Releaselog

Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE x86 SP1 Integrated July 2008 OEM DVD-BIE

Posted on 11.07.2008 at 15:25 in Applications by Christian

BIE, known group by Vista releases, released this time updated x86 aka 32bit version of Windows Vista. This version includes all updates available until July 2008. Also it uses one of those so called OEM Bios hack methods, so just install it and enjoy. After installation you can use Windows Update and all features as you would with genuine copy. Well technically speaking it is genuine copy. :D

P.S. Make sure to check NFO for detailed instructions.

Release Name: Microsoft.Windows.Vista.ULTIMATE.x86.SP1.Integrated.July.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE
Size: 2.61 GB
Links: Homepage, NFO
Download: UploadJockey, Mirrors, Torrent (search)

* Comments(270)

Comments (270)

Feel free to post your Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE x86 SP1 Integrated July 2008 OEM DVD-BIE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All
  1. VIP
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:26

    Vista sucks, XP rocks :D

  2. Christian staff member
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:28

    @ VIP

    Impressive…

  3. XPdude
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:30

    i agree with VIP ….XP is the best OS till now…and probably will be in future…

  4. jay
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:30

    Meine Oma!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Vele Lamja
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:30

    w00t:)

  6. Mob Hunter
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:31

    Will prolly DL and dual boot w/ XP, just to finally see dx10 in all it’s glory.

  7. Hugh Jardon
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:33

    Anyone actually using Vista?

  8. martix
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:37

    3-4 years later we will be cursing windows 7, praising Vista and will have totally forgotten about XP, just as it happened with windows 98.
    Its a never ending cycle I tell ya…

  9. AlphA
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:38

    @ No 1.

    Yeah and stones and sticks are better than guns!!!

    Derr Huuu…

    Idiot…

    Show me XP DX10 suport.. blah blah blah.. .. ..

  10. nirmal
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:38

    nope.. coz games perform better in xp :D

  11. zmikey96
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:38

    Comment from 2001:

    Windows XP sucks, 98 rocks. XP is all eye-candy and a resource hog, and is plagued by freezes and BSOD’s. Who wants to have to buy 512MB of ram just to run an OS? No thanks, ill stick with 98.

  12. linux user
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:38

    Is this a bootable DVD? I used to download a non-bootable one, which made me install xp and then upgrade to vista. I hope this is bootable..

  13. woot
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:39

    Vista=Windows ME lol

  14. zmikey96
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:39

    @ 10

    No they don’t. I get an average of 15FPS more in all my DX10 games then when I had XP on the same exact system.

  15. the.dwarfer
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:39

    i’m using both xp and vista, and although vista was buggy to start, once you update drivers and fiddle with it for a while (which is what i love doing) it works well and looks better than xp. still keeping xp going just incase tho.

  16. Vista
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:40

    leave me along…im trying my best….

  17. linux user
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:41

    never mind, i found on the nfo that this is bootable..

  18. linkme
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:42

    RS links plz thx

  19. Bones
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:44

    How is XP better? I had XP installed on my new system and it ran great (3.4 Q6600 8GB RAM), but once I installed Vista it ran AMAZING. Seriously, It starts up 4x faster, programs open instantly instead of 5 seconds, games have higher FPS, and rendering is about 10x faster. Opening a 2GB photoshop file is almost instant compared to 30 seconds on XP.
    Vista is meant for new hardware, so if you have new hardware use vista, if not stick with XP. You are an idiot if you install vista on an older system.

  20. btnh
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:49

    RS links?

  21. Mob Hunter
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:53

    @ 19 Bones

    I’ll bet it ran better! Seeing that XP will only address up to 4GB RAM. Mob Hunter=jealous.

  22. Mat
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:53

    I am always amazed how Microsoft’s competitor and the press have mamanged to make Vista into such a monster!

    Some of my friends who know litterally NOTHING about computers still often tell me “Hey, you are running Vista? I heard it sucks!”.

    Why would it ? The conversation usually stops there.

