Releaselog

Narnia Sample And Facts READNFO-mVS

Posted on 18.05.2008 at 02:55 in Movies by Marceli

Well there’s nothing like a big “fuck you” from a scene group every now and then, and that’s just what we have here. We know that a lot of groups steal from P2P and mVs promises to not be one of them, but I’m not sure if I want to believe that, although they might not do it as much as all the other groups I think they do it every once in a while. They also bring us a sample of the new Narnia movie, so maybe we can expect the whole this sometime soon. BTW the last paragraph mentions that they want proof that the AR was more than 10% off, well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd :D Might want to learn how to do simple math before arguing…

Here’s the message from their NFO:

“I would like to start off with a big fat american FUCK YOU to all the
sites that nuked us for “stealing from p2p”. Check all the p2p sites you
have now and see if this shit is on it yet you cunts. This is the same
video source as what happens in vegas. Here is a one minute video clip of
something that will probably be on torrents in a few hours but just to
prove we get the shit first here you go. We do not need to steal from p2p
we will leave that to the new groups out there like kamera. We do not
pre as soon as we get video since most of the time audio is capped after
since we do not want to waste our nights where we could be banging your
moms. Once again you may hate us but your hate only makes the mvs
stronger!!! (like the hulk) so all you poor traders getting nuked on our
rlses, feel free to tell your local nuker what a cunt he truly is, and
to feel the mVs cock up his ass.

As a side note, nukers trying to claim our vegas AR was 10% out, you
are a fucking joke. Make proof before writing shit like that. BTW we
know who you are and what grps you are related to, so think twice,
unless you would like to be schooled in the next mVs nfo.loly.”

Narnia.Sample.And.Facts.READNFO-mVS
Links: RS, NFO

* Comments(368)

Comments (368)

Feel free to post your Narnia Sample And Facts READNFO-mVS torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All
  1. Einstein
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:20

    @ 92

    you don’t need to be a maths expert to work out percentages LOL its basic maths learned very early in school. Even countries with a bad educational system can work it out.

  2. sl
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:21

    quote:
    “pwnd :D Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…”

    my question:
    “talking to yourself?”

    thx for the good morning laugh…. =P

  3. Largo
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:21

    So Marcelli isn’t the best at maths, he still gets RLS’s posted quick :D

  4. unholycleric
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:22

    wow what is with all this hostility? why do people hate marcelli so much. he’s just bringing us the news. if he makes a small mistake so be it. What marcelli was saying was that its 25% more than the vertical than it should be.

    i.e. Actual Aspect ratio is 235%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
    This one on the other hand is 260%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)

    260% – 235% = 25%

    Now if you were to find the percentage “difference” that would be:

    25%/235% = 10.6%

    I hope this clears marcelli’s standpoint.

  5. manzejl
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:23

    @marceli:

    learn some maths. just because the difference is .25 doesn’t mean the difference percentage is 25. It will be calculated on the expected value i.e. 0.25/2.35*100

    260%-235%.Jesus christ, from where did you come up with that?

  6. unholycleric
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:23

    wow what is with all this hostility? why do people hate marcelli so much. he’s just bringing us the news. if he makes a small mistake so be it. What marcelli was saying was that its 25% more than the vertical than it should be.

    i.e. Actual Aspect ratio is 235%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
    This one on the other hand is 260%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)

    260% – 235% = 25%

  7. unholycleric
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:25

    hmm.. something went wrong. Anyway…

    2.6:1 = 260%:100%
    What the aspect ratio means is that the horizontal is 260% of the vertical. simple as that.

  8. Anonymous
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:27

    lol@Marcelis embarrassing himself.

  9. bokka
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:27

    MVS go suck pukkas butt wheres axxo btw long time no see? holla

  10. Untamed
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:29

    I believe the reason for the hostility is because of the ‘Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…’ comment. Marceli starts insulting popular groups about simple maths when he cant even do it himself.

  11. jordansky
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:44

    This is a CAM, not anything to call home about.

