-665993</guid>
		<description>Epic FAIL.
Should be illegal.

I loooked at the apple stuff and ended up with a Creative Zen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic FAIL.<br />
Should be illegal.</p>
<p>I loooked at the apple stuff and ended up with a Creative Zen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