    I use vista and guess what ? It runs just as well as XP, and it is much cuter. :)

    Dont get me wrong, XP is good too, but XP is a 8 years old technology. It is great for old laptops and stuff, but it is the past.

    Mat

  23. Slayman
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:53

    @ 20 was asking myself the same Q normally those links spawn extremely fast in here

  24. derp
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:54

    Since SP1 vista is better than XP but only -IF- you’re not running a PC from pre-2005. If you have 2gb+ of ram and a core2duo equiv there’s no reason to be still using XP.

    The same thing happened with XP as mentioned by others in this thread, it only became worth using over Win2k after SP2. Of course most of you won’t remember that because you’re too young.

  25. Rahul
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:56

    Im using a dual boot system (XP+VISTA)…………XP is only for games….VISTA is for all other work…….VISTA is visually very attractive…..n very secure too…..try running an XP system without any antivirus n see wat happens after a week……n try the same with VISTA…..

    VISTA is definitely better…….but install it only if u have new hardware……..esp a latest graphic card.

  26. Bones
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:56

    @ 21

    No, dumbass, 64 Bit XP can use up to 128GB ram.

  27. Mob Hunter
    July 11th, 2008 | 15:57

    @ 24 Derp

    Oh, I remember 2k. I actually didn’t switch to XP until late 2005. 2k=low sys resources=more room for games. Didn’t go XP until I had a gig of ram.

  28. Mob Hunter
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:00

    Thanks Bones. Previous post did not specify x86 or 64 bit. You are correct. Have a cookie.

  29. Ricardo Alexandre
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:04

    Seeds please=)

  30. bla
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:04

    gief x64 release please. Vista shouldnt have even been relased as 32bit version.

  31. Huge Jorgan
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:11

    Anybody seeding this anytime soon !!

  32. Mao
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:11

    @30,

    very true. I run all 3 major os here, and XP is the 3rd. still cannot decide if OSX or Vista is the 1st and I’m a long time Mac//PC user. Both have advantages over the other, don’t listen to any fanboyance. :)

    at the end of the day, in the real world, apple’s crap does not smell any better than micro$oft or linux.

  33. Fábio Silva
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:15

    You don’t know nothing about vista, since sp1, the vista is more faster and stable. I using now the Microsoft Windows Vista ULTIMATE x86 SP1 Integrated June 2008 OEM DVD-BIE, and is very good. Recommend BIE distributions too all. More faster is your computer, more you can push vista to the limits…

  34. KimJongWill
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:16

    @ 30

    There is a x64 release by the same group in June:
    Microsoft.Windows.Vista.ULTIMATE.x64.SP1.Integrated.June.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE
    Runs flawlessly and runs all updates.
    Been using the Dell OEM for more than a year without a single problem, unlike XP which freezes up all the time and runs like crap compared to Vista on a newer PC.

  35. mfc
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:16

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4287732/Microsoft.Windows.Vista.ULTIMATE.x86.SP1.Integrated.July.2008.OE :)

  36. AlphA
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:19

    RE: #19

    I also heard that XP can’t use all 4 x cores.

    So from XP – Vista will unlock the extra 2 x cores.

  37. m0
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:20

    @19-totally agree. Vista x64 ultimate w/ AMD quad 9850BE & 8gb ram…boots in 20 seconds, ALL games run perfect. just turn off aero & eye candy crap and it looks exactly like xp minus a few menu option changes. Give it up, its patched decently, and runs well if you know how to maintain it…its like a car. geez give it up

  38. fred
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:20

    http://rapidshare.com/files/128907528/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128908851/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128909048/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128909855/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128910030/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128910935/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128911072/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128911389/Never.Back.Down.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND.part8.rar

  39. serious
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:20

    I’m usually up to date with software, firmware and most often also hardware, but I’ve skipped Vista completely. Well, I installed it, tried it out for a couple of hours with a neverending frustration and reinstalled XP. I’ll probably install Vista when I upgrade my hardware to dx10 compatible stuff, but I’ll stay with XP till then… this I’ll dload anyhow, it might come in handy :) Thanks!

