Releaselog

Microsoft: piracy rate of Vista is half the XP

Microsoft said it’s seeing piracy rates for Windows Vista that are half those of Windows XP. The decline in piracy rates is largely due to the fact Vista is much tougher to fake than XP. Microsoft VP, Mike Sievert, said: “Piracy rates are lower because it’s harder.” There are a variety of reasons for that, including the fact businesses no longer have volume licence keys that can be used to activate an unlimited number of machines. Another is the fact Vista machines that aren’t properly activated pretty quickly become basically unusable once they enter “reduced functionality mode”. For Microsoft, the gains have been significant. In its last profits call, Microsoft said five percentage points of Windows growth could be attributed to gains in piracy.

But Microsoft is making the experience a little less harsh for those running pirated versions of Vista. With Service Pack 1, Microsoft is doing away with reduced functionality mode in favour of putting prominent notifications on systems that are not found to be genuine. Non-genuine systems with SP1 will display a warning at start-up that the system is not properly activated. Users will have the option to “activate now” or “activate later”, though the second option won’t show up for a time. Users will also have their desktop background changed to white and a prominent notification placed in the lower right hand corner saying that the machine is not genuine.

Still, in a significant change, those with non-genuine or non-activated copies of Vista will still be able to use their systems. Also with SP1, Microsoft is closing two key loopholes that pirates have used to evade Microsoft’s security measures. One involves mimicking the process used by large computer makers to pre-activate their Vista machines, while the other extends the grace period that customers have to activate their machine, in some cases extending it for decades. Nice, but does Microsoft really think noone will crack it?

Source: Zdnet, Silicon 

Comments (180)

Feel free to post your Microsoft: piracy rate of Vista is half the XP torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
  1. HoratioDUKEz
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:09

    vista sucks

  2. CooLMaN
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:10

    Vista piracy rate is lower due to the fact it sucks and no one wants to use it, stupid.

  3. Manfea
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:13

    Is it that it is harder (i found a working crack very quickly) or is it that fact vista slows down systems so much people are staying with XP?

  4. Reverend
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:13

    @2 Agreed. Haha.

  5. JoshuaMH1
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:13

    Yeah, I agree with CooLMaN.

    It will always be crackable, just less people want it.

  6. Lopez
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:17

    SP1 will be cracked even in its beta period :D

  7. 08/15
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:18

    just imagine if vista was uncrackable and people started to check out alternative operating systems?

  8. CelestialP3nso
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:21

    Ubuntu Rules….just hopping to find a way to run Directx games…I DONT WANT WINE!

  9. Obscurax
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:21

    Lol this article made me laugh :) . Especially the part where microsoft states the “Ooo so good” protection.

  10. KeViN
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:25

    Nice way to prevent piracy MS… doing a OS nobody cares lol

  11. EoN
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:27

    Maybe M$ should leave the protection part to the monkeys…
    It seems they are smarter than humans. lol

  12. atlas
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:30

    I have solved the world’s trash problem! Stick it in Sievert’s mouth!
    MY GOD this is hilarious. In other news:

    MS Cancer rate is HALF that of MS AIDS. “The new cancer strain is a testament to MS security,” Mike Seivert informs us. Sievert would not further comment as he was bleeding from the rectum and a short distance away, wooden ships set sail for sweden, leaving a resounding “YARRR” to echo upon the waves.

  13. fungus
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:31

    vista is a lot easier to crack than xp and microsoft don’t seem to be able to detect it yet unlike xp with it’s constant new versions of wga

  14. anon
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:34

    what a joke, they think they are winning… only reason piracy rates are so low is coz no one wants to use Vista till they have to… many many ppl are still happy enough with XP

  15. CrystyXp
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:38

    I use Vista ! I like vista ! And in Game , the performance is more greate that in XP ! i am sure that in max 2 years XP users will have Vista instald in Computers ;) ) ;)

    :wave:

  16. Trell
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:38

    I had exactly the same thought as CooLMaN when I read that BS statement from Micro$oft. I don’t know who M$ are trying to kid, but if they want to pat themselves on the back for their ‘great anti-piracy job’, and fool themselves that it’s ‘cos of their ‘brilliant security measures!’ It just means that they’ll get complacent. Still, it’s some of the best f**ked-up logic I’ve ever seen!

