Comments on: Microsoft Windows 7 Build 6519 M1 DVD-MSBP

By: iso

iso — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:09:58 +0000

windows 7 6519 build m1 < bunun için verilen linklerin hepsi ölü..! yenilermisiniz (turkish)
m1 windows 7 build 6519 m1 Windows 7 Build 6519 M1 Windows 7 build 6519 m1 ويندوز 7 بناء 6519 <الارتباط لجميع الموتى..! تحديث
(arabic)
M1 do Windows 7 build 6519 m1 Windows 7 Build 6519 <ссылка на все мертвые ..! обновления (Русский)
m1 παράθυρα 7 οικοδομήσουμε 6519 <για τη σύνδεση όλων των νεκρών ..! refresh (Ελληνικά)
everyone to understand I have written in 8 languages..Please refresh link ..:)

By: filip

filip — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:27:40 +0000

can someone post me a link for a download of windows 7 (no torrent)
thx

By: any

any — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:54:09 +0000

can someone reupload the files plse.

By: yakacm

yakacm — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:49:32 +0000

I like Vista and have found it as stable as can be expected, ppl who go on about Linux need to get real, I have used Unix @ my job for 20 years, so could run Linux no probs. I tried it for a cupla years always on a second drive, and it just doesn’t work very well, it’s the old saying too many cooks…., everytime you download something you have endless librarys to get also, when you try to start an app 50% time nowt happens, that’s why it’s free cuz they couldn’t sell it, there’s no such things as a free lunch. As for Macs the lack of choice kills it for me, PC are modular you want a choice of mobo, memory, processor, drive you got it, with the vast array and combination of hardware MS windows runs on it’s amazing it does as well as it does. As for this release it is just a milestone build, all the other milestone builds have been based on the previous release IE Vista MS build based on XP. I am going to have a bash @ it on my second machine just to try it, you’d need to be mental to use it as your main OS, or bung it on a second drive, on my main machine I have 32/64 bit Vista and XP, treble boot.

By: john

john — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:30:44 +0000

Windows seven m2 6574 has been found click here for the torrent link http://www.raygoldmodels.com/

By: JM

JM — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:32:57 +0000

U mean :
win 98: decent
win 98 SE : good
Win2K: decent
WinME: crap
WinXP: pretty good after patching
Vista: crap
Win7: ? (continuing the pattern it will rock!)

By: rrox75

rrox75 — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:14:23 +0000

watch full movies anime tv and cartoons at http://shorl.com/dristustobebedru
It is free for you stream and download!e http://shorl.com/dristustobebedru

By: ali

ali — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:02:37 +0000

you can inter this site you will find what you want

http://www.madelife7.co.cc

By: Anom

Anom — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:51:53 +0000

You can see Windows 7 Milestone 1 screenshots and videos here:
http://www.winmatrix.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=18023

By: valnomien

valnomien — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:07:47 +0000

i have it installed on virtualbox but cannot get passed the activation point. typing in the key then after install does not work and there is no way to get to the run command in order to pull up services and stop wpa and apply the crack. i dont want to try a native install because my winxp box has been working fine ever since before service pack 3. i’m really curious about getting this to work does anyone know a way on VM

By: Someone

Someone — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:22:34 +0000

It is sad that on a site like this only 2 out of 200 comments ask about the “legislative compliance functionality”

By: Wozu

Wozu — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:17:12 +0000

Maaaan I can’t install this. It says that Install.wim (2.6 GB file) is missing. WTBH? It is there. I tried to install it from DOS (booting) and XP. Does the install work only from Vista or what? Or could I’ve screwed it up when I implemented the crack into the image?

By: hacker1

hacker1 — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:14:43 +0000

I use vista yeah it’s fast … but why does it need 1gb of RAM just to run faster? I can understand if it’s a program like video editors or graphics editors but for an OS that isn’t ideal… you got your anti virus running and firewall then your browser.. so yeah with it’s high demand for memory your pc will slow down… where as XP is very light.Just image what XP can do while running on 1 GB or even 2!

By: DVD4039

DVD4039 — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:46:09 +0000

Password: HI ARYATEAMS.COM

By: Telroy Benksin

Telroy Benksin — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:57:41 +0000

@ 173

How am I entirely wrong when I went from a 20 second boot time on vista to a 45 second boot time on xp, on the SAME EXACT HARDWARE? Photoshop opens INSTANTLY, compared to 5-7 seconds it took on xp. Rasterizing a 600dpi PDF file went from 20 seconds on vista to 2 1/2 minutes on xp. My FPS in call of duty is 120 on vista vs. 100 on XP. Computers with more than 2GB RAM will run significantly faster with vista. Vista is the fastest, most stable, responsive OS I’ve ever used. The only true thing about vista being slower is when you put it on an older computer, and that falls into the “no sh!t” category. Thats like complaining that XP sucks, just because you choose to run it on a pentium1 with 256k of ram. no sh!t its gonna run slow!