Releaselog

Mega Structures Shanghai Super Tower WS PDTV XviD-FTP

Posted on 03.05.2008 at 06:18 in TV Shows by Mr. X

Watching the mega-structure type shows always gets me to wonder in amazement at what the power of technology can do. In this one, again by FTP (keep up the great work) covers the creation of the 101 floor Shanghai World Finacial Centre in mainland China. Warning contains 9/11 propaganda so in order to off-set the imbalance: ae911truth.org

The Shanghai World Financial Centre will, on completion, be mainland China’s tallest building. At 101 floors tall, the skyscraper has been built to withstand anything nature and man can throw at it

:arrow: Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP
640×352 25 – vbr mp3 128 – 350MB
Search Torrent – Search Usenet – NFO

* Comments(128)

Comments (128)

Feel free to post your Mega Structures Shanghai Super Tower WS PDTV XviD-FTP torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
  1. Kurt Cobain
    May 3rd, 2008 | 06:21

    Made in China.

    Let’s see how long this will last…

  2. fl0w
    May 3rd, 2008 | 06:26

    Man… 911 propaganda? Dude.

  3. amibanned?
    May 3rd, 2008 | 06:26

    hahah kurt – made in seattle – let’s see how long he’ll last
    *gunshot* ahem…

    reading the details ‘built to withstand anything god or man will throw at it’ sounds like a challenge!

  4. forever
    May 3rd, 2008 | 06:38

    I believe it will last forever since it isn’t build in the US territory.

  5. links
    May 3rd, 2008 | 06:39

    biroad.net links please

  6. Mr.Ceeeeee
    May 3rd, 2008 | 06:53

    i never knew about wtc building 7 till today :O

  7. Mr Roboto
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:02

    Any other links for this? Rapidshare or torrents? Thanks

  8. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:03

    Mr. X is spot on with his take on the propaganda, in fact, I have inside knowledge that there were actually 5 WTC towers that collapsed that day, in fact, another one just fell down a few moments ago. Doubt it will even make the news …god damn U.S gov’t! Also, I’m pissed and obsessed with a country across the world because they have waaay bigger d*ck than me!

  9. Mr. X staff member
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:05

    lol they clearly show a clip of the thermate cutter charges emitting molten metal from a closeup of one of the WTC buildings. talk about blowing their cover on the whole official story they were pushing for the jet-fuel theory.
    http://i27.tinypic.com/14622r.jpg
    http://i25.tinypic.com/nmko0m.jpg

  10. some_guy
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:05

    get over it people. 911 is planned by the U.S. idiots

  11. Anon
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:10

    Loose Change 911.
    Awesome Movie

  12. Tito
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:23

    children and hippies, the only ppl that believe in cospiracy theories.

  13. H
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:25

    whats with all the conspiracy theories?

    try watching this
    penn and teller are gold

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-V1bXs_5Io

  14. Strange Wilderness
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:25

    Anyone got a Strange Wilderness DVDrip? Think he retail come out this week so I don’t know if I missed the non-cam rip

  15. CIVITATIS NOVI EBORACI
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:26

    Mr. X you are an idiot! As a former FDNY paramedic who saw BOTH planes hit with his own two eyes, I find it hard to believe the WTC was wired with explosives. How would you wire buildings the size of the WTC with explosives without having any of the more than 50,000 people that work there notice?

    Martin, we come to this site for news about releases, NOT to have loony propaganda shoved down our throats!

  16. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:38

    Mr. X said, “lol they clearly show a clip of the thermate cutter charges emitting molten metal from a closeup of one of the WTC buildings. talk about blowing their cover on the whole official story they were pushing for the jet-fuel theory.”

    Hmm… 900,000 lb Hunk of metal with a load of JET FUEL, or “thermate cutter charges” shown in a grainy ass 1980’s point and click camera shown from National Geographic site. Why haven’t they opened a formal investigation again?!

    P.S. I also have inside information on this also, the U.S. government ac

  17. t0ucan
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:40

    Thanks for the release, but we dont need your propaganda fed to us, take it out this is a rls site not a personal opion one. If you belive the US rigged this up your an utter complete moron, grow up.

