Releaselog

New Category: BDRip

Posted on 02.02.2009 at 18:28 in BDRiP,Movies,Site news by

As you probably just noticed, I’ve (finally) added a new category called  BDRip. BDRip has been introduced to the scene some time ago, and some of you might remember the release by DMT for Zack And Miri Make A Porno. This movie was first released as a BDRip, and later we received the  traditional DVDRip.

But what is BDRip and why should I care?

First of all, you probably noticed that lately Blu Ray versions are being released before the actual DVDRip popped up. Groups like DMT saw that and released a ‘BDRip’ version of that movie. BDRip is basically just the same thing as a DVDRip, but it uses the Blu Ray as source. BDRip also uses the Xvid codec, and has the same rules concerning multiple CD’s.

You should ‘care’ about this since the quality is a bit better and you can watch the movie most of the time earlier. DMT proposed the following rules:

-BluRay may be used as source only if no DVDRip has already been released.
-Such releases must be tagged .BDRip.
-Reencoding xvids using x264 releases is strictly forbidden.
-BDRip dupes DVDRip, and vice versa, DVDRip dupes BDRip.

Some examples so you can compare:

Screenshots compared:

Traditional DVDRip

Traditional DVDRip

New BDRip

New BDRip

Video samples compared
Zack And Miri Make A Porno BDRIP XviD-DMT

Zack.And.Miri.Make.A.Porno.2008.DVDRip.XviD-COCAIN

So I hope you like my idea of bringing you BDRips. Let’s hope other scene groups will follow and that the scene rules get updated:) . Have a nice day.

* Comments(156)

Comments

Feel free to post your New Category: BDRip torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
1 2
  1. STFU
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:30

    Are you sure you got those screen grabs correct? They both look the same res to me! lol

  2. Frado staff member
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:33

    Yes normally it's correct I believe

  3. STFU
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:33

    Ok thought it was a straight BD rip not a BD to DVD res

  4. Uh_oh
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:36

    I see no screenshots :S
    just text(Traditional DVDRip..) where screens should be

  5. Frado staff member
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:38

    Works here…

  6. Thom
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:39

    Thanks for the post. Informative.

    Both screens look the same to me though…very little, or no difference in quality.

  7. toto
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:40

    I dont get the whole scene thing – the nuking and unnuking – who comes first – Why not concentrate on making rips in the best quality with full DD or DTS sound. Most people has 20mbit connection these days. I would rather download a 2gb movie in superb quality than a 700mb cheapass quality.

  8. foo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:42

    Even DVD rips are usually scaled down. This is only about the source, noticed there are are no subs with DMT release, I guess they didn't figure out how to rip those?

  9. lol
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:43

    worst movie btw…lol!

  10. Sean
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:43

    That's because the scene doesn't release things for your enjoyment, sorry.

  11. cxy
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:44

    why use xvid……isn't x264 better?..is it so that some ppl might want to use it in xvid standalone player??? isn't it time to kill xvid…..??

  12. toto and lol
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:47

    dude all i can get is a 7.6mb speed where i live its bad,by the way this is a good movie lol no taste

  13. InFaDeLiTy
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:53

    Which mod fails at screencapping?
    How can you compare when there seconds apart.
    Who knows if lighting or anything changed within that few seconds.
    You need EXACT same screens.
    Please redo screencap and fix this post that was going good then got ruined.

  14. afaniti
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:55

    Lol. screens looks the same

  15. smile
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:56

    nice ;)

  16. ruckerz
    February 2nd, 2009 | 18:57

    You should have a category for COMPLETE BLURAY, which usually means an image of the BluRay disc itself.

    x264 is way better than xvid in my case. But then again, x264 High Profile you need Core 2 Duo or better.

  17. lenny
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:00

    it is time to kill xvid, x264 is a much more efficient codec

  18. Alfred
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:01

    For those who believes that are no diferences between the screenshots, look again, the bartender is much happier in BDRip. That means something.

  19. drg
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:03

    Where is the difference? O_o

    Actually this is a good idea. There is a very big difference between DVDrip and BDRIp, the image is much more clear and sharp.
    I advice you (the author) to find another screenshot, this is kind'a not really good

  20. Frado staff member
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:06

    I know the difference is a bit harder to see, but that's why I also added full video samples..

  21. Undecided...
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:07

    @17 I'd agree but isn't the image like 25GB?

    Not popular enough tbf

  22. Caveman
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:09

    both screenshots quite the same, eh?
    Nevermind,IMO it's time to break so called "scene rules" and offer only Rips from DVD or BD at about 900-1000 MB. For me best compromise between few quality loss and less size in comparison to original DVD or even Blueray disk.

  23. fingerlings
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:10

    Those scene BDRips are lame. BDRips aren't new at all, only these ugly XviD ones are new. The scene groups TLF, NewMov, XTM, BMDru, and CNXP have released hundreds of proper BDRips using x264 and AAC the way they should be except for the ridiculous 2CD thing. Who the hell uses CD-R's for movies anymore?!?

    m-HD and m-720p are 1000 times better anyways. Go to hd-bb.org to access 1000's of m-HD's. That's the place where all the encoders are.

