Releaselog

Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE x86 SP1 Integrated July 2008 OEM DVD-BIE

Posted on 11.07.2008 at 15:25 in Applications by Christian

BIE, known group by Vista releases, released this time updated x86 aka 32bit version of Windows Vista. This version includes all updates available until July 2008. Also it uses one of those so called OEM Bios hack methods, so just install it and enjoy. After installation you can use Windows Update and all features as you would with genuine copy. Well technically speaking it is genuine copy. :D

P.S. Make sure to check NFO for detailed instructions.

Release Name: Microsoft.Windows.Vista.ULTIMATE.x86.SP1.Integrated.July.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE
Size: 2.61 GB
Links: Homepage, NFO
Download: UploadJockey, Mirrors, Torrent (search)

* Comments(270)

Comments (270)

Feel free to post your Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE x86 SP1 Integrated July 2008 OEM DVD-BIE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All
  1. thanks
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:51

    @80, thanks for the links

  2. culonaranja
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:52

    How sad u have to play on Vista DX10 only ? Nobody ! That is one of real old argumnets, but since sp1 and a few more updates there are no difrence btw xp and vista.

    And if u go with 64bit, that is again more aplus for vista than for xp64. And not because XP64 poor driver support, that changed alot, it has some other minor problems.

    I pres. won´t go back to xp 32 bit! I know i may loose some fp/s i certain aspects, but vista has no disadvantge like mayn write.

    And 3rd, STOP crying pls!!! u pirates are using it for free and are still arguing about xp vs vista.

    Iv tested with TombRaider 10 Y. Any. and i had about 70fp on vista, and only 56!! on xp 32bit[lara croft house, no sp1].

  3. mongo
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:53

    Who”"

  4. weng
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:57

    people here are like little kids..no one is forcing you what OS to install or use. if your happy with xp, fine stick with it. if you love vista,who care’s stick with it.. what actually matters is wherever your happy, then go for it.

  5. Fran
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:58

    Vista is a good OS but the press sucks and there is very negative comments from Linux users. The same happened with XP. Get Vista drivers and try it!

  6. djg
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:04

    hay guys send me megaupload links plz ??????????????

    hay guys send me megaupload links plz ????????????????

    hay guys send me megaupload links plz ???????????????

  7. Mayberts
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:06

    i have been using vista since day 1 and to start with it was a bit flakey, but after a few update it’s much better anyone moaning about it being sluggish and slow try improving your pc spec or learn how to controll your systems processes and performence

  8. jimmy
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:08

    Hey, question here. I have a Emachine computer, and I’m currently running Windows XP. NOw, I do not know if i can install windows Vista on my computer. SHould I? I’ve had the computer for around 3 years now. Thanks!

  9. Moshster
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:13

    Windows rocks and out numbers Linux and OSX. Live with it.

  10. bombero
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:16

    #110,

    You can install VISTA on that E-machine if you have enough to run it. This is Windows “Ultimate” and it needs at least a 128 mb video card and 2 gigs of ram to run smooth, I have an older P4 3.0 running @ 3.7gig and 2 gig ram with 512 video card, and Vista Ultimate runs fine………I also think it will downgrade to VISTA home or Office if your hardware dont have the nuts to run the Ultimate version…..

  11. Mayberts
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:17

    @110 jimmy

    probably not a good idea as vista needs plenty of ram and a good cpu what are the specs of your pc and i could tell you more

  12. 8800GTX SLI
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:17

    @ 97

    Well I’ve been using computers since before there were even OS’s, therefore I know a lot much more than you could ever know about computers. And as an expert, I can tell you there is a HUGE difference between DX9 & DX10. You are looking at graphics, and sure there is no difference there, but performance wise dx10 kills dx9. I get 20fps more on average for DX10 games than XP on the same exact system, and High Def gaming is 10x better with dx10. DX9 at 1920×1080 sucks, cant even compare to DX10.

  13. Mayberts
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:19

    i agree with 114

  14. jimmy
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:24

    My specs for my Computer are: 496 MB’s of RAM, Intel Celeron D, 80 GB HD…..Will the regular Vista work on my CPU?