  18. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:43

    Mr. X said, “lol they clearly show a clip of the thermate cutter charges emitting molten metal from a closeup of one of the WTC buildings. talk about blowing their cover on the whole official story they were pushing for the jet-fuel theory.”

    Hmm… 900,000 lb Hunk of metal with a load of JET FUEL, or “thermate cutter charges” shown in a grainy ass 1980’s point and click camera shown from National Geographic site. Why haven’t they opened a formal investigation again?!

    P.S. I also have inside information on this also, the U.S. government actually controls National Geographic, they released these picture of the “thermate cutter charges” so they could get madd hits for Google ads, now they are banking off you’re asses! You poor fools! You will never outsmart us! Also our D*ck is still waay bigger than yours and your little man complex is duly noted!

  19. ross kemp? more like ross snitch
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:44

    Take a look at the collapse of building 7 of WTC. then you will have serious doubt about the official and the only one investigation.

    there’s a good enough evidence to suspect that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111

    you paramedical noobs

  20. mjamal14
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:44

    I had a question are tv show torrents illegal.like dvdrip torrents are illegal.but tv shows are free to air.are they copyrighted or somethin

  21. Mr. X staff member
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:49

    re: 13
    you find it hard to believe they were wired with explosives because you do not know about the elevator ‘modernization’ plan, possibly used to put the military grade explosives in the building’s core.

    16: how tough is it to figure out jet fuel does not burn hot enough to weaken the high-grade steel of the WTC. there are a million 911 truth websites, and ones such as the ae911 website that engineers have busted this a million times over. as for the ‘why havent a formal investigation’ argument it could be because you’ve never heard of something called a media blackout.

    17. personal attacks are immature. if you don’t know that the US has partaken and planned many operations of ‘false flag terrorism’ in the past, it’s not too hard to make the connection as a reasoning for the 911 attacks as well. if you don’t learn about history you’re doomed to repeat it. morons like you especially like to come here and post ignorant comments.

  22. mjamal14
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:52

    can some one reply @20

  23. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:53

    The insults always coming from the side of “anti-america” are the always blatantly obvious ‘tell’ to most people with 2 eyes of extreme bias and agenda. At least try and hide it by talking as if you’re coming from an understand point of view, cause sh!t, you aren’t fooling anybody.

  24. MrMagoo
    May 3rd, 2008 | 07:59

    @20
    Yes they are.

  25. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:08

    “17. personal attacks are immature. if you don’t know that the US has partaken and planned many operations of ‘false flag terrorism’ in the past, it’s not too hard to make the connection as a reasoning for the 911 attacks as well. if you don’t learn about history you’re doomed to repeat it. morons like you especially like to come here and post ignorant comments.”

    Pot meet kettle? Come on now Mr. X you are going to have to show some signs of being somewhat philosophically adept, before we can start taking your judgments on the evidence that you have have presented before us.

    Honestly though I haven’t really looked into it very much, cause I mean… why would the U.S. Gov’t take such a great risk of getting caught over this just so they can kill their own family members and friends or acc at the very least, cause that’s what they would have been doing. Big money in the Towers = our U.S. Gov’t

  26. Mutu
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:14

    How to download this? those links dont give anything :(

  27. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:21

    This thread reminds me of the time when the U.S. Government forgot to put stars in the background of the moon landing. They’ll just have to jot this down on a notepad so they remember not to show the ‘thermate cutter charges’ next time.

  28. CIVITATIS NOVI EBORACI
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:29

    Mr. X, if the US government blew up the WTC with the intention of going to war with Iraq and Afghanistan, why didn’t the US government plant some WMDs in Iraq to justify the war? If the US government is so good at keeping these conspiracies a secret, why couldn’t they keep things like the Watergate scandal out of the papers? Or the Iran-Contra, I could go on all night…

    And Mr.X the fact that steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn’t have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C

    http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

  29. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:37

    CIVITATIS NOVI EBORACI, ummm… steel doesn’t really need this so called “strength” to hold up buildings like the WTC, that’s usually reserved for the big ones, so stop it with your propaganda already!

