Comments (156)

1. STFU
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:30

   Are you sure you got those screen grabs correct? They both look the same res to me! lol

2. Frado
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:33

   Yes normally it's correct I believe

3. STFU
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:33

   Ok thought it was a straight BD rip not a BD to DVD res

4. Uh_oh
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:36

   I see no screenshots :S
   just text(Traditional DVDRip..) where screens should be

5. Frado
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:38

   Works here…

6. Thom
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:39

   Thanks for the post. Informative.

   Both screens look the same to me though…very little, or no difference in quality.

7. toto
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:40

   I dont get the whole scene thing – the nuking and unnuking – who comes first – Why not concentrate on making rips in the best quality with full DD or DTS sound. Most people has 20mbit connection these days. I would rather download a 2gb movie in superb quality than a 700mb cheapass quality.

8. foo
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:42

   Even DVD rips are usually scaled down. This is only about the source, noticed there are are no subs with DMT release, I guess they didn't figure out how to rip those?

9. lol
   February 2nd, 2009 | 18:43

   worst movie btw…lol!

10. Sean
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:43

    That's because the scene doesn't release things for your enjoyment, sorry.

11. cxy
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:44

    why use xvid……isn't x264 better?..is it so that some ppl might want to use it in xvid standalone player??? isn't it time to kill xvid…..??

12. toto and lol
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:47

    dude all i can get is a 7.6mb speed where i live its bad,by the way this is a good movie lol no taste

13. devilachils
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:50

    http://place2bscene.co.uk

14. InFaDeLiTy
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:53

    Which mod fails at screencapping?
    How can you compare when there seconds apart.
    Who knows if lighting or anything changed within that few seconds.
    You need EXACT same screens.
    Please redo screencap and fix this post that was going good then got ruined.

15. afaniti
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:55

    Lol. screens looks the same

16. smile
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:56

    nice

17. ruckerz
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:57

    You should have a category for COMPLETE BLURAY, which usually means an image of the BluRay disc itself.

    x264 is way better than xvid in my case. But then again, x264 High Profile you need Core 2 Duo or better.

18. lenny
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:00

    it is time to kill xvid, x264 is a much more efficient codec

19. Alfred
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:01

    For those who believes that are no diferences between the screenshots, look again, the bartender is much happier in BDRip. That means something.

20. drg
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:03

    Where is the difference? O_o

    Actually this is a good idea. There is a very big difference between DVDrip and BDRIp, the image is much more clear and sharp.
    I advice you (the author) to find another screenshot, this is kind'a not really good

21. Frado
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:06

    I know the difference is a bit harder to see, but that's why I also added full video samples..

22. Undecided...
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:07

    @17 I'd agree but isn't the image like 25GB?

    Not popular enough tbf

23. Caveman
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:09

    both screenshots quite the same, eh?
    Nevermind,IMO it's time to break so called "scene rules" and offer only Rips from DVD or BD at about 900-1000 MB. For me best compromise between few quality loss and less size in comparison to original DVD or even Blueray disk.

24. fingerlings
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:10

    Those scene BDRips are lame. BDRips aren't new at all, only these ugly XviD ones are new. The scene groups TLF, NewMov, XTM, BMDru, and CNXP have released hundreds of proper BDRips using x264 and AAC the way they should be except for the ridiculous 2CD thing. Who the hell uses CD-R's for movies anymore?!?

    m-HD and m-720p are 1000 times better anyways. Go to hd-bb.org to access 1000's of m-HD's. That's the place where all the encoders are.

25. Donnie Darko
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:12

    BDRip is old news, some p2p groups have already done BDRips (or BRRips whatever you want to call them and no I'm not talking about m-HD sh!t) and most of them using x264 codecs which produce cleaner/sharper image. However x264 is not supported by stand alone players and tends to lose efficiency after you burn a video file to CD/DVD.
    Also BDRips even in p2p stay withing the 700MB/1.4GB cd, even DMT release was 700mb, so it's quite pointless to discuss if people have the connection or bandwith to get BDRips. I, for one, would love to see more and more of this "new" type of ripping output and finally replace the DVDRips since you get better quality for the same size.

    PS: I agree with InFaDeLiTy about the screenshots, you need two identical frames from the different source to make a proper comparison.

26. J
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:14

    fist of all those two screens aren't same frame so no comparison can be done, secondly using xvid on bdsource is nonsense – x264 does much better job.