    Next Week: Microsoft cures lung cancer by buying out tobacco companies and hiking the price of cigarettes to $2000, then, for an encore, prevents wars, famine and poverty by destroying the world. Well done M$!

  17. wtf
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:45

    whats this vista they mention?

    :P

  18. aka
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:51

    meh, i been using a cut down (hooky) version of vista i made myself for ages. dont get me wrong i agree with more of you guys. it does suck ass but its the sign of the times. in a year or 2 99% of next gen games will be vista only. mind you it doesnt stop me from dual booting xp pro lite :P

  19. skeev
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:54

    Hilarious – the reason that people are not pirating Vista is because its crap and people dont want to pirate it let alone pay for the dam thing.

    A huge amount of people are asking for XP rather than Vista on new pcs – others are going back to a system that works ok.

    Microsoft trying to get anything positive from the waste of time and money they spent thinking every office in the world would spunk up cash to be new and trendy.

    Of course the pcs we use will have to get more powerful and have more memory to run the programs and of course games but this isnt the way to do it.

    Its not being pirated cos its too tricky to crack ..no bugger wants it – get a clue microsoft….and stop the spin

  20. LGx
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:55

    omg. microsoft should consider Vista is 2x lamer than XP. and if nobody wants a legit one, then who wants a haxed? :P
    with SP3 XP owns Vista, so they want to downgrade XP with SP4 maybe :)

  21. Lord Shoa
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:57

    Yes it is down to no one wanting vista as you can do so much more with xp without the bugs.

    One day we we will all be on vista but it will be on service pack 3 by then and most of the bugs will be gone as well.

    So I am sure there will be more than xp one day with hacked OS its that we are not stupid enough to upgrade just yet, seeing as xp runs 3x faster than vista with sp3 why would be want to.

    Yes sp3 is not out but beta testers say its 3x faster with this update than vista or was it 3x faster than it was when it was brought out of the clossset in 2001.

  22. doh
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:57

    why would anyone want to “pirate” that crap ?

  23. mefin
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:00

    For everybody who doesn’t like Vista))

    http://dslnet.ru/signaturepics/sigpic7790_4.gif

  24. spar
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:00

    haha

    I know everybody already said it, but I gotta say it again

    The reason why people dont bother downloading Vista is cause its crap.

    not cause it “is much tougher to fake than XP”

  25. yingjai
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:01

    harder to fake? please. the oem trick never fails. what are they going to do? prevent all the major manufacturers from preinstalling vista?

  26. Anonymouzor
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:03

    They are ofc talking of the other kind of piracy where people sell fake boxes of windows, not internet piracy.. ;)

    The 2 are different but share the same name, cause alot of confusion..

  27. PRODUCT
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:05

    Vista is Garbage. No one wants it. Microsoft is a bunch of idiots.

  28. nikolica
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:07

    that’s because much more people use linux nowdays…

  29. KRIEGHOFF
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:07

    Its a turkey no matter how they try to dress it

  30. mr æ
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:08

    well its lower cuz,nobody wanst the damn thing.lol.
    how stupid are they.harder to crack,lol

  31. Noelie
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:13

    I liked Vista but I had problems with stuttering sound when I was downloading stuff and no matter what I tried to fix it I couldn’t. Then I found a registry hack to download SP3 (RC1) for XP and I’m delighted with it. Much much faster. Unless SP1 for Vista works miracles I won’t be going back.

  32. tony
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:16

    its mostly because vista is so buggy with slow support for drivers and i wont upgrade until i need to or theirs a better operating system.

  33. John
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:17

    Monkeys more clever than humans, damn!

    LOL..that definately true

  34. Internal
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:18

    Are they really that dumb

    XP = Stable, runs all games, more compatable with software

    Vista = Lowers your performance, makes alot of your games and software no longer work!!!!!

    Microsoft do your maths no one wants it cause it is a pile of sh1t

  35. sVista
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:22

    Friends the best Windows OS is Windows Server 2003 x86 & x64 and Windows XP x64. Vista is a disappointment:

    Vista = sVista (= σβήστα = greek word meaning erase/delete)

    lol

  36. crimson
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:26

    most pirates just have more “computer experience” then the average “stupid” user .. e.g less vista piracy

  37. me
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:26

    a big company like ms aren’t going to care if home users are using pirate copies, the majority of users will buy their pc form a shop with vista pre-installed

    if people have vista on their pc’s at home, larger companies are more likely to adopt it (everyone upgrades to newer os’s somewhere down the line)

    as long as the companies are licensed (dare i say, i’d like to think that most in the us / uk are) then ms will make their money

    ballmer said it himself, ms would prefer users to use pirated copies of windows than use another os

    majority wins, everytime

    for the record, i’m still using xp

  38. ViT
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:29

    Maybe because… hmmm let’s see… vista sucks real bad?! ;)

  39. munnavai
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:32

    can any one kindly suggest any link for properly cracked vista ultimate (32 bit).
    Thank you.

  40. slapdash
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:35

    waiting for winxp sp3 next year release..i heard this sp much great than vista sh*t…hasta la vista winxp sp3 ;)

  41. dudeman
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:36

    A question for Linux lovers:

    If I switch to Linux, how will I get to play my DX10 games and use all my music recording software and hardware?

    Yes I’m sure Linux is great for surfing and writing documents (what OS isn’t? loool!) but what about us who actually use applications other than firefox and openoffice? ROFLFMFOGMAOING

  42. SVISTA ENTELOS
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:38

    SVISTA NA PANE STON DIAOLO.. ORAIOS…
    XAXAXAA!

  43. mcf3778
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:39

    Vista! Will it play Halo 3? I’ll stick with my windows 95!

  44. ZV
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:43

    Hmmm, I actually thought Vista was much easier to crack than XP, it took a long time to crack XP but Vista went down pretty fast.

  45. EliteC64
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:49

    Ide rather you use a free copy of my software instead of putting money into another Companys operating system, Wow i believe it cause steve ballmer said so.

    Come here son i got a bridge to sell you.

  46. mr.Floppy
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:49

    @45 Xp got cracked almost instantly,with sp1 was a slight delay.

  47. munnavai
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:50

    link please!!!!!!!!!!!!

  48. dj
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:50

    lol agreeing with everyone saying it sucks thats why nobody bothers pirating it

  49. Z
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:54

    Suck confirmed.

  50. Crinan
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:56

    I bought my new system 9 months ago i looked into vista but stuck with XP for the simple fact its user friendly on all my software i just think its far better overall.Hopefully i won’t be forced to switch to vista for at least another 3 years fingers x’d.

  51. Dave
    December 4th, 2007 | 12:58

    “Microsoft: piracy rate of Vista is half the XP”

    Yeah , cause nobody wants that sh*t.

  52. adam
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:00

    The decline in piracy rates is largely due to the fact Vista is much tougher to fake than XP. Microsoft VP, Mike Sievert, said: “Piracy rates are lower because it’s harder.”

    Now that’s what I call spin! I wonder what their sales rates are compared to “piracy rates,” whatever the hell those are.

  53. bigk
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:00

    I actually found a loophole which lets you register windows vista ASAP over the phone. I can’t actually disclose any information, as it is a loophole that can be closed QUICKLY.

    I actually found this out by mistake, gives you a valid CD KEY and not too hard to do and absolutely free.

    I don’t think SP1 will have changed anything and may disclose my loophole ;-)

  54. Allexz
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:03

    LOL “harder to pirate”

    ROFL! :D It’s EASIER! Download+Activationcrack = “Original Vista”

    It’s basically even easier to pirate Vista, the only problem is that is slow and a pain in the ass. Vista that is.

