Releaselog

Narnia Sample And Facts READNFO-mVS

Posted on 18.05.2008 at 02:55 in Movies by Marceli

Well there’s nothing like a big “fuck you” from a scene group every now and then, and that’s just what we have here. We know that a lot of groups steal from P2P and mVs promises to not be one of them, but I’m not sure if I want to believe that, although they might not do it as much as all the other groups I think they do it every once in a while. They also bring us a sample of the new Narnia movie, so maybe we can expect the whole this sometime soon. BTW the last paragraph mentions that they want proof that the AR was more than 10% off, well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .25 which is 25%, so pwnd :D Might want to learn how to do simple math before arguing…

Here’s the message from their NFO:

“I would like to start off with a big fat american FUCK YOU to all the
sites that nuked us for “stealing from p2p”. Check all the p2p sites you
have now and see if this shit is on it yet you cunts. This is the same
video source as what happens in vegas. Here is a one minute video clip of
something that will probably be on torrents in a few hours but just to
prove we get the shit first here you go. We do not need to steal from p2p
we will leave that to the new groups out there like kamera. We do not
pre as soon as we get video since most of the time audio is capped after
since we do not want to waste our nights where we could be banging your
moms. Once again you may hate us but your hate only makes the mvs
stronger!!! (like the hulk) so all you poor traders getting nuked on our
rlses, feel free to tell your local nuker what a cunt he truly is, and
to feel the mVs cock up his ass.

As a side note, nukers trying to claim our vegas AR was 10% out, you
are a fucking joke. Make proof before writing shit like that. BTW we
know who you are and what grps you are related to, so think twice,
unless you would like to be schooled in the next mVs nfo.loly.”

Narnia.Sample.And.Facts.READNFO-mVS
Links: RS, NFO

Comments (368)

Feel free to post your Narnia Sample And Facts READNFO-mVS torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
  1. Lulea
    May 18th, 2008 | 02:59

    MVS is still good.

  2. CoolHayward
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:00

    LAWL! You sure showed them! Good Job! Stick it to the man.

  3. Stretch
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:01

    who gives a fook

  4. mvs fan
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:02

    i think this is also nuked

  5. ifailatmathstoo
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:03

    2.6 / 2.35 = 1.106

    or perhaps:

    1.6 / 1.35 = 1.185

    no idea where the .25 and 25% comes from though

  6. narn
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:04

    i want the full movie

  7. Marceli staff member
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:05

    @5

    I have no clue why you’re dividing… If the AR is off you subtract the ARs, not divide them.

    2.6 - 2.35 = .25 (25%)

  8. gavrielle
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:06

    Sample looks goods, but no audio.

  9. ifailatmathstoo
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:07

    2.6 - 2.35 = .25

    though, that’s why i tried other methods

  10. ifailatmathstoo
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:08

    feel free too delete my posts then since they lack context with your edits :)

  11. DrPlebb
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:08

    quote [ your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .15 which is 15%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…]

    I didn’t follow your math on that one at all Marceli
    where did you get the .15 from and how does it equal 15%?

    I made it about 10.6% if those ratios you provided are right.

    I’m certainly no expert though.
    Maybe my maths skills are too simple too. =)

  12. david j
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:09

    heres the video sample w/ no audio

    http://www.vimeo.com/1028477

  13. trLmos
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:10

    HAHAHAHAAAA, I laughed so hard when I read what they wrote. Mighty pissed off.

    Hey btw thanks for the automatically sent mail with “Congratulations on your birthday!”, haha. :)

  14. Marceli staff member
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:11

    @11

    once again, you dont divide them, you subtract. and .25 is 25% because .25 is 25/100 which in turn is 25%

  15. josepts
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:12

    sooo, is the movie out yet?

  16. MMM
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:12

    mVs is back in full-on action …lolz..wat an amazin comeback !!!!

  17. Term1N4T0R
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:14

    This looks like balls..
    A movie for white kids to jak off too!

  18. mathwiz
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:15

    @14
    You cant get percentages by subtracting them. You have to divide.

  19. freitax
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:18

    @Marceli

    subtract?for percentages?are you insane?
    the only interpretation of 25% is that their AR has 25% more (of 2.35) than it should!YOU DIVIDE! and yes it isn’t 25%! it’s 11% off!!!!!!jesus!

    let me show you…

    100 - 2.35
    x - 2.6 —>>> x=110,6%
    meaning is 10,6% off!!

  20. Marceli staff member
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:18

    @18

    youre already working with percentages, youre just finding the difference between them (260% - 235% = 25%)…

  21. MrX
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:19

    This site needs to be fooking nooked

  22. iambored8907
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:19

    I LOL every time I see a nuke that contains “stolen”, because they are all stolen! Not anyone of the groups or P2P own the rights to the movie.

  23. josepts
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:19

    See kids, this is what happens when you don’t go to math class…

  24. mathwiz
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:20

    @20
    AR is a ratio, not a percentage, and it wouldnt make any difference anyway. You have to divide to get a percentage difference from the numbers.
    If you subtract ARs you could end up with -1 which according to your logic is -100% and thats no pixels at all.

  25. StupidQuestion?
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:21

    (2.6/25)*100 to get percentage, if im correct, which im probably not. but anyway, that would leav 10.4

    so from 2.6 to 2.35 there would be a total difference of 10.4 PERCENT or a SUM difference of .25

  26. Logic
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:23

    You don’t just divide and you don’t simply subtract!
    %Error = [Observed - Expected]/[Expected] X 100%

    Therefore:
    [2.6-2.35]/[2.35] x 100%= 10.6%

    So yes their AR is off by more than 10%!!!!!

    I guess the question then comes to, how much did they crop? Because even if the AR of the video is wrong (because of over cropping) the video may not be stretched at all (for example, too tall actors or too short actors).
    In that case it should be nuked for over-cropping. I don’t know because I haven’t bothered to check out the release my self, but I just thought I would put in my two cents!

  27. Stanley D
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:24

    I thought off 10% from the proper meant 100(2.6-2.35)/2.35
    which is 10.6382978723404….% so I guess it is off by more than 10% Oh My God! Bet anyone watching this thing will be relegated to eternal damnation. mVS …Thanks for the movie .. I’ll be watching it.

  28. Mr0
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:26

    Some words need to rewrite again.

  29. shadowsill
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:26

    as much as i loved your ownage, and while it certainly does still apply, the percent off is (2.6-2.35)/2.35*100=10.6%

    that’s middle school math people, jesus christ

  30. JL
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:26

    This would be my guess of how to calculate it…
    1.10 x 2.35 = 2.585 (This is ten percent higher than proper)
    .9 x 2.35 = 2.115 (This is ten percent lower than proper)

    If 2.35 is the proper aspect ratio. then 2.115 would be the minimum accepted ratio and 2.585 would be the maximum. Let me know if I’m wrong. Therefore 2.6 would be over the accepted aspect ratio but it’s very close.

  31. Stanley D
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:27

    @26 LOGIC - Congrats!!
    Nice to see someone here can do the math right!

  32. steveo
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:28

    these links are a phishing scam to get RS account details….http://myref.de/?155344

  33. KAKTUS CAR
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:28

    Marceli, no offense, but you are idiot :))

  34. Adam
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:29

    use percent error formula.
    |observed value - accepted value|/accepted value x 100

    |2.6-2.35|/2.35 x 100
    .25/2.35 x 100
    .1063 x 100
    10.63

    so assuming all the given information was true, they ARE over 10% off, but only by .63 of a percent

  35. grade3
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:29

    2.35 X 10.65% - 0.25…….
    0.25 + 2.35 = 2.60 AR
    PLAIN AND SIMPLE

  36. =-/
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:30

    see if u can post links before i finish download

  37. =-/
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:30

    full movie =-)

  38. Ertunc staff member
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:30

    Woow sample looks great!

  39. Jeebus
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:31

    10.6% is correct. Jesus some people are dumb.

  40. mathwiz
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:31

    “your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1″

    The rls was obviously cropped/pan&scanned so you cannot count the real AR from just the video res.

  41. Leethere
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:32

    and i come to rlslog to see a math class! nice…and dont complicat simple math ppl

  42. Ertunc staff member
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:33

    Don’t whine about ratio

    look at quality

    nice job MVS

  43. JL
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:33

    all you should have to do is find the difference and divide by the proper ration which gives us 10.638297872340425531914893617021. Case solved.

  44. steveo
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:34

    these links are a phishing scam to get RS account details….http://myref.de/?155344
    h

  45. B-lo©
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:34

    Good sample……..i wonder when the vid gets releASED?

  46. josepts
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:35

    awww give me a break guys, the only math that really counts on RLSLOG is addition :)

  47. Shengis
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:36

    LOL @ “Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…”

    Red face there methinks……

  48. josepts
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:37

    bah, if only there was a edit button :(

    anyhow, that sample does look awesome for a TS

  49. Wah
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:40

    So this is what a nerd/geek fight looks like. hm.

  50. OrthodoxAthiest
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:40

    Thank goodness 26 posted, before we ran up another 100 comments showing how people need to go back to school. :D Maybe our next poll should be to find out the average age… after this I’m think approx. 12! :D lol

    Shame mvs didn’t spend the time it took them to write the message, on finding their own sources. I don’t care if they steal, because we always find out where credit SHOULD be due… but don’t lie about it… just makes you look like weenies! :D

    So… no good films being released then. :( I think I’ve downloaded 1 film in the last week… shocking!

  51. The Truth
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:41

    It looks like mathematics in not the strong point of RLSlog

  52. Bob
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:44

    MVS, bunch of twats.

  53. Stanley D
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:45

    Spam protection: Sum of 4 + 8 ?
    Who out there knows the answer?
    Come on dont be shy!

  54. SeanB
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:48

    Marceli, sorry but your wrong, the divide way is right. looks like they were technically over 10%, but under 11%.

  55. Unisonband
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:48

    Rlslog staff really need to be schooled on how calculate percentage difference.

  56. 6th grade math student
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:48

    Marceli, you’re an F’ing moron. Even though you were technically right about it being more than 10% since the correct answer would be 10.6% and that rounds up to 11%, it is no where near 25%. They were off by .2% of being in spec. I am not going to rehash the formula for that answer as many already have. Elementary school kids have better math skills than you. I would change your entry immediatly because after reading it, I thought the funniest thing about it was your moronic math

  57. Anon Knows Math!
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:49

    10.64%

    Jesus Christ people, go back to school.

    http://www.gmasononline.com/PERCENTAGEERROR.htm

    For those you want the goddammed truth.

  58. MiRKED
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:53

    marceli your a S T U P I D F A G !

  59. jm
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:55

    the error is 10.6% not 25%

    2.35 -> 100% (correct AR)

    (2.6 - 2.35)*100%/2.35 = 10.6% Error

    ;)

  60. Ignorance
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:55

    http://www.marshu.com/articles/percent-error-formula.php

    If you can’t figure it out.

  61. roguedog
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:55

    Best posted review i’ve read in a very long time …. direct and too the point !

    cheers great job and keep releasing….

  62. rooks454
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:56

    MVS has came through for me many times. Screw the nukers, some of the b.s. scene rules. Release the material and get your credit for the releasing it to us the users of such sites.

    And proper your own release. I think it is a slap in the face when a different group has to proper the previous groups release.

    just a thought from a MVS fan and fan of all the other greats “Pukka” (which is one of my fav’s) and others from “Bald” (yes bald is beautiful) or “Cocain” (yes cocain is good…lol..)

  63. Stanley D
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:57

    Marceli: New post is still wrong - Not 15% - 10.6%
    “well here it is: your rls was 624×240 which has an AR of 2.6:1, while the proper AR should be 2.35:1, which means the AR is off .15 which is 15%, so pwnd Might want to learn how to do simple math you idiots before arguing…

  64. world web super information hwy
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:59

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image)

  65. OsT
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:59

    ***NuKeD***<>
    Half ass’d maths RLSLOG.net Style.
    Stick 2 what u know fellas
    OsT

  66. there waiting on direct link audio =-)
    May 18th, 2008 | 03:59

    prob day or two they got video ready just gotta sync with the audio (waiting for direct link)

  67. Thiseas
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:00

    You know you need to edit your info on the description. If you’re trying to embarass someone, better be sure you won’t make a fool of yourself.
    At least the 10.6% is above 10 so you’re partially saved by accident.

    PS. I bet they either don’t know maths or made the wrong division i.e.: 0.25/2.6=0.096 (9.6%) and thought they’d get away with that.

  68. world web super information hwy
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:01

    add this at the end of the web address (image)

    and you can see what % of a IMAGE is MISSING.

    stfu

  69. Shannon
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:05

    mvs may be stealing from other sources, but at least they know basic math lol.

  70. Ertunc staff member
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:11

    Be kind to each other people!

  71. steveo
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:16

    lol… there all so full of homsexual rage that they just cant help it now….

  72. Brendan
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:20

    Who cares if it’s stolen?
    It’s all stolen to start with.

    How dare that group ilegally pirate a video that someone else ilegally pirated first!

    They deal in stolen video.
    If they’re going to complain that people are stealing what they stole, then they need to STFU and just get all their movies from Blockbuster.

  73. ahole
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:20

    I have trouble with the spam protection, Been doing this about three years, and think about90% of the time the staff is right, MVS you do a Great job

  74. Tranquil
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:25

    As someone who didn’t really understand anything that said i would like to say that you All do a good job, seeing as how i damn well can’t do any of it. I love everyone.

  75. Dubya
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:26

    bottom line we all know every group at some point has stolen or “borrowed” another groups work, its the nature of the business and I wouldnt be proud of it being 10% off, who gives a sh*t, we’re either gonan download it or we’re not. I mean if you download cam quality you’re getting half ass crap anyhow. So who f’ing cares and Marceli… its ok dawg, we all now know, that you are not Smarter than a 5th grader. lol
    I do love how it took another staff member and 38 posts before someone actually rated the quality.