  30. 9/11 dude
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:46

    Does anyone remember that the goverment was doing a terrisom test on the same day this happend, and mr x is right about the steel it has been proven so many times, im not sayin the goverment has did this but someone has done this within are own country to cover up alot of things, its called pretend are country is getting hit and terrision and it gives u the right to invade any country you feel i forget the word for it i wish i could remember… everything bout the 9/11 things most are false but there is so much evidence to back up so many things the steel, the one building that feel like if there was a demolition going on, which was the most crazy evidence of them all, there where explosives in the basement of the trade centers videos of the buildings and the bombs going off do your research people the usa sucks the goverment rules all, corperations, we are going downhill bush wanted to get to iraq for oil this whole country is going down and its the republicans fault for voting bush in, in the first place :P

  31. Mr. T
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:47

    It is kinda ridiculous to think that WTC was destroyed with explosives… I mean if you’re going to have a comment like that over the death of over a thousand people, where’s your credibility? Seriously, you’re speaking like you know every detail such as “you find it hard to believe they were wired with explosives because you do not know about the elevator ‘modernization’ plan, possibly used to put the military grade explosives in the building’s core.” So, modernization plan? Why don’t you tell us more about it, Mr.X. Or it is just another mumbo jumbo you saw on TV or read off the “forums”? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:GhxftwB9R7sJ:www.infowhores.co.uk/11-9-2001.html+melting+point+of+high+grade+steel+was+used+in+WTC&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us look at the link, it requires only about 300*C to begin to weaken the steel. With the intense heat caused by the airplane fuel, don’t you think it’s more than enough to weaken the steel structures of the building? Seriously, conspiracy without actual evidences is weak. What’s the point of destroying a financial building to risk stalling/lagging the economy? For Christ’s sake, our President is a Republican. The majority of business owners and rich people are Republican. So, what’s the point of doing something to affect the economy and risk losing their money? Well, think about it. Would you be stupid enough to go out and mess up your economy so you could lose money?

  32. uneeq
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:49

    Damn..hate to be on the top floor in that building.

  33. 9/11 dude
    May 3rd, 2008 | 08:50

    bush has already screwed ar economy up havent u noticed or are you blind ?????????

  34. nighthawk
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:00

    is there any adrive links for this pls? im ofcourse referring to the mega structures ep..

  35. CIVITATIS NOVI EBORACI
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:12

    “that’s usually reserved for the big ones” what? what big ones?

  36. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:13

    In all fairness when Mr. X wrote that qoute about the elevator plans I’m betting 90% percent of the readers realized he was talking completely out of his a$$ at that point. Especially when this info was a supplement to the big tip off, “thermate cutter charges’ you guys seen them? They are absolutely fascinating.

    Here, lets take a look at them again.

    http://i27.tinypic.com/14622r.jpg

    I know that one was awesome and absolutely shocking ancient rock painting, but just wait till you check out this one!

    http://i25.tinypic.com/nmko0m.jpg

    All I can say is wow, wow, WOW!

  37. tony
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:16

    if anyone wants this i can create some invites to get it from funfile.org leave me a message here cheers tony.

  38. tony
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:18

    by the way i now have a new computer after my other one overheated.now running a amd2 5600 with vista home prem 64.

  39. nasim
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:21

    link pls…

  40. hiface
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:22

    guys, can we please cut hte argument and post the vid links? megashares? rapidshares even? or whatever yall can do

  41. tony
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:26

    sorry my credits for invites have being disable ill talk to the admin.

  42. Netranger
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:32

    Where are the rapidshare files?

  43. Nein
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:48

    MrX is just an attention whore who trolls often with no regard to whom she offends.I suspect, simply to raise hit count on her mediocre and unintelligible posts…

    Reality check Science from a CREDIBLE source on a website that wasn’t “made at home”
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

    Loose Change Tin Foil Battalions arguments destroyed

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=stVmEmJ666M
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=1d0XEHahJ2Q
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=T_Fm3Zc7D8I
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=lpckijMVe3I
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=fEg6XEP-Cig

  44. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 09:54

    Testing… testing… anyone been having problems with their messages not being diplayed?

  45. bob
    May 3rd, 2008 | 10:02

    no download links!!!

  46. paul van douch-baggen
    May 3rd, 2008 | 10:34

    links please links please links please links please links please links please links please links please

  47. F2
    May 3rd, 2008 | 10:36

    Thanks for this post Mr X! Any chance of RS links pleaaase people?

  48. indianpunk
    May 3rd, 2008 | 10:37

    um OT i guess, What do you call it when they show days of construction in a few minutes , tht really looks amazing

  49. cheese
    May 3rd, 2008 | 11:08

    Yeah mr. x that 9/11 truth link? WTF that just shows your stupidity in so many ways

  50. nu
    May 3rd, 2008 | 11:09

    i agree with Mr X

    i could understand a building collapsing, but i dont see how a building that size could collapse straight down and at free fall (or near) speed after not being on fire for very long

    and how could a basic fire cause the same event to happen in #7?

  51. H
    May 3rd, 2008 | 11:35

    “i could understand a building collapsing, but i dont see how a building that size could collapse straight down and at free fall (or near) speed after not being on fire for very long”

    you dont see how?
    are you a structural engineer?

  52. lol wut
    May 3rd, 2008 | 11:49

    conspiracy movies are as much filled with propaganda than the news on the TV.
    Theres prolly some truth but still a lot is just plain bull…

    the reason those theories are so popular is coz everyone hates bush and america.

  53. grimpr
    May 3rd, 2008 | 12:05

    9/11…Rooseveltian tactics,just like what Franklin did in the WWII Pearl Harbor attack, intercept communications, prepare for the imminent attack, sacrifice a few,grab the right for the much greater global political and economic interest of the United States. Pearl Harbor + 9/11…two historical excuses for the United States to go for official war.

  54. ke
    May 3rd, 2008 | 12:17

    lots of babble and no links :(

  55. imbalanced
    May 3rd, 2008 | 12:45

    here you go guys.

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4170173

  56. Roland
    May 3rd, 2008 | 12:46

    9/11 conspiracy BS aside, does anyone have download links or a torrent for this? I like watching these architectural shows, but I can’t find this anywhere.

  57. imbalanced
    May 3rd, 2008 | 12:49

    im just seeding it.

  58. hodad
    May 3rd, 2008 | 13:21

    apparently if you call people stupid that buy into the whole 911 conspiracy theory, then your comments here will not be posted. Get over your obsession with America. There are tons of countries I can’t stand, but that fact doesnt make its way into all my posts on the internet. I do find it funny that so many people act like they know everything when they have NO IDEA what’s really going on. I wish our love for the scene would transcend our hate for humanity here.

  59. saywhy
    May 3rd, 2008 | 13:40

    I am sorry I got to stick up for my Government this time…Most of you all sound like the smartest cats in the world, but with the dumbest ideals…about bombs being planted, that is a funny one(maybe in 1993), we used it to go to war, still laughing….Do we risk going to war with other countries over wanting to go to war with Afgan? Wasn’t other counties in the trade center, so by us blowing up the trade center or allowing it didn’t we mess with their economic growth, or financial growth? Now we would be going to war with 30 countries, but are we no we are not? As for the jet-fuel theory you all are not looking at the bigger picture…You are right the jet-fuel doesn’t get hot enough to melt steel, but paper does it gets up to 2500 degrees if the conditions are right, and at 110 stories I think it was right back drafts takes fires and turns them into a bomb, by just opening up a door……And seeing these was offices, got a lot of paper, wood for the desks so yes a lot of fuel…Now lets think about the stress placed on the building. The jet was 159 ft long 156 feet wide, and 395,000lbs if full of fuel…and flying at Mach 0.80 or 530mph(851Kmh)…Yes I am pretty sure from the impact at the weakest point of the structure(top)compromised the integrity of the steel for all 47 columns constructing the core…The best way I can put it is a wrecking ball they are normally 1000lbs to 12000lbs and they take a building down with less impact…Or take your finger push your forehead push hard enough you will fall…One thing I know we did not do this to our country friends and families…But thanks for the share…

  60. WujouMao
    May 3rd, 2008 | 13:42

    oh now Alian Robert will be pleased. a new building to climb

  61. SeanB
    May 3rd, 2008 | 14:13

    Censor my comments Mr.X? Get a life. If you cant debate like a rational person, dont open your mouth.

  62. s.m.
    May 3rd, 2008 | 14:35

    I just want to say thank you for such a great site. However I come here for movies not to have somebody force their beliefs on me.It ticks me off that I have to read this junk in a forum like this. I dont come on the site and leave comments about my personal beliefs and I dont want to hear yours either, especially about a topic this touchy. Just tell me if the picture quality is good ..

  63. SeanB
    May 3rd, 2008 | 14:40

    Agreed!

  64. tito
    May 3rd, 2008 | 14:49

    rapidshare?

    p.s. anyone arguing over this with mrx is a tool. cant you judge his intelligence from his posts?

  65. Hmmz
    May 3rd, 2008 | 14:52

    I don’t appreciate the propaganda comment, or anything similar, on what should be a scene release website.

  66. iSteve iJobs
    May 3rd, 2008 | 15:46

    @saywhy.

    I still can not find these damn jet engines on Pentagon lawn. Even though I am using Mac with Windows XP SP3 installed and looking at photos made at different angles and times right after impact.

  67. john dykes
    May 3rd, 2008 | 15:50

    911? get over it. was it a sad/horrible thing? yes. do i feel bad for the families that have lost a loved one? very much so.

    but to be honest, there are far more worse things happening in the world which most of us will never even hear about, just because it doesn’t involve westerners.

    but make no mistake, don’t let your emotions or anger misguide you into believing everything the government throws at you. to blindly believe that 911 was a straightforward terrorist attack masterminded by osama is easy, everyone is capable of doing that.

    to not even take into consideration, that there might be a bigger truth behind all of it, is just plain naive. who knows, maybe the whole thing was exclusively masterminded by some very very powerful people, more powerful than the president. maybe the government didn’t even know about it. we as observers will never find out the whole truth.

  68. 3xkrazy
    May 3rd, 2008 | 16:07

    Most American are to stupid to even doubt anything told to them, why else would they be dumb enuff to vote for Bush even after his first term.I guess American like the way he kill all over the world.American only care bout them selves and will kill anybody or take over any country they want to maintain power there worse then Nazi cause they are more stupid

  69. suolas
    May 3rd, 2008 | 16:07

    If you REALLY want a doc about 9/11 Without the conspiracy theories, try “Truth & Lies of 9/11″ Follow the paper trail, as the guy says, the main reason American’s don’t believe is because ‘They don’t read.’ The answers are right under your noses in the public domain, yet you don’t have the noodles to investigate and read them for yourselves.
    shame.

  70. Pro
    May 3rd, 2008 | 16:19

    netload or file factory links?

  71. Mr. X staff member
    May 3rd, 2008 | 16:24

    23, 25, 27, 28, 31, 36, 43, 49, 51, 52
    I would like these people to attempt to explain to me, by backing up their ‘official story’ they are pushing, to explain the progressive, free-fall speed of building 7 of the WTC. And no, it was not damaged enough by wreckage or fires to make it collapse like that. Any sane person watching the collapse of building 7 can conclude something fishy was going on. not to mention all those ‘coincedental’ corporations that had office in building 7, but that’s irrelavent to it collasping like that, right ?

    and especially reserved for 59:
    explain how you never heard that the WTC buildings were strategically desinged for the impact of 737 airplanes (the biggest commercial airlines at the time)
    how do you explain that the weakest point of the tower is at the top ? the tower was essentially a ‘mesh’ screen on the outside, sort of like your screen door in your kitchen. you push a pencil through the screen and it still stands. at the centre of all this mesh, lays a huge steel core. this was the design idea for the WTC buildings. futhermore if fire hypothesys you are pushing were to hold true, you would just see the top segment of the building with impact completely topple over, not become pulverized into concrete and steel meteorites. remember it’s a fact that no high-rise building has ever progressivesly collapsed at free-fall speed, due to fires.

  72. RAPIDSHARE ONLY
    May 3rd, 2008 | 16:57

    WHERE IS RAPIDSHARE LINK?

  73. SM
    May 3rd, 2008 | 17:01

    You have to congratulate the Bush administration on getting Al-Qaeda to go along with the whole airplane thing. (sarcasm off)

  74. cjcarlos
    May 3rd, 2008 | 17:37

    I’ve seen on tv building been demolished and them setting up the charges in specific points in the building. for the explosion. so that the build falls striate down so it doesn’t damage the builds around it.and when i saw the wtc falling it reminded me of that.so you have to ask your would a plane hitting the wtc like that so high cores the building to fall the way it did.

