Releaselog

Mega Structures Shanghai Super Tower WS PDTV XviD-FTP

Posted on 03.05.2008 at 06:18 in TV Shows by Mr. X

Watching the mega-structure type shows always gets me to wonder in amazement at what the power of technology can do. In this one, again by FTP (keep up the great work) covers the creation of the 101 floor Shanghai World Finacial Centre in mainland China. Warning contains 9/11 propaganda so in order to off-set the imbalance: ae911truth.org

The Shanghai World Financial Centre will, on completion, be mainland China’s tallest building. At 101 floors tall, the skyscraper has been built to withstand anything nature and man can throw at it

:arrow: Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP
640×352 25 - vbr mp3 128 - 350MB
Search Torrent - Search Usenet - NFO

Comments (128)

Feel free to post your Mega Structures Shanghai Super Tower WS PDTV XviD-FTP torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2]
  1. Theodore
    May 4th, 2008 | 02:01

    I don’t know the truth about that day but what I do know is, it’s just as ignorant and a whole lot more dangerous to accept what your told than to come up with or listen to some out there theories.

    Conspiracy theories is an unfortunate term in todays world, any idea which seeks to challenge events with a seemingly obvious cause seems to be branded a conspiracy theory. This is no light term either, it carries a vast weight of negative connotations, nobody with a professional image to uphold wants to be tarred with this brush.

    This is all very convenient. As a society we are being taught to reject alternative viewpoints, to close our minds to the possibility of the extraordinary and even to ridicule and stereotype those who would suggest alternative views. However the people feeding us the supposed truth, the reality, are our governments and our media.

    Were being led down a path where we will give up our freedom of speech and our civil liberties all because of supposed truths and were not doing anything about it because to believe such an idea, you would have to be a crazy conspiracy theorist nutjob.

    This is rather Orwellian I agree and I am in no way saying that I believe 9/11 was a result of a Governmental plan. Just that sometimes you can walk to far down a route to turn back.

    Whichever side your looking at this issue from, I urge you to read about the “H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007″ and to please keep an open mind.

  2. Blah
    May 4th, 2008 | 03:42

    I can’t believe some people still think that the official WTC story is the truth. You people are so brainwashed. I see that a big argument is that steel loses half it’s strength at a certain temperature. If so, why does the building collapse straight down, and at almost terminal velocity? Idiots. Open your eyes.

  3. Hatchet
    May 4th, 2008 | 04:10

    So wheres the torrent? I love megastructures

  4. heinrich
    May 4th, 2008 | 04:37

    i live and work quite close to that building. its next to the Jianmao tower. and its quite amazing standing next to it

  5. nWo
    May 4th, 2008 | 04:39

    Screw Loose Change is the best 9/11 movie I’ve ever seen…

  6. bob
    May 4th, 2008 | 05:34

    gdfgfdfdsfs

  7. bob
    May 4th, 2008 | 05:42

    i am being blocked from expressing my thoughts on this site. clever, as i can post this and my above post, but if i talk of conspiracys, it wont post… wow

  8. CIVITATIS NOVI EBORACI
    May 4th, 2008 | 05:45

    @Blah

    Since you can’t be bothered to actually click on links provided by other posters, here is an article that addresses your concerns about free falling buildings…

    Physics Problem Number 1 — Free Fall of the WTC Towers

    “How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and 9 seconds (WTC 2), speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from a similar height in vacuum (with no air resistance)?” (NIST FAQ #6)

    The suspicion behind this question is that the Towers were weakened by surreptitious, controlled demolitions. In this view, the structure below the impact zone (where airplanes collided, exploded, and fires burned) “should have” provided resistance to the descent of the block above the impact zone, slowing or even stopping the collapse.

    The NIST response is that the lower structure was only designed to hold up the weight above any given floor statically, not dynamically. The force imparted by the collision of the upper block was beyond the limits of the lower structure to resist. The lower structure was essentially crumbled by a “hammer” of descending material, and the mass of this hammer increased during the course of the collapse.

    Let’s explore further.

    ¦ Problem 1, Force Balance

    Once the framing in the impact zone has failed, the upper block is accelerated by gravity until it crashes into the lower structure below the impact zone. Labeling the mass of the upper block m, and its speed v, the block would have a momentum m*v and an energy of (1/2)*m*v^2. Its weight would be m*g, where g is the constant of gravitational acceleration (9.81 meters/second^2).

    The balance of forces on the upper block as it impacts the lower structure is presented here as the impulse momentum form of Newton’s 2nd Law:

    The time rate of change of momentum = The sum of the forces,

    [m*v(final) - m*v(initial)]/dt = F - m*g.

    Here, positive direction, velocity and force are taken to be vertically upward; dt is a label for “delta t”, a very brief time interval during which the impact occurs and the momentum changes from m*v(initial) to m*v(final); and F is the force of resistance by the lower structure. If A is the net horizontal cross-sectional area of the load-bearing columns of the lower structure, then F/A is the average compressive stress across that area.

    This type of force balance is applied to the impact at each floor, sequentially, by redefining m as the mass above it, v(initial) as the outcome of the alternating floor impacts and free falls during prior compaction, and v(final) as the outcome of the latest impact.

    We can regroup the terms of the force balance as follows:

    F = m*g + m*[v(final) - v(initial)]/dt,

    F = m*g*[1 + {v(final) - v(initial)}/(g*dt)],

    F/(m*g) = 1 + {v(final) - v(initial)}/(g*dt).

    Before each building was perturbed, the upper block did not have any motion, v(initial) = v(final) = 0, and the magnitude of the upward-directed, resisting force of any part of the structure was equal to the weight of material above it; F/(m*g) = 1.

    When an upper block drops through an impact zone that has lost structural strength, and crashes into the rigid lower structure, it imparts a dynamic force in addition to its weight. The dynamic force is the second term in the last expression for F. The total force, F, acts during the time interval dt during which the momentum of the upper block is reduced (in magnitude) from m*v(initial) to m*v(final). Clearly, the lower structure will crumble when F is greater than the maximum force it can support, or when F/A is greater than the maximum stress it can withstand.

    ¦ Problem 1, Numerical Example of Progressive Collapse

    Free fall without air resistance from a height H takes time T, given by

    T = square root [(2*H)/g].

    At any time 0 < t < T during the free fall, the velocity is given by

    v(t) = -g*t, (negative sign for downward direction),

    and position is given by

    h(t) = H - (1/2)*g*t^2.

    So, for H = 440 m (=1443 feet) the free fall time is T = 9.5 s, and the velocity slamming into the ground is -92.9 m/s = -208 mph.

    What actually happened in the buildings? We consider a suggestive numerical example.

    With the onset of failure, the upper block drops through a space of L = 3 meters, taken to be the distance between floors. Starting from rest at time t = 0, the block reaches a velocity of v = -7.7 m/s at t = 0.78 s. The descending block makes contact with the topmost stationary floor of the lower structure.

    We will assume these floor structures to be dL = 1 meter thick (1 meter = 3.28 feet). Each floor structure is a framework of steel below and within a layer of concrete. The floors spanned a distance of between 10 m and 20 m between the outer square perimeter (63.4 m a side) and the core support along the axis of the building, which housed elevator shafts, stairwells and support columns, within a rectangular area of [42 m x 27 m].

    Impact is a very brief process whose duration is dt = 1/100 s. During the impact, energy ripples through the floor structure as elastic waves in the steel and concrete; the velocity of these stress waves is V(steel) = 1900 m/s and V(concrete) = 930 m/s; the wave speed is a property of the material (P-waves). The waves traverse the thickness of the floor structure in a time dL/V = 5/10,000 s for steel and 1/1000 s for concrete, so they can bounce between 10 to 20 times across the 1 m thickness; and they can run along the span of the floor within 0.005 to 0.01 s.

    The waves alert the volume of the floor structure to the imposition of a new load, and infuse that volume with much higher stress. The floor structure is deflected downward a distance d = -0.077 meters (3 inches) during impact. In becoming stressed, the floor structure absorbs some of the energy of the descending block, slowing it by dv = 0.5 m/s (in this example). Within dt = 1/100 s, the floor structure has transmitted the force of the new load to its joints with the building’s core and periphery.

    Recalling the last form of the force balance, and inserting the numbers from this example, we find the magnitude of the total reaction force to be

    F/(m*g) = 1 + dv/(g*dt) = 1 + 0.5/(9.81*0.01) = 6.1,

    a load of six times the weight of the upper block.

    I continued this particular calculation, floor by floor, as a sequence starting from rest: free fall for 3 m, impact delays transit for 0.01 s and decreases descent velocity by 0.5 m/s, free fall for 3 m, transit delay and velocity decrement as before, and so on. The block reaches the ground in 10 s with a total of 87 floor impacts. The collapse of 344 m (1128 feet) accelerates from -7.2 m/s (-16 mph) after the initial impact, to -46 m/s (-104 mph) at the ground.

  9. sucitta
    May 4th, 2008 | 07:26

    i love al gore and the goverment, they would never lie to us…. its silly to think so, they love us. !!

  10. sucitta
    May 4th, 2008 | 07:31

    fsdjhfsjdfjsdlkfjsdlkjfklsdjfkljsdfjsdlkjfklsdjflkjsdlkfjklsdjflksdjklfjsdlkjfklsdjfkljsdklfjlksdjfkldsjlfkjsdlkfjsdkljfklsdjfklsdjlkfjdsklfjlksdjflksdjklfjsdkljflksdjflksdjfklsdjflkjdslkfjsdlkjflksdjflksdjflksdjlkfjdslkjflksdjflksdjfkljsdlkfjsdlkjflksdjflkjsdlkfjsdlkfjlksdjflksdjlfkjsdlkfjklsdjflksdjflksdjlfkjsdlkfjklsdjfklsdjflksjdlkfjsdlkjfklsdjflksjdlkfjlsdkjflksdjlkfjsdlkjflksdjflksdjlkfjsdlkfjlksdjflksdjflksdjlkfjsdlkfjlksdjfklsdjfklsdjfklsdjlkfjsdlkfjlksdjflksdjfklsdjlkfjdsklfjsdlkjflksdjflksdjfklsdjlkfjfsdlkjf

  11. sucitta
    May 4th, 2008 | 07:34

    rhselrhlewkrhjklejrjsdaljsdiotjiowetiohrweiothriothiorehtoirewhtioh

  12. MiikeMiike
    May 4th, 2008 | 07:41

    There will always be gullible idiots who fall for conspiracies.

  13. Horatio
    May 4th, 2008 | 07:46

    http://www.newzleech.com/usenet/?group=&minage=&age=&min=min&max=max&q=Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP&mode=usenet&adv=

    will yield an NZB for this, binsearch will not.

  14. Jebus
    May 4th, 2008 | 07:51

    i love the goverment

  15. sucitta
    May 4th, 2008 | 08:11

    i love flowers

  16. August
    May 4th, 2008 | 08:18

    Shame on you believing in the 911 truthers. They are almost worse than Holocaust deniers. We have plenty wrong with our country and blatant and verifiable evidence of the Bush regime’s attempt at repressing information regarding our horrible war in Iraq and you decide to believe these conspiracy nuts? Its sad more than anything. Richard Dawkins, the editor of Skeptic magazine, Popular Mechanics, Rolling Stone Magazine, have all debunked their horrible claims but you continue to believe the lies. Not everything can be explained, their is no scientific method that would confirm every detail out there. Stop perpetuating lies and work on moving our country to a more optimistic future.

  17. CIVITATIS NOVI EBORACI
    May 4th, 2008 | 10:10

    here here August

  18. Herman the German
    May 4th, 2008 | 11:37

    I think the US used a laserbeam from a satelite to make the towers fall. The Energy you would need can be calculated (r³*m+c²/c*p). Clearly they borrowed the technology from Marsians or Jupitarians, because Earthling are yet not capable of using that much power in a laserbeam(Not even the REAL government of the US - I’m not talking about GWB).

    You all should get your facts straight. It’s so obvious, you just have to watch the right “documentaries”.

  19. *************SEBASTO***************
    May 4th, 2008 | 12:05

    comments should be closed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

  20. XYZ
    May 4th, 2008 | 13:40

    It’s made by the german guys from ThyssenKrupp AG!!!
    So it’s not really made by Chinese guys!!!
    LINK for German: http://www.thyssenkrupp.de/
    LINK for English: http://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/index.html

  21. XYZ
    May 4th, 2008 | 13:43

    Chinese are not able to create such a great building, without Germans best building creators!!!