  55. BitLover
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:04

    Agree with me@38.

    friend of my does work in pc shop and is saying; that most customers with preinstalled vista will be back to the shop after 3 to 12 weeks, asking that it is possible to downgrade Vista to XP, because Vista seems to have problems or is to slow or most of the programs just do not work as they should.

    Does MS investigate as well does numbers? Or they just counting how many Vista’s are went preinstalled out from the manufactures. Not to mention that many of those manufactures are forced to preinstall Vista and do not have the choice for XP.

    I think all this good news from MS about Vista is a marketing scam, in reality they know that Vista sales are not really as good as expected.

  56. PsYcHo
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:14

    lol xp is trash !!!
    Everyone likes virus and Spyware I Take It…

    Get Vista 64 Bit… If Your System Can Take IT…

    if not stay with Crud-XP…

    BTW Thx NoPE :)

  57. LMAO
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:22

    they can’t even get people to steal it.

  58. Big-Byte
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:27

    Vista is incompatible to older Games and Appz, but is it possible to use DX 10 under XP ???

  59. G
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:28

    Vista was crap…just like xp was at launch….its much much better now than it was at launch….give it a little more time it will be good…im using it Vista..together with dual boot xp pro….u will all be Vista soon….be happy with it…natural evolution…

  60. G
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:29

    Edit: Using Vista 64-bit…security IS BETTER than in XP….way BETTER…

  61. nitromeatbag
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:34

    Who the hell wants to pirate a OS so is a piece of crap.. seriously I tried vista 2 times since it was released. Just last week I tried it out again after telling myself not to give into hope that maybe with the patches the OS will be better, but it still sucks. Its the worst os since Windows ME.

  62. anonymous
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:38

    Does this mean SP1 will detect my DELL OEM version as illegal?

  63. r0x
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:39

    i am satisfied user with Windows Vista Premium 32bit OEM LEGAL :) . Its not expensive :) especially for you from USA, etc…

  64. UncertainGod
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:43

    Nobody gives a spoon about vista, that’s why it’s not getting pirated much.

  65. Vidhun
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:43

    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
    I am laughing my ass of after reading this…..Man! The day vista was released within a week or two I had a copy of it from the internet and now is the FUNNY PART.. the copy which I have installed is the same O/S which comes preinstalled with DELL PCS so the damn thing installed SO SMOOTHLY THAT IT DID NOT EVEN CARE TO ASK ME FOR A SERIAL..every thing works perfectly,installs,updates and it came preactivated…

    PS:BUT STILL I REALLY LIKE XP BETTER THAN VISTA

  66. spin the black circle
    December 4th, 2007 | 13:44

    noone wants to use it before it is stable and fast, thats why the rates for piracy are low, dumbass micro.

  67. []D[][]\/[][]D
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:00

    vista suxs ya knaw wha i b saynz yo? i be back to x to the mutha f** P all day knaw mea? windaws just dont know how we do tis! i be on mac alls day yo… who knaw wha im b saynz?

  68. Jixx
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:01

    lower piracy rate?
    lower customer rate!
    M$: pirate==consumer

    sweet! i bet rite when none buys “Windows 7″ (yeah,that is the name of the next one) they’ll start to seed an “open home edition” on torrent.
    dx10 for vista only? screw you! wine will take that.
    32bitExe just for M$? hahaha. Apple will do that by the end of 2008!

    time to sell M$ stocks!

  69. Joe
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:02

    I’ve had no problem with it… it came pre-loaded on my new laptop, and even before I bought it I was like, “Geeze better get the XP disk ready”.

    I decided to give it a try, and to be honest I’ve had absolutely no problems with it. The laptop is pretty good though… 2.0Ghz Turion 64×2, 2 gigs of ram. What’s sad is that monitoring memory usage it takes up a gig (”48%”) by itself with just about no other programs running… It’s not slow at all though. I program and game and all that jazz too and I have not run in to one compatibility issue.

    I recall when I tried it on my P4 2.8Ghz 1Gig Desktop PC it raped it pretty hardcore so I went back to XP on that one.

  70. HigherIQ
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:04

    lol WOW. I’m making a pdf of this read and everyones post as good joke for people to email everyone lol. What a way to be ending the year (Micronuts joke).

  71. GriM
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:05

    na the reason vista piracy rates are so low is the OS “”SUCKS BALLS”" just like bill gates do’s

  72. john
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:07

    xp sp3 rulzzz…

  73. me
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:07

    Em vista is good, if u have pc to run it. So lamers who have 2gb of ram should forget it and return to theyr mister 10 years old XP(so fast)!
    I have x64 and have no driver issiues.
    Q6600 4GB ram 8800GTS and 1TB hdd, vista(on raptor 10k rpm) boots up in seconds and all programs start when u click them.
    When i had xp system it was so slowarse(coz of multicore), thats why i changed for vista buissness and no complaints! All games run as before and best thing is that it hasent shown any errors sins i installed it.
    So who doesent know: vista is based on server2003 so its secure

  74. Influenced
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:13

    I think 99% of people will agree vista sucks
    I didn’t even want to use xp when it first came out.
    But Hey, unless some1 wants to continue improving XP after MS call it quits.
    Vista may accidentally install itself against my best wishes.

  75. Delta Force
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:16

    XP SP3 Beta are already available (about 1 month)
    and i already using it.
    and no problem using it with pirated XP :)

    Upgrading to vista well i will wait until i got another computer. i don’t want new os and new slow down :)

  76. stole XP
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:20

    to get rid of vista on my new PC lmao

  77. cX
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:24

    CooLMaN
    December 4th, 2007 | 11:10
    Vista piracy rate is lower due to the fact it sucks and no one wants to use it, stupid.

    You are Correct My friend .

    LOL They actualy think that thier protection is what keeping pirates away from Vista ?

    ITS THIER CRAPPY OS !

  78. HollyWood
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:24

    @2 CooLMaN said it all… LOL

  79. Necro-File
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:25

    Much harder my ass; I have a pirated, WGA approved version of Vista Ultimate I’ve had since the operating system was first officially released. The decline is probably due to morons who think Vista isn’t as good as XP; The same idiots who though 98 was better than XP.

  80. ScytheNoire
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:26

    if MS wanted to fight piracy they’d release the OS at a reasonable price. make it the cost of the average PC game. then people wouldn’t care so much about pirating because the cost wouldn’t be out of proportion.

  81. me
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:29

    i’ve already posted once @38

    most of you are so childish, you were either 10 years old when xp came out, or have a bad memory

    everyone bashed xp when it came out

    microsoft os’s need time to ’settle in’ the userbase is colossal, so many different hardware configurations that they need to adhere to, grow up

    posing things like “m$ vi$ta suxxorsszzz, xpee ruwleszzs!11lone” doesn’t help you put your misinformed point across

    vista is the next big thing, and will replace xp soon for most of you

  82. Vidivaldi
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:31

    “So lamers who have 2gb of ram should forget it and return to theyr mister 10 years old XP(so fast)!
    I have x64 and have no driver issiues.
    Q6600 4GB ram 8800GTS and 1TB hdd, vista(on raptor 10k rpm) boots up in seconds and all programs start when u click them.”

    Yea… sure… it sounds really good with an operating system that require 4gb to start work good… i seriously hope you didn’t get that system so you could run visty correctly because then you’ve got the whole lamer idea wrong.. LOL

  83. Poopie Dookie
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:32

    VISTA SUCKS!!! NOBODY WANTS IT!!!

  84. Belga
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:35

    When xp came, everybody were like “OMG IT SUCKS” and what is the situation now? So, I think vista is on the same line as xp was when it was released :)

  85. dnL
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:37

    meh I wrote a super long post and it didn’t even show up?
    w/e, so to be brief, I was forced to go over to vista b/c of some random reasons. Well anyways, at first I didn’t like vista at all but now I just can’t imagine myself going back to xp anymore, multitasking works way better on vista IMO. Like on xp, if one program hangs, the whole system gets often choppy but on vista I might not even notice it. And other than abit higher program compatibility and lower memory usage, are there any other reason why xp is better than vista?

  86. JOrge
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:40

    Jajaj it´s so bad that even free people dosen´t want it

    Very bad move the DRM crap,worst OS since millenium.

  87. Zordon
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:44

    @ 86 dnL
    I agree with you completely

  88. otli
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:45

    Harder to pirate? lol

    No: it just sucks, that’s why I haven’t change

  89. Fractal
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:53

    #68: “vista suxs ya knaw wha i b saynz yo? i be back to x to the mutha f** P all day knaw mea? windaws just dont know how we do tis! i be on mac alls day yo… who knaw wha im b saynz?”

    No. Git.

  90. 4FuK-S8kZ
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:53

    @80

    Well said!! – You beat me to it!!

  91. John
    December 4th, 2007 | 14:54

    Well its seemingly low, this because theres pirated versions they dont have a clue about. But as far as me using it, Ill just stick with XP. An operating system should allow the user to perform multiple task without requiring so much memory. To even have the flexiblity you would with XP when using vista you would need 2 gigs of RAM or more. Then what if you wanted to play those high end PC game titles. Like Gears of War or Crysis. Hell you would need like 4 gigs of RAM. Alienware.com does make it pheasable but with a hit to your wallet.

  92. Hot
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:00

    So many morons in this post :/

  93. Tux
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:01

    this is so funny..

    People prefer XP – vista sucks. the only reason they are making money on vista is because people are forced to buy it with lots of new PC’s.

    It’s been said 90 times already, just wanted to add to the statistic.

  94. satake
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:01

    Sign me in on the No Vista User!

  95. []D[][]\/[][]D
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:04

    @93 Hot

    Youz b da moron! sucha nub! nowz stfu… ya knaw wha i b sayns ya mee?

  96. Madferret
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:04

    to be honest I installed Vista when I had my old rig and thought it sucked big time (3.2ghz P4 1Gig made myself)

    until… i built my new quad core system q6600 2.4ghz 2 gig ram i thought I’d give Vista another chance and to be honest it bloody flys, I tried installing XP hoping for even more performance boost but it ran ‘Slower’ than it did when it had Vista on.

    bottom line in my opinion

    if you have a single core computer keep with XP

    if you have a dual or quad core machine Vista all the way ftw

    and btw build your own machine as pre-built computers (Dell,HP,Fujitsu etc etc) suck ass and you’ll always have a crap slow arse rig and hence I think a ‘majority’ of the comments on this thread are coming from people who have nice shiney cases with a hair dryer running there CPU

    rant over :)

  97. Jao
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:12

    some of my mates are forced to use Vista and they are constantly asking for advice from either me or others, everything is a problem, and only about half of programs work, vista is pretty awful, maybe when service packs are out it will be worth looking into.

  98. Madferret
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:17

    @ 92

    you really are clueless my friend and have no idea what your talking about but just ‘guessing’ and presuming

    im running all the games you mentioned on vista with 2gig of ram at max without multi-task issues all for under £700 the cost of a newly built rig, which i presume is half the price of a alienware machine at the starting range to which to add is now owned by ‘DELL’ so not a smart move to direct people to the ultimate idiot computer manufacturer’s

    I suggest you do your homework abit more and pour a nice warm cup of stfu while you at it ;-)

  99. kebrus
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:28

    i have to agree with #7 (08/15)

    they obviously don’t want to people leave completely away from their OS, so they “made it a little harder to crack” but not completely (even though they probably couldn’t do it if they wanted to)

  100. masterfaster
    December 4th, 2007 | 15:33

    There is no need to go to Vista x64.

    Win2003/WinXP x64 are way better and safer and faster, because they have the kernel of a server OS.

    Do you actually test OSes before you write an opinion?

    But yes, Vista x64 is way better than Vista x86.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Hot info about new scene releases!