  75. Luke
    May 3rd, 2008 | 17:41

    76 posts and not one RS link

  76. KILLERNUTTZ
    May 3rd, 2008 | 17:43

    http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf
    What I want to know is this…
    If two airliners caused the steel in the two towers to weaken and collapse, then why was melted steel found under all THREE buildings? Not weakened steel under the buildings, but melted steel. What could do that?
    http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/red_hot_ground_zero_low_quality.wmv

    Also…
    After two airliners have been hijacked and flown into the wtc towers, how in the world did a third airliner even reach the Pentagon. The airspace around the Pentagon and Washington is restricted and wouldn’t they be on lookout for a plane heading that way? Don’t they have airforce bases close by on alert? Does the Pentagon have surface to air missiles? And what is up with Norman Minetas testimony in front of the 911 commission, and why didn’t it make it in their final report?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y
    This is just some of my questions, I have lots more.

  77. Pop006
    May 3rd, 2008 | 17:52

    The BEST post are the ones you want to download, but there are no links

  78. SeanB
    May 3rd, 2008 | 18:23

    It’s time to get rid of Mr X.

    Somehow he’s forgotten this is a RELEASE SITE.

  79. dbz
    May 3rd, 2008 | 18:35

    RS links:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112272704/Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112276513/Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112280516/Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112284635/Mega.Structures.Shanghai.Super.Tower.WS.PDTV.XviD-FTP.part4.rar

    no pass.

  80. duffy
    May 3rd, 2008 | 18:55

    Thanks DBZ, 80 comments without a link or torrent, the rest of you are farcking lame.

    Twelve contains the numbers one and two, just like the toilet yesterday where somebody went number two instead of number one! And one and two with 911 and you get 914! Drop the 4 and it’s 91! Exactly the score Kyle got on his spelling test twelve days after 9/11! Who has the most to gain from 9/11?! Kyle! Who was nowhere to be found the morning the towers fell?! Kyle! Who dropped the deuce in the urinal?! Kyle! But probably the most damning of all is the evidence seen in this photo of Tower 2! When I zoomed in I saw what first appeared to be a blur, but when I computer-enhanced it, You almost got away with it, you sneaky butt hole.

  81. The Walrus
    May 3rd, 2008 | 18:56

    Dbz. thanx for RS links….

  82. steveo
    May 3rd, 2008 | 19:01

    cheers DBZ muchos grassyarse ;)

  83. wow
    May 3rd, 2008 | 19:11

    the whole thing is stupid…terrorists tried to attack the wtc before and failed so they did again and succeeded

    i love the notion that bush some how outsmarted 99.9% of americans (except for people like you Mr. X) but in any other situation hes a illiterate redneck

    also lets say the government wanted to goto war for oil…why then would they set up a democratic government that recieves all the revenues…before the iraq war saddam was pumping out more oil that he was supposed to under opec

    the whole idea goes back to a lone ranger psychology….that it takes one good guy to do away with a bunch of bad guys but it takes a bunch of bad guys to do something so terrible

  84. Mr. T
    May 3rd, 2008 | 19:12

    LOL Mr.X, it’s like you say “I believe Intelligent Design is real, now prove me wrong.” You discredit yourself when asking people to explain or provide proofs for your theory. That is just ridiculous. Were you there when the towers fall? Were you the one that came and touched and investigated the Ground Zero? How do you know that it was a designed incident? Show us the proofs beside what you “see” on TV. We do not trust your eyes, Mr.X. Do you remember how long it took for human to realize the Earth is not flat and that the sun does not rotate around the Earth. Seeing can be deceiving. Judging by your statement “remember it’s a fact that no high-rise building has ever progressivesly collapsed at free-fall speed, due to fires”, you do not major in or study science, do you? How do you know it’s a fact, Mr.X? How do you know your statement will be true for every situation and scenario? I mean with the credential of the government vs. your credential, I wonder who would I believe in? You did not even tell us where you are from, but you seem to be somewhat “anti-American”. Unless you provide evidences more than your “eye evidences”. All of these conspiracies are weak. Hypothesis is just another falsify statement. Providing evidences more than what you see, the actual evidences please. And please, please, please…… providing evidence instead of giving us more and more non sense hypothesis and asking us to go proving your hypothesis is false.

