Releaselog

Microsoft Windows 7 Build 6519 M1 DVD-MSBP

Posted on 11.06.2008 at 15:01 in Applications by MaTay

With Windows Vista finally behind us, it’s time to turn our attention to the next Windows client release, which is currently codenamed Windows “7″, though Microsoft has used other code-names, like “Vienna” and “Windows Seven” in the past. This release is the early build which was showcased at a conference back in January ‘08. Remember to read .nfo first before installing. Enjoy.

Easier. Windows 7 will make it easier for users to find and use information. Local, network and Internet search functionality will converge. Intuitive user experiences will be further advanced. Automated application provisioning and cross-application data transparency will be integrated.

More secure. Windows 7 will include improved security and legislative compliance functionality. Data protection and management will be extended to peripheral devices. Windows 7 will advance role-based computing scenarios and user-account management, and bridge the inherent conflicts between data protection and robust collaboration. It will also enable enterprise-wide data protection and permissions.

Better connected. Windows 7 will further enable the mobile workforce. It will deliver anywhere, anytime, any device access to data and applications. It will enable a robust ad-hoc collaboration experience. Wireless connectivity, management and security functionality will be expanded. The performance and functionality of current and emerging mobile hardware will be optimized. The multiple device sync, management and data protection capabilities in Windows will be extended. Finally, Windows 7 will enable flexible computing infrastructures including rich, thin and network-centric models.

Lower cost. Windows 7 will help businesses optimize their desktop infrastructure. It will enable seamless OS, application and data migration, and simplified PC provisioning and upgrading. It will further efforts towards non-disruptive application updating and patching. Windows 7 will include improved hardware- and software-based virtualization experiences. And it will expand the PC self-help and IT Pro problem resolution diagnostics in Windows.

Microsoft.Windows.7.Build.6519.M1.DVD-MSBP

1 DVD, 2.91 GB, msbp-6519win7
Showcase, NFO, Links removed

Comments (202)

Feel free to post your Microsoft Windows 7 Build 6519 M1 DVD-MSBP torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
  1. bob
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:06

    Is this a new windows os already?

  2. cw
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:06

    I think i wait for the real one thnx.. :)

  3. AnTje14
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:06

    @1
    Just an Beta in his early stage

  4. emzmansion
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:07

    its a build, so I am guessing still beta… hmmm lets see what this can do

  5. Mrquiteaguy
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:07

    Anyone install it yet?
    Would like to know what ppl thought of it compared to Xp and Vista

  6. emzmansion
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:07

    it still has the Vista interface…

  7. pj
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:08

    wow thats quick and well early

    any screen shots of how my comp will look after installing?

  8. random dude
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:08

    wat, “version 6.1″ on windows 7?

  9. mango
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:09

    REMINDER: This build will expire in June 2008!

    WTH?

  10. cw
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:11

    Not recommended for “serious” computing.
    Use only as a test..

  11. viennarocks
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:12

    how about some RS links

  12. MitchRapp
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:13

    how bout reading the NFO

    Also, what kind of morons have trouble with Vista? Lay off your 386 with 512k ram and get with the 2008 computer technology.

  13. Name
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:13

    torrent links
    http://www.mininova.org/tor/1493029
    http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1512566/775222/
    http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1512541/4002612/

    REMINDER: This build will expire in June 2008!