  15. Mayberts
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:29

    yes it will work if you go with vista home basic, but it will not ran as well as xp will on your pc

  16. no...
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:30

    If u have problems installing this version, try this: http://s1.fi.bitefight.org/c.php?uid=20473

  17. extra
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:32

    To everybody saying that vsta is new at xp is old technollygi ITS SO STUPID, SO WHAT?.. Vista is based on the same technolgy as 2000 and xp, both are great os but i think vista is os with so mutch add ontechnollygi ITS SO STUPID, SO WHAT?.. Vista is based on the same technolgy as 2000 and xp, both are great os but i think vista is os with so mutch add ons it make it slow.s it make it slow.

  18. extra
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:39

    wow, what happened there, begin over again:

    To everybody saying that vsta is new at xp is old technology ITS SO STUPID, SO WHAT?.. Vista is based on the same technology as 2000 and xp, both are great os but i think vista is a os os with so mutch add ons it make it slow.

  19. DJWill_I_AM444
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:45

    Real men use XP

  20. Hawkmoon
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:49

    I agree with a lot that’s been said here in both camps – pro Vista and con Vista. Personally, I decided to just go dual boot and explore the virtues and limitations of both OSs. We’ll all be screwed again as soon as Windows 7 is released – especially with the OS moving toward more touchscreen functionality. The bottom line is just sticks with what works for you and who gives a rats azz what anyone else uses or thinks.

  21. 1uk3
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:50

    I’ve been using Vista since the RC versions and am very happy with it.

    Currently using Home Premium x64 – it’s much more stable than XP – it never crashes.

    I also use XP SP3 on my work machine but can’t stand the default Fischer Price looks (Luna Blue) so have to change the theme to Classic.

    To use Vista you need a fairly powerful PC so wouldn’t recommend it unless this is what you have.

    I my opinion Vista just hasn’t gone far enough with new features over XP but it’s still my favourite operating system to use on a daily basis.

    Anyway… there’s my two worthless cents. ;)

  22. Nmarez
    July 11th, 2008 | 19:51

    Im using Vista x64 Home Premium, have had 0 problems.

    Fairly new PC tho 8 month old, but 8 month without any vista issues i can only say if you have vista issues, its most likely a PEBKAC (problem excist’s between keyboard and chair).

  23. Potato
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:03

    I run Vista and it’s faster than XP imo.

  24. Kaka
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:10

    Proper TinyVista Rev02 Link with plenty of seeders:

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4285291/TinyVista_Rev02_-_eXPerience

    Uploaded by the man himself eXPer1ence

  25. 0sx11
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:14

    I heard vista is painfully slow and that it can barely run photoshop unless you have insane amounts of ram. seriously who wants to spend $3000 on a computer just to run a nicer looking version of xp, that has more bugs and isnt compatible with any hardware? I also heard that when you get a BSOD even if you have legit software, when you turn your PC back on it will show as not genuine. And also its slow to copy files, slow to play movies, and my friend said vista can barely play HD movies without skiping and becoming pixelated. LOL you have all been fooled by bill gates while he swims in a pool of your cash.

  26. osx12
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:21

    Oh yeah, well I heard Vista eats babies and small animals.

  27. cos
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:25

    ===MEGASHARES===

    bievsp178.iso
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=0f0ba6f

  28. Nikola staff member
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:37

    Sorry but Win XP is old….let him DIE!!! Win vista is THE BEST software for all computers. Vista gives us more…. more options, functions, better memory share, more speed. Only if you have a la junk computer…then Vista sucks… Like when Xp first come… anyone who had a low-end PC had problems with XP. That’s with Vista now. Upgrade your PC and don’t blame Vista if you have a junk for computer( I don’t insult anybody I just say about facts) Vista rules. I use 64 bit editon. I won’t change Vista… Only if better OS comes out… Will I ever come back to XP???? NOPE!

  29. LagerLout
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:41

    @128
    You should really get your hearing checked out.
    Idiot.

  30. Yashau
    July 11th, 2008 | 20:50

    Cannot download RS or MU from Uploadjockey. Please post RS links!

  31. Jaqueee King Bee
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:08

    any uploadjockey links?? UJ is so much faster than torrents or usenet.

  32. RicRogue
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:15

    @133

    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860536/Vista_Ultimate.part01.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860546/Vista_Ultimate.part02.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860566/Vista_Ultimate.part03.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860563/Vista_Ultimate.part04.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860564/Vista_Ultimate.part05.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872436/Vista_Ultimate.part06.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872440/Vista_Ultimate.part07.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872461/Vista_Ultimate.part08.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872506/Vista_Ultimate.part09.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872988/Vista_Ultimate.part10.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885247/Vista_Ultimate.part11.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885262/Vista_Ultimate.part12.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885266/Vista_Ultimate.part13.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885354/Vista_Ultimate.part14.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885873/Vista_Ultimate.part15.rar.html

  33. UngaBunga
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:16

    @136, thanks! getting it at 960 kB/s. :-)

  34. sanchez
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:26

    @24 yeah mebbe buisnesses.. i was 98se until XP sp1 was out lol.

  35. million dollar question
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:30

    & now for the million dollar question…

    is this a good release?

  36. polo
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:43

    @ marco

    U have xp on c: right now, right ? If so run the vista dvd ant select “inside” setup process the partition c: and format it[no quick format]. And use the new c:[of course by formating c: xp is dead!].

    Wait for a few sec and enjoy Vista Ultimate. That waht all we do. If u are not experience “enuf”, install vista as virutla os. For that dl Virtualbox,vmware player etc.. and select on d: e: etc.. about 20gb freespace.

    now u have XP on c: and somewhere on d:,e: etc.. u have as “folder,image”the vista os as guest installed.

    Check the Froums for VirtualBox help. 3rd way would be to buy a 2nd or 3rd Hard drvie and use that for Vista only.

  37. Andrew
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:44

    Could someone please tell me in lamens terms what the difference is between 32 bit os and 64. I’m quite new to this. Thanks

  38. Multiple Choice
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:46

    Vista is superior over Windows XP.
    Everyone that complains that Vista is too slow or that they are getting the infamous BSoD falls into one of the following categories:

    A.) You dont know how to properly install an OS, (ie: Vista,XP,OSX,Linux)
    B.) You watch too much Porn, dont know proper maintenance of a computer.
    C.)You are an Idiot and need to contact geekstogo.com or bring your computer to a local computer repair store.
    D.)Your mom bought you a computer for christmas and you need to read the manuals before posting.
    E.) All of the above

  39. Christian staff member
    July 11th, 2008 | 21:50

    @ million dollar question

    Yes. Can i get my million $ now? :mrgreen:

  40. showtime
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:07

    i have a toshiba laptop juss bought i lost my multi os dvd which has all the os’s ever made on 3 dvds anyway tho i have the os that came with my laptop running on it which is vista home pre i want to use this has a upgrade so i dont lose the toshiba software that came on my laptop so if use this disk has an update would the crack work also also when i go to properites on my computer it says i have a 32-bit os so will this run on my laptop please and thank you

  41. skankbreath
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:12

    @genuine or not – I don’t know if you realise just how stupid your comment sounds.

    “Will never try vista again, xp is so much better ill stick with that untill windows 7.”

    First of all, when XP was at the same stage of development, Win2K users said the exact same thing about XP. XP was utter garbage until SP2 and not really worthwhile and stable until SP3.

    So what, in yoru little mind, makes you so confident that when Win7 is released it will be your saviour, your shining star of OS’s that will solve all problems out of the box? It wont. By then Vista will be the most favoured OS, just as XP SP3 is now and Win2KPro was before that. Your complaint goes back to the first Win98 edition, which was useless until Win98 second edition was released.

    Let me guess you must have loved Win3.11 for workgroups right? Actually you probably werent’ alive then but still, believe me, don’t hold your breath for Win7, you’ll be right back here complaining that is sucked and you are going back to Vista SP3 and will not use Win 7 but will try Win8 when it comes out.

    Give me a break, your story is old

  42. venuism
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:12

    Vista’s aright once you have tweaked it, plus it looks better than xp. I still keep my Ubuntu disk handy though, to fix any screw ups!

  43. JXLEGEND
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:15

    MEGAUPLOAD LINKS PLEASE!

    MEGAUPLOAD LINKS PLEASE!

    MEGAUPLOAD LINKS PLEASE!

  44. mdma
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:23

    Andrew,
    in lamens terms 64bit Windows have access to more RAM this means applications can store more of their actions inside of faster memory (RAM), instead of saving it on hard drive (temp files). Not many applications have 64bit compatibility so sometimes it’s useless. Moreover not all hardware manufacturers have 64bit drivers.

    64bit systems are made for professionals who use resource hungry applications like in graphic, CAD, video and music editing and servers.

    So bottom line if you intend to use 64bit system make sure that all applications and hardware you must have compatible with 64bit operation system.

  45. madmacs
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:24

    Weli, i don´t care what every1 say about Vista, it was a must have for me being a gamer, and with the right pc and all updates it´s facking sweet!! XP was good, Vista kicks ass!!!
    Core 2 Quad 6600 G0 @ 3 Ghz
    2x 8800gt in Sli
    3gb 4-4-4-12 ram
    Vista Ultimate 32 bit (Original, but i had the Dell OEM to try;) )

    Hated it the first 6 months, now i love it!!!

  46. j
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:30

    some folks have seen too many justin long Mac commercials. I have been using vista business that came with my Thinkpad and it runs great, faster than XP, no compatibility issues. and i found a great d/l of vista ultimate with sp1 for x86 or x64 systems about a month ago and no probs here. the best thing I like better about vista over xp is that it has better driver support. it is more plug and play than xp.

  47. James
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:40

    How do I download it from the Upload Jockey Web site?

  48. Brolly
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:54

    Some advice please guys.

    My PC is a Acer Aspire E360
    AMD Athlon 64×2 3800+
    1.5 gig ram
    ATI Radeon x600

    Should I use this Vista Ultimate? I’m currently running Windows Media Center 2005 SP3.

  49. wakeme
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:56

    Can i install this from within wxp to a diferent partition, or do i have to boot from dvd? i want to do a dual boot setup

    thanks

  50. partofthepuzzle
    July 11th, 2008 | 22:57

    Listen up!

    It isn’t that Vista sucks, it’s that it just isn’t very compelling. IOW, there are almost no reasons for a satisfied XP user to go to the trouble or expense to install Vista. Many of the features of Vista are now available for XP users via 3rd party apps and utilities.

    This is the thing that MS just doesn’t seem to understand. It’s not the same as when XP came out because XP finally provided the merging of the Win 9x UI and the more advanced NT architecture (better memory protection, unified driver model, much more stable system, etc.) so there was a compelling reason for everyone to upgrade. Not just consumers but also for corporate IT departments, who were wanted a more stable platform.

    But with Vista, the advantages are minimal and people just don’t feel the need to make the move. The solution is simple: either MS will have come out with an OS that is more compelling or someone else will!

  51. Google
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:17

    @25

    I don’t that getting viruses is always a result of the OS. I’ve ran XP for years and I don’t use any antivirus software and never have issues or get viruses. Really if you’re just smart about your web browsing/downloading I don’t see how anyone can have an issue.

  52. Lichen_King
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:25

    Three questions:

    1. Does this pass WGA?
    2. Downgradeable back to XP?
    3. Virus and spyware free?

  53. da man
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:32

    not genuine, and not activated. nice release BIE it doesnt even come activated whats the point//?

  54. MAK
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:32

    Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE – x86.SP1.Integrated.July.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE

    RAPIDSHARE PREMIUM USERS ONLY

    http://rapidshare.com/files/128956286/bievsp178.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128970658/bievsp178.part2.rar

  55. JohnnyIDontHackStuff
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:34

    I need a Vista Ultimate cd key for installation…

  56. MAK
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:34

    Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE – x86.SP1.Integrated.July.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE
    RAPIDSHARE PREMIUM USERS ONLY

    http://rapidshare.com/files/128956286/bievsp178.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128970658/bievsp178.part2.rar

  57. Metal
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:37

    All these spastic VISTA HATERS should shut up and at least try it out for a month before saying its sht… Vista is so far ahead of XP, that when I go back to work and use XP it literally hurts looking at that OLD OLD platform!

  58. Dan
    July 11th, 2008 | 23:56

    My PC that I bought brand new recently for £330 (approximately $650)is an AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200, with 4GB DDR2 memory, and a Geforce 8400GS. I just installed Microsoft.Windows.Vista.ULTIMATE.x64.SP1.Integrated.June.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE tonight and it’s running like a dream. It’s only when I saw this post that I decided to give it a try but thought I may as well look for the x64 version… All drivers have installed with absolute ease compared to XP and as long as they’ve worked it in the same way, this release should be fine too. I followed the instructions in the nfo and my copy has updated without a problem and is activated.

    I got a very good score on the Windows Experience Index, it was only brought down to a 3.5 by my graphics card, which I’ve been intending to upgrade since I got the machine anyway. So as a benchmark, this spec will run Vista Ultimate perfectly and contrary to what someone said earlier, it wont cost you $3,000….

  59. Setag Llib
    July 12th, 2008 | 00:42

    Vista x64 SP1 is far better than XP32 SP3, XP64 and Vista32 SP1. The security is amazing and if you have a relatively new computer then it runs just as fast or better than XP all the while being more secure and looking much better too.

    This age old arguement of XP being better than Vista is getting OLD!

    I wonder what all the people who swore by Win98 are using now? Yeah, you guessed it, WinXP!

    Time is a healer and soon enough Vista x64 and 64-bit processing will dominate the market.

    For the Win98 enthusiasts, have fun with you 486’s!

  60. karbtik
    July 12th, 2008 | 01:43

    Thanks everybody here for all the Good Free Entertaianment!!!
    Plz..continue……

  61. JXLEGEND
    July 12th, 2008 | 02:18

    MEGAUPLOAD LINKS PLZ AND THANK U!

  62. John C
    July 12th, 2008 | 02:42

    @91,

    My point was not a comparison between Vista and Linux. There is no comparison. Vista runs your PC with a pretty background and Linux runs the Internet.

    My point is the argument that Vista runs better on new hardware. It is a stupid argument. The plan is always for MS to boost the sales of new hardware with their latest OS release.

    And anything will run better on new better spec’d hardware than on older hardware. Again, the argument doesn’t make sense. Minimalist genius programmers will not be found at MS. Their new hardware requirements gives them the room for bloated applications and tons of updates to cover their original mistakes.

  63. Alfonso
    July 12th, 2008 | 02:55

    hey guys have you compared beryl or compys VS windows vista??
    to crash ubuntu you need to be a really stupid person, and in windows it allways happen :P linux can run all the windows app and mac app too, but in windows? just compare the native games in windows like quake4 or ut2k4 and the load times are nothing compared to the windows lowloads, the only problem with linux is the ati users because ati do not give much suport on linux, but if you have an nvidia it rocks :)

  64. BiG-ArFI
    July 12th, 2008 | 02:57

    Man, everyone needs to stop this vista sucks thing. This release is for people that want it, not for people to have a debate about it. Vista was slow, but now vista ps1 is way better. Just like any other older os, the first is always a problem, but the packs always make it better. I just want to know if BIE also released the x64 version also. My butt smells, gotta go clean my poop hole.

  65. adama_bill
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:09

    Thanks MAK – #160

    You’ve made it so much easier for me.

    Regards

  66. Dan
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:12

    @167

    If it crashes all the time, that’s because you have a bad setup or a bad computer. It doesn’t happen in Windows all the time for most people who know how to do a bit of basic housekeeping and maintenance ;)

  67. djg
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:22

    what is this man?????

    cant u peoples post Megaupload Links, what a shame peoples?????

  68. e08
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:23

    Vista rocks, you just need the computer to run it.

    And I hate when people label the Vista DVD “Ultimate”. ALL Vista disks come with each version! You can use any disk to install any copy, it’s the serial number which dictates what you install, on a legit copy that is…

  69. Zorvan
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:25

    I don’t care about the arguments between XP and Vista.

    What I want to know, from someone who has already downloaded and installed from this release, is whether it is:

    A.)In fact “genuine and activated” as claimed.

    B.)Can turn the computer on and off without losing activation.

    C.)Can hook to the internet without losing activation.

    D.)Can connect to and download from Windows Update without losing activation.

    E. )Can be installed by simply installing the dvd and “upgrading” from XP, rather than having to be a full-install.

    If it fails at any of these things, then it fails completely.

  70. cj
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:31

    is upgrading from xp(sp3) or fresh install recommended?

  71. dash
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:37

    @Pro:

    Sorry for you my friend, that can only mean two things: either you have an old video card that has no hardware support for DX10, or you play games that have the same visuals in either renderer (DX9 or DX10). The only other option is that you are blind, and I’m pretty sure that you are not.

    DX10 brings a *hell* lot of an improvement to visuals, but you have to have a correct hardware and a correct game. Let me clear it up, Assassin’s Creed has both DX9 and DX10 versions, but they look absolutely the same. DX10 version has just more optimizations and runs faster than a DX9 one in Windows Vista. But, take for example Crysis, or Call of Juarez, if you have the hardware for it, you will experience a *huge* difference in graphics between DX9 and DX10 modes, which you can’t miss.

    By the way, I go for Windows Vista. Period.

  72. Cheng
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:40

    @84 Me
    Multi-language or only english ?
    Please, response!!!!!!!!!!!!
    —————-

    Vista Ultimate (and Ultimate only) is multi-language even if the DVD is English only or whatever other language the DVD is. All you need to do once installed is to open up Ultimate extra’s from the start menu and select the language you want to use and Vista Ultimate downloads the selected language pack and changes its language to that. Pretty nifty stuff and a real pity it’s not available to Vista Home, Pro or Business.

  73. FockU
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:41

    To all the people that say wonders about XP, Just try Vista for 2 or 3 months (With a decent computer of course), then make your opinion, it looks like you know nothing about XP vs Vista. The stupid things people say nowadays. Vista sucks bla bla bla.Work with it first, i am computer technician and i can solve many more problems with Vista then with XP, you have a more direct approach to the hardware, just take a look to the computer policy management and the way the prefetch works. Inform your selfs before saying stupid things. Just one thing, yes besides ultimate and business the other versions sucks, but you don’t have any ideia on how much you can tweak Vista..
    Educate yourselfs, XP belongs in the past, and all software is being designed based on Vista.

    The only reason people started saying bad things with vista is because it was not compatible with old hardware making it unstable, but it was the same with the others S.O, the drivers only came later from the manufacturers.

    And if you a the latest technology in cpu’s and graphics card you are stupid not to play vista.
    Try crysis with and without dirctx10 or assassin’s creed or world in conflict then come talk to me if you don’t see any difference

  74. Yashau
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:45

    Does anyone have links to the x64 edition?

  75. FockU
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:46

    And another thing, my PC never crashed (except when i overclocked it to much) naver got a blue screen with Vista NEVER NEVER.

  76. motaba
    July 12th, 2008 | 03:52

    @94
    if you install vista straight over another windows OS with out formatting your hard drive then there will be a folder in the C:/ drive called “windows old”, it will contain all your old documents, pics, music etc etc…….. vista does not delete unless told to.

  77. SameName
    July 12th, 2008 | 04:12

    Here we go again, the evangelical battle between windows xp and windows vista. Get a life

  78. Vitz
    July 12th, 2008 | 04:20

    For those that dont know, X64 version is already out .
    Doesn’t give me much trouble after I solve mostly hardware problem :) . Ran smooth on my OC 6750 @3.6ghz , 4GB ram . I wonder if atnother 4GB would actually give me some performance I need or just some “show off” ? Also running graphic card like 8800GT also boost the rating in Vista :) .

  79. Decept
    July 12th, 2008 | 04:36

    how about some flyupload or the like?

  80. Zlo
    July 12th, 2008 | 05:27

    stfu noobs, Vista is slow, and yeah i have 4Gb Ram and Intel Core 2 Cpu. XP ftw

  81. Yashau
    July 12th, 2008 | 05:48

    Please please RS links for the x64 bit.

    Thanks!

  82. tsong
    July 12th, 2008 | 06:15

    IGB ram with A780G chipset , run vista fine for with only IGP HD 3200, better than my previous XP

  83. da truth
    July 12th, 2008 | 06:53

    i can see the difference between xp and vista, with xp being better, but ive never had a vista problem. heres my question, why does my dj setup run better on xp than vista? i was running vista, switched backed to xp and am now getting ready to go back to vista because it handled the program better. any ideas as to why?

  84. block
    July 12th, 2008 | 07:12

    Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE x86 SP1 Integrated July 2008 OEM DVD-BIE

    Only Rapid Lİnk

    http://www.coolxvid.com/?p=711

  85. Alexander
    July 12th, 2008 | 07:32

    I read the comments hoping to find someone that has tried out _THIS_ release of Vista. Is it what it says it is? Does it install to begin with? Viruses? Trojans?