  85. Rob
    May 3rd, 2008 | 19:21

    Lol useless fighting on the internet,
    almost like the special olimpics, u may win, but ur still ret*rded

  86. kik5u
    May 3rd, 2008 | 19:36

    LOL mr t is like “media cant lie to us, I wont believe it noo noo noo noo”. :D This document below will really open your eyes:
    http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/3650648/Loose_Change_2nd_Edition_-_911_Conspiracy_-_Perfect_Quality.3650648.TPB.torrent

  87. InvisibleMan
    May 3rd, 2008 | 20:29

    http://911.magnify.net

  88. OMG
    May 3rd, 2008 | 20:53

    And the best post award goes to #82 and #87!! Good job guys!!! You made the most sense.

  89. Derek
    May 3rd, 2008 | 21:18

    Ok, this is funny stuff. Mr. X has got nothing… so now,and ever so predictably, he tries to take a sidestep by then asking for us to prove that somebody(who he himself doesn’t even know is) didn’t actually plant a bomb. Nice. If nothing else, that some good comedic relief.

    You guys realize that a 747 was also flown into the Pentagon right? Did they pick straws to determine what side of the building they were going to blow up? Actually…I’m starting to think I’ve gotten ‘had’ here, that you’re really actually just throwing sh!t out there to fuel hits to the site.

    If that’s not the case then it’s pretty obvious all you’re trying to do is convince people by finding whatever means to to try and reach the end that you so desperately want to believe be true, I hope for your sake that most of your beliefs are void of this irrational line of thinking. The radicals are NEVER right. If you want to do the world good, change yourself for the better first, cause that’s the only thing you can control, if everyone did that, there would be a whole lot less problems in our world.

  90. jj
    May 3rd, 2008 | 22:12

    who cares about 9/11 it was like 7 years ago, move on people

  91. hodad
    May 3rd, 2008 | 22:19

    I love this site, but if mr.x keeps it up I will revert back to NFO’s, samples & IMDB ratings to get my release info. That is all release log uses. They don’t even watch the releases before they get commented on. If you have anymore useless garble to sputter out just keep it to yourself b/c you sound like an ignorant pr1ck and you instantly lose credibility with half your readers.

  92. CrystyXp
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:00

    Please look at this !

    this make me wonder :( (

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PCr8CyG1Sg

    Just God will know what was :( and he will be punished

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PCr8CyG1Sg

    I Can`t Belive it !!!

  93. CrystyXp
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:04

    maybe will know that someday

    i`m sure

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2QAh0rBrew

    2 aircraft allways suspicios

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2QAh0rBrew

    everything will be know some day

  94. imbalanced
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:06

    At 77 , Duffy

    “Thanks DBZ, 80 comments without a link or torrent, the rest of you are farcking lame. ”

    look at post 55 and see torrent , learn to read lamer.

  95. Beaver
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:12

    Thanks a lot for the RS links!!!

  96. CrystyXp
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:23

    HERE IS THE LINK GUYS !!!!

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4170173

    FOR THIS TORRENT !!!

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4170173

    GOOD LUCK !!!

  97. Mr. X staff member
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:25

    what a useless argument with 91 and 86, cant even begin to rant about how brainwashed and hopeless they are

  98. Nulo
    May 3rd, 2008 | 23:40

    http://rapidshare.com/files/112319710/ftp-natgeomegastructuresshanghaisupertowerwspdtvxvid.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112326067/ftp-natgeomegastructuresshanghaisupertowerwspdtvxvid.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112332165/ftp-natgeomegastructuresshanghaisupertowerwspdtvxvid.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/112338439/ftp-natgeomegastructuresshanghaisupertowerwspdtvxvid.part4.rar

    password
    http://www.forum-maximus.net

  99. Old Commie Pinko Degenerate
    May 4th, 2008 | 00:03

    I’ve come to this debate far too late but firstly lemme say that when I was kid most people believed that more than one person (L Oswald) shot the lowlife Kennedy. Now peeps got really obssesed by it much like this whole tower 7 thing except in that plot it was the ‘4th bullet’. Eventually as time and logic prevailed people came to see how it is one bloke could off the prez of amerika. But they were so obsessed by the conspiracy by right wingers thing with kennedy they never looked at what really happened to Martin Luther King.

