Releaselog

Michael jackson-history megamix-convert-dvdrip-x264-2009-mVz

Here’s mVz with the History Megamix. DVDRip quality. Nfo says: Some really cool tunes. Says enough..

HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I (usually shortened to HIStory) is a double album by Michael Jackson, released on June 20, 1995, and is Jackson’s ninth album. The first disc, named “HIStory Begins” consists of a selection of Jackson’s greatest hits from the singer’s past fifteen years, while the second, named “HIStory Continues” features new songs, with the exception of “Come Together”, which was recorded in 1987.

Release Name: Michael_jackson-history_megamix-convert-dvdrip-x264-2009-mVz
Genre: Pop/dance
Video Quality: x264
Audio Quality: MP3 VBR
Size: 91MB
Rip Date: 2009-07-18

Links: NFODOWNLOAD

Comments (44)

Feel free to post your Michael jackson-history megamix-convert-dvdrip-x264-2009-mVz torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. brĂ¼no
    July 18th, 2009 | 20:41

    guess if the phrase "the MJ crap posts never end" is repeated a thousand times, it will get posted in much higher volume. but i try…

    please, stop!

  2. googlia
    July 18th, 2009 | 20:45

    nice to see Mike dancing afain :mrgreen: cool mix indeed :cool: :oops:

    Michael_jackson-history_megamix-convert-dvdrip-x264-2009-mVz

    http://www.rlslog.net/michael-jackson-history-megamix-convert-dvdrip-x264-2009-mvz/

  3. DogaN
    July 18th, 2009 | 20:49
  4. K
    July 18th, 2009 | 20:50
  5. DogaN
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:00
  6. kla
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:02
  7. Linkman
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:12
  8. Nic
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:14

    why on earth do you guys keep idolizing this pedophile?

  9. physio
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:20

    Michael_jackson-history_megamix-convert-dvdrip-x264-2009-mVz.mkv
    http://depositfiles.com/files/vtccrym7e

  10. hmm
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:23

    Real simple if your not a fan why even click on the infornmation to post in the first place?

  11. Steve T
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:37

    He was cleared in a court of law, So how is he a pedophile ??

    He adored children and that court farce destroyed him.

  12. Nic
    July 18th, 2009 | 21:46

    orly. SO the 20mil each he payed off to the families in the first case means he was innocent?, lmao. You dont go paying people that kinda money unless your guilty of something. 2nd, he was never found innocent on the 2nd trial, only not guilty, big difference there.

  13. darks_virus
    July 18th, 2009 | 22:06
  14. Gob
    July 18th, 2009 | 22:29

    He was never a paedophile, the kids parents wanted some money and i was an easy way.. he payed off the 1st claim because he didn't want a court case to taint his career. then Bashir came along and twisted a video together that sparked a boatload of parents claiming MJ had abused their kids.. nothing but money grabbers!

    and he was found NOT GUILTY.. he was a man with the mind of a child who made some of the greatest music in history.

    END

  15. Steve T
    July 18th, 2009 | 22:36

    See Above

  16. Steve T
    July 18th, 2009 | 22:39

    There are some real idiots out there. NOT GUILTY means INNOCENT.
    The opposite of GUILTY is………… you guessed it INNOCENT.

  17. Ghandi
    July 19th, 2009 | 00:23

    Wow @23 dude I mean no disrespect at all but how many excuses are you going to make for this creeper?

    If it was anyone else that didn't make GOOD music then BOOM Jail and if he got murdered in jail 90% of the people posting in defense of this pedophile would be screaming HALLELUJAH the Pedo's dead and got what he deserved.

    Seriously the dude above is 110% correct an innocent person does not PAY for the crime he DID NOT commit. Only the guilty dish out millions of dollars to the Pimps that are these kids parents. You are 100% correct these parents did do this to get rich because they knew no grown man was only going to "sleep" with these children he was going to rape them and he did deal with it, its fact. Not guilty means you pay nothing then run their names through the mud for trying to do it to you.

    No lawyer in this world would tell someone to give out his last millions and leave himself utterly broke if he was innocent.

  18. RAD-X
    July 19th, 2009 | 00:39

    Wow mickael love bionic commando, so where is BC?
    NuhNuhNuh

  19. BullDog
    July 19th, 2009 | 01:11

    Why is everyone going so nuts over a CHILD MOLESTER? Let him go he is in no way comparable to Elvis!

  20. BenD
    July 19th, 2009 | 02:40

    I ain't in no way a Mike Jacko Fan, but "Elvis", R U kidding me!?

  21. Johney666
    July 19th, 2009 | 02:51

    1. In both the cases it was the parents who offered out of court settlement. So if your son was molested would you rather go for the money?

    2. He was in show business of all things and in that line of profession you don't want that kind of bad publicity in the front page of every newspaper around the world. So that is why he probably payed them off. But the damage was already done by that time I guess.

    C'mon ppl don't let yourselves be brainwashed by the media. Don't be the average commoner, rise above it!

  22. julie
    July 19th, 2009 | 03:25

    @23 – im with u gob, leave michael alone people, i love him and i just think its sad that he's gone when he had so much talent and so much more to offer.. rip michael, i hope you're getting the break and rest and peace u need…
    he was treated unfairly and its a miracle he came thru it all after how long most people have been trying to get to him…
    he loved children, i dont believe he's a molester, he was misunderstood about the whole thing and the wrong people used that to get to him… so wrong… they dont care about us was an appropriate song 4 what happened at that time, to all the haters…
    i just wished michael got help for his drug addiction, instead of just taking the stuff constantly & ending his life, still hard 2 believe he's gone…

  23. thank you
    July 19th, 2009 | 04:36

    Thank you for this post !

    RIP my KiNG

  24. MJRocks
    July 19th, 2009 | 04:59

    MJ Rocks and people who put him down are in the closet fans!!

  25. york
    July 19th, 2009 | 06:04

    @21 and all the other idi-ots! Your a fan or not! If yr not , than dont come and place some stupid comments here. People share these things to honor him… You guys believe what media made you beleive and what helped to break MJ.
    He's love for kids was big but not in that perverted way.
    He paid the money to get it over…He was sick and tired of people abusing HIM. He was stupid enough to think it would be over when he paid. But other jerks wer just waiting to do the same thing. I was in his house for a coupple a times. I met him and had a meet and greet once. We started talking about my diabetes and he invited me in his house. I was about 11 yrs…. He was the friendliest man and maybe to naive… But ive noticed never anything sexual about it!
    There's a reason the Chandler boy now confesses…

  26. koubaros
    July 19th, 2009 | 09:14

    Some of you seem to forget that there are hundreds of artist, politician, stars, actors etc etc in the past and present who have been idolised and have not been angels with wings. Some of them might be idolised by you who claim that MJ was in fact a child lover. We could start seperating the artist from the person or the actor from the person, but anyone of you who has that kind of logic in him, please do this for all of them!

    MJ and others have not been in the center of the spotlight for their sexual abusive reputations or other diabolic behaviour. They are widely loved for their work in the respected proffesion. I would like to believe that only 9 or 10 of 100 fans of MJ could accept the fact that he is alegedly a child lover along with the fact that he was the artist who made a huge impact in music.

    We could claim that everyone is rotten, since these are troubled days that we live in and therefore base that fact of the payoff of the kids parent's to his guilt. Alltogether, payoff has always meant guilt. If that is so, I as a parent of a child that had been abused, would NEVER have agreed on money in return to my child's abuse! I would like to see justice! Place guilt on a pedastel and see who the guilty is, the one who is paying off or the one who if payed off!?!?!?

  27. AVI
    July 19th, 2009 | 17:53

    @27.Ghandi:

    Ironically,you chose the name of a great leader who has been accused by his mates of sleeping in the same bed with his niece.I'm talking about Ghandi,yes.Read the story,if you don't know it yet.But that's not my point.What I wanted to tell you is: every single time you speak about a celebrity,especially a MEGASTAR like Michael (we won't see too soon a 2 hours long memorial LIVE on CNN,that's how big artist Michael was),please consider for God's sake that you are not talking about a common person,ok? After years and years of hard work,after decades of tours,a celebrity WOULD PAY to save

  28. AVI
    July 19th, 2009 | 18:11

    ……to save her/his career,even if she/he is innocent.The fight in justice would take too much time and in the meantime that artist couldn't work.It's all about image in this business,where 100% g.a.y. like Enrique Iglesias or Keanu Reeves make girls faint all over the world :)

  29. OpenYourEyes
    July 19th, 2009 | 18:46

    To all you people making up your minds without knowing the facts, please open your eyes and don't be ignorant sheep.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexual_abuse_accusations_against_Michael_Jackson

    If you read that you'll see that the father was clearly out to get money and destroy MJ. The evidence wasn't there. The boys claims about MJs body didn't match the photos. Why did he pay? You can read it there – and it's not because he was guilty.
    Now can we make the posts just about the content please?

  30. Jay Hunter
    July 20th, 2009 | 10:17

    FFS lads just download the video, say thanks and STFU. If you hate MJ there's nothing MJ fans can do to change your mind. If you love MJ, don't waste your time thinking that "the internet" will change his views in the face of rational opinion. Everyone's hard-nosed about this topic, so please, STFU.

Leave a reply