  76. Dubya
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:26

    correction: **would be “gonna download it” or we’re not.

  77. XsTatiC
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:28

    Wow… I can’t believe a post suggesting people to learn simple math could screw up so completely on simple math.

    Thank god some of the posters here can calculate percentages.

    Jesus christ that was pathetic.

    .25 can equal 25%… if it is a base of exactly 100. However if I had $2.60 and then I had $2.35 that would mean I lost $0.25. Now, obviously 10% of $2.60 is $0.26. So logic says that by having even less than 10% ($0.25) it can’t really equal 25%.

    Really, even if you can’t do simple math at least realize simple logic.

  78. Tranquil
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:28

    are we gonna get the whole movie?

  79. Dan
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:30

    All this maths is making my brain fuzzy…..

    Oh sh!t and now to post this comment I have to do Spam protection mathematics…GREAT! Thanks a lot mVs!

  80. Tully
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:35

    This is shocking! Both parties to this and just about every comment
    on this is breaking the rules shown in front of me as I type.
    Abuse, swearing, personal attacks are only tarnishing the integrity
    of this site which many people,Worldwide, regard as invaluable.

  81. Teacher
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:36

    Marceli just delete this post.
    We cant say the word SH@T but you talk like that to the people that come to this site.
    Also get a calculator :-P

  82. Unbreakable /Bmore
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:39

    Poor mVs man, there always getting f’d with. Its like they release some good pre’d movie and yet…wait…too bad its nuked because the date is wrong or something; i guess ide be pissed if i always got shiotted on for trying to release FREE pred movies. Can’t say I blame em’ to be honest…

    -Unbreakable /Bmore

  83. Michael Collins
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:39

    I blame America

  84. Funny
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:44

    wooo hooo i am 4,908,079,094th visitor to see the lucky banner yay lol stupid ads

  85. Anonymous
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:44

    83- no, it’s bush’s fault

  86. Funny
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:46

    I blame Canada

  87. NEWBIX.NET
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:46

    so when does this get pre’d?

  88. WM7
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:47

    I am not part of the ’scene’. I have to respect the efforts of these groups within the guidelines. Considering what they have to work with at times the results are amazing. I have repaired videos; out of sync audio, jumping motion, tweening frames, etc.. AR is the least of my concerns…624/16=39,
    240/16=15. Blocks of 16 - I couldn’t ask for any more, hooray! no compression/deinterlacing artifacts even better. Be thankful
    for the non-bogus files and quality provided by mVS and all the other groups making the effort. Here’s one to all of you despite your differences…

  89. Anonymous
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:49

    Big FUK YOU to mVS!!

  90. Funny
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:52

    Big FUK YOU to #89

  91. antzology
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:52

    You must feel like a bit of a dumbass now, eh Marcelli?

  92. Funny
    May 18th, 2008 | 04:55

    I don’t think he/she said that he/she was a mathematics expert so why would he/she feel dumb

  93. lol
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:00

    NUKED RLSLog.net.Marceli:cannot.calculate.simple.math.problems

  94. aidex
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:01

    I have 2 kids, this reminds me of there childish arguements

  95. 2nd grader
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:01

    lolololol marcelli, your the stupidest of the most stupidest people around, what a donkey, you should RESIGN from rlslog you pole smokin loser

  96. pre schooler
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:04

    and he can’t even come out of his closet to admit his mistake, typical moron.

  97. Untamed
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:09

    So when is this BS post going to be removed or edited. You would of thought he would of wanted to correct it ASAP.

  98. shadowmove
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:10

    WTF is going on here?
    They wanna post? why don’t they?
    If their rlses are good, no problem… If others groups make better… their problem.
    As for the “who stole what to who”… Well, that’s ironic i suppose… no?

  99. Deacon Thorn
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:11

    If the aspect ratio of the film is that of PanaVision, which is 2.35:1 and their aspect ratio is 2.6:1, which falls between CinemaScope 55 (2.55:1) and Ultra PanaVision 70 (2.75:1), then there is definitely a nuke there.

    Next week, I’ll be talking about my argument about Pan and Scan and why it is a communist plot to steal from your widescreen enjoyment of film. See you then!!!!

  100. trLmos
    May 18th, 2008 | 05:13

    ifailatmathtoo; “2.6 / 2.35 = 1.106″

    AAH I hate you 1 *chop chop* hm, ey yo mr dot come roll back behind 0. No you silly fish not the 1 the 0. All right so what you say?

    10.6!

    *idiots dancing*

    Is everyone american here? :o

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »

Your Ad Here

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!