  12. «Vampirescu»
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:51

    WOW 111 coments about math, this site used to be awesome, but the past 4-6 months has been lots of new people with lots of dumb comments

  13. uhhh...
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:52

    “i.e. Actual Aspect ratio is 235%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
    This one on the other hand is 260%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)

    260% – 235% = 25%”

    so let me get this right. 2.35:1 is (apparently) 235%:100%
    …….
    If i had 1/4 of a dollar. which is 1:4 (or 25%) would that make the 1 to 4 ratio equal to 100%:400%?

  14. wtfcopter
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:06

    well lets rls the movie already shizzzzzzzzzzzz

  15. Chill
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:15

    hahaha
    marcell got pwned

  16. RobertSamuel
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:17

    What is P2P anyway? And whats wrong with using thier stuff?

  17. OsT
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:20

    marcell’s new handle should b “basic_maths_b!tch_2_+_1_=_4″

  18. Karl Rove
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:22

    Let’s do this “simple math” the easy way, kids: 10% of 2.6:1 ratio is 0.26:1 ratio. This means that the AR of 2.35:1, at a 0.25 difference, is less than 10% off.

    There’s a time to convert decimals to percentages, and this isn’t that time.

  19. Perry
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:23

    Beautiful quality.

  20. liquidmonkey
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:24

    yeah, let’s do the math, your all a bunch of 12 year olds arguing about the dumbest things on the net :)

    who cares, i already have this movie anyway, hahahahahaaha :)

  21. liquidmonkeysux
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:27

    well stop typing and rls it n00b!! :P

  22. runfromfire
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:34

    Hm. I’m just a intermediate at aquiring media… There seems to be an entire culture that I’m unaware of. I wonder who these people are? What company do they keep,that such insults are uttered without fear of retribution? With what recourse do they threaten those that question their legitimacy? How have they become so fluent in such offensive language that it moves me so poetically? Clearly I have much to learn.

  23. Spartacus
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:36

    @113 uhhh…:
    yes, sure. $1 would be 400%, and you have only 100%, so you have $0,25
    it’s a pretty stupid way imo but it’s correct.

    also @104 unholycleric:
    your method is exactly the same as the others who posted the correct way:
    (2.6-2.35)/2.35=0.106 -> 10,6%

  24. SuitcaseBomb
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:37

    OMG. Stop posting the same math equation over and over again noobs. Read the other 121 attempts at calculating simple percent error. Jesus.

    Delete this entry. Yeeeesh. An RLS staffer thinks he’s too big for his britches and gets all hot and bothered about an NFO flaming. Can you say ‘Who gives a fck?’

    Don’t make an entry to flame, do that in IRC if you really want to vent. Sheesh. We come here for release info, not to hear you rant over your time of the month. Get a maxi. Out.

  25. jostie
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:39

    NObody Cares !!!!!!!

  26. Funny as a douchebag
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:40

    @84

    No, you’re the 4,908,079,094th n00b who doesn’t ad block and probably uses IE.

  27. schurmo
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:42

    OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  28. ghostgamer
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:46

    thx

  29. bluemc
    May 18th, 2008 | 06:59

    LOL LOL LOL this has got to be the funniest thread on rlslog…. keep going ppl… Marcelli should go back to school since he cant do basic maths…

  30. Ken
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:01

    i guess i’ll throw in my 2 cents or is it 2.6 cents,
    ahh the hell with it here’s a nickel. lol

  31. yeah
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:03

    when is this going to be released, tomorrow maybe? that’s hella quality

  32. El Padrino
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:05

    Que chinguena su madre los de P2P!!!!

  33. tyrodd
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:11

    to mVS group put the movie online he is a fake

    WHAT IS %20 OUT OF 1,999,888

  34. treysongs
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:12

    http://www.boysfood.com

    get all movies in theaters here in dvd quality !

  35. PURPLE HAZE
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:13

    so wens da movie comn

  36. Skyline
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:16

    who cares about this? in other news…

  37. Matt
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:20

    Woah, vitriole much!
    I figure I’m going to add one more post to the maths debate, with a view to actually clarifying exactly what everyone is on about in relation to all of the different things being argued about. But before I do that, a few quick points:
    1. It’s not fair to be rude at someone *just* because they’re not good at maths.
    2. It IS fair to be rude at someone if they are not good at maths AND (depite that) they have (rudely) accused someone else of not being bad at maths.
    2b. Doing that (being bad at maths and rudely telling someone else that they are) just makes you a person who is bad at maths AND arrogant as such it makes it perfectly reasonable to nail you for being stupid.