  22. hodad
    May 5th, 2008 | 00:13

    ^actually, americans designed this building & mr.x got pwned by that article from comment 101. I bet you feel stupid now after acting like you were right there at building 7 when it “blew up” LOL.

  23. Welp
    May 5th, 2008 | 03:15

    Reading these comments has made me lose faith in humanity. Probably the worst comments are the ones calling people brainwashed and stupid for not believing that 9/11 was a conspiracy. I think the definition of stupidity is blindly believing the intellectually dishonest claims of some kids who dubbed their voices over 9/11 clips and called it a documentary. If you’re so confident in your beliefs there is no harm in going out there and googling “loose change debunk”. Do yourself a favor and read how every single point that has ever been brought up has been thoroughly debunked.

  24. Mr. T
    May 5th, 2008 | 05:11

    Mr. X, do you realize your statement that we are brainwashed is kinda ….. sad??? Why don’t you ask yourself if you are brainwashed with the stupidity of conspiracy? Maybe you are just one of those boys/girls who lost their common sense. Brainwashed by media? Asking yourself where did you hear the conspiracy from? And is your source’s credibility better than the mainstream news’s credibility? That just totally proved that your credibility is no longer there. Ok look, imagining that the conspiracy was true, tell me what’s the point of the conspiracy? What’s the benefit? What’s the point of destroying our own building in order to go to war instead of going with premptive strike like the Iraq War? What kind of moron would do that? Where’s your common sense really? I am a skeptic myself. I took critical thinking classes in school not for requirement, but for understanding and analyzing different sources of news. Asking yourself, what’s the benefit for the conspiracy? Would those people, who began the conspiracy, benefit from this? Obviously yes, they will be benefit from this in some way. If you think yourself as a person of science, at least showing proofs instead of non sense hypothesises that can’t be tested. We already knew that governments are never trueful about everything. That’s the way thing is. All we have to do is being skeptic about the sources of the news and analyze them to tell whether they make sense or not instead of believing in all of these mumbo jumbo.

  25. bingo handjob
    May 5th, 2008 | 18:33

    I appreciate this site, visit daily, and click ad links to help out. I found the Mr. X propaganda remarks out-of-place and unprofessional. Also rather juvenile and foolish. I am sorry to see them.

  26. s.m.
    May 6th, 2008 | 14:06

    I commented a few days ago about this is a great site keep the personal beliefs out of it..etc etc. I just today managed to come back to this site and to see mr-x is a staff member has completely and forever changed my opinion on this site. The truth of it is yes govt. lie ..anyone who says other is an idiot. However it makes no diff. here. Many people were killed many lifes forever changed .. and that is where focus should be. Those victims had no part of the plan regardless of who did it. The people in the towers were innocent. I also must say I served in the army ..I was out before the wars but again the 99.99% percent of the soldiers killed were there for pure reasons..when they say soldiers fight for their buddies that is the truth. They are there for honorable reasons and they died there for it. When you tell those people they died for lies your wrong. They died to try and help the people .. Finally it doesn’t matter american french german yellow red who cares. The fact remains that people died a lot of them. And as stated before that is the part that should matter. One last thing you cant wipe your as without in coming out before you even flush..remember the president the blow job the impeachment attempt’s ? If even one person helped or knew it would be on youtube before the buildings fell.

  27. s.m.
    May 6th, 2008 | 14:32

    the last part of my post was missing so I will try again..What I was saying is to see that Mr. X is “staff” I totaly changed my opinion on this site.. It is very telling when “staff” talk to the people who make their site what it is I.E. us the surfers. No question what you think of us. Well I for one don’t let anyone bend me over and then come back for more. You guys have lost me as a “supporter” as there are plenty more sites out there that are exactly the same as this. Now I can only guess what the response will be to this …so what… what differance will that make and the answer is simple… It might not be as damaging as one would hope .. but..I can rest easy knowing that as long as you guys keep it up there will be many more behind me the only thing that would keep my support is to get rid of mr.x.. Not for having the beliefs he does but for the rude comments… I can name 10 more sites that even post links faster than this one but I wont..

  28. TRUTH MAN
    May 16th, 2008 | 19:48

    do you want some other truth that you dont know you will be surrprised that things is not as what you see and think go and visit here to learn more about hard truth http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

Pages: « 1 [2]

Your Ad Here

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!