27. Julio
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:25

    In BDrip the pixels are more defined and when you see it moving you can't notice the scale down pixels like when it happens with the normal dvdrip…

    You need to look closely to both images to notices the definition even if they are both the same size…

    Dvdrip and DVDrip screener are better than VHS rip screener
    BDrip is way better than Dvdrip even if they are the same size…
    And x264 as codec is better than xvid…
    720p is better than BDrip and x264 because image size is bigger…
    1080p is even better than everything else cos it's even bigger than 720p.

28. blah
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:27

    Nice screenshots, Craig Robinson is the man. "I'm so excited!"
    I'd love to see more x264-encoded rips in full DVD resolution. 640×272 junk sucks.

29. Taki
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:28

    oh, no, it's time to forget xvid alredy! x264 is the way to go!

    i think it's the right moment to rewrite some rules.

    1. no more 700mb movies rip!
    2. rip movies into ONE single file, no more BS 2CD's rip!
    3. use x264
    4. add at least english subtitles as well!
    5. send xvid 6 feet under

    without it, it's just same old, same old!

30. EmperorAtahualpa
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:28

    I like the fact that some people now rip BluRay discs with 700MB releases. I downloaded and watched both the DVDRip and the BDRip version of "Zack and Miri Make a Porno" and noticed the better image quality of the BDRip compared to the DVDRip, if only just slightly.

    However, what I don't like about the BDRips is the name! Technically, the BluRay scene releases in DVD5 or DVD9 are also BluRay rips or BDRips, so the name is a little confusing.

31. Frostii
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:35

    Let me get something straight here…
    Blue ray will be the next big thing in the next couple years in the scene releases ? x256 instead of Xvid ? Thats how it'll roll ?

    DVDrips will be a blast from the past ?

32. Frostii
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:39

    I apologize:

    x264

    typo error

33. aXXo Rocks
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:40

    Whatever it is ….aXXo Rocks…
    Rest all sucks

34. Mike
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:52

    So are these better or worse than the 4.xxGB MKV files. Or no different?

    BTW 34 is a sick f**k. Links are kiddie porn.
    Please remove.

35. tw34kfr34k
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:53

    this is very good thx
    you can obviously see the BDRip is sharper.
    i prefer 700mb movies because it takes way too much disk space if you want a huge collection.
    atm i have 1800gb and its all full.if i would have all my movies in bluray or hd id need like 20 terra lol

36. BigO
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:56

    @34

    sick pervert. child porn in his links!!!

37. lolinfo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:56

    The difference is the original source, blu-ray will have more detail but it's scaled down to dvd resolution, it will have more detail even if its scaled down but not really hd.

38. lakis123
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:56

    @34 yorki!

    BAN HIM IMMEDIATELLY!!

    THE PICTURES HE IS POSTING ARE CHILD PORN!

39. hi
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:00

    Silent.Hill.HomeComing.PAL.MULTI5-XBOX360-iND

40. anon
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:02

    so the proper order in quality is as follows:

    xvid dvdrip > xvid bdrip > h.264 mkv dvdrip > h.264 mkv bluray rip

    i still dont understand why the scene still insists on 700meg rips and 2cd rips. storage is so cheap these days, why size for cdrs anymore?

41. bob
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:04

    I doubt that child pornography is permitted here yorki. Die in a fire.

42. jiggaboo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:04

    I've baconed rlslog lol!

    http://bacolicio.us/http://www.rlslog.net

43. lolwut
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:05

    @41 same reason tv hasn't switched to all HD, slow, poor, tech dumb people slowing everyone down.

44. br3
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:07

    BAN 34 now.
    Sort out your release's comments Frado and DELETE THE CHILD PORN

45. Yo-Moma!
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:10

    @34 OMFG you lamer. CHILDPORN! I would LOVE to SADISTICALLY beat you up the fix you up and then beat you up some more and so on.

    Frado, Martin BAN this lamer!

    PS make public his IP so we can REPORT HIM to PROPER AUTHORITIES

46. BenD
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:12

    @ # 34

    Are they your SISTERS ?! . . .

    I bet they are, if not. They're your daughters, you F@ck.

47. mat3201
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:13

    yorki or whatever his name is,needs to be head slapped. please remove his sick sick sick pics,and report him to the police.
    I know you will do the right thing.
    Thanx
    Mat3201

48. Bob
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:14

    lolwut – well now not everyone is inclined to toss out their perfectly functional equipment and buy an overpriced hd tv and brd player for a moderate visual improvement. Call us crazy.

49. Blade
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:15

    BdRip are great news…

    btw. as mentioned before…..no.34 is one sick son of a b**ch and should be banned from life. quote: Die in a fire.

50. trilo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:17

    #34 is child porn, dont click, someone report his IP address

51. sam
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:25

    So it was the porn industry that tipped the edge to BR as the standard?

52. Yo-Moma!
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:36

    So? where is his IP? its not a joke!, either you report him or make his IP public.

53. B005T3R
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:37

    Those comparison pictures look exactly the same to me?!

54. Saberus
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:45

    wow! what a m-o-r-o-n-s… wanna see some nice quality BDRIP? look at this:
    http://thepiratebay.org/user/SAMNhaNc3/
    (at the size of normal xvids quality better than 4gigs rips)
    that's the new nhanc3 btw. ooww.. and f_u-c_k the xvid's now it's time for x264.

55. Jon
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:46

    @18
    XviD doesn't uses lower processor power compared to x264. That's why it won't ever be "killed". You can play XviD on any DivX certified DVD player. Good luck playing x264 video on a DVD player.

56. Moshster
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:47

    Here here! Time to retire XviD and switch to AVC/VC1/x264. Also switch to Matroska containers and retire the 20 year old AVI container format.

57. pop pop
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:50

    It's funny how being used to watch almost everything in HD makes you realize the futility of having 2 separate groups for standards res. xvid encodes. xD

58. =BRRipz=
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:53

    Many p2p groups like PRoDJi or D-Z0N3 already make BR/BDRips for Xvid standalones, with 5.1 sound and high bitrates. Size is 1.45 – 2GB instead of scene 700MB – 1.37GB. Most important, they use sharp CQM and proper filtering resulting in very crisp and clean encodes. My 3yo Home Theater loves them!

    Sample of a proper blu-ray rip for SD standalones:

    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/861105/wanted.brrip.xvid.d-z0n3.sample.rar

59. bleble
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:58

    This makes no sense. If the output file is the same codec and same resolution, than what do I care about the source? All it does is make me check two separate categories for no reason.
    If they really want to differentiate between the two, just make the new rips higher resolution and ditch the stupid 700MB limit already. And stop rescaling, leave a native DVD resolution for DVDRips.
    The standards for DVDRips were set up almost a decade ago in a complete different era. The scene is starting to fall technologically behind most mainstream video providers, like youtube, hulu or netflix.

60. valgore
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:03

    Thanks for the info its realy good to know but the screen pics are funny because the dvdrip pic looks sharper than bd

61. Raptoger
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:09

    I completely agree, drop the 700MB limit and switch to H264 codec. We all have outgrown the CD era, 56Kbps connection. Lets get updated already. Every movie in H.264 looks better when at least 1000MB in size.

62. TheGoD
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:10

    BDRips as a category? Sorry guys, but thats real dumb! First of, the differents on the sample isnt that great and in many cases there wont be a difference at all because the studios using the same blueprint for the (commercial) BD-Release and the DVD-Release. Seperating BD-Rips form DVD-Rips just divites the avialable releases in two groups who virtually share the same quality and makes searching more complicated. So please rethink your decision.

    On the other site a got to agree with the majority that sticking to the scene rules is just plain stupid! Its 2k9 people!! I virtualy dont know anybody who still burns movies the regular cd's. Most of the people are using dvd's for years or keep on buying new Hard Disks when the run out of space. SO PLEASE STOP USING CD SIZES! If u want to stick to a standard size (which is dump anyway because flicks dont stick to a standard lengh) use a third or a half of a dvd-r!!!

    The other think is this nonsense regarding the used video-codecs. While I can unterstand why mp3 is still around I think x264 or wmv are way better choices when it comes to video-encoding. The offer the same quality at a lower size or better quality at the same size compared to mpeg 4 asp. Most of the people who download movies online on a regular bases got a pc or game-console hooked up to there tv anyway. Plus u can always reencode to the format of your own choice. I mean, DivX certified DVD player cant play RAR-files ether and still the vast majority of releases hit the wire as RAR-files!

63. gonzo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:11

    im waitin for the VHSrip

64. Barry
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:16

    @60: I thought that too… are we crazy?

65. asdf
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:18

    

    No difference at all, the screenshots look the same…

66. LOL
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:20

    BRRip 480p – top vs DVDRip 480p Devise HQ – bottom
    Both XVID 1,4GB comparable bitrate and parameters , different SOURCE.
    One Bluray, other DVD.

    http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q262/anonim1979/BRRip480pvsDVDRip480pDeviseHQ-botto.png

67. bleble
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:20

    Oh and BTW, DVDRips already look like sh!t on anything except the old SD CRT TVs, screeners are even worse and don't even get me started on CAMs – they really are for blind people and 7-year olds. So seriously, scene, get your sh!t together, ok?

68. Zen
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:37

    proper BDRips are 720×400 with ~2000k bitrate

    these BDRips from scene xvid groups that try and fit in the old txd rules are a joke

69. deeznuts
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:44

    Sweet. I hope this replaces a lot of DVDrips.

70. BD
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:47

    BD-Rips are a good thing. Quality is much superior than in the sample pics visable.

    @x264
    As long as that crap isn't playable on Standart Standalones the whiners can shove it up their ass.

71. noone
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:50

    honestly, horrible idea…

    it defeats the whole concept of rips… people don't go and create more video formats and scene type releases because they want to, they create them because they need them, H.264 (not x264) exists because someone thought they could improve the compression in videos… BD exists because someone thought they could make larger capacity discs (beside other things)… and the only reason people still use xvid is because of compatibility purposes..

    that said:
    1. There is no gain on having a "BDrip" and a DVDrip since their quality will eventually be the same because they dumb down the resolution and compression to fit in a compatible 700MB disc
    2. DVDs still come up first then BDs… just because one particular film didn't you don't create a whole new "scene category" for it
    3. by the time BDs take over DVDs so will H.264 take over xvid, which means either smaller files or larger resolution videos, so even if eventually the scene "creates" a new BDrip category they will have their own "rules" for it, imposing rules on something that isn't even a necessity yet is plain stupid…

72. no-difference
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:01

    completely disagree… no improvement , can't tell the difference !!!

    From the sample above :
    The black man still look like a black man.

73. romanodj
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:11

    @19

    LoL

74. wow
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:17

    @ 66

    if your going to post a comparison don't re size the pictures. that totally ruins any details that can be seen between the two.

    post the full resolution screens or don't post at all.

75. P
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:17

    @66
    bdrip looks a lot better from your sample pics

76. okeywithme
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:35

    you guys that don't like BDrip can go f%^$ your#$@%^# in the face. A BDrip is in size of 1 to 1.5 GB and has much better quality than dvdrip.

    One of my fav uploaders is newartriot. Search it in mininova and download a couple of his BDrips and see for yourself.

    I agree that BDrips have to be encoded right and not everyone know what the %&*% that means.

    So I like to see BDrips on this site but if it doesnt happen then I will just stick with other sites and stick it in your m%ms bras.

    anyways. I just gotta say to all you nerds who talk sh^$ about BDrips to go F@#^ yourselves one more time.

77. CoolJ
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:39

    I think #77's mom created BDrips

78. peter
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:42

    the negro looks the same in both pictures

79. Kernel
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:43

    Bury DVDRips. They are blurry.

    BluRay 720p or 1080p x264 FTW!

80. k3nnyd
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:49

    I think Xvid is still fine. BDRip is good if you have a giant television and also a capability to play x264 onto your TV. This either requires a computer connected to it or other hardware usually starting at about $150 for something like Western Digital TV box or $400 for a PS3.

    Xvid is fine for watching movies at your computer on a 20ish inch and under monitor. You won't really notice a quality difference until you display it on a 40+ inch TV. If you don't do this then you're wasting your bandwidth. And speaking of bandwidth, no most people don't have 20mbit. In the USA pretty much NOBODY does aside from FIOS users which is like less than 1% of Internet users. Not to mention most of the major ISP's have bandwidth caps such as Comcast's 250GB limit. I'm not getting giant x264 rips when I can get twice as many movies per month getting Xvids.

    So if I had a) a giant TV, b) 10mbit+ consistent speed, c) unlimited bandwidth, and d) hardware to display x264/Bluray on a TV then I would be all for BDRips and such. But since I nor do 99% of people in the USA satisfy all 4 of these requirements then its utterly pointless to waste your time on anything but 700-1400mb Xvid rips. Peace.

81. common sense
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:55

    Cool! Finally got a decent easy to use program that recognizes mkv files and burns them to a dvd (Super DVD Creator v9.8)

    But watch out because you will hear people complaining about the size of these rips…

82. estacado
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:07

    In DVDRips the actors make funny faces, but in BDRip they don't. I like watching people make funny faces.

83. hoobastank
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:13

    Well, as you all hopefully clearly can see, in the above picture he bobs his head to his right, and in the picture below he bobs his head a little to his left. So maybe thats the difference, bdrip aligns the picture better verticaly.

84. dr. spaceman
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:19

    nice quali …..

    http://www.irfree.com/2008/12/19/death-race-unrated-2008-brrip-xvid-ac3-d-z0n3/

85. Random
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:21

    Why are people posting suggestions about what the scene should do here? Seriously?

    Thanks for the new category and the explanation.

86. anomynous
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:22

    holy sh*t! BDrips change the characters' expressions from pissed to happy! That is good technology.

87. stephen
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:25

    I think the BDrip is a great idea but when are the groups that rip these things going to realise that noone cares about CD's anymore!! Why are you still ripping them to 700mb, everyone buys DVD-R these days so why cant you start upping the resolution of these rip to something of a higher quality and make sure all rips have AC3 sound??? So many people have Dolby Digital Amplifiers but cant use them for good sound anymore unless they buy a dvd, and why would they do that when they can get the movies from torrents 6 months earlier. I think it's time to raise the quality bar a little guys!!!

88. Alkamist
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:31

    Nice you used my siggy… Not a BD fan but ty anyways!

89. QuestionGuy
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:31

    so any computer can play a BRrip? its exactly like a Dvdrip right?

90. chuckz
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:38

    you could put a 700mb movie into a 10mb or less .swf file and it will look better

    .swf is the way of the future

91. hacked off
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:43

    yep no more 700mb avi's or daft 2cd bloody releases either, why dont they just rip a hd/blueray and scale down to dvd5 size that way i can just watch it my divx player in great quality instead of putting 6 avi's on a data dvd which when i watch on my 42inch lcd looks crap!

92. y2k
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:47

    yep no more 700mb avi's or daft 2cd bloody releases either, why dont they just rip a hd/blueray and scale down to dvd5 size that way i can just watch it my divx player in great quality instead of putting 6 avi's on a data dvd which when i watch on my 42inch lcd looks horrible!

93. stephen
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:48

    I think they should finally make the DVDrip standard to have full dvd resolution and Dolby Digital AC3 sound and stop worrying about trying to fit the movies onto an out of date format that noone uses anymore(CD's). Everybody plays these movies on either a dvd player or a Media Center or a PC which all have DVD drives in them so why cant the file size be increased a little and a better quality DVDrip be produced, i think it's about time, especially if Blue Ray is going to start being used as the sourced for these rips now. Why bother ripping them down to 500*300 resolution from 1920*1080 when DVD standard is 720*576, doesn't make sense to me, most people have huge download limits these days so lets stop living in the past, move to the present, people dont even burn music to cd's that much anymore, it's time for HIGHER QUALITY DVDRIPS!!!!!!!

94. fubar
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:02

    if we switch to BDrips we need to stop using rapidshare with their 2.5 gb daily limit.

95. skiely69
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:14

    I think people are confused with HD 720/1080 xvids which use the mkv container & BR/BDrips. The BR/BDrips are much clearer & have better sound then standard dvdrips xvids but use the same container & with the same resolution but bigger file size so u can play them on standalone or other compatable players through usb or on your pc. BR/BDrips are very cool but mkv is the future.Until Standalone players play mkv nothing will change..

96. UnReaL
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:16

    BRRip is better than BDRip… much much better.. & the file size isn't much bigger…

97. Taki
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:20

    scene sucks! scene rules are ancient rules from the stone age! forget stupid CD's and stupid 700mb and start taking care about quality.

98. Mr Happy
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:28

    @34, hey can you email me some kiddie porn please. I've been blocked by my ISP for looking it up over http, so please if you have some can you email me the links.

    Also if anyone has any young kiddies (ideally between ages of 6 to 9) in BD quality can you send me the info on how to get them.

    many thanks!

99. bakeLit
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:34

    As you can know, DEViSE (www.thedeviseplace.org) usually makes x264 DVDRips, which are much, much better than the XviD ones. I prefer to download those, but they're 1.4 GBs, so it's not that good for huge collection maniacs like me..

100. Almi
     February 3rd, 2009 | 00:41

     Is it just me or does the DVDrip look better then the BDrip? BDrip plz GTFO

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply