<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mid-range graphics in small benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:41:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WestcoastStrangler</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-22477</link>
		<dc:creator>WestcoastStrangler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/#comment-22477</guid>
		<description>Help Needed...
so my comp recently started shutting down wen i play CSS.. hasn&#039;t happened lately. only difference now is my bro is away on vacation and would play 5 hours a day or so. do i need a cooler .. more ram.. lol{512}.. more power.. 350 power thing-e.. a while back my monitor fizzled out with pretty smoke coming out from the top.. it was cool
AMD 2.10Ghz
512 MP DDR SDRAM
AVG RAdeon X700 Pro
any help!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help Needed&#8230;<br />
so my comp recently started shutting down wen i play CSS.. hasn&#8217;t happened lately. only difference now is my bro is away on vacation and would play 5 hours a day or so. do i need a cooler .. more ram.. lol{512}.. more power.. 350 power thing-e.. a while back my monitor fizzled out with pretty smoke coming out from the top.. it was cool<br />
AMD 2.10Ghz<br />
512 MP DDR SDRAM<br />
AVG RAdeon X700 Pro<br />
any help!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazyheinz</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-22427</link>
		<dc:creator>crazyheinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/#comment-22427</guid>
		<description>So wich one is better, the 7900GS overclocked or the 1950 overclocked???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wich one is better, the 7900GS overclocked or the 1950 overclocked???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrOz3nD</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-22414</link>
		<dc:creator>FrOz3nD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/#comment-22414</guid>
		<description>So both graphic cards are amazing but ATI overtakes the Nvidia by few MILES !!!
ATI has always been a super high-end quality card delivering high quality game support unlike the Nvidia.
Wa a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So both graphic cards are amazing but ATI overtakes the Nvidia by few MILES !!!<br />
ATI has always been a super high-end quality card delivering high quality game support unlike the Nvidia.<br />
Wa a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrD</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-22403</link>
		<dc:creator>MrD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/#comment-22403</guid>
		<description>I recently moved from a sapphire x800gto2 256meg (bios flashed and oced to reach x850xtpe speeds) to a MSI x1950pro 256meg (bought a high end psu, hiper 580w from old zoostorm 500w, at the same time to make sure it could cope!) and realised that where i used to play BF2:RealityMod at 1024x768 medium graphics 2xAA, I now needed to buy myself a brand new spangly widescreen monitor 1440x900 to replace my clear but limited crt since the gaming I was now capable of in the same game is 1280x1024 at maximum everything (using a force widescreen code you manually enter into the games desktop shortcut to reach 1440x900 which looks fine!)

As shown above, with FEAR I am now capable of playing the game at 1024x768 max grahpics, with occassional lagging most likely down to my HDD being a 2meg variant (buying an 8meg faster one in a couple of weeks to use as my master drive)  But I am now able to get as far as several extensive gaming sessions in the past, in one sitting!   This is like when I jumped from a barton 2500 32bit cpu with ati 9600xt upto a 64bit system (venice 3000+ oced) and the x800gto2 and reinstalled Farcry for some smooth and fun gaming!  

By sticking the x1950pro and 7900gs together for fps ratings, people have to remember that the x1950pro is a more modern card, and as such you might want to look at all the graphics it can show onscreen at once, where the 7900gs has a little problem showing everything, like the x800gto2 i moved from.  Graphics that have been in place a lot since Half Life 2 was released.  It doesn&#039;t seem to make sense to go backwards in technology just to save yourself £15</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently moved from a sapphire x800gto2 256meg (bios flashed and oced to reach x850xtpe speeds) to a MSI x1950pro 256meg (bought a high end psu, hiper 580w from old zoostorm 500w, at the same time to make sure it could cope!) and realised that where i used to play BF2:RealityMod at 1024&#215;768 medium graphics 2xAA, I now needed to buy myself a brand new spangly widescreen monitor 1440&#215;900 to replace my clear but limited crt since the gaming I was now capable of in the same game is 1280&#215;1024 at maximum everything (using a force widescreen code you manually enter into the games desktop shortcut to reach 1440&#215;900 which looks fine!)</p>
<p>As shown above, with FEAR I am now capable of playing the game at 1024&#215;768 max grahpics, with occassional lagging most likely down to my HDD being a 2meg variant (buying an 8meg faster one in a couple of weeks to use as my master drive)  But I am now able to get as far as several extensive gaming sessions in the past, in one sitting!   This is like when I jumped from a barton 2500 32bit cpu with ati 9600xt upto a 64bit system (venice 3000+ oced) and the x800gto2 and reinstalled Farcry for some smooth and fun gaming!  </p>
<p>By sticking the x1950pro and 7900gs together for fps ratings, people have to remember that the x1950pro is a more modern card, and as such you might want to look at all the graphics it can show onscreen at once, where the 7900gs has a little problem showing everything, like the x800gto2 i moved from.  Graphics that have been in place a lot since Half Life 2 was released.  It doesn&#8217;t seem to make sense to go backwards in technology just to save yourself £15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrD</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-22402</link>
		<dc:creator>MrD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/mid-range-graphics-in-small-benchmark/#comment-22402</guid>
		<description>I just recently went from a sapphire x800gto2 256meg (bios flashed and oced to x850xtpe speeds that would play BF2:RealityMod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently went from a sapphire x800gto2 256meg (bios flashed and oced to x850xtpe speeds that would play BF2:RealityMod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