  40. Dustin
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:22

    I have a legit copy of Vista (with Key and all) that came with my laptop and i’m about to reformat…will this mess anything up or can i just enter my key when installing? Would love to save time and hassle having to go through all the updates (including SP1) again.

  41. bla
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:25

    #34 thanks. Must have missed it. Running xp x64 atm but to be honest its a bit lacking and unstable at times.

  42. d00d
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:28

    Why not just release the 64 bit version while they were at it?

  43. ME
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:28

    yes a stock vista will outperform a stock xp but you will only save your self on average 2 secs lol its nothing!

    BUT a custom 64bit XP will outperform vista by a LONG way! i am currently running this 64bit xp and its got the options to make it look like vista and run more stable and faster but i personally hate the vista look so i have my own skins installed.

    and to those ppl who think xp cant use 4 cores…. WTF???? lol of course it can!!!! im doing it right now lmao

  44. @40
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:29

    no, you’ll be using an illegal copy.

    Stick with what you have….

  45. dosguy
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:30

    When’s Microsoft going to realize that people don’t want to buy a new operating system every 3 years? Okay, not all of us actually “buy” it, but still… Before we even get used to using one system they’re shoving another one down our throats. They need to stick with a system people are comfortable with, like XP, and make constant improvements instead of scrapping it for something that’s not as good.

  46. Musicalchairs
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:30

    #8 Using XP SP3, totally back you..
    although Vista does look pretty..

  47. XP os Better
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:33

    Vi$ta is for n00bs and is wayaaaaay slower than xp and has BSOD every 10 minutes. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar or a paid micro$oft shill. Its physically impossible for vista to be faster evne on newer systems it makes no difference. using more resouces = slower. I installed vista, got bsod anytime I tried to do anything, and it was so slow it would take 10 seconds just to open a JPEG file. And this is on a quad core with 8 GB just like bones (the liar) claims to use.

  48. Miamilobo
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:34

    @38 WTF?

  49. Dustin
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:35

    @47 – Microsoft’s reach in the computer market is so vast that they make a profit because of the number of people buying new PCs that come with pre-installed OS’s. Since Windows is the main OS for companies such as Dell, HP, etc…that is why they release a new OS ever few years and the reason people buy it.

  50. Miamilobo
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:36

    @44 Thanks dude!

  51. pihug12
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:41

    Multi-language or only english ?
    Thank’s !

  52. mupet0000
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:43

    @49

    Well you are obviously doing something wrong. I have never BSOD with vista in a year and its much more responsive than XP.

  53. skankbreath
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:44

    First of all, this is a download link for Windows Vista, not a debate as to whether or not people are too scared to move into a new operating system.

    XP with SP3 was FINALLY a fixed version of XP, based on the time it took for XP to become a useable OS, Vista is light years ahead of it.

    For people with old, underpowered systems, they can’t use Vista and get in a hissy fit about it, grow up, buy some real hardware or simply STFU.

    All these XPSP3 junkies, that aren’t old enough to remember that EVERY OS has had the same issues with adoption,need to realize, sooner or later you will have to upgrade or change OS’s. Or else, like now, you will be left in the dark due to your fear of change. If you want to keep your push mower instead of a gas or electric mower, have at ‘er; it’ll do a great job all the same.

    Again, if you want to debate XPSP3 and you REALLY think anyone else does, other than people also using it, then find a forum somewhere else to debate it with your cronies or some people who actually care that you can’t get out of your confort zone.

    Thanks for the post, Christian, don’t need it myself as I have an OEM but I am sure it will help a lot of people who just don’t have the dough for it yet.

    Rlslog rules! \m/ \m/

  54. Billy Bob
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:49

    Vista? WTF You mean my windows 95 needs an update…

  55. skankbreath
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:51

    @49 XP os Better:
    “Vi$ta is for n00bs and is wayaaaaay slower than xp and has BSOD every 10 minutes. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar or a paid micro$oft shill. Its physically impossible for vista to be faster evne on newer systems it makes no difference. using more resouces = slower. I installed vista, got bsod anytime I tried to do anything, and it was so slow it would take 10 seconds just to open a JPEG file. And this is on a quad core with 8 GB just like bones (the liar) claims to use.”

    Next time have someone, that knows how to install and configure an OS, take care of things for you..

  56. ME
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:52

    its not that im scared of change! i change my os every other week lol trying out all the hundreds of custom ones and out of them all i found a 64bit xp with sp3 custom one which is the fastest and most stable ive ever found!!

    and who cares about the looks of vista? you can replicate vista’s looks on xp very easily if you so wished but i personally dont like vista’s looks but like i say looks arent important as there so easily changed on both vista and xp lol

  57. boss
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:56

    Is this able to be genuine, because the June one they released wasn’t cracked for me, and i was put into reduced functionality mode….. :(
    thanks for any response

  58. mspL4
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:59

    By running Vista you are basically an unpaid Beta tester for Microsoft…They should know better than to release products that are not fully tested.

    You wouldn’t buy a car that hadn’t been completely tested for safety and reliability would you?

    The software dictates the shelf life of Hardware, we’re being brute forced into upgrading out gear every couple of years just to line the pockets of the richest people in the world.

    And they wonder why people use pirated free software…

  59. dekoder
    July 11th, 2008 | 16:59

    I am happy with Vista Ultimate, it took me some time to decide to upgrade from XP. But now I would never go back to XP again. Works perfect with Vista.

  60. rupertmurdoch
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:00

    Can someone please post rapidshare links, becasue this freaking uploadjockey points to ads instead of files

  61. vistor
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:05

    im still using sep.07 Rel for 32+64bit no problem until today.

  62. Ted
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:09

    I’ve 1500.00 in pilot gear, joysticks, wheels, and such that will not run in Vista.

    Linux rocks@!

  63. ken
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:10

    uploadjockey is a piece of junk ,its not my pc either 1 link works try another wont work go back later it works so whats up with that.

  64. djg
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:11

    megaupload links please
    megaupload links please
    megaupload links please
    megaupload links please

    megaupload links please

    megaupload links please megaupload links please

    megaupload links please

    megaupload links please

    megaupload links please

    megaupload links please

    megaupload links please

  65. boss
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:17

    does anyone else have a problem with this release, it seems that it is not genuine… Do you need to turn off updates or do something else in order for it to work, or am i just an idiot and doing something wrong….

  66. JAT
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:18

    Awesome release, was waiting in anticipation ever since the x64 BIE release made it’s debut. Honestly, Vista is not so bad with capable hardware. In fact, Vista – with all its multi-threading optimizations – makes better use of high-end hardware than XP ever will. I am slowly being coaxed away from XP being the end-all-be-all…that said, I still do express high regard for XP, and have even as of yet fully migrated from it. It’s a tough OS to let die.

    BTW – We need a MS link! Stat!

  67. tele
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:22

    @67

    use developer activation noob

  68. blblbbl
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:22

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=jMBjK-QWgeI

  69. tele
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:26

    720p on youtube YEA RIGHT!

    more like 72p

  70. spaceface
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:29

    is this better than my zx81

  71. Chunk Buttcheek
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:31

    Linux forever !

    Wooooo !!

  72. Ken
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:42

    I like eXPerience version better…Slimmed down to 1 CD

    TinyVista Rev02 – eXPerience

    Windows TinyVista Rev02
    ———————–

    Windows Version ————> 6.0.6001 (Service Pack 1)
    Vista Edition ————–> Ultimate
    Architecture —————> x86
    Install Type —————> Unattended
    Product Key —————-> N/A
    Activation —————–> Activated Offline, Upon Installation
    WINDOWS Folder Size ——–> 2.44 GB
    ISO File Size ————–> 699 Mb
    Install Time (In VMware) —> 15 Minutes

    Torrent and details
    http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1544676/

  73. Thrashie
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:44

    lol geez cant you ppl just use whatever you wanna use for OS and stfu about it

  74. X64 version
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:52

    Those looking for x64 version

    http://www.btmon.com/Applications/Windows/Windows.Vista.ULTIMATE.x64.SP1.Integrated.June.2008.OEM.DVD-BIE.torrent.html

  75. no...
    July 11th, 2008 | 17:54

    It sucks, try this: http://s1.fi.bitefight.org/c.php?uid=20473

  76. John C
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:08

    @8,

    XP will be running on CPUs a lot longer than Win98. MS woke up after 98 marketing wise, at least. Putting the year it was released in the name instantly dates it. Win 98 just sounds older and older as the years passed. XP has had a longer support run than Win98 ever did. So, XP will never be looked at as Win 98.

    And those saying get Vista because it runs better on new hardware. Please try and listen to what you are saying. Everything runs better on new faster better hardware. Linux runs better on a newer machine. It’s called collusion between MS and manufacturers. Look it up.

  77. Tincho
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:09

    If you have a new PC then use Vista…if you have a older PC then run XP…If you have a piece of trash windows ´98 is for you

  78. RicRogue
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:09

    Working…No Pass…

    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860536/Vista_Ultimate.part01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860546/Vista_Ultimate.part02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860566/Vista_Ultimate.part03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860563/Vista_Ultimate.part04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128860564/Vista_Ultimate.part05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872436/Vista_Ultimate.part06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872440/Vista_Ultimate.part07.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872461/Vista_Ultimate.part08.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872506/Vista_Ultimate.part09.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128872988/Vista_Ultimate.part10.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885247/Vista_Ultimate.part11.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885262/Vista_Ultimate.part12.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885266/Vista_Ultimate.part13.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885354/Vista_Ultimate.part14.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/128885873/Vista_Ultimate.part15.rar

  79. Pablo
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:09

    Ok so I have Windows XP SP2, If I get this, would I just install it and it’ll work.

  80. Genueine or nOt????
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:10

    can anyone else confirm that its genuine? I also tried the june release and it says not genuine and will be reported to microsoft as counterfiet. as soon as I install my desktop turns black and says this copy is not genuine, and when I start i only get a black screen with “update now” and If I cancel my computer restarts to the same screen. so now I lost ALL of my important data and being reported to microsoft as a counterfitter. Vista sucks balls, what kind of OS would BlackSOD you out of your own files? Will never try vista again, xp is so much better ill stick with that untill windows 7.

  81. view from the bottom
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:10

    “I like eXPerience version better…Slimmed down to 1 CD”
    “Torrent and details
    http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1544676/”

    no seeders, scraped 2 days ago says there

  82. Me
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:11

    Multi-language or only english ?
    Please, response!!!!!!!!!!!!

  83. speedy11131
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:12

    lol @ 49… BSOD every ten minutes?

    I’ve had Vista for about a year on my machine, never had a blue screen…

    “using more resources = slower”

    Yeah, on a machine that can’t handle it. You give vista what it needs, it runs fine (i only got 2GB of RAM and a dual core btw…)

    Thanks for the post btw. If I ever reformat this’ll be of great use because I won’t spend hours running updates…

  84. view from the bottom
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:14

    “so now I lost ALL of my important data and being reported to microsoft as a counterfitter. ”
    you could have reinstalled another version or another os,to another folder/partition or saved data with something like linux, one of those disks you have no need to install, be sure to have ready before you try another time

  85. speedygonzo
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:18

    I think the people that say that Vista sucks haven’t installed it on their pc or haven’t gotten use to it yet. I use to have Xp and I luved it but when I installed Vista at first I didn’t like it so much. After a while once I got use to it I really enjoy it more than XP. Vista has more features and has alot of improvements like for example the sound quality is awesome. Vista works perfectly fine and I wouldn’t go back to XP. I been using Vista now for about 6 or 7 months and its a great OS just give it a try.

  86. Boobo
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:19

    Beautiful nfo :)

  87. buha
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:26

    work this release with other language packets?

  88. the.dwarfer Loves to fiddle with his "joystick"
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:33

    @ the.dwarfer : Only thing you love fiddlin with, is your joystick. And with joystick i’m not talkin about the one you use to play video games.

  89. DOBbbbBBBBTR1
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:34

    @ 78

    I have a Linux Install on the same machine as vista, c2d with 3GB ram, and linux is nowhere near as fast, in any area. Vista out performs linux in everything Ive tried when comparing the two. The one thing I can say for Linux is that it installs a lot quicker, but the time spent configuring your system to run with it kinda makes the quick install pointless. Vista automatically found + installed almost every driver I needed too. Much better OS than Linux.

  90. vistor
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:36

    Then only problem with this rel. is u can´t install diff. lang.packs!

    i dl few add. packs and could not install them [vista sep.07dvd-bie]

  91. Lord Shoa
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:36

    @11
    What ever 98 BSOD every 10 seconds.
    XP maybe every 4 months only because Nvidia don’t know how to make drivers properly.

    Vista can only say compatibility is a very big issues.

  92. Marco
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:40

    If i did download and install this would all the stuff on my computer be deleted or would i still have everything but just with vista?

    Sorry if its a stupid question.

    Many Thanks

  93. newton
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:40

    can i upgarde my german Vista Home Basic with this?

    and no i dont want to perform a clean install, take to much time,… and yes i have the resources to run ultimate, but the laptop was shiped with home basic installed

  94. vistor
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:42

    Linux is great, but without tweaking,customizing its crap. The most use ubunut anyway, and that is kinda the big. crap in linux distr. history. The “Idea” behind it is great, but a naked debian distr. with dif. naem is kinda poor “product”.

    If linux go with ,gentoo,slackware,debian[real] or any unix like system. Always select the “original” ones!! not any salckware based,debian based, gentoo based…those are crap[most of them]. Iv tested until today about 100diff. Distros, and for me only Slackware,Debian or FreeBSD are good to be calle dalternative OS.

    If u need “copy” of ubunut crap, go with mint!

  95. Pro
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:43

    People, I’ve been using computers since DOS 3.1,
    XP is the best, and for all the i-diot-s that think DX10 is all that, it’s not, play a game in DX9 and DX10 side by side without knowing which is which, I bet you won’t even tell the difference.

    btw, I need this dvd to install it on some computers here as some other i-diot-s over here think Vista is better.

    can someone upload it on netload with 400mb links?

  96. vistor
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:44

    @ marco

    That depends how u installed xp b4[c: and d:]. If u have 2 or more partition, install vista over c:[reformnat c only].

    But before doing that, dl virtualbox and install vista as “guest OS”. U can try it there, b4 atte. to install nativly.

  97. Marco
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:47

    @vistor

    im not sure what you mean?
    are you saying i could install it and only overwrite one drive and keep the other?
    In which case i could transfer everything to that one drive?
    I have a c: and a d: drive could you explain more simply sorry

  98. ak
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:48

    I have xp sp3.Very satisfied with it.I’m plan keeping it for long.I’ve seen vista after sp1 on many friends with new & powerful pc and my opinion is that it rocks,and it’s definetly faster than xp,but i don’t have money for a new pc.

  99. view from the bottom
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:49

    “and for me only Slackware,Debian or FreeBSD are good to be calle dalternative OS. ”
    wish they had better driver support in free and open bsd, i tried with several computers, not once worked :(
    whereas ubuntu has so far worked with all (though not with all peripherals)

  100. Anonymous
    July 11th, 2008 | 18:49

    Junk,Spyware,Etc. Need I say more!
    No really this has been the worst Operating system ever!
    So if you need it to play your new games, well I give you that, and thats all! Xp has far more life. My Xp only runs 14 Processes at idle, etc. Astalavista Baby!

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!