    I find nothing to this end. Instead I find a high-fly technical discussion on the merits of XP better summarized with the following ever-present information-rich comment “Vista sucks, XP rocks”… great, just fcking great.

  86. million dollar question
    July 12th, 2008 | 09:50

    Ditto 189…

    Still no info about this release.. Has anyone tested it? Is it activated? does it stay activeted? can you update it? does it do what NFO promises???

  87. FBI
    July 12th, 2008 | 10:06

    Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d’enculis de ta mire

  88. me
    July 12th, 2008 | 10:45

    You are all idiots using only microsoft os

  89. Zorvan
    July 12th, 2008 | 11:34

    @192

    Hey, Mr. “me”.

    Instead of showing off your anonymous e-peen calling a group of people idiots when odds are at least a few of us would probably kick your ass every way to Sunday, why not use your apparent genius for something useful, like telling us if this release works as intended?

    Oh, you don’t know? Then kindly take your feeble attempts at kindergarten insults somewhere else while us grown-ups try to talk some sense in here.

    Now, with that out of the way, has ANYONE tried this release yet and if so, does it match up to all its claims?

  90. miley cyrus
    July 12th, 2008 | 11:40

    My daddy says Vista is ugly!

  91. Zorvan
    July 12th, 2008 | 11:43

    @194

    miley cyrus, according to the internet you’re more worn out than a 60 year old hooker.:)

    Still waiting on confirmation this release works, people.

  92. bob
    July 12th, 2008 | 12:12

    Want to make a ton of money into your paypal account by clicking websites then check this:
    http://www.buddypond.com/?r=honkey
    100% Working

  93. Mock
    July 12th, 2008 | 13:31

    XP can perform better with older hardware. but try CrossfireX 3870 X2 and 6GB of ram. thats a total no go on XP. CrossfireX dont even run on XP and with 2GB VGA mem than im left with only 1.5 GB memory out of my 6GB in XP because that how XP allocates memory under X86. One of my very bad experience with Vista has been AHCI. after i reinstalled under IDE compatible mode Vista has ran rock stable

  94. ZV
    July 12th, 2008 | 13:49

    I was an avid XP user and have both Vista and XP, I never boot
    XP. Vista is much nicer, more info, and it runs pretty smooth. (It’s not quite as fast as XP, but I still have some tweaking to do) I have not had any glaring Vista problems except for Utorrent, but I think that is Utorrents fault and not Vista. I did not want to take the plunge, but am happy I did.

  95. da man
    July 12th, 2008 | 14:44

    @ 173 & 190

    No, its not genuine. I have a box on my lower right that says “this copy is not genuine” and says I may be a victim of counterfeiting. Cannot run updates, cannot use extras, cannot change screen saver without watermark appearing saying to activate. When you start up its a black screen that says activate now, and if you cancel out your computer shuts off, and if you click later you only have certain features to use (but at a slower pace) Every 10 minutes you get a pop up saying to activate now or be reported to Microsoft as a counterfeiter.

    Way to go BIE, releasing another fine Vista release that is not genuine. Whats the Point?????

  96. da man
    July 12th, 2008 | 14:45

    @ 173 & 190

    No, its not genuine. I have a box on my lower right that says “this copy is not genuine” and says I may be a victim of counterfeiting. Cannot run updates, cannot use extras, cannot change screen saver without watermark appearing saying to activate. When you start up its a black screen that says activate now, and if you cancel out your computer shuts off, and if you click later you only have certain features to use (but at a slower pace) Every 10 minutes you get a pop up saying to activate now or be reported to Microsoft as a counterfeiter.

    Way to go BIE, releasing another fine Vista release that is not genuine. Whats the Point?????

  97. Spyros
    July 12th, 2008 | 15:17

    Da Man do you have a laptop or an OEM Pc?

  98. flo
    July 12th, 2008 | 17:31

    Vista is very good for an good PC:-)

  99. Kat
    July 12th, 2008 | 18:12

    I have already vista basic installed. can i just upgrade without have my HD´s formated?

  100. Alexander
    July 12th, 2008 | 18:18

    So. Has _anyone_ tried it yet?

    Be kind and post your experience.

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!