Narnia Sample And Facts READNFO-mVS
Well there’s nothing like a big “fuck you” from a scene group every now and then, and that’s just what we have here. We know that a lot of groups steal from P2P and mVs promises to not be one of them, but I’m not sure if I want to believe that, although they might not do it as much as all the other groups I think they do it every once in a while. They also bring us a sample of the new Narnia movie, so maybe we can expect the whole this sometime soon. BTW the last paragraph mentions that they want proof that the AR was more than 10% off, well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd 
Might want to learn how to do simple math before arguing…
Here’s the message from their NFO:
“I would like to start off with a big fat american FUCK YOU to all the
sites that nuked us for “stealing from p2p”. Check all the p2p sites you
have now and see if this shit is on it yet you cunts. This is the same
video source as what happens in vegas. Here is a one minute video clip of
something that will probably be on torrents in a few hours but just to
prove we get the shit first here you go. We do not need to steal from p2p
we will leave that to the new groups out there like kamera. We do not
pre as soon as we get video since most of the time audio is capped after
since we do not want to waste our nights where we could be banging your
moms. Once again you may hate us but your hate only makes the mvs
stronger!!! (like the hulk) so all you poor traders getting nuked on our
rlses, feel free to tell your local nuker what a cunt he truly is, and
to feel the mVs cock up his ass.As a side note, nukers trying to claim our vegas AR was 10% out, you
are a fucking joke. Make proof before writing shit like that. BTW we
know who you are and what grps you are related to, so think twice,
unless you would like to be schooled in the next mVs nfo.loly.”
Comments(368)
MVS is still good.
LAWL! You sure showed them! Good Job! Stick it to the man.
who gives a fook
i think this is also nuked
2.6 / 2.35 = 1.106
or perhaps:
1.6 / 1.35 = 1.185
no idea where the .25 and 25% comes from though
i want the full movie
@5
I have no clue why you’re dividing… If the AR is off you subtract the ARs, not divide them.
2.6 – 2.35 = .25 (25%)
Sample looks goods, but no audio.
2.6 – 2.35 = .25
though, that’s why i tried other methods
feel free too delete my posts then since they lack context with your edits
quote [ your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .15 which is 15%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…]
I didn’t follow your math on that one at all Marceli
where did you get the .15 from and how does it equal 15%?
I made it about 10.6% if those ratios you provided are right.
I’m certainly no expert though.
Maybe my maths skills are too simple too. =)
heres the video sample w/ no audio
http://www.vimeo.com/1028477
HAHAHAHAAAA, I laughed so hard when I read what they wrote. Mighty pissed off.
Hey btw thanks for the automatically sent mail with “Congratulations on your birthday!”, haha.
@11
once again, you dont divide them, you subtract. and .25 is 25% because .25 is 25/100 which in turn is 25%
sooo, is the movie out yet?
mVs is back in full-on action …lolz..wat an amazin comeback !!!!
This looks like balls..
A movie for white kids to jak off too!
@14
You cant get percentages by subtracting them. You have to divide.
@Marceli
subtract?for percentages?are you insane?
the only interpretation of 25% is that their AR has 25% more (of 2.35) than it should!YOU DIVIDE! and yes it isn’t 25%! it’s 11% off!!!!!!jesus!
let me show you…
100 – 2.35
x – 2.6 —>>> x=110,6%
meaning is 10,6% off!!
@18
youre already working with percentages, youre just finding the difference between them (260% – 235% = 25%)…
This site needs to be fooking nooked
I LOL every time I see a nuke that contains “stolen”, because they are all stolen! Not anyone of the groups or P2P own the rights to the movie.
See kids, this is what happens when you don’t go to math class…
@20
AR is a ratio, not a percentage, and it wouldnt make any difference anyway. You have to divide to get a percentage difference from the numbers.
If you subtract ARs you could end up with -1 which according to your logic is -100% and thats no pixels at all.
(2.6/25)*100 to get percentage, if im correct, which im probably not. but anyway, that would leav 10.4
so from 2.6 to 2.35 there would be a total difference of 10.4 PERCENT or a SUM difference of .25
You don’t just divide and you don’t simply subtract!
%Error = [Observed - Expected]/[Expected] X 100%
Therefore:
[2.6-2.35]/[2.35] x 100%= 10.6%
So yes their AR is off by more than 10%!!!!!
I guess the question then comes to, how much did they crop? Because even if the AR of the video is wrong (because of over cropping) the video may not be stretched at all (for example, too tall actors or too short actors).
In that case it should be nuked for over-cropping. I don’t know because I haven’t bothered to check out the release my self, but I just thought I would put in my two cents!
I thought off 10% from the proper meant 100(2.6-2.35)/2.35
which is 10.6382978723404….% so I guess it is off by more than 10% Oh My God! Bet anyone watching this thing will be relegated to eternal damnation. mVS …Thanks for the movie .. I’ll be watching it.
Some words need to rewrite again.
as much as i loved your ownage, and while it certainly does still apply, the percent off is (2.6-2.35)/2.35*100=10.6%
that’s middle school math people, jesus christ
This would be my guess of how to calculate it…
1.10 x 2.35 = 2.585 (This is ten percent higher than proper)
.9 x 2.35 = 2.115 (This is ten percent lower than proper)
If 2.35 is the proper aspect ratio. then 2.115 would be the minimum accepted ratio and 2.585 would be the maximum. Let me know if I’m wrong. Therefore 2.6 would be over the accepted aspect ratio but it’s very close.
@26 LOGIC – Congrats!!
Nice to see someone here can do the math right!
these links are a phishing scam to get RS account details….http://myref.de/?155344
Marceli, no offense, but you are idiot
)
use percent error formula.
|observed value – accepted value|/accepted value x 100
|2.6-2.35|/2.35 x 100
.25/2.35 x 100
.1063 x 100
10.63
so assuming all the given information was true, they ARE over 10% off, but only by .63 of a percent
2.35 X 10.65% – 0.25…….
0.25 + 2.35 = 2.60 AR
PLAIN AND SIMPLE
see if u can post links before i finish download
full movie =-)
Woow sample looks great!
10.6% is correct. Jesus some people are dumb.
“your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1″
The rls was obviously cropped/pan&scanned so you cannot count the real AR from just the video res.
and i come to rlslog to see a math class! nice…and dont complicat simple math ppl
Don’t whine about ratio
look at quality
nice job MVS
all you should have to do is find the difference and divide by the proper ration which gives us 10.638297872340425531914893617021. Case solved.
these links are a phishing scam to get RS account details….http://myref.de/?155344
h
Good sample……..i wonder when the vid gets releASED?
awww give me a break guys, the only math that really counts on RLSLOG is addition
LOL @ “Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…”
Red face there methinks……
bah, if only there was a edit button
anyhow, that sample does look awesome for a TS
So this is what a nerd/geek fight looks like. hm.
Thank goodness 26 posted, before we ran up another 100 comments showing how people need to go back to school.
Maybe our next poll should be to find out the average age… after this I’m think approx. 12! 
lol
Shame mvs didn’t spend the time it took them to write the message, on finding their own sources. I don’t care if they steal, because we always find out where credit SHOULD be due… but don’t lie about it… just makes you look like weenies!
So… no good films being released then.
I think I’ve downloaded 1 film in the last week… shocking!
It looks like mathematics in not the strong point of RLSlog
MVS, bunch of twats.
Spam protection: Sum of 4 + 8 ?
Who out there knows the answer?
Come on dont be shy!
Marceli, sorry but your wrong, the divide way is right. looks like they were technically over 10%, but under 11%.
Rlslog staff really need to be schooled on how calculate percentage difference.
Marceli, you’re an F’ing moron. Even though you were technically right about it being more than 10% since the correct answer would be 10.6% and that rounds up to 11%, it is no where near 25%. They were off by .2% of being in spec. I am not going to rehash the formula for that answer as many already have. Elementary school kids have better math skills than you. I would change your entry immediatly because after reading it, I thought the funniest thing about it was your moronic math
10.64%
Jesus Christ people, go back to school.
http://www.gmasononline.com/PERCENTAGEERROR.htm
For those you want the goddammed truth.
marceli your a S T U P I D F A G !
the error is 10.6% not 25%
2.35 -> 100% (correct AR)
(2.6 – 2.35)*100%/2.35 = 10.6% Error
http://www.marshu.com/articles/percent-error-formula.php
If you can’t figure it out.
Best posted review i’ve read in a very long time …. direct and too the point !
cheers great job and keep releasing….
MVS has came through for me many times. Screw the nukers, some of the b.s. scene rules. Release the material and get your credit for the releasing it to us the users of such sites.
And proper your own release. I think it is a slap in the face when a different group has to proper the previous groups release.
just a thought from a MVS fan and fan of all the other greats “Pukka” (which is one of my fav’s) and others from “Bald” (yes bald is beautiful) or “Cocain” (yes cocain is good…lol..)
Marceli: New post is still wrong – Not 15% – 10.6%
“well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .15 which is 15%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image)
***NuKeD***<>
Half ass’d maths RLSLOG.net Style.
Stick 2 what u know fellas
OsT
prob day or two they got video ready just gotta sync with the audio (waiting for direct link)
You know you need to edit your info on the description. If you’re trying to embarass someone, better be sure you won’t make a fool of yourself.
At least the 10.6% is above 10 so you’re partially saved by accident.
PS. I bet they either don’t know maths or made the wrong division i.e.: 0.25/2.6=0.096 (9.6%) and thought they’d get away with that.
add this at the end of the web address (image)
and you can see what % of a IMAGE is MISSING.
stfu
mvs may be stealing from other sources, but at least they know basic math lol.
Be kind to each other people!
lol… there all so full of homsexual rage that they just cant help it now….
Who cares if it’s stolen?
It’s all stolen to start with.
How dare that group ilegally pirate a video that someone else ilegally pirated first!
They deal in stolen video.
If they’re going to complain that people are stealing what they stole, then they need to STFU and just get all their movies from Blockbuster.
I have trouble with the spam protection, Been doing this about three years, and think about90% of the time the staff is right, MVS you do a Great job
As someone who didn’t really understand anything that said i would like to say that you All do a good job, seeing as how i damn well can’t do any of it. I love everyone.
bottom line we all know every group at some point has stolen or “borrowed” another groups work, its the nature of the business and I wouldnt be proud of it being 10% off, who gives a sh*t, we’re either gonan download it or we’re not. I mean if you download cam quality you’re getting half ass crap anyhow. So who f’ing cares and Marceli… its ok dawg, we all now know, that you are not Smarter than a 5th grader. lol
I do love how it took another staff member and 38 posts before someone actually rated the quality.
correction: **would be “gonna download it” or we’re not.
Wow… I can’t believe a post suggesting people to learn simple math could screw up so completely on simple math.
Thank god some of the posters here can calculate percentages.
Jesus christ that was pathetic.
.25 can equal 25%… if it is a base of exactly 100. However if I had $2.60 and then I had $2.35 that would mean I lost $0.25. Now, obviously 10% of $2.60 is $0.26. So logic says that by having even less than 10% ($0.25) it can’t really equal 25%.
Really, even if you can’t do simple math at least realize simple logic.
are we gonna get the whole movie?
All this maths is making my brain fuzzy…..
Oh sh!t and now to post this comment I have to do Spam protection mathematics…GREAT! Thanks a lot mVs!
This is shocking! Both parties to this and just about every comment
on this is breaking the rules shown in front of me as I type.
Abuse, swearing, personal attacks are only tarnishing the integrity
of this site which many people,Worldwide, regard as invaluable.
Marceli just delete this post.
We cant say the word SH@T but you talk like that to the people that come to this site.
Also get a calculator
Poor mVs man, there always getting f’d with. Its like they release some good pre’d movie and yet…wait…too bad its nuked because the date is wrong or something; i guess ide be pissed if i always got shiotted on for trying to release FREE pred movies. Can’t say I blame em’ to be honest…
-Unbreakable /Bmore
I blame America
wooo hooo i am 4,908,079,094th visitor to see the lucky banner yay lol stupid ads
83- no, it’s bush’s fault
I blame Canada
so when does this get pre’d?
I am not part of the ’scene’. I have to respect the efforts of these groups within the guidelines. Considering what they have to work with at times the results are amazing. I have repaired videos; out of sync audio, jumping motion, tweening frames, etc.. AR is the least of my concerns…624/16=39,
240/16=15. Blocks of 16 – I couldn’t ask for any more, hooray! no compression/deinterlacing artifacts even better. Be thankful
for the non-bogus files and quality provided by mVS and all the other groups making the effort. Here’s one to all of you despite your differences…
Big FUK YOU to mVS!!
Big FUK YOU to #89
You must feel like a bit of a dumbass now, eh Marcelli?
I don’t think he/she said that he/she was a mathematics expert so why would he/she feel dumb
NUKED RLSLog.net.Marceli:cannot.calculate.simple.math.problems
I have 2 kids, this reminds me of there childish arguements
lolololol marcelli, your the stupidest of the most stupidest people around, what a donkey, you should RESIGN from rlslog you pole smokin loser
and he can’t even come out of his closet to admit his mistake, typical moron.
So when is this BS post going to be removed or edited. You would of thought he would of wanted to correct it ASAP.
WTF is going on here?
They wanna post? why don’t they?
If their rlses are good, no problem… If others groups make better… their problem.
As for the “who stole what to who”… Well, that’s ironic i suppose… no?
If the aspect ratio of the film is that of PanaVision, which is 2.35:1 and their aspect ratio is 2.6:1, which falls between CinemaScope 55 (2.55:1) and Ultra PanaVision 70 (2.75:1), then there is definitely a nuke there.
Next week, I’ll be talking about my argument about Pan and Scan and why it is a communist plot to steal from your widescreen enjoyment of film. See you then!!!!
ifailatmathtoo; “2.6 / 2.35 = 1.106″
AAH I hate you 1 *chop chop* hm, ey yo mr dot come roll back behind 0. No you silly fish not the 1 the 0. All right so what you say?
10.6!
*idiots dancing*
Is everyone american here?
@ 92
you don’t need to be a maths expert to work out percentages LOL its basic maths learned very early in school. Even countries with a bad educational system can work it out.
quote:
Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…”
“pwnd
my question:
“talking to yourself?”
thx for the good morning laugh…. =P
So Marcelli isn’t the best at maths, he still gets RLS’s posted quick
wow what is with all this hostility? why do people hate marcelli so much. he’s just bringing us the news. if he makes a small mistake so be it. What marcelli was saying was that its 25% more than the vertical than it should be.
i.e. Actual Aspect ratio is 235%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
This one on the other hand is 260%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
260% – 235% = 25%
Now if you were to find the percentage “difference” that would be:
25%/235% = 10.6%
I hope this clears marcelli’s standpoint.
@marceli:
learn some maths. just because the difference is .25 doesn’t mean the difference percentage is 25. It will be calculated on the expected value i.e. 0.25/2.35*100
260%-235%.Jesus christ, from where did you come up with that?
wow what is with all this hostility? why do people hate marcelli so much. he’s just bringing us the news. if he makes a small mistake so be it. What marcelli was saying was that its 25% more than the vertical than it should be.
i.e. Actual Aspect ratio is 235%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
This one on the other hand is 260%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
260% – 235% = 25%
hmm.. something went wrong. Anyway…
2.6:1 = 260%:100%
What the aspect ratio means is that the horizontal is 260% of the vertical. simple as that.
lol@Marcelis embarrassing himself.
MVS go suck pukkas butt wheres axxo btw long time no see? holla
I believe the reason for the hostility is because of the ‘Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…’ comment. Marceli starts insulting popular groups about simple maths when he cant even do it himself.
This is a CAM, not anything to call home about.
WOW 111 coments about math, this site used to be awesome, but the past 4-6 months has been lots of new people with lots of dumb comments
“i.e. Actual Aspect ratio is 235%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
This one on the other hand is 260%:100% (Horizontal:Vertical)
260% – 235% = 25%”
so let me get this right. 2.35:1 is (apparently) 235%:100%
…….
If i had 1/4 of a dollar. which is 1:4 (or 25%) would that make the 1 to 4 ratio equal to 100%:400%?
well lets rls the movie already shizzzzzzzzzzzz
hahaha
marcell got pwned
What is P2P anyway? And whats wrong with using thier stuff?
marcell’s new handle should b “basic_maths_b!tch_2_+_1_=_4″
Let’s do this “simple math” the easy way, kids: 10% of 2.6:1 ratio is 0.26:1 ratio. This means that the AR of 2.35:1, at a 0.25 difference, is less than 10% off.
There’s a time to convert decimals to percentages, and this isn’t that time.
Beautiful quality.
yeah, let’s do the math, your all a bunch of 12 year olds arguing about the dumbest things on the net
who cares, i already have this movie anyway, hahahahahaaha
well stop typing and rls it n00b!!
Hm. I’m just a intermediate at aquiring media… There seems to be an entire culture that I’m unaware of. I wonder who these people are? What company do they keep,that such insults are uttered without fear of retribution? With what recourse do they threaten those that question their legitimacy? How have they become so fluent in such offensive language that it moves me so poetically? Clearly I have much to learn.
@113 uhhh…:
yes, sure. $1 would be 400%, and you have only 100%, so you have $0,25
it’s a pretty stupid way imo but it’s correct.
also @104 unholycleric:
your method is exactly the same as the others who posted the correct way:
(2.6-2.35)/2.35=0.106 -> 10,6%
OMG. Stop posting the same math equation over and over again noobs. Read the other 121 attempts at calculating simple percent error. Jesus.
Delete this entry. Yeeeesh. An RLS staffer thinks he’s too big for his britches and gets all hot and bothered about an NFO flaming. Can you say ‘Who gives a fck?’
Don’t make an entry to flame, do that in IRC if you really want to vent. Sheesh. We come here for release info, not to hear you rant over your time of the month. Get a maxi. Out.
NObody Cares !!!!!!!
@84
No, you’re the 4,908,079,094th n00b who doesn’t ad block and probably uses IE.
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thx
LOL LOL LOL this has got to be the funniest thread on rlslog…. keep going ppl… Marcelli should go back to school since he cant do basic maths…
i guess i’ll throw in my 2 cents or is it 2.6 cents,
ahh the hell with it here’s a nickel. lol
when is this going to be released, tomorrow maybe? that’s hella quality
Que chinguena su madre los de P2P!!!!
to mVS group put the movie online he is a fake
WHAT IS %20 OUT OF 1,999,888
http://www.boysfood.com
get all movies in theaters here in dvd quality !
so wens da movie comn
who cares about this? in other news…
Woah, vitriole much!
I figure I’m going to add one more post to the maths debate, with a view to actually clarifying exactly what everyone is on about in relation to all of the different things being argued about. But before I do that, a few quick points:
1. It’s not fair to be rude at someone *just* because they’re not good at maths.
2. It IS fair to be rude at someone if they are not good at maths AND (depite that) they have (rudely) accused someone else of not being bad at maths.
2b. Doing that (being bad at maths and rudely telling someone else that they are) just makes you a person who is bad at maths AND arrogant as such it makes it perfectly reasonable to nail you for being stupid.
So, to clarify some of the maths involved.
First:
A ratio is the same as a fraction. So (for example):
A quarter = 1:4 = 1/4 = 25%.
A quarter refers to having one out of four possible parts of something. So, for example (in US currency)
A quarter is to have 25c out of the possible 100c (one dollar).
If you have four quarters, you have one dollar.
Thus 1:4 means you have one out of four possible quarters (to make one dollar). It is however possible to have more quarters than one dollar, so the ratio can go the other way:
If (for example) you have 6 quarters, that is a ratio of 6:4
So you have 6 of these quarters of dollars or 150c. ($1.50)
It is possible to express the exact same amount of money in many different ways:
Eg. As a decimal: $1.50
As a fraction: 6/4
As a ratio: 6:4
And (as per our argument now) as a percentage:
150%
So, the matter of how exactly you work out the percentage revolves around what your base is. So, if your base is $1, then your base is 100c (which makes it nice and easy to work with).
So 25% of 100c = 25c
But if you had 25% of $2 (200c) then you would have 50c.
To go from a fraction (or a ratio, remembering that they’re actually the same thing) to a percentage you need to divide one by the other.
You ALWAYS divide the left (or top) number by the right (or bottom).
So:
1/4 = 1:4 = one divided by four = 0.25
Of course everyone is used to having “percentage” written in its non decimal form so it is multiplied by 100 to get to the more conventional “25%”.
Another way to say the exact same thing is to say:
0.25:1
You are saying that you have one quarter (0.25) of a possible 1.
Wherever you have a ratio which is:
X:1
X can always be assumed to be a percentage OF whatever the 1 is.
In the example of a computer screen, the resolution might be:
1680×1050
This is saying that there are 1680 pixels across and 1050 pixels down.
Because some people like to express this as a fraction or ratio (how many across pixels there are for every down pixel aka “across pixels per down pixels” aka 1680/1050 we want a way to say “for every one down pixel there will be ??? across pixel” So they want to say ???:1 (??? across pixels for every 1 down pixel)
The best way to do that is to remember that a ???:1 ratio is exactly the same as saying ??? times 100 percent.
So, if it is 1:1 that’s 100% 2:1 is 200%, 6.5:1 is 650% (etc).
So, how do we make it a percentage again?
Our fraction is:
1680/1050
Our ratio is:
1680:1050
To make it into a percent, divide the top (left) by the bottom) right and multiply by 100.
In this case:
1680 divided by 1050 = 1.6
Multiply by 100 = 160%
So, 1680 is 160% of 1050.
This means the same as:
- There are 1.6 across pixels for every down pixel
- number of down pixels times 1.6 = number of across pixels
- 1.6:1 pixel ratio
Remeber that our “1″ in that ratio is talking about the number of down pixels (1050) because we wanted to know: “how many across pixels are there for each down pixel?”. So “100%” or 1:1 would be a screen with a resolution of 1050×1050 (a square).
So, if we have two ratios and want to know the percentage difference between the two, how do we do it?
We’ll go back to using money for this one because it’s easier:
If you have:
2.5:1 money, you have 250% of the “base” of money. Seeing as the “base” of money is 100c, having 250% of it means you’ve got $2.50.
So 2.5:1 money = $2.50.
If someone else has:
3:1 money, they’ve got $3 exactly.
So, they’ve got 50c more than you, (3 minus 2.5 OR $3.00 minus $2.50) but do they have “50%” more than you?
50% is half, so if they had half more than you when you had $2.50 then they’d have to have $1.25 more than you or $3.25 total.
But they don’t, they’ve only got $3!
So, we want to work out how much the difference between your money and there money is as a percentage.
So, we know they’ve got 50c more than you.
So you have 250c and they have 50c more.
That’s 50c:250c
So, divide left by right:
50c divide by 250c = 0.2 = 20% more.
So, they have 20% more money than you, your money makes our 100% value, their money makes the 120% value.
So their money to your money (as a ratio) is:
1.2:1
Or, for every $1 you have, they have $1.20.
If your ammounts were more complex, like for example:
They have:
$1285
You have:
$1190
You can work out one of two things from this if you like:
First: What their money is as a percentage of yours (so you can say “for every one dollar I have, they have ??? dollars”)
OR
Second: What percentage MORE money than you they have.
To do the first, you decide who is important to you, put them on the right. So, if you want to work out “for every $1 I have they have $???” put yourself on the right. If you want to work out “for every $1 THEY have, I have $???” then put them on the left.
We’ll assume you’re working it out with you as the important person so:
Them:you
1285:1190
First (for every dollar I have they have ??? dollars??)
divide the left by the right
1285 divide by 1190 = 1.0798
So, for every $1 you have, they have $1.0798 (almost $1.08)
This means they have 107.98% of your money or 1.0798:1
Or, if you want to work out “for every dollar I have, they have ???c more than me” you first have to work out how much more they have so you simply take you away from them.
So:
1285 minus 1190 = 95
Now, you’re still the important thing to look at so you’re still on the right:
95:1190
So divide left by right:
95 divided by 1190 = 0.0798 (look familiar?)
That says that for every $1 you have, they have $1 plus an extra $0.0798 or 7.98c (AKA 7.98%)
Hmmm, that maths lesson was longer than it was planned to be.
I guess it’s bound to happen when you’re bored and at work.
Hope I helped some people to understand, lol.
(I tried to keep it nice and simple rather than simply stating the complex (albeit perfectly logic) construct)
P2P no es nada bueno!
Sceners this uptight are pityful.
P2P has it’s pro’s and con’s but i have to be honest, i have not dealt with P2P for a long time!
Marceli you’ve got to admit it…. you’ve got PWNED!!! xD
LOL Matt .. nobody is going to read more then 3 or 4 lines of your post i´m sorry
but hey you put a lot of effort into it and it looks pretty legit 
ah ah now some compulsive “haha your math sux” post : haha Marceli your math sux
wtf is p2p i thought p2p stand for peer to peer is p2p a group like mvs and axxo pukka etc. wtf is p2p
wow there should be a pole on the age of people who enter this site i would like to see it because with all this bad math im surprise half the people know how to spell
if you are a staff member don’t you have to know math or atleast pass middle school
Marceli just got pwned!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wait and see what I have in store for you in the next rls!
Guys check this out!
http://forums.rlslog.net/showthread.php?t=3542
I’m considering making donation to Marceli for a private math course at home… Who’s with me ??
holy virtualdub + donald graft deflicker batman, they need to learn how to set that plugin properly. They did not get the threshold right so it’s fading in like crazy.
just to add something educational to the mud sling fest: one normally uses the term “percentage points” to avoid the ambiguity. So the two ARs in question (260% and 235%) differ by 25 percentage points, and the former is 10.6% larger than the second. Both statements are correct.
Question is, which one is the basis for the scene rule? 10 percentage points or 10%? Being not part of the scene I honestly don’t know.
Greetings from the old Europe.
stfu and go back to chatting in #irpg so I can win moar
maths wow on rls is pro
i believe the childrens are our future teach them maths and let them lead the way , show them all the beauty they posses inside give them a calculator to make it easier let our children calculate to get the right answer for you and for me
now that all the yelling is done with, can we get some actual download links for the actual movie?
Self ownage is the best.
thanks for bangin’ my mom mVs
“Maths” + Internets = I’m having funs
Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwn!!! What a pathetic post Marceli… “Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…” Bit touchy aswell arent you. By far would have to be the worst review of anything ive ever seen on this site, absolute pointless dribble just for the sake of an argument, lmao! Keep up the good work :p
yeah atleast mVs is doing us all a favor and bangin our moms. Without them who would?!?!
This thread is just too funny.
this is going to be one of those threads that lasts forever
Man, scene people used to just be sensitive, annoying little geeks with connections and talent. Now they’re just annoying little pseudo-geeks who substitute bombast for talent and FTP 0-day access for credentials…
AHHHHHhhhhh…..
Do you remember when?….
weird, one of my balls, the left one, is hanging a good 4 inches below the other one. Must have had a falling out with the right one.
The problem isn’t that Marceli has a peanut brain and can’t do math, it’s that Marceli posts up the erroneus math then goes about saying “Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots…”
Pathetic.
@143 – LEARN HOW TO SPELL ??? WELL FOR A START ‘POLE’ IS SPELT POLL IN THE CONTEXTUAL ELEMENT TO WHICH ONE IS REFERRING – HEH HEH HEH !!
“erroneus”
you can’t spell, might want to work on that
Marceli LOL, that is a crack up. I thought you were joking ROFL.
Using Marceli’s logic:
when 1100% becomes 1000%
you lose 100%, so you lose everything
hahahaha
he should be an astrophysicist, he’d come up with theory of everything in no time at all, cause if you know everything, taking the percent of that from 0, makes you lose 100% of it, so it would therefore take no time to do anything. I took pre-algebra in 6th grade I know these things as well.
This is one of the funniest tit for tat rambling argument posts I have seen. Since this sites spam protection for posting is a MATH question itself I wonder how many people couldn’t add and who’s comments are therefore absent here
Sad but although percentages are a middle school question I guess these kids were skipping and at home playing Xbox instead.
WIKI LINK FOR HOW TO FIGURE A PERCENTAGE OF CHANGE BETWEEN TWO NUMBERS
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_figure_out_the_percentage_difference_between_two_totals
Funny thread, but must be embarrasing for Marceli. I think he went into hiding.
Hey, it’s “Schooled”-house Rock.
Well, anyways, here goes.
Lets take 100 inches as the one in the aspect ratio, that means the 2.35 would equal 235, so you would have a picture 235 inches by 100 inches.
Also the 2.6, if we followed the same formula of 1 = 100 inches would equal 260 inches by 100 inches.
We take the larger value and subtract the smaller value and get a total which is 25.
Now, we take the 25 and divide it by 235. We get a total of .106, percentile equivilent is 10.6, which means that 10.6 percent of the picture is missing from the 2.35 AR.
I’ve always used the 1 = 100 in. formula when talking to people about pan and scan vs. widescreen. It does make a difference when they find out that, if they had a 100 inch high screen, that pan and scan takes 102 inches away from a 2.35 AR film.
Nice. Well said
It was really funny reading your comments
Waiting for The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XVID-mVS
@109 Bukka STFU with that G@Y @ss Axxo his rips suck, and they aren’t even his he just re-encodes them from the scene release, which has already been proven, also his movies don’t even play on a 2nd monitor cuz it crashes ur pc, everyone else’s does. aXXo is not scene therefore his P@P garbage wont be posted here.
I consider most p2p people noobs anyways.
oh, the irony!
Will this please get removed.. it’s annoying. mvs vs some dude on rls log.. big deal…
Rumour has it mvs stole the sample from
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4193235/Narnia_2-Principe_Caspian_A.Latinowww.Hispatorrents.org
Spanish audio
Thats like head shoot from a big distance with glock
I got pwned
what film they crying about, I thought narnia was out, or
is this another film…
forget last post, found out….
@179
no i did not
Ahhh, I love the smell of irony in the morning.
DONT YOU EVER USE MY PC AGAIN !!!!!!
The Voice
best quote of the thread
nuked – bad.language
old farts method we were taught at skool.
pecentage = (difference/original)x100
difference 2.6-2.35=0.25
0.25/2.35 x100 = 10.6% difference of the 2.35 AR
bloddy hell… this movie is crap anyway, right?
http://rapidshare.com/files/115729723/narn.sample.avi
err, lol mate, correct me if im wrong but the AR is 9.62% off, since 2.35/2.60 = 90.38%, 100-90.38 = 9.62
SAMPLE:
http://rapidshare.com/files/115732050/narn.sample.avi
Marceli should be banned and never allowed to post. POS!!!
BTW the last paragraph mentions that they want proof that the AR was more than 10% off, well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd
Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
YOU SIR ARE A COMPLETE IDIOTA
@153 “thanks for bangin’ my mom mVs”
Imao
))))))))
Martin, check your editors please…
Can’t wait for next mVs release, their nfo is gonna be a blast!
Hi my name is Marceli,
I just turned 6 today, I was 5 years old yesterday, so:
6 – 5 = 1, which is 100%
Yay, I doubled my age in one day!!!
good job. You should be proud of that =)
I’ll let you all on a little secret about pirating.Most people dont care how we get the movies/shows/etc we care about A. Quality and B. The time it took to get them. If MVS wants props and judging by the sample they will get it, hurry up and post the movie already.
@139
So are posters who can’t spell.
Pitiful. P-I-T-I-F-U-L. Pitiful.
Class dismissed.
I for one, will be unable to sleep untill this matter is resolved.[/sarcasm]
At least we all passed the spam protection
LOL
Its like a bloody ,aths teachers forum!
Damm lol
Lol the spelling bug is here now, i ment maths
@160
Don’t feel bad. Half the people posting here are still looking forward to the day their’s drop.
LOOOOOOOOOOL you absolute tard….you just made my morning
Back to school for somebody?
This might help: http://catalogue.learndirect.co.uk/courses/104074BS016/
ROFL
I’m sorry but you ALL have FAR too much time on your hands… move on
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…
vv
So many sh.t just because of an average, no sound, 1 minute sample of Narnia…
Nothing better to do i guess.
There is no sound prob because they either dont have it yet, need to sync it or waiting for a new source…..
Looks ok for a TS if thats what it’ll get labelled….
It started in US on 16th and a few counties week before so very quick really!
Props in order
marceli is at tw@t, and i have been mentioning this for a while now on previous posts. Thankfully he saved me from having to do this anymore. He acts like he carries some weight around here, but in truth he knows fuk all. By far the biggest idiot on this site.
mVs thank you
cant wait to see full rls, the quality looks great.
ps you cannot truly work out the correct AR on a cam release, surely that is obvious. I think the easiest way to prove this is to look at the fim itself. One of the best cams i have seen for a while, with no “egg” or “fat” heads and no noticeaable crop…….. just my opinion.
Narnia.Sample.And.Facts.READNFO-mVS
nuked reasons
caused maths problem on rlslog
wet our appetite for The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian.xvid-MVS
The picture f.u.c.k.y.o.u.p.2.p used a custom font
http://rapidshare.com/files/115737466/NARNIA_2.part01.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115737612/NARNIA_2.part02.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115737894/NARNIA_2.part03.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115738057/NARNIA_2.part04.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115738191/NARNIA_2.part05.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115738414/NARNIA_2.part06.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115738547/NARNIA_2.part07.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115738770/NARNIA_2.part08.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115738972/NARNIA_2.part09.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115739227/NARNIA_2.part10.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115739460/NARNIA_2.part11.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115739554/NARNIA_2.part12.rar
this is the spanish version
To find this much venom and invective in the comments one usually has to scroll down to a Mr. X post.
And Marceli isn’t hiding, he just obviously has more class than to react to all the junior flamebaiters posting here.
You can say what you like about P2P,at least i have never seen a nasty nfo from them.
@210, replace class with balls. the guy is a fuktard at best.
all of you get a life …..who cares about the maths…..at the end of the day its well off……hence nuked.
THE END
NOW SMILE DOWNLOAD AND ENJOY YOUR LIFE
How embarrasing for you Marceli.
Thanks for the laugh.
MVS SUCKS
marceli selfpwnage
Suggestion for screening dumb-ass comments: Instigate spam protection based on calculating x as a percentage of x + y (expressed as decimals of course)!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage_point
from the horse’s mouth
1st!
http://filebin.ca/zdfkos/ampli.mp3
Can anyone recognize this track!!
What gets me is that you tried to make mvs look bad marceli, when the only thing you accomplished is making youself look like a complete idiot. Ever heard of the old age say “it’s nice to me nice”?
As always. Sorry for the bad english, I’m english.
I can’t believe what a spastic Marceli is!
(2.6-2.35)/2.35=0.10638
Or 10.64%
Marceli must have a real problem posting what with the spam protection sums, thicko!! hahahahahahaha!
I can’t believe what a spastic Marceli is!
(2.6-2.35)/2.35=0.10638
Or 10.64%
Marceli must have a real problem posting what with the spam protection sums!
I can’t believe what an idiot Marceli is!
(2.6-2.35)/2.35=0.10638
Or 10.64%
Did anyone notice there is a flaw in the math of Marceli?
I have been trying it for hours now but it’s a real brain-teaser. Maybe someone should contact mVS to get around the table and figure this out and post the outcome on the board.
Hope this will ever be solved..
In the meantime I’ll be looking out for a DVD-RIP of Narnia tho..
It’s not all that uncommon to compare percentages by simply adding/subtracting them. How often do you see news reporters using division to compare percentages?
“Today support for canditate X went up with 10.6% from 35% to 60%”
Although Marceli should have clarified that he was talking about percentage points, the funniest posts here are the ones apparantly unaware of the concept of percentage points.
alright all you n00bs late to the party, shove your stupid math formulas straight up your bungholes then do a spinarooni on my fat toe. this is as much fun as beating a dead horse. doing your mom is more fun except she smells like rotten cabbage. and shes ugly. real ugly. ill still do her since i have low standards. real low. lucky you.
so i dont care anymore. marceli, go post something new. redeem yourself. and please promise never to do math again.
thank you.
who gives a FOOCK about a SAMPLE????
[b]lol raw math is wrong, correct number is 10.6%, and u nO0bs don\’t know what is cropped, so 2.6:1 AR can be 100% correct, jeez i love those p2p dilettants.
Better post about STALKER Clear sky leaked demo[/b]
@229
your mom does. i gave her a sample… all night long! then i squashed some spoiled tofu in her ugly mug and kicked her out the door. stank beeyatch!
@230 old_ripper
shut the fock up you fat n00b! who the hell cares what you think you smelly sack of hippo shet?!? take your stupid math and shove it straight up your arse friend! im not your buddy!
idiot.
Sorry for being rude. I had my dad up my a$$ just now.
Marceli, how old are you?
When I was 12 I can calculate percentages properly. Are you 11?
does it matter ?
Narnia 2 Russian TS
screen samples
http://i044.radikal.ru/0805/e3/d74e2b6ff94f.jpg
http://i046.radikal.ru/0805/d8/109ab71fbfc5.jpg
http://i012.radikal.ru/0805/f5/318b29ac3081.jpg
http://i003.radikal.ru/0805/7a/6038d49369cf.jpg
@209…..links
what a load of crap that dl is. cam muck where you cant even see whats going on. people stop posting links to crap that i wouldnt make my cat watch.
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767296/narnia_2.part01.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767363/narnia_2.part02.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767317/narnia_2.part03.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767323/narnia_2.part04.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767291/narnia_2.part05.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767351/narnia_2.part06.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767334/narnia_2.part07.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767401/narnia_2.part08.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767289/narnia_2.part09.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767289/narnia_2.part09.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767392/narnia_2.part10.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767282/narnia_2.part11.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767321/narnia_2.part12.rar
no pass
Spanish audio p2p source
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767296/narnia_2.part01.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767363/narnia_2.part02.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767317/narnia_2.part03.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767323/narnia_2.part04.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767291/narnia_2.part05.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767351/narnia_2.part06.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767334/narnia_2.part07.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767401/narnia_2.part08.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767289/narnia_2.part09.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767392/narnia_2.part10.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767282/narnia_2.part11.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/115767321/narnia_2.part12.rar
no pass
What a bunch of TWATS….a crook callin a crook a crook…
Lets call it what it is….theft
Don’t matter who does it…it all starts with ….theft…
Talk about the pot callin the kettle black.
Again…bunch of f**kin twats.
Bunch of Twats….its all stolen….
Talk bout the pot callin the kettle black….
your all right, Marcelli is right when he says 25% because he means that the horizontal resolution is 25% higher than what it should be, in reference to the vertical resolution.
on the other hand it’s also 10.6% higher, in reference to the expected horizontal resolution.
in my opinion, since where talking about 2 dimensions, the AR is in fact off by 10.6% because thats the number you get when you use both dimensions:
(2.6*1)/(2.35*1) = 1.106 = 110.6% -> off by 10.6%
@221. pwner
totally off topic, not like any of the other posts are,
but that track is Calabria and hard to believe you don’t know of it.
People really need to let the math dilemma go.
Insulting Marceli, showing you’re smart by posting a correct equation or just writing nonsense is good for nothing really.
Shows how important your lives are by wasting so much time on this…
The bottom line about the math:
• Go to Google.com.
• Type in 2.35 + (10.64% * 2.35)
• Result = 2.60004
Which means the AR was off by 10.64%, not 25%, 9.4% or any other number. Think about it; if you have $2.35, and you get 25c more, you’ve gotten >10% more since 10% of 2.35 is obviously 0.235. Thus, the correct offset is 10.6%.
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
I WILL LEARN MATH
@241 go back to skool with your anti-math logics
This post was worst than all the optimizer posts we got in one month altogether.
look at the actual film. does it look like the AR is 25% off. does it fuk. dont baffle yourselves with bullsheeit, look to see the film was fine.
@235
kk, where can we get torrent for that russian TS?
i download and doesnt look like a TS at all must be diff source you have.
Don’t worry Marceli,this should help you out!
http://btjunkie.org/torrent/The-Interactive-Classroom-Math-and-English-Tutor-and-Education-K-to-12/4432b321d39bd66fe92ba72f311c460b8344d318d0c5
It isn’t 25% haha
@235 Looks much better than your aunties link here some screen from that release
http://i31.tinypic.com/m951lg.png
http://i31.tinypic.com/2s6wkuf.png
http://i28.tinypic.com/52gkqq.png
@PrS
Thanks
@235
Хроники Нарнии: Принц Каспиан / The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (2008) TS
Ratios are fractions people!!! 2.6 is 2.6 OVER 1! 2.6/1 and 2.35/1 so the source AR of 624×240 is 624 divided by 240 equals the 2.6 so the cropped AR 2.35 would be 564×240 so the video is only 60 pixels off and 60/624 would give you the percentage off by pixels, whjich is only 9.6 % difference in pixels so i would say that IS under the 10% rule.
I DONT CARE
There is ONLY a 9.6 % pixel difference when you convert that to a ratio it will stay the same!!!! Thats what a ratio is, a representation of a fraction converted to a decimal the ratio will stay the same at any point of the conversion and that’s a basic mathematics LAW. So instead of trying to get the % difference using fractions (ratios) convert back to pixels and the differences maintain and you will see only 9.6% difference in pixels!
(=
=)
Sweet Bring on the TS and Stop having pissing contest over fractions. I read all that and i think im crazy now.
257 comments about a sample 80% about math equations so thats about 222 comments abouth math that equals out to about 222.453637433939 percent of people who are really bored with nothing better to do but i just commented on it to .that brings it up to about 222.563856638393 iedsssaghliilfhglkjghkfkhjk
There are 2 TS on the internet!
nr 1 on interfilm.ru
nr 2 where mVs got it from! (better Q !)
TORRENT AT:
http://www.megashara.com/movies/79495/hroniki_narnii_prints_kaspian_the_chronicles_of_narnia_prince_caspian.html
Хроники Нарнии: Принц Каспиан / The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (2008) CamRip
http://www.megashara.com/screenshots/t_167344__snapshot20080518132656.jpg
http://www.megashara.com/screenshots/t_167345__snapshot20080518132721.jpg
http://www.megashara.com/screenshots/t_167346__snapshot20080518132806.jpg
gr.
sorry wrong links to samples
here the good ones:
http://www.megashara.com/screenshots/167344__snapshot20080518132656.jpg
http://www.megashara.com/screenshots/167346__snapshot20080518132806.jpg
http://www.megashara.com/screenshots/167345__snapshot20080518132721.jpg
@255
You buggered it up!!
The % difference is aways expressed as the difference over the standard i.e. 100(624-564/564) = 10.6%
In this case 2.35 is the standard not 2.60 as you have calculated. Back to school.
@ALL
Bottom Line = “Don’t be rude” that goes for everybody.
lol… (slamming head in the keyboard), i haven’t laughed for a long time this much, about 80% of the posts are offtopic =)),
it’s a stupid Narnia release it’s not even a good movie, you talk like it’s the release of the century….
proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%
wow somebody was sick when % was explained in school
I’m 100% pissed off that i just wasted ten minutes of my life reading this.
What you are not getting is that 2.60 AR actually represents 624/240 and 2.35 represents 564/240 so if you subtract 564/240 from 624/240 you get 60/240 which is 1/4, that’s where you keep getting the 25%, but all that 25% is saying is the width difference is 25% of the height ( 60 pixels cropped off width, height maintains at 240 pixels) that isn’t the AR difference. And at # 262, the 2.35 is the incorrect AR so how is it the standard? The standard (correct) AR is 2.60, so 564 is only 90.4 % of the correct 624. (remember in math the word -OF- always equals multiply) So if you multiply the correct 624 times 90.4% you will get the 564, if you did it your way and multiplied the 624 by 89.4% you only get 558 pixels which is 2.3244 AR NOT 2.35.
10.6% is right
@265 kexo
dumba$$
ok which idiot helped Marceli with the spam protection
obviously he couldn’t have passed that all by himself
You start out with a ratio, not a percentage. I will skip over the ratio part to simplify.
624×240 the proper should be 564×240
math to find proper (2.35*240 and 1*240)
624-564 = 60
What percentage of 564 is 60?
60/564 * 100 = 10.6%
Thus, 624 is 10.6% more than 564
ok so why is a cropped picture the proper and the full picture the incorrect AR?
At least we now know why we have so little staff comments. They can’t get past the Spam protection.
I see what you are saying, that 110.6 of 564 will equal 624. But the 564 is the bad cropped image, that’s exactly what rlslog said in the post that the 2.60 is the full image.
well IMDB says the correct AR should be 2.35 so i do see what you are saying it is 10.6% if it’s suppose to be 564, everything i calculated was for the width to be 624.
I just couldn’t let it go when they said 25%, obviously marcelli has never bet on horses lol.
%Diff = |2.6 – 2.35| / [ (2.6 + 2.35) / 2 ] * 100 = 10.1%
This is the craziest post I have ever read at rlslog.
don’t believe me?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent_difference
“which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd
Might want to learn how to do simple math before arguing…”
indeed, Marceli: you may want to learn how to do simple math.
and making fun of the scene is all well and good, but when youre wrong, you end up looking pretty stupid.
@207 – “marceli is at tw@t, and i have been mentioning this for a while now on previous posts. Thankfully he saved me from having to do this anymore. He acts like he carries some weight around here, but in truth he knows fuk all. By far the biggest idiot on this site.”
not martin?
All the people that actually try to look smart by correcting a simple equation hereby informed that they are not smart and should go back to working on some garage in Texas and go back to battseksing with their sisters. Damn rednecks trying to look smart.
Oh dear this has got to be the funniest post I have ever read, Ever.
Marcelli isn’t a tw@t, All you people posting countless solutions which are the same, to the SAME fukup, are tw@ts.
How funny is that shi-at?!!
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
Finally Marcelli shows what a dumb fook he is, stay at school and learn something and leave the real math to real people.
any links?
@277 – that interpretation at WIKI is wrong. you, yourself wrote that page at wiki and put it here as a reference, right? you’re real clever!!!
i am god…
and you all rock..
my children.. its all worth it..
spend tme on releaselog and you shll be happy forever
i love HEAVY METAL BTW
peace
My children,
Speak to me..
This Marceli guy is really funny. First he should learn how to do math correctly. Then perhaps recognize his mistake and correct it.
@189
Did you not see the other 100+ posts showing the correct way to do the math? Come on now. So, yeah, you’re wrong.
Education systems are failing us when people cannot do basic math. Basic math knowledge is a quality of life issue.
@277 Your math is WRONG!!!
Your suppose to find out how much one value deviates from the other and give it in percent.
Your calculation takes the AVERAGE of the two numbers in the denominator. That will give the percentage difference of the AVERAGE of the two. THAT IS WRONG!!!
who give a fook, RLSLOG staff are all dumb fooks at school anyway, follow skit and fooking kill yourselves
lol.
all so funny, great work Marcella.
anyhow.
percentage difference in ASPECT is 10.64%
percentage difference in PIXELS is 9.62%
damn look at all u n00bs bustin a nut over this math problem. omgzorz i know math better then youzzzz, i have no lifes!!!!! stfu already.
Now someone release this movie with english line audio already!!!!
always remember to keep your apples with apples and oranges with oranges.
#293 is Marceli
@295 lol hellllll no. If you werent such a n00b youd see my previous comments on page 2. dumbass
If the AR was truly 25% off, you would get something like 1.76:1, which is considerably less than a widescreen TV AR.
Remember, kids:
Stay in drugs, and don’t do school.
Firstly, the math IQ here on this site is bad!!Pathetic even!
And what is all this BS about this “xxx stole from yyy” crap. This is idiotic cause every damn rls her is STOLEN! SCENE and P2P alike. Who cares if it was stolen, as long as the quality is good.
I wonder how some people here manage to get past the spam protection system.
nuked this, stolen that & a distraction about AR !….all i care about is
a) decent pic and audo..file formats and that stuff dont matter
b) Is it on my newsserver yet ?….
All the rest is for people who are lvl 70 on WOW
you idiots are still discussing who is right or wrong? get a clue and go wank yourselves off or something. in regards to whats what…whos nuked…and so on…a big f-in LOL@u for caring so much. Pls jump off a bridbge if you have to resort to belittling an OP on a site who is here for your benefit.
Now I know how they hire George Bush’s advisors!
Geez,
Don’t sugarcoat it. Tell us how you really feel.
omfg some of you sound like a b.itching girl, who cares about maths this aint a math site, move along.
25% ? …oh man that was really funny
Over 300 comments, still no apology or retraction. Marceli’s credibility is doomed.
Marceli, if this is post number 306 and the previous 305 before me are just as pissed what percentage of people think that you are a n00b?
Sad is the day that my dog can do percentages better than this moron who’s a neuron short of a synapse.
I’m glad to have found out you aren’t Canadian I would have been really ashamed of my country to think such a sperm produced a human like individual.
The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XviD.READNFO-iAPULA
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4194572/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XviD.READNFO-iAPULA
What’s funny to me here is the lack of reaction to mVs’s horribly rude message. The internet has become a real center of immature discourse, adn ho-la is it tiresome. I don’t know who this Marceli is but he’s probably away from his computer. I went through these posts and its the same garbage over and over. I’ll be encouraged when people talk like normal, balanced individuals. This topic, from mVs to all these responses is embarassing.
Haha, look at all the super geeks.
“Oh no, your incorrect. Let me tell you how to work it properly but be a major douche about”
Go play with your calculators, stop bashing Marceli and get a life.
Back on topic:
Hope this get’s released soon, wouldn’t mind watching it.
haha, my favorite part is when Marcell says:
“so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math before arguing”
freakin classic
So what percentage was it off by?
You math geniuses! Now, I have an idea about the huge difference between the median age and the mean age of the people in these forums. Drink your milk, eat your greens, apparently you need them desperately.
idiots. marceli already responded that he was pwnd. read a little you so-called math geniuses. then perhaps i will give you your mother back. after ive had another two rounds with her first.
you all sorry bunch of piss lapping sh!tfaced n00bs.
NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR STUPID MATH! SO SHOVE IT STRAIGHT UP YOUR WRETCHED ARSE!
hahaha Marceli
you proved to the world once again what a a total fkin n00bikins you are
muahaha PWNed
mARCELI iS teh real CHiNBALLS muaha
@314…you proved to the world once again why wisdom comes with age…not with the dropping of testicles. I would seriously like to throw all those like you into a pen with a wild bull. Real life might possibly change your tune. Then again maybe we can hope you get charged, lose your testicles, and cant reproduce.
Martin
You should kick these n00b twats like Marceli in their pre-teen pubeless balls. Look at what the fool has done. He made your site look like rlsn00b.net
No, that’s wrong of me. He made this site look even more like rlsn00b.net
“do some simple math before arguing”
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Number 1 on the All-time Greatest self-pwns of all time
ghehehe
Surely Marceli can never show his face on this site again?
He has the credibility of George Bush’s brain donor.
You guys SUCK. You allow this BULL$H!T topic full of profanity, but you strictly censor user comments.
What a load of GARBAGE.
My son is crying in his bedroom.
When I try to enter he blocks the door and I hear this terrible moaning sound.
I am worried. I think he might attempt suicide.
OK I am not worried. I hope the little fu.cker cuts his head off with the knife I pushed under the door – and quick.
What’s your next post Marceli?
Sesame Street?
The answer to life, the universe and everything is I AM PWNED
Marceli,
At this difficult time in your life I thought you might like a friend.
I don’t know who this friend could be, but if he shows up I will certainly let you know.
@291 Mr X,
you are in need of some therapy…[seriously]
Back to my post:
Why did I get my post deleted…?
I have seen idiots post about random XxX language and
I get deleted? Please re-post.
Everyone needs to dl and STFU…”torrent [metadata] files”
I didn’t know there were math teachers in here…
Our society at its best huh…?
All people should care is getting there movie and maybe a thank you here and there.
I don’t know what this means but if mvs is hooking me up to a free movie why piss them off? I don’t know what nuked means either. In my opinion I dont think people should talk smack about them.
Marceli, there is always room for you in my bed
I don’t know why groups bother stealing p2p releases, it would be quicker to just Rip the DVD.
238 lol, rofl.
who de hell cares if it;s coming from p2p. yeah own is better, but it doesn’t care if it’s coming from the russians(p2p).
stop that
DD i pissed alil bit in my pants ))))))))
some1 put this on wikipedia
:
Nr5 Marceli
I have no clue why you’re dividing… If the AR is off you subtract the ARs, not divide them.
2.6 – 2.35 = .25 (25%)
Nr14 Marceli
once again, you dont divide them, you subtract. and .25 is 25% because .25 is 25/100 which in turn is 25%
Nr20 Marceli
youre already working with percentages, youre just finding the difference between them (260% – 235% = 25%)…
my dog has higher IQ
Who cares about if its a p2p source i just want a good movie and if a better version comes out ill just grab that one.
But using threats against people on the internet is just stupid
All release groups does great work dont get me wrong but isent it good that some use p2p sources then the ones that dont will proper it with a better one and thats good is u ask me.
Martin, I’m really sorry for screwing up so bad. I resign and promise never to come to this site again. I hope one day to make amends for my bad and hope that God forgives me, but he probably wont do cos I am a Jew and all. Please also forgive me for sending you that MMS of my pre-teen balls. Thanks, Marceli. xxx
Darkone23 is in for the next round of bashing
2 cents is .02, not 0.2, wow, your in for it now
mVs are lameeers
wonder if this post is going to be linked on the “most POPular” as it seems to have more posts than the 300 post
Best article+comments ever. Gonna bookmark for later use.
********New RLSLOG competition****
Design a cheer-up/get well soon card for Marceli to win
Grand Prize – your math homework will be done by Marceli for a year.(that should keep him out of this site!)
i’m gonna miss u marceli…
muaaaahhhhaa
ummm… 0.25 may be 25% of ONE but it ain’t 25% of 2.6
Unless all principles of Mathematics have been completely overhauled since I got my degree..?
hahah marceli u idiot pwnd by mVs!! hahahahaha
owned by teh nfo lolz
http://rapidshare.com/files/116031589/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part01.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116032227/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part02.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116032366/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part03.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116032828/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part04.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116033888/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part05.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116034064/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part06.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116034273/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part07.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116034832/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part08.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116034971/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part09.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116036184/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part10.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116036382/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part11.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116036585/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part12.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116037622/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part13.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116037810/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part14.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116037981/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part15.rar
if you want to help keep the releases coming fast :
http://rapidshare.com/files/116037983/help.txt
The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs
Time After Pre: 16 minutes and 14 seconds
i would like to post this link for narnia
in the site with my name MiNa
couse i want to be one of this great site
The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs
http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e156/razvanultra55/thumbs20080519162010.jpg
The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs
IMDb…..: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499448/
DATE ……: 19-05-2008
AUDiO …..: LINE
FORMAT ….: XViD
GENRE …..: FAMILY
QUALiTY …: TS / LINE
ARCHiVES ..: 1
LANGUAGE ..: ENGLiSH
RATiNG ….: 8.0/10
SUBTITLES .: N/A
———————————
links to download:
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029461/mvs-tconpca.part01.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029456/mvs-tconpca.part02.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029589/mvs-tconpca.part03.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029519/mvs-tconpca.part04.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029555/mvs-tconpca.part05.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029573/mvs-tconpca.part06.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029571/mvs-tconpca.part07.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029686/mvs-tconpca.part08.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029704/mvs-tconpca.part09.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029691/mvs-tconpca.part10.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029688/mvs-tconpca.part11.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029634/mvs-tconpca.part12.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029666/mvs-tconpca.part13.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029664/mvs-tconpca.part14.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/116029398/mvs-tconpca.part15.rar
or
http://netload.in/dateie7ea21c53e111c98d734c0bf9559f499/mvs-tconpca.part12.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei225953376a6c22dfcd63f8ab57ed7bbe/mvs-tconpca.part05.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateiaa59d971ecb03b95c491d2e14b4ce970/mvs-tconpca.part13.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei894418440b9b5c2d2182842ad3d5c9d7/mvs-tconpca.part06.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei09812002a2f358c5954a5214061fac42/mvs-tconpca.part08.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateifd75f0dcbcabd3180813df06c3fe0bf9/mvs-tconpca.part01.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei78bfcbc48aadc0e59e0a7c8a83fadd27/mvs-tconpca.part09.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateic742e56585515c3329f0265c63ed90d5/mvs-tconpca.part02.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateif72bc23b066bd534c9f0f0cfa81b81f2/mvs-tconpca.part10.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei188490afb7eb56d296d8682a6a6d2732/mvs-tconpca.part03.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei5c9e9aa1a885bc64fa2939a397ec2396/mvs-tconpca.part07.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateie89fb860db5183e1c19e746045110743/mvs-tconpca.part15.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei4adb499f4a99223a33a8ba0d1a797cb2/mvs-tconpca.part14.rar.htm
pass:areg
RMVB
http://netload.in/datei32fbdb67ca7637456958c5b51a8d90a6/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part3.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateibe595248416df78801adf99ba0670ccf/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part4.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei64b4ad12526f1727d8ef9c45d94fd9d7/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part2.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei85a43a9894412ce6fb4996cb210a5f3e/The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs.part1.rar.htm
if u like my links and want to thankx me do it plzz
finally its out, thanks
how to become famous in 2 secs…..
your a heroe Marceli
*sarcasm detected*
Priceless comments / post.
This will go down in history, Marceli.
Marceli = Busted LOL
Thick twat. You truly were pwnd!!! What a fooking cooooooooooooooccccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
stupid mother fu©ker I hope you get ®aped by a donkey you stupid mother fu©ker. .25 = 25% looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll A§§holeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Grow up CHILDREN!!!
He made a math mistake, and was corrected.
Time for some of your mommy’s and daddy’s to finally come into your messy filthy bedrooms, shut your idiot box off, and pull your pants down for a much needed spanking!!!!
GROW UP!!!
> My son is crying in his bedroom.
> When I try to enter he blocks the door and I hear this terrible
> moaning sound.
Quick, tell him to stop, or he might go blind!
LOL!
Read the nfo for MVS release of
The.Chronicles.of.Narnia.Prince.Caspian.TS.XViD.READNFO-mVs
http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php?page=nfo&id=76571
lol Marceli cant do simple maths lawl
Better get rid of him before you start seeing atarikid fire up his bots. Marcelli just put rlslog on the map and not in the way I bet you guys would like it. Friendly warning from people who really do know.
Maybe you should learn how to do a little math.
You really should be embarrassed about that one!
The Scene/p2p Are St000pid SomeTimes,as we all know…As well as,”Some People” who do posts for rlslog seem to like to open there “personal opinion” mouths a little to often,instead of simply and easily informing people,rather than trying to “get involved” in anything else at all…Just stick to your posting gunz,and hopefully you will be safe
…And “the scene” needs to get over them selves,and realize that YES,”The Public” is the LARGEST consumers of there “products”…so people just need to share and shud up 
…Soundz simple but,when it comes to 1337 keyboard jockeys,it doesn’t seem so possible i guess…People say they “don’t like” fighting/violence/war ect ect ect…but people who ALL STEAL can’t seem to get along…Saaad…lol
marceli cant reply b/c he can’t pass the spam protection.
I’d like to stick my 3 inch slab of manmeat 1/4 of the way into your lubed up lust tunnel Marcelli. If I did a full thrust all the way inside you then pulled out %.25 of the way, how much left of my manmeat would still be inside you? 3=====D
this has 2 go straight 2 the Most popular section or u guys r straight b!tches. GREATEST PHUK UP OF @LL T!ME.
I have a feeling “Marceli” will never be back under that pseudonym….. EVER! Dude would be censoring every post made for some time after that colossal blunder.
expect a new editor to rlslog soon
0.25 x 100 = 25
25% x 100 = 25,
0.25 = 25%
^Look dumbass, .25 is 25% of 1!!! NOT 2.6!!!
your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%
–
have you ever considered it could be cropped..? sigh…