  24. Donnie Darko
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:12

    BDRip is old news, some p2p groups have already done BDRips (or BRRips whatever you want to call them and no I'm not talking about m-HD sh!t) and most of them using x264 codecs which produce cleaner/sharper image. However x264 is not supported by stand alone players and tends to lose efficiency after you burn a video file to CD/DVD.
    Also BDRips even in p2p stay withing the 700MB/1.4GB cd, even DMT release was 700mb, so it's quite pointless to discuss if people have the connection or bandwith to get BDRips. I, for one, would love to see more and more of this "new" type of ripping output and finally replace the DVDRips since you get better quality for the same size.

    PS: I agree with InFaDeLiTy about the screenshots, you need two identical frames from the different source to make a proper comparison.

  25. J
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:14

    fist of all those two screens aren't same frame so no comparison can be done, secondly using xvid on bdsource is nonsense – x264 does much better job.

  26. Julio
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:25

    In BDrip the pixels are more defined and when you see it moving you can't notice the scale down pixels like when it happens with the normal dvdrip…

    You need to look closely to both images to notices the definition even if they are both the same size…

    Dvdrip and DVDrip screener are better than VHS rip screener
    BDrip is way better than Dvdrip even if they are the same size…
    And x264 as codec is better than xvid…
    720p is better than BDrip and x264 because image size is bigger…
    1080p is even better than everything else cos it's even bigger than 720p.

  27. blah
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:27

    Nice screenshots, Craig Robinson is the man. "I'm so excited!" ;-)
    I'd love to see more x264-encoded rips in full DVD resolution. 640×272 junk sucks.

  28. Taki
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:28

    oh, no, it's time to forget xvid alredy! x264 is the way to go!

    i think it's the right moment to rewrite some rules.

    1. no more 700mb movies rip!
    2. rip movies into ONE single file, no more BS 2CD's rip!
    3. use x264
    4. add at least english subtitles as well!
    5. send xvid 6 feet under

    without it, it's just same old, same old!

  29. EmperorAtahualpa
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:28

    I like the fact that some people now rip BluRay discs with 700MB releases. I downloaded and watched both the DVDRip and the BDRip version of "Zack and Miri Make a Porno" and noticed the better image quality of the BDRip compared to the DVDRip, if only just slightly.

    However, what I don't like about the BDRips is the name! Technically, the BluRay scene releases in DVD5 or DVD9 are also BluRay rips or BDRips, so the name is a little confusing.

  30. Frostii
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:35

    Let me get something straight here…
    Blue ray will be the next big thing in the next couple years in the scene releases ? x256 instead of Xvid ? Thats how it'll roll ?

    DVDrips will be a blast from the past ?

  31. Frostii
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:39

    I apologize:

    x264

    typo error

  32. aXXo Rocks
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:40

    Whatever it is ….aXXo Rocks…
    Rest all sucks

  33. Mike
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:52

    So are these better or worse than the 4.xxGB MKV files. Or no different?

    BTW 34 is a sick f**k. Links are kiddie porn.
    Please remove.

  34. tw34kfr34k
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:53

    this is very good thx
    you can obviously see the BDRip is sharper.
    i prefer 700mb movies because it takes way too much disk space if you want a huge collection.
    atm i have 1800gb and its all full.if i would have all my movies in bluray or hd id need like 20 terra lol

  35. BigO
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:56

    @34

    sick pervert. child porn in his links!!!

  36. lolinfo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:56

    The difference is the original source, blu-ray will have more detail but it's scaled down to dvd resolution, it will have more detail even if its scaled down but not really hd.

  37. lakis123
    February 2nd, 2009 | 19:56

    @34 yorki!

    BAN HIM IMMEDIATELLY!!

    THE PICTURES HE IS POSTING ARE CHILD PORN!

  38. hi
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:00

    Silent.Hill.HomeComing.PAL.MULTI5-XBOX360-iND

  39. anon
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:02

    so the proper order in quality is as follows:

    xvid dvdrip > xvid bdrip > h.264 mkv dvdrip > h.264 mkv bluray rip

    i still dont understand why the scene still insists on 700meg rips and 2cd rips. storage is so cheap these days, why size for cdrs anymore?

  40. bob
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:04

    I doubt that child pornography is permitted here yorki. Die in a fire.

  41. jiggaboo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:04

    I've baconed rlslog lol!

    http://bacolicio.us/http://www.rlslog.net

  42. lolwut
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:05

    @41 same reason tv hasn't switched to all HD, slow, poor, tech dumb people slowing everyone down.

  43. br3
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:07

    BAN 34 now.
    Sort out your release's comments Frado and DELETE THE CHILD PORN

  44. Yo-Moma!
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:10

    @34 OMFG you lamer. CHILDPORN! I would LOVE to SADISTICALLY beat you up the fix you up and then beat you up some more and so on.

    Frado, Martin BAN this lamer!

    PS make public his IP so we can REPORT HIM to PROPER AUTHORITIES

  45. BenD
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:12

    @ # 34

    Are they your SISTERS ?! . . .

    I bet they are, if not. They're your daughters, you F@ck.