    So without a bios hack it wont work

  14. webmasterATwannabexxxstars
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:14

    @pj

    your computer will look just like all computers do after installing M$ Beta’s; blue screen of death

  15. Butt-plug
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:14

    Register at seedmore.org/
    http://www.seedmore.org/download.php?id=9572&name=Microsoft.Windows.7.Build.6519.M1.DVD-MSBP.torrent
    or
    http://www.mininova.org/get/1492786

    =================
    = Release Notes =
    =================

    - Mount / Burn
    - Set your bios clock back to 02 December 2007
    - Install without a key
    - To get rid of WPA extract ****.rar:
    Click Start -> Run and Type services
    Go to Services->Software Licensing and choose “Disabled” as Startup method
    Reboot your computer, when rebooted, go to
    C:WindowsServiceProfilesNetworkServiceAppData
    RoamingMicrosoftSoftwareLicensing
    and delete the tokens.dot file there, replacing it with
    the one from this package.
    Yet again, go to Services->Software Licensing and choose “Automatic”
    as Startup method.
    Run the vistaactivation.exe file (as included), activate your computer
    as if it was running Vista Ultimate. (Should any errors occur, just
    neglect them.) Restart your computer.
    After reboot, it will now ask for a cd-key, use the following one:
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - wait a few minutes it for it to activate!
    Now you’ve got a activated Windows 7 version.

    REMINDER: This build will expire in June 2008!
    So you have 6 months to test!
    Don’t forget to set your bios clock back!

  16. Newt182
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:15

    @pj

    have u not seen vista?

  17. mase
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:15

    just can’t get over the childish interface 7 and vista uses

  18. AnTje14
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:17

    REMINDER: This build will expire in June 2008!
    So you have 6 months to test!
    Don’t forget to set your bios clock back!

    Huh?!

  19. mupet0000
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:18

    Wow already, imma gettin this

  20. Bhaskar
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:19

    I’ma beta test windows 7 when they change the UI. Not this early, unless they have some break through feature…

  21. Links
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:19

    6519.1.071220-1525_x86fre_client_en-us-gb1cfre_en_dvd.iso
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=2b8213b

    tokens.dat
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=d6ba9e7

    vistaactivation.exe
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=e458e75

    or

    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629018/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part29.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629025/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part01.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629024/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part02.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629022/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part03.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629026/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part04.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629169/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part05.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629887/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part06.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629885/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part07.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629888/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part08.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121629886/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part09.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121630064/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part10.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121630655/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part11.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121630651/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part12.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121630653/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part13.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121630737/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part14.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121630816/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part15.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121631358/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part16.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121631361/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part17.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121631359/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part18.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121631432/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part19.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121631484/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part20.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632057/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part21.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632056/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part22.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632055/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part23.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632154/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part24.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632153/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part25.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632713/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part26.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632712/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part27.rar.html
    http://rapidshare.com/files/121632772/MW7B6519M1-MSBP.part28.rar.html

  22. alex
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:20

    this was posted yesterday at other torrent site. so far rlslog has been getting a little slow at posting :(

  23. meh
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:21

    ..far too early to bother

  24. alex
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:23

    this is only good for 6 months after you change your bios so be prepared for a downgrade :(

  25. CajuCLC
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:24

    REMINDER: This build will expire in June 2008!

    O.o
    Well, they say we have to set bios to early, but… Will it work anyway?
    Just wondering, I won`t change my XP until this is a final version and I have a new pc. lol

  26. edwin
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:25

    REMINDER: This build will expire in June 2008!
    So you have 6 months to test!
    Don’t forget to set your bios clock back!

    Huh?!

    December 2007 - June 2008… loooks like about 6 months

    that’s why u have to change your clock

  27. Mr. A
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:26

    uhhh it says 6.1

  28. common sense
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:35

    This has to be a fantasy release. I seem to remember that we had quite a few “experts” here saying that this would not be released before 2010, even though MS clearly stated that this would be out next year.

    Guess the people that thought they knew more then the people making the OS at Microsoft need to rethink their condescending positions of being a know-it-all.

  29. bobbull
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:36

    I don’t understand why some people hate vista.
    i had it for a year now it only crash one time.
    and i have 3 kid on it everyday.like #12 say
    get more ram and a real virus and firewall software
    not the pirate you good to go.

  30. deli
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:38

    demek windows 7 nin temeli buu.. dneeyelim bakalım…

    herkese teşkkürler bu arada..

