<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Napster opens world&#8217;s biggest MP3 store</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:34:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arcanum</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-334630</link>
		<dc:creator>arcanum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-334630</guid>
		<description>Look despite all the assertions that a high encoded mp3 is indistinguishable from lossless, the fact remains that mp3 is a lossy format. You are loosing something of the original when listening to an mp3. For many songs of rock/pop/electronic genres it&#039;s true you may not hear a great difference. 

I&#039;m not trying to insult mp3s or people who listen to mp3s. But you can hear a difference with a moderately priced stereo system. I personally have AU$800 Focal speakers, with a AU$600 Panasonic digital amplifier. 

My view is that artists put in a great deal of time and effort trying to make great sounding music with nuance, and I want to listen to it as they intended. If anything now we live in the digital age we might expect even higher fidelity, as music now comes direct from the studio without the degradation due to limitations of the CD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look despite all the assertions that a high encoded mp3 is indistinguishable from lossless, the fact remains that mp3 is a lossy format. You are loosing something of the original when listening to an mp3. For many songs of rock/pop/electronic genres it&#8217;s true you may not hear a great difference. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to insult mp3s or people who listen to mp3s. But you can hear a difference with a moderately priced stereo system. I personally have AU$800 Focal speakers, with a AU$600 Panasonic digital amplifier. </p>
<p>My view is that artists put in a great deal of time and effort trying to make great sounding music with nuance, and I want to listen to it as they intended. If anything now we live in the digital age we might expect even higher fidelity, as music now comes direct from the studio without the degradation due to limitations of the CD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333819</link>
		<dc:creator>GM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333819</guid>
		<description>lol @ 450kbps mp3...

Standard MP3 format only goes up to 320 kbit/s.
Unlesss you have a very good sound system or uber headphones + exceptional hearing, you won&#039;t tell the difference between a properly(!!!) encoded 320kbit/s MP3 and lossless.

Note at properly encoded, because most people (and sadly also companies) have no idea what that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol @ 450kbps mp3&#8230;</p>
<p>Standard MP3 format only goes up to 320 kbit/s.<br />
Unlesss you have a very good sound system or uber headphones + exceptional hearing, you won&#8217;t tell the difference between a properly(!!!) encoded 320kbit/s MP3 and lossless.</p>
<p>Note at properly encoded, because most people (and sadly also companies) have no idea what that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morbid</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333767</link>
		<dc:creator>morbid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333767</guid>
		<description>care</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveo</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333720</link>
		<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333720</guid>
		<description>Yes Grimms right... But selling mp3 music without any protection for around $1 a song or $10 for an album... is actually damn expensive if you think about it.

People might as well use amazon if they want to stay legal, might even be cheaper. My 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Grimms right&#8230; But selling mp3 music without any protection for around $1 a song or $10 for an album&#8230; is actually damn expensive if you think about it.</p>
<p>People might as well use amazon if they want to stay legal, might even be cheaper. My 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grimm</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333681</link>
		<dc:creator>Grimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333681</guid>
		<description>Apparently, #11 can&#039;t read. It states in the article that DRM is not attached to these files. Dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, #11 can&#8217;t read. It states in the article that DRM is not attached to these files. Dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXST</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333633</link>
		<dc:creator>TXST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333633</guid>
		<description>Usher-Here_I_Stand-2008_GT4

http://rapidshare.com/files/116289838/uhis2008.tar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usher-Here_I_Stand-2008_GT4</p>
<p><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/116289838/uhis2008.tar" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/116289838/uhis2008.tar</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilbo teabaggins</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333628</link>
		<dc:creator>bilbo teabaggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333628</guid>
		<description>napster baaaaaad!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>napster baaaaaad!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveo</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333622</link>
		<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333622</guid>
		<description>@15 Nice copy/paste. What site did u find that from upmyownass.com?

@17 Whatever you say, seems totally clear your talking out of your A hole.. sometimes people like you argue and split hairs over anything no matter how small and pointless.. or maybe I just don&#039;t have Your superman hearing, but for normal people there is no noticeable difference between high encoded and lossless. Its a fad, for people who pretend they are perfect and insist perfection, despite themselves being imperfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@15 Nice copy/paste. What site did u find that from upmyownass.com?</p>
<p>@17 Whatever you say, seems totally clear your talking out of your A hole.. sometimes people like you argue and split hairs over anything no matter how small and pointless.. or maybe I just don&#8217;t have Your superman hearing, but for normal people there is no noticeable difference between high encoded and lossless. Its a fad, for people who pretend they are perfect and insist perfection, despite themselves being imperfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333585</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333585</guid>
		<description>well, steveo, get a decent audio system or a new pair of ears. sorry that you can&#039;t distinguish mp3 from lossless on your tiny speaker, but ppl , but you don&#039;t have to be an audiophile to hear the difference, idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, steveo, get a decent audio system or a new pair of ears. sorry that you can&#8217;t distinguish mp3 from lossless on your tiny speaker, but ppl , but you don&#8217;t have to be an audiophile to hear the difference, idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcanum</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333583</link>
		<dc:creator>arcanum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333583</guid>
		<description>Re: The Lossless debate

I&#039;ve done the test with 450k/bit mp3 and lossless file encoded from the same source and I can certainly recognise the difference. On some tracks it&#039;s so small as to be insignificant, but on others (such as on some classical tracks that have a great dynamic range and an intricate arrangement) it is really quite noticeable. If there is a perceivable difference then there is no waste of space.

On the other hand, many people have portable music players with 8GB or less of storage. Naturally, lossless is less than ideal if you want a variety of genres available in your pocket, so the mp3 is a great compromise. 

The easy solution is for stores to sell both formats. Then the audiophiles are happy, and the normal listener can fit a good library on their nano. Personally, I&#039;d buy the flac then re-encode for my iRiver clix 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: The Lossless debate</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done the test with 450k/bit mp3 and lossless file encoded from the same source and I can certainly recognise the difference. On some tracks it&#8217;s so small as to be insignificant, but on others (such as on some classical tracks that have a great dynamic range and an intricate arrangement) it is really quite noticeable. If there is a perceivable difference then there is no waste of space.</p>
<p>On the other hand, many people have portable music players with 8GB or less of storage. Naturally, lossless is less than ideal if you want a variety of genres available in your pocket, so the mp3 is a great compromise. </p>
<p>The easy solution is for stores to sell both formats. Then the audiophiles are happy, and the normal listener can fit a good library on their nano. Personally, I&#8217;d buy the flac then re-encode for my iRiver clix 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MusicFan</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333482</link>
		<dc:creator>MusicFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333482</guid>
		<description>@5 @6
Just because broadband is widely available doesn&#039;t mean you have to waste space.  Do you think most people&#039;s ears can actually tell the difference between lossless and an efficient high quality lossy format?  You&#039;d probably need a really high-quality stereo system for that, and most people listen to downloaded songs on their iPod or other portable media player.  I&#039;d take a high quality Ogg/Vorbis file over a lossless format because a)I can download them faster and b) they take up less space.
Just because you have the space doesn&#039;t mean you should be wasteful with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@5 @6<br />
Just because broadband is widely available doesn&#8217;t mean you have to waste space.  Do you think most people&#8217;s ears can actually tell the difference between lossless and an efficient high quality lossy format?  You&#8217;d probably need a really high-quality stereo system for that, and most people listen to downloaded songs on their iPod or other portable media player.  I&#8217;d take a high quality Ogg/Vorbis file over a lossless format because a)I can download them faster and b) they take up less space.<br />
Just because you have the space doesn&#8217;t mean you should be wasteful with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixtrixx</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333479</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixtrixx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333479</guid>
		<description>Napster was good 10 yrs back when it was underground, especially when searching for rare/classic dance tunes from the 90&#039;s. Trouble is with these sites is that they dont offer full version mixes of underground genres, like Hard House/Trance, Scouse House etc, all of which are freely available in the right places on the net if you google correctly :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napster was good 10 yrs back when it was underground, especially when searching for rare/classic dance tunes from the 90&#8217;s. Trouble is with these sites is that they dont offer full version mixes of underground genres, like Hard House/Trance, Scouse House etc, all of which are freely available in the right places on the net if you google correctly <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jolly Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolly Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333467</guid>
		<description>Napster got me into downloading stuff 8 years ago. I still remember metallica on mtv complaining about it, and trying to download as many songs as i could on my 56k connection knowing it was going to be shutdown. Such a revolutionary piece of software for its time , now turned into a boring store. At least the main idea of it lives on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napster got me into downloading stuff 8 years ago. I still remember metallica on mtv complaining about it, and trying to download as many songs as i could on my 56k connection knowing it was going to be shutdown. Such a revolutionary piece of software for its time , now turned into a boring store. At least the main idea of it lives on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peddle faster</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333465</link>
		<dc:creator>Peddle faster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333465</guid>
		<description>screw buying mp3&#039;s even after you&#039;ve paid the DRM makes pretty damn sure that you don&#039;t actually &#039;own&#039; the music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>screw buying mp3&#8217;s even after you&#8217;ve paid the DRM makes pretty damn sure that you don&#8217;t actually &#8216;own&#8217; the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avanza</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/comment-page-1/#comment-333433</link>
		<dc:creator>avanza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/napster-open-worlds-biggest-mp3-store/#comment-333433</guid>
		<description>good too see napster back in it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good too see napster back in it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