    So, to clarify some of the maths involved.
    First:
    A ratio is the same as a fraction. So (for example):
    A quarter = 1:4 = 1/4 = 25%.
    A quarter refers to having one out of four possible parts of something. So, for example (in US currency)
    A quarter is to have 25c out of the possible 100c (one dollar).
    If you have four quarters, you have one dollar.
    Thus 1:4 means you have one out of four possible quarters (to make one dollar). It is however possible to have more quarters than one dollar, so the ratio can go the other way:
    If (for example) you have 6 quarters, that is a ratio of 6:4
    So you have 6 of these quarters of dollars or 150c. ($1.50)

    It is possible to express the exact same amount of money in many different ways:
    Eg. As a decimal: $1.50
    As a fraction: 6/4
    As a ratio: 6:4
    And (as per our argument now) as a percentage:
    150%
    So, the matter of how exactly you work out the percentage revolves around what your base is. So, if your base is $1, then your base is 100c (which makes it nice and easy to work with).
    So 25% of 100c = 25c
    But if you had 25% of $2 (200c) then you would have 50c.
    To go from a fraction (or a ratio, remembering that they’re actually the same thing) to a percentage you need to divide one by the other.
    You ALWAYS divide the left (or top) number by the right (or bottom).
    So:
    1/4 = 1:4 = one divided by four = 0.25
    Of course everyone is used to having “percentage” written in its non decimal form so it is multiplied by 100 to get to the more conventional “25%”.
    Another way to say the exact same thing is to say:
    0.25:1
    You are saying that you have one quarter (0.25) of a possible 1.
    Wherever you have a ratio which is:
    X:1
    X can always be assumed to be a percentage OF whatever the 1 is.
    In the example of a computer screen, the resolution might be:
    1680×1050
    This is saying that there are 1680 pixels across and 1050 pixels down.
    Because some people like to express this as a fraction or ratio (how many across pixels there are for every down pixel aka “across pixels per down pixels” aka 1680/1050 we want a way to say “for every one down pixel there will be ??? across pixel” So they want to say ???:1 (??? across pixels for every 1 down pixel)
    The best way to do that is to remember that a ???:1 ratio is exactly the same as saying ??? times 100 percent.
    So, if it is 1:1 that’s 100% 2:1 is 200%, 6.5:1 is 650% (etc).
    So, how do we make it a percentage again?
    Our fraction is:
    1680/1050
    Our ratio is:
    1680:1050
    To make it into a percent, divide the top (left) by the bottom) right and multiply by 100.
    In this case:
    1680 divided by 1050 = 1.6
    Multiply by 100 = 160%
    So, 1680 is 160% of 1050.
    This means the same as:
    - There are 1.6 across pixels for every down pixel
    - number of down pixels times 1.6 = number of across pixels
    - 1.6:1 pixel ratio

    Remeber that our “1″ in that ratio is talking about the number of down pixels (1050) because we wanted to know: “how many across pixels are there for each down pixel?”. So “100%” or 1:1 would be a screen with a resolution of 1050×1050 (a square).

    So, if we have two ratios and want to know the percentage difference between the two, how do we do it?

    We’ll go back to using money for this one because it’s easier:
    If you have:
    2.5:1 money, you have 250% of the “base” of money. Seeing as the “base” of money is 100c, having 250% of it means you’ve got $2.50.
    So 2.5:1 money = $2.50.
    If someone else has:
    3:1 money, they’ve got $3 exactly.

    So, they’ve got 50c more than you, (3 minus 2.5 OR $3.00 minus $2.50) but do they have “50%” more than you?
    50% is half, so if they had half more than you when you had $2.50 then they’d have to have $1.25 more than you or $3.25 total.
    But they don’t, they’ve only got $3!
    So, we want to work out how much the difference between your money and there money is as a percentage.
    So, we know they’ve got 50c more than you.
    So you have 250c and they have 50c more.
    That’s 50c:250c
    So, divide left by right:
    50c divide by 250c = 0.2 = 20% more.
    So, they have 20% more money than you, your money makes our 100% value, their money makes the 120% value.
    So their money to your money (as a ratio) is:
    1.2:1
    Or, for every $1 you have, they have $1.20.
    If your ammounts were more complex, like for example:
    They have:
    $1285
    You have:
    $1190
    You can work out one of two things from this if you like:
    First: What their money is as a percentage of yours (so you can say “for every one dollar I have, they have ??? dollars”)
    OR
    Second: What percentage MORE money than you they have.

    To do the first, you decide who is important to you, put them on the right. So, if you want to work out “for every $1 I have they have $???” put yourself on the right. If you want to work out “for every $1 THEY have, I have $???” then put them on the left.

    We’ll assume you’re working it out with you as the important person so:
    Them:you
    1285:1190
    First (for every dollar I have they have ??? dollars??)
    divide the left by the right
    1285 divide by 1190 = 1.0798
    So, for every $1 you have, they have $1.0798 (almost $1.08)
    This means they have 107.98% of your money or 1.0798:1
    Or, if you want to work out “for every dollar I have, they have ???c more than me” you first have to work out how much more they have so you simply take you away from them.
    So:
    1285 minus 1190 = 95
    Now, you’re still the important thing to look at so you’re still on the right:
    95:1190
    So divide left by right:
    95 divided by 1190 = 0.0798 (look familiar?)
    That says that for every $1 you have, they have $1 plus an extra $0.0798 or 7.98c (AKA 7.98%)

    Hmmm, that maths lesson was longer than it was planned to be.
    I guess it’s bound to happen when you’re bored and at work.

    Hope I helped some people to understand, lol.
    (I tried to keep it nice and simple rather than simply stating the complex (albeit perfectly logic) construct)

  38. El Padrino
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:21

    P2P no es nada bueno!

  39. SYN7HOR
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:25

    Sceners this uptight are pityful.

  40. El Padrino
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:25

    P2P has it’s pro’s and con’s but i have to be honest, i have not dealt with P2P for a long time!

  41. ▀▄▀ЕLСσцz▀▄▀
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:36

    Marceli you’ve got to admit it…. you’ve got PWNED!!! xD

  42. ghostgamer
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:38

    LOL Matt .. nobody is going to read more then 3 or 4 lines of your post i´m sorry ;) but hey you put a lot of effort into it and it looks pretty legit ;)

    ah ah now some compulsive “haha your math sux” post : haha Marceli your math sux ;)

  43. edwinerzz
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:38

    wtf is p2p i thought p2p stand for peer to peer is p2p a group like mvs and axxo pukka etc. wtf is p2p

    wow there should be a pole on the age of people who enter this site i would like to see it because with all this bad math im surprise half the people know how to spell

    if you are a staff member don’t you have to know math or atleast pass middle school

  44. mVs
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:47

    Marceli just got pwned!
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Wait and see what I have in store for you in the next rls!

  45. ▀▄▀ЕLСσцz▀▄▀
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:50

    Guys check this out!

    http://forums.rlslog.net/showthread.php?t=3542

    I’m considering making donation to Marceli for a private math course at home… Who’s with me ??

  46. deflicker
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:52

    holy virtualdub + donald graft deflicker batman, they need to learn how to set that plugin properly. They did not get the threshold right so it’s fading in like crazy.

  47. Martha
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:52

    just to add something educational to the mud sling fest: one normally uses the term “percentage points” to avoid the ambiguity. So the two ARs in question (260% and 235%) differ by 25 percentage points, and the former is 10.6% larger than the second. Both statements are correct.
    Question is, which one is the basis for the scene rule? 10 percentage points or 10%? Being not part of the scene I honestly don’t know.
    Greetings from the old Europe. ;-)

  48. Panix
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:52

    stfu and go back to chatting in #irpg so I can win moar

  49. mimi
    May 18th, 2008 | 07:57

    maths wow on rls is pro

  50. mrborat
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:09

    i believe the childrens are our future teach them maths and let them lead the way , show them all the beauty they posses inside give them a calculator to make it easier let our children calculate to get the right answer for you and for me

  51. timo
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:14

    now that all the yelling is done with, can we get some actual download links for the actual movie?