  46. mat3201
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:13

    yorki or whatever his name is,needs to be head slapped. please remove his sick sick sick pics,and report him to the police.
    I know you will do the right thing.
    Thanx
    Mat3201

  47. Bob
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:14

    lolwut – well now not everyone is inclined to toss out their perfectly functional equipment and buy an overpriced hd tv and brd player for a moderate visual improvement. Call us crazy.

  48. Blade
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:15

    BdRip are great news…

    btw. as mentioned before…..no.34 is one sick son of a b**ch and should be banned from life. quote: Die in a fire.

  49. trilo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:17

    #34 is child porn, dont click, someone report his IP address

  50. sam
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:25

    So it was the porn industry that tipped the edge to BR as the standard?

  51. Yo-Moma!
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:36

    So? where is his IP? its not a joke!, either you report him or make his IP public.

  52. B005T3R
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:37

    Those comparison pictures look exactly the same to me?!

  53. Saberus
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:45

    wow! what a m-o-r-o-n-s… wanna see some nice quality BDRIP? look at this:
    http://thepiratebay.org/user/SAMNhaNc3/
    (at the size of normal xvids quality better than 4gigs rips)
    that's the new nhanc3 btw. ooww.. and f_u-c_k the xvid's now it's time for x264.

  54. Jon
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:46

    @18
    XviD doesn't uses lower processor power compared to x264. That's why it won't ever be "killed". You can play XviD on any DivX certified DVD player. Good luck playing x264 video on a DVD player.

  55. Moshster
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:47

    Here here! Time to retire XviD and switch to AVC/VC1/x264. Also switch to Matroska containers and retire the 20 year old AVI container format.

  56. pop pop
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:50

    It's funny how being used to watch almost everything in HD makes you realize the futility of having 2 separate groups for standards res. xvid encodes. xD

  57. bleble
    February 2nd, 2009 | 20:58

    This makes no sense. If the output file is the same codec and same resolution, than what do I care about the source? All it does is make me check two separate categories for no reason.
    If they really want to differentiate between the two, just make the new rips higher resolution and ditch the stupid 700MB limit already. And stop rescaling, leave a native DVD resolution for DVDRips.
    The standards for DVDRips were set up almost a decade ago in a complete different era. The scene is starting to fall technologically behind most mainstream video providers, like youtube, hulu or netflix.

  58. valgore
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:03

    Thanks for the info its realy good to know but the screen pics are funny because the dvdrip pic looks sharper than bd

  59. Raptoger
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:09

    I completely agree, drop the 700MB limit and switch to H264 codec. We all have outgrown the CD era, 56Kbps connection. Lets get updated already. Every movie in H.264 looks better when at least 1000MB in size.

  60. TheGoD
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:10

    BDRips as a category? Sorry guys, but thats real dumb! First of, the differents on the sample isnt that great and in many cases there wont be a difference at all because the studios using the same blueprint for the (commercial) BD-Release and the DVD-Release. Seperating BD-Rips form DVD-Rips just divites the avialable releases in two groups who virtually share the same quality and makes searching more complicated. So please rethink your decision.

    On the other site a got to agree with the majority that sticking to the scene rules is just plain stupid! Its 2k9 people!! I virtualy dont know anybody who still burns movies the regular cd's. Most of the people are using dvd's for years or keep on buying new Hard Disks when the run out of space. SO PLEASE STOP USING CD SIZES! If u want to stick to a standard size (which is dump anyway because flicks dont stick to a standard lengh) use a third or a half of a dvd-r!!!

    The other think is this nonsense regarding the used video-codecs. While I can unterstand why mp3 is still around I think x264 or wmv are way better choices when it comes to video-encoding. The offer the same quality at a lower size or better quality at the same size compared to mpeg 4 asp. Most of the people who download movies online on a regular bases got a pc or game-console hooked up to there tv anyway. Plus u can always reencode to the format of your own choice. I mean, DivX certified DVD player cant play RAR-files ether and still the vast majority of releases hit the wire as RAR-files!

  61. gonzo
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:11

    im waitin for the VHSrip

  62. Barry
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:16

    @60: I thought that too… are we crazy?

  63. asdf
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:18

    :)

    No difference at all, the screenshots look the same…

  64. LOL
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:20

    BRRip 480p – top vs DVDRip 480p Devise HQ – bottom
    Both XVID 1,4GB comparable bitrate and parameters , different SOURCE.
    One Bluray, other DVD.

    http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q262/anonim1979/BRRip480pvsDVDRip480pDeviseHQ-botto.png

  65. bleble
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:20

    Oh and BTW, DVDRips already look like sh!t on anything except the old SD CRT TVs, screeners are even worse and don't even get me started on CAMs – they really are for blind people and 7-year olds. So seriously, scene, get your sh!t together, ok?

  66. Zen
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:37

    proper BDRips are 720×400 with ~2000k bitrate

    these BDRips from scene xvid groups that try and fit in the old txd rules are a joke

  67. deeznuts
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:44

    Sweet. I hope this replaces a lot of DVDrips.

  68. BD
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:47

    BD-Rips are a good thing. Quality is much superior than in the sample pics visable.

    @x264
    As long as that crap isn't playable on Standart Standalones the whiners can shove it up their ass.

  69. noone
    February 2nd, 2009 | 21:50

    honestly, horrible idea…

    it defeats the whole concept of rips… people don't go and create more video formats and scene type releases because they want to, they create them because they need them, H.264 (not x264) exists because someone thought they could improve the compression in videos… BD exists because someone thought they could make larger capacity discs (beside other things)… and the only reason people still use xvid is because of compatibility purposes..

    that said:
    1. There is no gain on having a "BDrip" and a DVDrip since their quality will eventually be the same because they dumb down the resolution and compression to fit in a compatible 700MB disc
    2. DVDs still come up first then BDs… just because one particular film didn't you don't create a whole new "scene category" for it
    3. by the time BDs take over DVDs so will H.264 take over xvid, which means either smaller files or larger resolution videos, so even if eventually the scene "creates" a new BDrip category they will have their own "rules" for it, imposing rules on something that isn't even a necessity yet is plain stupid…

  70. no-difference
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:01

    completely disagree… no improvement , can't tell the difference !!!

    From the sample above :
    The black man still look like a black man.

  71. romanodj
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:11

    @19

    LoL

  72. wow
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:17

    @ 66

    if your going to post a comparison don't re size the pictures. that totally ruins any details that can be seen between the two.

    post the full resolution screens or don't post at all.

  73. P
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:17

    @66
    bdrip looks a lot better from your sample pics

  74. okeywithme
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:35

    you guys that don't like BDrip can go f%^$ your#$@%^# in the face. A BDrip is in size of 1 to 1.5 GB and has much better quality than dvdrip.

    One of my fav uploaders is newartriot. Search it in mininova and download a couple of his BDrips and see for yourself.

    I agree that BDrips have to be encoded right and not everyone know what the %&*% that means.

    So I like to see BDrips on this site but if it doesnt happen then I will just stick with other sites and stick it in your m%ms bras.

    anyways. I just gotta say to all you nerds who talk sh^$ about BDrips to go F@#^ yourselves one more time.

  75. CoolJ
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:39

    I think #77's mom created BDrips

  76. peter
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:42

    the negro looks the same in both pictures

  77. Kernel
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:43

    Bury DVDRips. They are blurry.

    BluRay 720p or 1080p x264 FTW!

  78. k3nnyd
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:49

    I think Xvid is still fine. BDRip is good if you have a giant television and also a capability to play x264 onto your TV. This either requires a computer connected to it or other hardware usually starting at about $150 for something like Western Digital TV box or $400 for a PS3.

    Xvid is fine for watching movies at your computer on a 20ish inch and under monitor. You won't really notice a quality difference until you display it on a 40+ inch TV. If you don't do this then you're wasting your bandwidth. And speaking of bandwidth, no most people don't have 20mbit. In the USA pretty much NOBODY does aside from FIOS users which is like less than 1% of Internet users. Not to mention most of the major ISP's have bandwidth caps such as Comcast's 250GB limit. I'm not getting giant x264 rips when I can get twice as many movies per month getting Xvids.

    So if I had a) a giant TV, b) 10mbit+ consistent speed, c) unlimited bandwidth, and d) hardware to display x264/Bluray on a TV then I would be all for BDRips and such. But since I nor do 99% of people in the USA satisfy all 4 of these requirements then its utterly pointless to waste your time on anything but 700-1400mb Xvid rips. Peace.

  79. common sense
    February 2nd, 2009 | 22:55

    Cool! Finally got a decent easy to use program that recognizes mkv files and burns them to a dvd (Super DVD Creator v9.8)

    But watch out because you will hear people complaining about the size of these rips…

  80. estacado
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:07

    In DVDRips the actors make funny faces, but in BDRip they don't. I like watching people make funny faces.

  81. hoobastank
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:13

    Well, as you all hopefully clearly can see, in the above picture he bobs his head to his right, and in the picture below he bobs his head a little to his left. So maybe thats the difference, bdrip aligns the picture better verticaly.

  82. dr. spaceman
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:19

    nice quali …..

    http://www.irfree.com/2008/12/19/death-race-unrated-2008-brrip-xvid-ac3-d-z0n3/

  83. anomynous
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:22

    holy sh*t! BDrips change the characters' expressions from pissed to happy! That is good technology.

  84. stephen
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:25

    I think the BDrip is a great idea but when are the groups that rip these things going to realise that noone cares about CD's anymore!! Why are you still ripping them to 700mb, everyone buys DVD-R these days so why cant you start upping the resolution of these rip to something of a higher quality and make sure all rips have AC3 sound??? So many people have Dolby Digital Amplifiers but cant use them for good sound anymore unless they buy a dvd, and why would they do that when they can get the movies from torrents 6 months earlier. I think it's time to raise the quality bar a little guys!!!

  85. Alkamist
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:31

    Nice you used my siggy… Not a BD fan but ty anyways!

  86. QuestionGuy
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:31

    so any computer can play a BRrip? its exactly like a Dvdrip right?

  87. chuckz
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:38

    you could put a 700mb movie into a 10mb or less .swf file and it will look better

    .swf is the way of the future

  88. hacked off
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:43

    yep no more 700mb avi's or daft 2cd bloody releases either, why dont they just rip a hd/blueray and scale down to dvd5 size that way i can just watch it my divx player in great quality instead of putting 6 avi's on a data dvd which when i watch on my 42inch lcd looks crap!

  89. y2k
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:47

    yep no more 700mb avi's or daft 2cd bloody releases either, why dont they just rip a hd/blueray and scale down to dvd5 size that way i can just watch it my divx player in great quality instead of putting 6 avi's on a data dvd which when i watch on my 42inch lcd looks horrible!

  90. stephen
    February 2nd, 2009 | 23:48

    I think they should finally make the DVDrip standard to have full dvd resolution and Dolby Digital AC3 sound and stop worrying about trying to fit the movies onto an out of date format that noone uses anymore(CD's). Everybody plays these movies on either a dvd player or a Media Center or a PC which all have DVD drives in them so why cant the file size be increased a little and a better quality DVDrip be produced, i think it's about time, especially if Blue Ray is going to start being used as the sourced for these rips now. Why bother ripping them down to 500*300 resolution from 1920*1080 when DVD standard is 720*576, doesn't make sense to me, most people have huge download limits these days so lets stop living in the past, move to the present, people dont even burn music to cd's that much anymore, it's time for HIGHER QUALITY DVDRIPS!!!!!!!

  91. fubar
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:02

    if we switch to BDrips we need to stop using rapidshare with their 2.5 gb daily limit.

  92. skiely69
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:14

    I think people are confused with HD 720/1080 xvids which use the mkv container & BR/BDrips. The BR/BDrips are much clearer & have better sound then standard dvdrips xvids but use the same container & with the same resolution but bigger file size so u can play them on standalone or other compatable players through usb or on your pc. BR/BDrips are very cool but mkv is the future.Until Standalone players play mkv nothing will change..

  93. UnReaL
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:16

    BRRip is better than BDRip… much much better.. & the file size isn't much bigger…

  94. Taki
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:20

    scene sucks! scene rules are ancient rules from the stone age! forget stupid CD's and stupid 700mb and start taking care about quality.

  95. Mr Happy
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:28

    @34, hey can you email me some kiddie porn please. I've been blocked by my ISP for looking it up over http, so please if you have some can you email me the links.

    Also if anyone has any young kiddies (ideally between ages of 6 to 9) in BD quality can you send me the info on how to get them.

    many thanks!

  96. bakeLit
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:34

    As you can know, DEViSE (www.thedeviseplace.org) usually makes x264 DVDRips, which are much, much better than the XviD ones. I prefer to download those, but they're 1.4 GBs, so it's not that good for huge collection maniacs like me..

  97. Almi
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:41

    Is it just me or does the DVDrip look better then the BDrip? BDrip plz GTFO :(

  98. Equinoxin
    February 3rd, 2009 | 00:58

    The problem for me is:
    My Xbox 360 doesn't play x264… fffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!

  99. Blender
    February 3rd, 2009 | 01:23

    Seems many forget that not every country in the world propose unlimited download and high speed broadband.

    Also ripping in the smallest possible size with highest quality is a Challenge that pushes the limit of codec and knowhow of the encoder.

    Each encoder have it's own matrices, scripts and filters that keep them as secret as possible. It's a hard work and hours of test and research to be able to encode as good as some encoders.

    I've seen some better quality 700MB than 1.4GB rips. If you liked a movie, support it by actually buying it.

  100. johnny_pt
    February 3rd, 2009 | 01:35

    NEW ALBUM BY LILY ALLEN CALLED IT'S NOT ME IT'S YOU JUST HIT ONLINE.

    LINKS SOON, BY ME.

  101. scourging666
    February 3rd, 2009 | 02:46

    It seems a lot of posters overlooked the part where DMT say they want to do BDrips because a Blu-ray source often becomes available before a DVD source. Translated for the reading impaired: this means you get to see the damn movie sooner than if you wait for a standard DVDrip.

    It has nothing to do with Xvid vs. x264. LOL @ all of the "x264 roxxors xvid sux" posts.

    Divx is bringing x264/MKV standards certification to standalone players later this year, so it's safe to assume the scene will update the rules when the time is right.

  102. EqualEyes
    February 3rd, 2009 | 03:05

    BDrips? Puh-leeze! If you're looking for the best value combo between resolution/definition and file size, it's about time some smart sceners just ripped Blu-rays to 1280×720 (if its a 1.85 AR movie) or 1280×544 (if it's a 2.35)… BUT… reduce the video bit-rate to reach a 2.2GB file size. That's not so much more than 1.4GB (yeah OK, 50% more) but you get 720p definition and the video quality is good enough. In addition, they could maybe reduce the 640 kbps audio doxn to 448 or even 384 if they really want to max out the video.
    Quite honestly, ripping at 3000 to 6000 kbps, just to fill a DVD5 is pure overkill. There's a point where additional bitrate just will not give you a better picture. Hell, I watched a 2.2GB file size HD rip (1280×720) of The Dark Knight (IMAX scenes intact) and it was perfect. You would have to run the movie in slow motion to really see additional quality in a 4.4GB rip.
    The more I see sceners agonizing over their stupid rules, the more I figure these guys must have obsessive-compulsive disorder.

  103. fingerlings
    February 3rd, 2009 | 03:17

    @ EqualEyes

    You need to check out hd-bb.org. I think you'll really like all of the m-720p movies.

  104. ahhhnth
    February 3rd, 2009 | 03:56

    @ #7: toto

    go ahead and ignore the bdrips & dvdrips and just download a dvdr. its a simple solution.

  105. ahhhnth
    February 3rd, 2009 | 03:56

    @ #7: toto

    go ahead and ignore the bdrips & dvdrips and just download a dvdr. its a simple solution.

  106. 1ns0mn14
    February 3rd, 2009 | 04:37

    lmao LAME you have an "HDRiP" category already which isn't an HDDVDRip limited group, it also includes BDrips and HDTV-ripped stuff, doesn't it?

  107. ilovemovies
    February 3rd, 2009 | 05:29

    non scene rippers like secret_myth and newartriot have been doing BDrips for a long time now using H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format and x264 encoder. even their normal dvdrips r done using x264 encoder .i have since stopped downloading 2 cd xvid rips.700 mb encoded with x264 encoder better than 1.4 GB xvid encoded rip.thats the whole point why H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format was introduced – less size better quality.
    check out these rips by secret_myth- http://www.mininova.org/user/secret_myth

    and newartriot – http://www.mininova.org/user/newartriot

  108. ilovemovies
    February 3rd, 2009 | 05:38

    and by the way Look for DivX Plus™ HD Certified devices later this year that will support playback of all DivX and DivX Plus files, as well as .mkv (H.264/AAC) videos from the Internet .details here – http://www.rlslog.net/divx-pro-v700-incl-keymaker-dvt/#comments

  109. not you
    February 3rd, 2009 | 06:10

    Bad examples of screenshots.(I think they may be backwards,too).Once you have the movie dl'd,and watching it,there is a BIG difference in quality.

  110. not you
    February 3rd, 2009 | 06:15

    Check out these screens:
    http://filesharefreak.com/2008/11/19/blu-ray-brrip-bdrip-two-new-xvid-hd-formats/

  111. tester
    February 3rd, 2009 | 06:38

    What we need is h.264 rips with 704 X 320 and not those stupid 680×232 releases, nobody really cares about burning in to CD's at 700mb.

    any good quality stuff around less than 1GB is good enough.

  112. greg
    February 3rd, 2009 | 07:59

    BDRIP? blu-disk rip. oh ok.
    ya, the dvdrip screen looks clearer and more vibrant than the blu-ray screenshot. lol

  113. Goatman
    February 3rd, 2009 | 09:37

    Where is the logic in making things fit onto CD-R's ??? I dont know about you I am sick of having 2 video files for 1 movie!!! and with a BDrip which is usually around 2 gig does that meant the file is going to be split over 4 cds???? I hope not!!!!!

  114. Assbestos
    February 3rd, 2009 | 09:56

    Completely superfluous. HDrip is sufficient in that it describes a rip from any HD source, since HDDVD is defunct, those rips will be coming exclusively from BluRay. Now I have two places to look for the same thing. Boo.

  115. clever
    February 3rd, 2009 | 10:25

    DivX Plus™ HD Certified Devices will start hitting shelves this year that support H.264/AAC so why does the scene insist on sticking with sh1tty 700mb xvid releases.

    With the price of blank DVD's so cheap who even still buys CD's. It's cheaper to stick a few movies on a blank DVD than burn 1 movie to a CD.

    Plus most computers these days are capable of playing H.264 files and with hard drives so cheap it's time to move into the future and change the scene rules.

    Those who disagree should get off this site and go back to downloading kvcd or aXXo rips. If you're not willing to join us in the future then you'd better go hide in a box cos we're not going to sit by and wait for you to catch up to the rest of us!

  116. bong_eye
    February 3rd, 2009 | 11:17

    @
    Blender (comment 102)

    in total agreement with you fella , i have been downloading mainly 700mb files for a number of yrs , quick download , less tear on your bandwidth and download allowance (if your so poor you dont have unlimited);) (bless , we will do a whip round for you!)
    i "tversity" * http://tversity.com/ them all thru my tv and yes some would say the crop spoils the film , i say CHANGE YOUR ASPECT RATIO DUMB ASS !!!!!!!
    most modern tv's allow some sort of aspect zoom or subtitle zoom , mine allows me a few options like movie , 16.9 ,4.3 ,subtital zoom and a manual option where i can stretch it vertically and horizontally no more black borders !!!

    * (for anyone that is not using tversity)
    What is the TVersity Media Server?
    The TVersity Media Server lets you manage your Internet and home media and create your personalized lineup of channels, or as we call it your Personal Entertainment Guide (PEG). It then serves this media to a multitude of networked devices in the home or on the go, overcoming their inherent limitations by doing all the necessary conversions on the fly, and thus making your media available anywhere, anytime and on any device.

    What devices are supported by the TVersity Media Server?
    TVersity is the most versatile media server and the only one that is truly universal in the range of devices it supports. TVersity can serve media to:

    * Devices supporting the UPnP AV / DLNA standard (which is the de-facto standard for connecitivity between devices in the digital home). This includes devices like networked TVs, DVDs, Stereo Receivers, Digital Media Adapaters/Receivers, Mobile Phones, Xbox360,Ps3 ,Satellite and Cable set-top-boxes and more.
    * Devices with a web browser (XHTML-MP or WAP 2.0) and media streaming or downloading capabilities like Mobile Phones, PDAs, the Sony PSP, and more.
    * Devices with an RSS reader and media streaming or downloading capabilities like the Sony PSP, iTunes/iPod and more.

  117. Shy
    February 3rd, 2009 | 11:36

    This x264 does sound great and i have noticed that some films are released earlier in this format, but i like to watch them on my standalone DVD player which also plays xvids. My question is, is there a workaround for this or will i need to convert to xvid?

  118. AR
    February 3rd, 2009 | 11:49

    For more quality we can download the x264 720p/1080p releases!
    If the HD certified divx players only come out later this year why change from xvid to x264 at this moment? We need to wait that the consumers are equiped.

    I don't want to download a movie or a sitcom and have to connect everyday my desktop to the tv to watch it. I just want to burn a dvd or save it onto a pen drive to use on the home divx player. I don't want to wait that Windows boots everytime I want a movie, and I like to have a remote to fast foward on the xvid player.
    There are 2 cd xvid releases (1400mb) that allow more quality.

    So I hope that the scene keeps compatibility with home divx players. Everyone else has other releases and rips available to download.

  119. JV
    February 3rd, 2009 | 13:11

    heehee… rules
    how cute

  120. $hadow
    February 3rd, 2009 | 13:36

    Just a head up for the people that cant see the screenshots and some other images from releaselog, check your antivirus/firewall software, like kaspersky, some security programs block some images that contain key names such as *banner* *ad* *you got the idea*, you need to allow the program to display those images, its not rlslogs website problem.

  121. luzifas girl
    February 3rd, 2009 | 14:58

    This Movie is Gäääähhhhhhnnnnnnn,
    but good when time to sleep!

  122. annonnumusss
    February 3rd, 2009 | 21:41

    ok so, will this BDRIP work on a divx/dvd player, 100 percent?

  123. @frado
    February 3rd, 2009 | 22:42

    Frado – "You should ‘care’ about this since the quality is a bit better"

    Er… Not really. If there's any appreciable quality difference between a BDRip and a DVDrip, then the DVDrip hasn't been done properly. If both formats are ripped to the same AR and bitrate, the results should be close to identical, and differences would be less a case of better/worse and more a case of "I like that one".

    Also, 'scene rules'? Like there's some special charter that they all vote on!? That's not really how it works.

    I'll be intrigued to see how much this 'new' format gets used – my guess is it's dead before it's got started.

  124. onehappynegro
    February 3rd, 2009 | 23:41

    the question here is why is everyone using dvd-players to play media on tv's?!

    i work in electronic retail store so i get to try a new unit every now and then, they're all fine the day you test it but after a while some teen in germany release a new codec and makes the media player useless.

    connect the pc to tv and change codec, enjoy!

  125. mr salty
    February 4th, 2009 | 00:57

    @fingerlings, thanks a lot…awesome site!!!

  126. Taki
    February 4th, 2009 | 16:00

    ok, stop talking, it's time to get BDRip release no. 2! this category is empty enough! only one release seems like empty place to me…

  127. Amro
    February 4th, 2009 | 19:12

    Let me take this chance to thank your site for the good work you've been doing.

    I like that BDrip idea. not a big jump from Dvdrip abut cool, keep them coming :-)

  128. Smithy
    February 5th, 2009 | 20:12

    For some reason, this file won's shown on stand alone divx players

  129. zombieman
    February 6th, 2009 | 19:17

    Why has'nt releaselog been updating their site? Is anybody else having this problem? It's been going on for a month. I see the same thing every time I log on. Where's the list of all new movie's?

  130. Oblivious Guy
    February 6th, 2009 | 20:52

    I just thought I'd mention that since 34 has been removed, the posts all moved up one. Now the first complainer of 34 is now the sicko. Lol. Just reread the posts. I lol'd as I went down.

  131. hgk
    February 7th, 2009 | 03:43

    Why is there no next page link? We only see the BDRip post…

  132. AK
    February 7th, 2009 | 12:18

    There is no difference in res or anything else all that is the difference is the screen has shifted abit and face is different on the second one or it could be that the screen shots are not the same and they are both DvdRip!

  133. ir6ub9
    February 7th, 2009 | 12:51

    Great organization. Thanks

  134. 137
    February 7th, 2009 | 14:44

    Just posting to update latest movies

  135. Ronnyboy
    February 8th, 2009 | 14:16

    I really hoped the BDrip would look better but IMO i really don't see any difference other then that the BDrip uses sick cpu resources.