  31. superaktieboy
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:38

    i’ll stay on linux thx.. im fine

  32. Butt-plug
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:39

    Can someone tell us if “links;” links are real or not pls :)

  33. Ishmael
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:42

    O_O You’re kidding right?… MS needs to build a new OS from scratch and not keep extending their OSs like they did with Vista and throw a new one out every two years. I do not and will not regret switching to Apple and OSX. :)

  34. Outsidemywindow
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:43

    @34
    They are real.
    I know where they came from.

  35. xyztynz
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:43

    So do Vista device drivers work with this?

  36. Cremo
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:49

    should know that links links are always good, but everyone can type in the same name though…

  37. Butt-plug
    June 11th, 2008 | 15:53

    cheer guys..

    where from outsidemywindow?
    477668atgooglemail.com ;)

  38. UGLY
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:02

    ARGH! We need a Bill Gates Edition! ;)

  39. Rob
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:02

    Is it just me, or is it just vista with more patches built in?

  40. berkut
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:08

    This is in no way a beta release. This build is still closer to being in alpha stage and was released mainly for hardware manufacturers to start working on compatibility issues. Unless you have a testing platform ready, I wouldn’t recommend anybody using it especially on your primary machines.

  41. serpenttongue
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:08

    About Windows, Windows 7 Ultimate failure in the making…

    I don’t trust M$ can pull this off, they’re gonna flop this OS too… hopefully they won’t force it on new computers like they did with Vista.
    I wish I didn’t hate Apple from all of my heart, or I would’ve switched to Mac long time ago… damn these BS corporations and their stupid mistakes >:(

  42. Nyr staff member
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:09

    LiNKs:
    Microsoft.Windows.7.Build.6519.M1.DVD-MSBP
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/9351857/msbp-6519win7.part01.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/1279876/msbp-6519win7.part02.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/6311208/msbp-6519win7.part03.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/2135135/msbp-6519win7.part04.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/847078/msbp-6519win7.part05.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/9210799/msbp-6519win7.part06.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/2187473/msbp-6519win7.part07.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/7853201/msbp-6519win7.part08.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/4803775/msbp-6519win7.part09.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/607549/msbp-6519win7.part10.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/3105619/msbp-6519win7.part11.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/6037402/msbp-6519win7.part12.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/8328804/msbp-6519win7.part13.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/4812355/msbp-6519win7.part14.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/2132248/msbp-6519win7.part15.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/5135640/msbp-6519win7.part16.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/8771519/msbp-6519win7.part17.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/6919870/msbp-6519win7.part18.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/7052752/msbp-6519win7.part19.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/5747152/msbp-6519win7.part20.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/1992465/msbp-6519win7.part21.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/5126507/msbp-6519win7.part22.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/9613917/msbp-6519win7.part23.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/7231979/msbp-6519win7.part24.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/5709437/msbp-6519win7.part25.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/6040293/msbp-6519win7.part26.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/6353693/msbp-6519win7.part27.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/4570982/msbp-6519win7.part28.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/5069995/msbp-6519win7.part29.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/1648486/msbp-6519win7.part30.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/4874992/msbp-6519win7.part31.rar
    http://www.uploadjockey.com/download/3383369/msbp-6519win7.part32.rar

  43. morpheus2
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:11

    It’s a fake !!!
    a Windows Vista SP1 integrated version with some modifications on the gui !

  44. iCorm
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:20

    Yeah!! its a edited version of Windows Vista SP1. Its just like the windows XP Performance edition thing they release every month with some changes. There is whole loads of thing about this windows 7 which also called “Windows Vienna” at http://www.osbeta.org/

    Love & Peace…

  45. Kaka
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:21

    any windows server 2008 final cracked WPA anywhere?

  46. Haas
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:22

    looks like ms want to throw every ms product in our face.
    I think i will be on linux when this releases…

  47. Bob
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:24

    Fake

  48. MitchRapp
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:25

    oh and for people who really want to try this release but are saying “zomg wtf expires June 2008 but we’re June zomg!” … read the NFO please

    it says this was released to testers in March 2008 with a 6-month timer on it

    all you have to do is set your BIOS date back and you’ll be fine to test it on your own…

    or VMware-it

  49. .DIN
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:29

    Ubuntu rules…

  50. moog
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:36

    me too
    i have an iphone and hate apple the most

  51. NewGuy
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:50

    is it not possible to use a program such as parallels or VMware to install this OS and simple set ti date in the settings of the program to the one required…? it theoretically should work….

  52. Pro
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:53

    yh it should, btw it is not possible to change the time in the VMware settings constantly back to the one listed in the NFO becuase Microsoft 7 includes a feature that prevents such frm happing, if you mange to find this file it is possible to bypass the restriction, kl

  53. d3m0nr33p3r
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:55

    Its in development and integerated with vista sp1 its nt a fake. This is done as the actual back end is nt yet ready for release or M$ dnt wanna show it. either good for a first.. was waiting and looking for this a while now/.
    thanks rlslog

  54. Respect-My-Authority
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:56

    What’s the point of this post, and what’s the point of even releasing it? As the info states, the beta will self destruct in June 2008, and then they say you have six months of testing. Ummm, seeing as they posted it in June, instead of January when it was release you really only have a couple days to use it, if it hasn’t already expired. Kind of pointless really, but I guess if you want to try it out and have an extra hard drive to use it’ll be fine.

    Nevermind, I just figured it out. You set the bios clock back to January 2008, and then you do have six months of use. Sorry, my bad. I still wanted to leave in that part about it self destructing though so didn’t delete my stupidness above. :)

  55. some guy
    June 11th, 2008 | 16:58

    @ 57 wts the point fo the long message? it gives the wrong impression..pointless n00bs

  56. Karl Rove
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:02

    Given Microsoft’s pattern lately, this release should be awesome after a service pack or two. Consider:

    Win2K: decent
    WinME: crap
    WinXP: pretty good after patching
    Vista: crap
    Win7: ? (continuing the pattern it will rock!)

  57. fake
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:03

    look at this link

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/29/windows_7_fake_bittorrent/

  58. Hi it me
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:08

    New Screenshots HERE!

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomlawrence/553643006/

  59. bawsack
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:13

    do people still use windoze? i thought anyone with half a brain had ditched it for a linux based OS

  60. Tony
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:28

    Yes, people with only half a brain are using linux.

  61. iCsLB
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:31

    its not a fake since it runs on same vista engine and all i know that win7 suppose to be a “fixed” vista
    because vista is sloppy by running huge number of software bundled with the os and require big amount of ram
    also it is a hard os to use for a simple user since there lots of features included hiding in bunch of places makes it messy..
    so they try to make it more user friendly
    also this “alpha” build have some changes i just ran compare with vista sp1 and there is some changes in kernel and svchost and it runs less software but i dont sure about it couse its just “alpha” stage.

    vista rtm is very bad..
    +
    vista sp1 is ok but much fixing needed
    =
    reason for win7

  62. Hugh Jardon
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:33

    Umm,

    Vista has been out for ages, and they still haven’t got it even close to being right yet.

    And some of you wish to play with a Beta Beta Beta Beta version of an app that is at least 3 years away?

    Now, that is soooo sad……..

  63. KK
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:34

    looks like vista

  64. thom
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:39

    it’s like what windows me was to 98 i guess to put it easy. so people saying it looks like vista - it’s going to, it’s not really a new OS, more of a major upgrade.

    I’m tempted but i’ll wait a little longer till a more stable beta’s about (and one that won’t die unless i change bios date within a month)

  65. Puskin
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:42

    fück them. M$ said it won’t be bloated, still not much less in iso size than vista ultimate. what a joke. :|

  66. A.Bundy
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:53

    #35, you didnt have to switch to apple. just install osx on a pc.

  67. misled
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:55

    Uh…@35- MAC OS gets more refreshes than anything.

    And to the rest- I use Vista Ultimate x64 SP1- it works GREAT. I disabled all the “rich user interface” options, and it now looks like XP. It runs 99.9% of stuff I throw at it. It runs quick- bootup on my laptop is roughly 28 seconds (with a C2duo 1.5ghz & 4gb ram).

    The key here is to configure your system correctly. Streamline it, use the newest/most reliable drivers, and if it works, DONT MESS WITH IT.

    As far a windows 7- I’ll go for it when its FINAL. Honestly, if any of you skim over the news, you’d notice that they aren’t using a NEW kernel on W7- its vista. So obviously its going to look like it. Just disable stupid Aero and all the junk you dont need.

    Oh yeah- and Linux only does a few things better, and overall is a lot more of a pain finding 3rd party drivers for all my hardware, and then configuring it all manually (usually @ the command line to boot…) Linux only does better with things like backtrak, and advanced hacking apps/scripting/etc. But hey guess what! SLAX! Debian live! Backtrack live cd! I dont need to install it- so it IS easier. But guess what…?!?!?!?! I GAME. So I need dx10/vista….

  68. mundox
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:56

    I’m happy with vista.

  69. ChriZ
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:57

    Probably better then the retail version of Vista…

  70. sluggahdee
    June 11th, 2008 | 17:59

    i hate vista and always will. its a resourch hog i mean wtf do u wanna use all that ram for when you pay for it??? your all suckers for using it and backing up something that still to this day doesn’t run all my music proggs so frig all that 500 mb ram bollox it still dont stick whoever made that lame ass comment!!…vista looks like it should be made in more than 5 years time so we do have the tech to run everything!!! as for this..lol jokes xp still rocks..you can use it easy and it aint hogging all my ram!!!

  71. sluggahdee
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:01

    lol at tony about linux :D

  72. Ian
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:03

    To all people saying “Haha I switched to [insert os here]“: good for you, we don’t care.

    This doesn’t look at all like the modular design they promised, I think this is just a vista sp1 with some of the new functions built in, eg just to test those features.

  73. ccs
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:10

    In what way is Windows Vista “finally behind us”?

  74. RAGE
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:14

    THIS AINT THE BETA OR THE OFFICIAL RELEASE,THERE ARE PROGRAMS OUT THERE THAT YOU CAN CONFIGURE THOSE EXACT SETTINGS THAT THEY SHOW IN THE SAMPLE LINK, TRUST I HAVE READ AND EXPERIMENTED WITH THAT PROGRAM ON MY PC

  75. misled
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:15

    Hogging your RAM? You are nuts. I saw a sale for 4GB of ram for $69 the other day. You can get a core 2 system now fully built for around $399.

    Vista provides more kernel-based system services= more ram needed. I DO agree that it doesn’t make use of those services as RAM very efficiently, but GUESS WHAT? Capitalism has do do with that. The hardware/software industry has been in cahoots for awhile if you haven’t already figured that out. All the hardware builders just get a green light to roll out ‘new’ technology from the D.O.D’s master list of consumer-ready products. You know- they military has technology FAR beyond whats available to the public.

    That trickles down to the market- then the hardware folks talk with the software folks and kindly ask their head programmers/staffers to either hire stupid programmers, or to get their intelligent ones to code horribly. Why? Well- if Vista were programmed flawlessly- it wouldn’t need tons of resources, therefore people would just stick with their current systems- and upgrades would only be driven towards hardcore gamers and the GPU scene would flourish.

    Simply put:

    HARDWARE GUY: “Code this like crap so we can sell more hardware, and we’ll pay you lots of money!”

    SOFTWARE GUY: “Ok! And we can mask it with a clever PR camp and release patches to appease the masses!”

    Yay! the system works!!!! (for them)

  76. indianpunk
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:23

    @60 read the date at which that article was posted

  77. HooHaa
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:30

    Will not function on Commodore 64, 128, SX64!

  78. indianpunk
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:37

    http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/win7_6519.asp

    this is how it looks

  79. whatever
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:39

    whatever… I’ll never turn my back on windows Xp.

    It does everything vista does and the directx 10 crap pulled by m$ has been suppressed by our lovely community.

    When the time to move on arrives i’ll just go on to some linux distro.

    phuck windows 7.

  80. d_YeN
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:40

    LOL @ Vista haters….

    Why drive a new car when u can drive an old one?!?!

    Jesus man, cant people understand Vista does the same plus more than XP

    Get a job and buy a new comp and if u still dont like it then STFU about it!

    You prob still use floppy disc’s lol

    I’ve had Vista for over a year and never any problems, i would imagine its because i have a decent processor, lots of RAMM and decent graphics…..

    Its amazing what a few quid will buy you these days!

  81. azen
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:42

    win 3.1 are good

    all after is no best. yu need machine with large money and
    job.

  82. om
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:42

    I thought this was so :(

  83. misled
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:48

    it all depends on what you want to do with your computer.

    XP= can do ANYTHING- except put your wifi car din monitor mode…heheh.

    Vista= only use if you game & want DX10. I know its lame, but it runs JUST AS FAST AS XP IF YOU TURN OFF ALL THE STUPID VISUAL ENHANCEMENTS. YOU CAN HAVE 512M RAM AS LONG AS YOU DO THIS. USE VLITE. UGH. !D!OTS

  84. kik5u
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:50

    Only cheap n00bs with sh*tty computers complains about vista. Its so slow, it crashes, its so demanding bla bla bla bla. Theres nothing wrong with vista. Vista ruuulz, sure it requires some additional punch from your computer SO WHAT, u can get that from hardware store near you. Stop complaining because u n00bs just suck and your computers suck too and I rule creek.

  85. Jay Sherman
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:50

    Just wait for AmigaOS 4

  86. AnTje14
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:55

    Now come on guy’s when are you gonna change the poll?!

  87. Newt182
    June 11th, 2008 | 18:57

    u can see all the noobs coming out saying its fake cus they dont really understand what it is.

    its not vista and it cant be a beta as someone said this must be an alpha build

    if u want a new fully working OS skip this

  88. sex w1th kidss is cool :)
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:00

    @12 - not all r as rich as u. not all buy a new pc every year. get re-connected 2 the rl world.

  89. sex w1th kidss is cool :)
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:04

    BTW, XP FTW!!!!1

  90. failbot
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:06

    hmm

  91. Dats Right
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:10

    If you take a turd and install it on the best hardware out there, you still have yourself a turd.

    Vista is just that…a steaming freshly pinched turd.

    Here’s to hoping Windows 7 is to Windows Vista as Windows XP was to Windows 2000. ;)

  92. failbot
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:11

    Vista does have its weak points, but its not as bad as most make it out to be.
    A large portion of the people that complain about it are just “bandwagoners” who are saying what they think will make themselves sound more tech-savvy. Another group of them is the *nix only crowd who really don’t give two turds about anything from “Micro$oft”. Then you have another group of complainers that are complete freaking morons.(Kind of like some of the posters here saying zomg this release is fake it looks exactly like vista, because they are too stupid to realize its for testing parts of the infrastructure of W7 OS and NOT the UI.)

  93. failbot
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:13

    You also have the ones that complain about the appearance of Vista’s UI when it can be made to appear EXACTLY like XP or 98 with less than 12 mouse clicks(on a side note i hated the appearance of XP too, any box i have running vista or XP are both set to appear as windows classic) and these people know abso-freaking-lutely nothing about what differs the cores of these operating systems.

    On another note looking at some of the very lackluster points that have been made against vista in this thread:

    Vista takes up too much RAM:
    Vista offers aesthetic features for its UI that take up a crapload of resources, as well as more kernel based services as mentioned above. That being said this can easily be disabled in the settings. You choosing to leave it running and take up your resources is solely on your shoulders. With UAC, DWM, and sidebar all turned off(i have no use for this crap though some people may think it looks nice) vista takes up less than 20% of the memory on my laptop(2gig) and less than 10% on my desktop(4gig)(roughly 200MB used). I hate to say it but if you have less than a gig of ram you shouldn’t be running vista at all. I mean c’mon, would you freaking install XP on a commodore? Get with the times.

    The interface is childish:

    I went over this pretty much at the start of this, pretty much as easily changed as the interface of windows xp. Learn how to use your freakin brain please.

    Now I can’t contest some of the faults vista has such as some issues transferring files to different types of media or other such issues(there are a few) and XP was nowhere near perfect when it came out either, especially until SP2. Hell, there are still some issues with windows XP that haven’t been resolved.

    /end rant

  94. Jockavelli
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:20

    I would say it is still an alpha!!!!! look 99% like vista some VERY poor video issues on HD TV’s, alot of filler files not for anything YET……

    All in all unless you have a secondry machine & wiling to play with it yourself & deal with crashes ( havent had any myself YET) avoid for now.

  95. Thraprod
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:26

    Here is my thoughts on the subject:

    I installed Vista on a 1.2g proc with 512 RAM. Without Aero running, it ran beautifully. No crashes at all despite some of the wacky things I do to my system on a daily basis. I did have some driver issues at first, but was able to find resolutions to them.

    Now, my tax return came and I went out a bought a new (cheap) laptop (dual 2.0 Proc, 2g ram) with Vista on it (My motherboard had died the month before and I decided to break down and upgrade after using that MB for years on end)… still no crashes.

    That being said, I ran XP for a number of years as well (with and without crashes, depending on some system factors), but I was smart enough to recognize that Vista was the way the market was going, and if I wanted to keep up on new versions of programs and whatnot, I was going to HAVE to upgrade and get used to Vista… so I went ahead and did it early.

    On Linux, I have used Knoppix, straight Debian, Ubuntu, DSL, and a few others, and loved it… it’s price especially. BUT my problem with Linux is this: Programs and Games. Several programs I enjoy using or Games I enjoy playing, I couldn’t use without pulling a dual boot, which seemed like it defeated the purpose to me.

    So in the end, I’m running Vista, am not rich by any stretch of the imagination, and don’t have any problems with it.

  96. Adam
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:27

    TESTED links !!

    http://www.warez-bb.org/viewtopic.php?t=1330991

  97. Ancientone
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:29

    well it seems that most users that bash vista are either too cheap to upgrade or run linux and macs. As these are uninformed sources I find it quite easy to disreguard them. I run vista ultimate on 3 computers and have no problems whatsoever. These are all legal copies and I run an average of 100 programs on each computer and play newest games . I dont have any problems whatsover and I never will because I upgrade before I try a New OS. BTW i tried linux and it is free crap.mac I wont even mention.

  98. Deathclaw
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:33

    Ubuntu FTW, no M$ cr@p

  99. mbdc
    June 11th, 2008 | 19:40

    100 posts and mostly complaints!!..

    And after putting up with all The OS X bashing from you guys in the Mac posts I find all this very enjoyable reading. :-)

  100. Armstrong14
    June 11th, 2008 | 20:08

    @50 Bob: What kind of dumb drug are you on? This isn’t TPB where everyone posts fake crap.

    Seriously, I couldn’t believe that at first because it’s like set to release in a year or two, but man! This is awesome, if I reformat I’ll try it out sometime :) But is this a leak or is it an official installer that Windows is giving to the public?

Pages: [1] 2 3 »

Your Ad Here

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!