I think you want to see a dog with tiny wings which is evolving the ability to fly but it doesn’t work like that I’m afraid.

And Wah, gravity is a proven fact, all you need do is test it by dropping something. Thus it is not and never was a theory. Evolution on the other hand is still a theory as you cannot show a transitional species and thus prove it is fact. You can make all the claims you wish, but until you can produce a transitional species, then it will be nothing more then a theory. You can show all the supposed species you want as well, but until you can provide one that is living and able to be tested and proved, again it is all theory. Sowing animals thousands of years in the past is not a valid defense as there is no way to test it, dna degrades and carbon testing and the like have fallicies and are not proof positive.

Scientifically, evolution is a theory like gravity, not a fact. In lay-terms, it’s a fact, not a theory, like gravity.

Its impossible to argue with irrational dogma, you’re not worth my time.

The key words are “considered” and “possibly” you have not provided proof, just speculation. I can provide the exact same thing in using the walking catfish to prove that all fish evolved from land animals. Just because some say it does not make it fact. I would like just ONE documented set in stone proof that evolution is a fact and not a theory.

And why is asking for proof of evolution disingenuous? Dont evolutionists ask for the same proof from ID believers. My point is that there is NO documented proof of the existance of either one, just as there is NO documented proof that mankind is the sole reason for Global Warmning as some have tried to say over and over.

You are going to have to go a whole lot farther in providing factual evidence before this debate is going to be over, at at present, no one has the proof that will close this debate on either side.

As a previous poster pointed out, gravity is also just a “theory” but has a massive amount of supportive evidence, much like Evolution.

In answer to you’re request for an example of a transitional fossil – Archaeopteryx.

There’s not enough room here to post links to all the proof you seek as you are so incredibly misinformed and it would be like trying to educate a child who still believed TeleTubbies ruled teh world.

Then again, I suppose the Swiss cheese theory of creationism makes all the sense in the world to you to, huh? fkin dummy.

skil
People like Dan are annoying – they don’t understand the scientific use of the word theory. They seem to think a Theory is the same as a Hypothesis. The Theory of Evolution is just as valid as the Theory of Gravity.
If he really could destroy The Theory of Evolution in a few minutes, he’d be one of the most amazing scientists of our time. But, he’s just talk.

And to get back on topic – thanks for the RS links for this and Mythbusters too

Forral
“disproven theory of manmade global warming” – Wrong.

“ToE is missing any form of life that has evolved into another” – Wrong.

“ID is missing proof of a superior being” – Correct!

1/3 ain’t bad for the typical moronic comment on an internet blog I suppose

————-
Ok simple test. Show ONE animal that has evolved into another and show a line proving same. If you three are right and I am wrong, then this should not be hard..right? And Wikipedia is NOT an option as anyone can edit that.

So put up or shut up. I already know ID is not a valid porsition, but I also know that evolution is not a proven fact either and anyone that thinks it is when they have to keep changing the whole set up with new discoveries, has more problems then can be fixed…and all of them mental. If you cannot, then you fit whatadummy’s description of himself…a fkin dummy

“ToE is missing any form of life that has evolved into another” – Wrong.

“ID is missing proof of a superior being” – Correct!

1/3 ain’t bad for the typical moronic comment on an internet blog I suppose.

In trying to call Whatadummy out all you’ve done is exposed your own inadequacies – such as reading. xx

People like Dan are annoying – they don’t understand the scientific use of the word theory. They seem to think a Theory is the same as a Hypothesis. The Theory of Evolution is just as valid as the Theory of Gravity.
If he really could destroy The Theory of Evolution in a few minutes, he’d be one of the most amazing scientists of our time. But, he’s just talk.

And to get back on topic – thanks for the RS links for this and Mythbusters too

The file is not fully saved at RapidShare yet. This file is possibly still being uploaded.

Please try again later.

Erm bit soon?