  52. anon
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:18

    Self ownage is the best.

  53. Hideki
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:21

    thanks for bangin’ my mom mVs ;)

  54. Jimmy crack corn
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:23

    “Maths” + Internets = I’m having funs

  55. pearljamaussie
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:23

    Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwn!!! What a pathetic post Marceli… “Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…” Bit touchy aswell arent you. By far would have to be the worst review of anything ive ever seen on this site, absolute pointless dribble just for the sake of an argument, lmao! Keep up the good work :p

  56. wtfbbqlawl
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:25

    yeah atleast mVs is doing us all a favor and bangin our moms. Without them who would?!?! :(

  57. Lhurgoyf
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:26

    This thread is just too funny.

  58. timo
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:29

    this is going to be one of those threads that lasts forever

  59. ZeWombat
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:30

    Man, scene people used to just be sensitive, annoying little geeks with connections and talent. Now they’re just annoying little pseudo-geeks who substitute bombast for talent and FTP 0-day access for credentials…

    AHHHHHhhhhh…..
    Do you remember when?….

  60. yeah
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:31

    weird, one of my balls, the left one, is hanging a good 4 inches below the other one. Must have had a falling out with the right one.

  61. capnjngl
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:32

    The problem isn’t that Marceli has a peanut brain and can’t do math, it’s that Marceli posts up the erroneus math then goes about saying “Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots…”

    Pathetic.

  62. COLLIEBUTT
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:34

    @143 – LEARN HOW TO SPELL ??? WELL FOR A START ‘POLE’ IS SPELT POLL IN THE CONTEXTUAL ELEMENT TO WHICH ONE IS REFERRING – HEH HEH HEH !!

  63. yeah
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:35

    “erroneus”

    you can’t spell, might want to work on that

  64. Psilan
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:38

    Marceli LOL, that is a crack up. I thought you were joking ROFL.

  65. haha
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:40

    Using Marceli’s logic:

    when 1100% becomes 1000%
    you lose 100%, so you lose everything

    hahahaha

  66. yeah
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:42

    he should be an astrophysicist, he’d come up with theory of everything in no time at all, cause if you know everything, taking the percent of that from 0, makes you lose 100% of it, so it would therefore take no time to do anything. I took pre-algebra in 6th grade I know these things as well.

  67. nicedude
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:47

    This is one of the funniest tit for tat rambling argument posts I have seen. Since this sites spam protection for posting is a MATH question itself I wonder how many people couldn’t add and who’s comments are therefore absent here :-) Sad but although percentages are a middle school question I guess these kids were skipping and at home playing Xbox instead.

    WIKI LINK FOR HOW TO FIGURE A PERCENTAGE OF CHANGE BETWEEN TWO NUMBERS
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_figure_out_the_percentage_difference_between_two_totals

  68. RumpRanger
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:48

    Funny thread, but must be embarrasing for Marceli. I think he went into hiding.

  69. Deacon Thorn
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:48

    Hey, it’s “Schooled”-house Rock.

    Well, anyways, here goes.

    Lets take 100 inches as the one in the aspect ratio, that means the 2.35 would equal 235, so you would have a picture 235 inches by 100 inches.

    Also the 2.6, if we followed the same formula of 1 = 100 inches would equal 260 inches by 100 inches.

    We take the larger value and subtract the smaller value and get a total which is 25.

    Now, we take the 25 and divide it by 235. We get a total of .106, percentile equivilent is 10.6, which means that 10.6 percent of the picture is missing from the 2.35 AR.

    I’ve always used the 1 = 100 in. formula when talking to people about pan and scan vs. widescreen. It does make a difference when they find out that, if they had a 100 inch high screen, that pan and scan takes 102 inches away from a 2.35 AR film.

  70. MiniDriversForehead
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:57

    Nice. Well said

  71. primo
    May 18th, 2008 | 08:58

    It was really funny reading your comments :-)

    Waiting for The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XVID-mVS

  72. TheEnd187
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:01

    @109 Bukka STFU with that G@Y @ss Axxo his rips suck, and they aren’t even his he just re-encodes them from the scene release, which has already been proven, also his movies don’t even play on a 2nd monitor cuz it crashes ur pc, everyone else’s does. aXXo is not scene therefore his P@P garbage wont be posted here.

  73. dj
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:01

    I consider most p2p people noobs anyways.

  74. GodspeedZion
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:02

    oh, the irony!

  75. kifart
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:07

    Will this please get removed.. it’s annoying. mvs vs some dude on rls log.. big deal…

  76. Ivan the Terrible Syncer
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:07

    Rumour has it mvs stole the sample from

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4193235/Narnia_2-Principe_Caspian_A.Latinowww.Hispatorrents.org

    Spanish audio

  77. TupaC
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:19

    Thats like head shoot from a big distance with glock :-)

  78. Marceli
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:24

    I got pwned :(

  79. boc
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:24

    what film they crying about, I thought narnia was out, or
    is this another film…

  80. boc
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:26

    forget last post, found out….

  81. Marceli
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:28

    @179
    no i did not

  82. The Voice
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:29

    Ahhh, I love the smell of irony in the morning.

  83. aXXo`s Angry Mum
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:33

    DONT YOU EVER USE MY PC AGAIN !!!!!!

  84. Ivan the Terrible Syncer
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:34

    The Voice

    best quote of the thread

  85. Tikrik
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:38

    nuked – bad.language :)

  86. fluffy
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:41

    old farts method we were taught at skool.

    pecentage = (difference/original)x100

    difference 2.6-2.35=0.25

    0.25/2.35 x100 = 10.6% difference of the 2.35 AR

    bloddy hell… this movie is crap anyway, right?

  87. your auntie
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:42

    http://rapidshare.com/files/115729723/narn.sample.avi

  88. erm
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:53

    err, lol mate, correct me if im wrong but the AR is 9.62% off, since 2.35/2.60 = 90.38%, 100-90.38 = 9.62

  89. sinner n saint
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:53

    SAMPLE:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/115732050/narn.sample.avi

  90. pwner
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:55

    Marceli should be banned and never allowed to post. POS!!!

    BTW the last paragraph mentions that they want proof that the AR was more than 10% off, well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd :D Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…

    YOU SIR ARE A COMPLETE IDIOTA ;-)

  91. dublitze
    May 18th, 2008 | 09:58

    @153 “thanks for bangin’ my mom mVs”

    Imao :) ))))))))

  92. pfeeee
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:00

    Martin, check your editors please…

    Can’t wait for next mVs release, their nfo is gonna be a blast! :D

  93. Marceli
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:02

    Hi my name is Marceli,

    I just turned 6 today, I was 5 years old yesterday, so:
    6 – 5 = 1, which is 100%

    Yay, I doubled my age in one day!!!

  94. timo
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:11

    good job. You should be proud of that =)

  95. Joker
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:19

    I’ll let you all on a little secret about pirating.Most people dont care how we get the movies/shows/etc we care about A. Quality and B. The time it took to get them. If MVS wants props and judging by the sample they will get it, hurry up and post the movie already.

  96. The Spelling Teacher
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:34

    @139

    So are posters who can’t spell.

    Pitiful. P-I-T-I-F-U-L. Pitiful.

    Class dismissed.

  97. The Voice
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:35

    I for one, will be unable to sleep untill this matter is resolved.[/sarcasm]

  98. d_YeN
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:38

    At least we all passed the spam protection

    LOL

    Its like a bloody ,aths teachers forum!

    Damm lol

  99. d_YeN
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:39

    Lol the spelling bug is here now, i ment maths :D

  100. Testes, Testes. 1-2-3
    May 18th, 2008 | 10:45

    @160

    Don’t feel bad. Half the people posting here are still looking forward to the day their’s drop. :P

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All

Leave a reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Hot info about new scene releases!