  136. ir6ub9
    February 8th, 2009 | 14:20

    Yes

  137. jon
    February 8th, 2009 | 15:27

    Fix ur links dude……'Movies' link now brings up this page

  138. staber
    February 9th, 2009 | 13:07

    @toto
    wth do u live 20mbit ??!!! i'm still stuck 8mbit -_-

  139. asdf
    February 9th, 2009 | 16:51

    <a ="http://link-protector.com/x-3157">http://rapidshare.com/files/196012228/account.rar</a&gt;

  140. alan
    February 10th, 2009 | 01:39

    the movies category is not getting updated to the recent released movies.

  141. kotzy
    February 10th, 2009 | 09:13

    once again i must say, that these scene rules are stupid as a horse in the middle of the river.

  142. almost n00b lol
    February 10th, 2009 | 09:32

    is there a reason why the scene has not moved along to
    mp4 releases with avc video and aac audio?

  143. almost n00b lol
    February 10th, 2009 | 09:44

    read all the posts, yea, h264 or avc video and aac audio in mp4 or mkv container.

    im in a 3rd world country and i have 2mb broadband.
    1-2Gb for per movie is not a problem…quality is becoming more important and xvid/avi aint cutting it no more. :D

  144. anubis
    February 10th, 2009 | 18:14

    bdrip owned!

  145. mandingo
    February 21st, 2009 | 00:15

    Some of you guys just aren't that bright:

    If you want FULL HD Resolution then download HDRiPS (Bluray, HD-DVD). What your boy means by using 'BDRip' means instead of downsampling a DVD movie to fit 700MB, he/she's doing it with an HD source. Common-sense: no matter how high the source resolution is, a 700MB rip from DVD and a 700MB rip from Bluray will look almost exactly the same…something the mod said as well.

    BDrip means the source is from a Bluray disc…but common sense will tell you that 700MB is NOT an HDRiP. Also notice that unlike HDRiP and DVDRiP it's spelled BDRip…NOT BDRiP. Use your brains people.

  146. rrpostal
    February 21st, 2009 | 00:41

    Nobody is arguing there is probably a "better", sharper, uber superior format than what is currently popular. But some of us are just going for easy and convenient. There are probably 5 movies ever made that I need the best quality for. Smaller files means easier to download and, quite simply, is good enough a majority of the time. It's not that I'm "poor" or "stupid" that I don't need to download huge files of the best version in the proper format. I am amazed that people spend hundreds of [monetary units] a month to watch the same crappy TV shows and unoriginal movies in super quality. It's like polishing a turd. I'm glad the option is there, but I'm also glad the "good enough" material is around. For the record, CAMs and TSs are NOT "good enough". But if people want them, I don't really care.

  147. mandingo
    February 21st, 2009 | 11:41

    One last thing: if you take the time to R E A D the mod's post you'll see that the only reason he/she does BDRips is because some movies get released earlier on Bluray than on DVD…so instead of b!tching over stuff you don't clearly understand (such as video resolution), be grateful that someone is using their own precious time to find ways to bring you quality releases as early as possible for free.

  148. Fergo
    February 21st, 2009 | 15:57

    Yeah well as with the Punisher War Zone BDRip when I put it on DVD-R using convertxtodvd3 it looked fantastic!!!

  149. BluRayJack
    February 24th, 2009 | 06:44

    Yeah well, bdrip&brrip my best group D-Z0N3 team.

  150. Pirate
    March 6th, 2009 | 20:54

    Lmao @ most posts.
    These dumb ass comments coming from the rapidshare fanboys and kiddies is hilarious.
    Xvid will continue to exist side by side with h.264 and DVD rips.
    You want a DVDR then grab a DVDR rip.
    Want a BD rip then do so.
    Xvid and 700 mb rips have a big user base as exemplified by the large numbers of standalone players sold & being sold.
    Not every one has unlimited bandwidth available nor uses their PC as a media center.. yet.

  151. nlx
    March 15th, 2009 | 14:55

    @100 Almi: To me too. The BD rip has faded colors. But like someone said before, they not the same frame. Maybe someone put a light on in the movie or his head block light earlier.

    for all the rest wanting to stop with DVD-rip…erm..why?

    Can't there be room for both?

  152. Borderliner
    March 21st, 2009 | 02:02

    You guys are missing an obvious detail – it's not about quality, it's about releasing speed. BDRips weren't thought up because they are better (which they might, but don't have to, be) but because BDs come ocasionally earlier than DVDs. Considering this the usage of TDX rules makes perfect sense – whatever comes first gets ripped first, but at to the same quality output. That's also why CAMs still exist – they come out earliest. Jut the lack of picture/sound is a lot more obvious ;)

  153. nlx
    March 22nd, 2009 | 10:11

    True Borderliner,

    That said, the release speeds are terrible at the moment. Still waiting for Friday the 13th DvD Screener while the movie is out of the cinema's already. It seems they only end up on paid sites or something. Or the Pink Panther II. That movie is only on cam for now. No screener as well. The difference between this 'BD-rip' and 'dvd-rip' will probably just 1 week ?

1 2

Leave a reply