    A lot of the obsession about wtc stems from an unwillingness to believe 14 middle class egyptian grad students could wreak so much havoc without some sort of ‘big plan’. The root of the theories are essentially racist an unwillingness to believe that a handful of ‘ragheads’ could cause so much destruction. It is assisted with the ridiculous assertions by the state security apparatus of amerika who failed to prevent the attack, then claiming that every arab nationalist since Saladin was in on the plot. Maybe some others helped with the money but the plot was essentially planned and implemented by the men who died that day. OBL had nothing to do with it but in between his boasts and amerikan alphabet soups (cia, fbi, nas etc) ass covering most peeps have been deluded into believing that he did. Because the official story is full of lies peeps who don’t want to face the fact that nothing can be protected from a band of people who are smart and determined, have fallen for all the insane theories. People who reckoned kennedy was assassinated by wingers also couldn’t face the reality; that one man could kill the prez so easily.

    There is a great article on the physics of how the wtc collpsed here.
    http://www.counterpunch.org/physic11282006.html
    The bloke who wrote its a respected physics professor with no ax to grind

    he also explains what happened in building 7 here:

    http://www.counterpunch.org/darkfire11282006.html

  100. saywhy
    May 4th, 2008 | 01:44

    @Mr X quoted is you just throwing that out there….
    “and especially reserved for 59:
    explain how you never heard that the WTC buildings were strategically desinged for the impact of 737 airplanes (the biggest commercial airlines at the time)”….Well Mr.X explain to me how you heard that the WTC buildings were strategically designed for the impact of a Boeing 767? Which is 2 times the size of the above 737 that you stated? Did your studies show you along the way that it was really a 707 that it was design for and not the 737? http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm So at this point I am done speaking about jets, for I see you just type to speak with out any full meaning behind them….But to answer your question no I never had heard about the WTC being designed for the 737…Sorry I missed that one,like I said I thought it was 707…”how do you explain that the weakest point of the tower is at the top ?” Do I really have to I mean honestly come on, for you to sit there and ask me that is a little crazy but okay…Where is the foundation at in a building? The top point is not braced to anything only the bottom part is…Which for a skyscraper the foundation support beams are where? Drilled into bedrock…..So the top point sways as the bottom foundation stays firm….Weakest point the top for a freestanding structure…As for “the tower was essentially a ‘mesh’ screen on the outside, sort of like your screen door in your kitchen. you push a pencil through the screen and it still stands. at the center of all this mesh, lays a huge steel core.” Yeah you lost me…I know under OSHA rules you have to have safety nets around the building so one doesn’t fall out or things doesn’t fall off, but it is way thicker then what you are saying you can poke a pencil through…So you are telling me when you seen the jet fly into the side and come out the opposite side the 47 steel beam core did not become damaged? Yes the structure was truly compromised at that point in time…You really don’t deal with construction do you? So I am going to leave that one alone as well…

    One last thing….”furthermore if fire hypothesis you are pushing were to hold true, you would just see the top segment of the building with impact completely topple over, not become pulverized into concrete and steel meteorites. remember it’s a fact that no high-rise building has ever progressively collapsed at free-fall speed, due to fires.” As for the fire it could hold true for paper really does get up to 2500 degrees when the conditions are right…In them buildings everything would be backed up electronically and by paper so lots of it…You would have to would, you trust 50 million dollars just by disk? I know I wouldn’t…I am sure they had gas lines running through out the building we know they had fuel underground and 4 inch main gas lines(which did catch on fire), we also know that the elevator shafts go straight down…So the fire and could of traveled down the shafts with the oxygen flow in them shafts I am sure it help spread…
    And no I am not brained washed….I just have my own thoughts and ideals and that is what I am using nothing more nothing less…Thank you for the Debate Mr.X

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply