<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft releases 26 new patches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:10:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-10686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/#comment-10686</guid>
		<description>As stated by the original poster m$ releases patches becuase they are the number #1 target for hackers, thats all.

And in terms of there coding? Well if any other OS ie: MacOSX or any Linux Distro was targetted to that extent i very much doubt they would have the money or man power to code fixes at the rate m$ does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated by the original poster m$ releases patches becuase they are the number #1 target for hackers, thats all.</p>
<p>And in terms of there coding? Well if any other OS ie: MacOSX or any Linux Distro was targetted to that extent i very much doubt they would have the money or man power to code fixes at the rate m$ does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eugeneius</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-10548</link>
		<dc:creator>eugeneius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/#comment-10548</guid>
		<description>Well, since it&#039;s not released yet, those patches are really just Microsoft working on the software... the only reason we even know about them is because the betas are leaked. When they release patches a week after Vista is launched, then we can complain :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since it&#8217;s not released yet, those patches are really just Microsoft working on the software&#8230; the only reason we even know about them is because the betas are leaked. When they release patches a week after Vista is launched, then we can complain :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dblmask</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-10539</link>
		<dc:creator>dblmask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/#comment-10539</guid>
		<description>&quot;A couple of the fixes also apply to the Windows Vista operating system...&quot; 
Vista: So close to the launch and is already been patched. Makes me wonder how &quot;secure&quot; will it be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A couple of the fixes also apply to the Windows Vista operating system&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Vista: So close to the launch and is already been patched. Makes me wonder how &#8220;secure&#8221; will it be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-10533</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/#comment-10533</guid>
		<description>well yeah, there aren&#039;t any serious alternatives for normal users, but still, i stand behind the opinion Microsoft coders could do a better job...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well yeah, there aren&#8217;t any serious alternatives for normal users, but still, i stand behind the opinion Microsoft coders could do a better job&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acm2000</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-10526</link>
		<dc:creator>acm2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/microsoft-releases-26-new-patches/#comment-10526</guid>
		<description>this doesn&#039;t confirm the &quot;weak security of their software&quot;, windows being the only real choice of an OS for most pc users, means its targeted constantly by hackers, simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this doesn&#8217;t confirm the &#8220;weak security of their software&#8221;, windows being the only real choice of an OS for most pc users, means its targeted constantly by hackers, simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

