Comments on: Kung Fu Panda 2008 720P BLURAY X264-OUTDATED

By: Conan

Conan — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:05:06 +0000

@22

the link is dead

can someone please post the last 2 parts into megaupload.
Thanks

By: MovieFan

MovieFan — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:29:47 +0000

A better comparison with proper screenshots.

Chakra:
http://i37.tinypic.com/spug3o.jpg

OUTDATED:
http://i37.tinypic.com/14w4p5f.jpg

As you can see the OUTDATED release is much sharper.

By: MovieFan

MovieFan — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:29:12 +0000

Nevermind, I was using someone else’s screenshots of the Chakra release and I think it was fake because it doesn’t have the black bars on the top/bottom that the Chakra release has.

By: MovieFan

MovieFan — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:09:46 +0000

Kung.Fu.Panda.720p.BD5.x264-Chakra
http://i34.tinypic.com/2vmzx3c.png

Kung.Fu.Panda.720p.BluRay.x264-OUTDATED
http://i33.tinypic.com/x6myps.jpg

And the outdated sample doesn’t look more blurry because of the JPG compression

By: MovieFan

MovieFan — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:03:56 +0000

By the way, here’s a link to the video sample in case anyone wants to check it out for themselves.

By: MovieFan

MovieFan — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:47:42 +0000

OK, I don’t want to add more fuel to this fire, and I’ll just leave it how it is and let people get whatever version they want of this. If you don’t mind a bigger file size, get the 1080 4GB release. If you want smaller size get the 720 2GB release.
About the gradient in the image I posted from this release, it was actually because of the image format/compression itself, and not the video source (I got the image from someone else’s post, which wasn’t a good idea I guess). I looked a the original video and the gradient is much smoother.
OK, I’ll leave it be now.

By: Jason

Jason — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:34:27 +0000

Those were some lame responses… guys, I just can’t get dumb enough to be at your level so you cold comprehend what I’m saying.

By: nzb

nzb — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:39:21 +0000

nzb file

Kung Fu Panda 2008 720P BLURAY X264 OUTDATED

http://www.adrive.com/public/0a6ec19e499c32e955d8d98f1997b1df9960bf67b226d1d2c434cc751b2b799e.html

By: mr cool

mr cool — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:27:15 +0000

he thinks hes tops because his name is jason like jason bourne.

looking at the sample, this isnt the clearest ive seen but more then watchable. i only just finished downloading this when the 1080p version came out.

By: Speed

Speed — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:49:23 +0000

@Jason

You seem to speak as though there is very little a difference between 2GB and 4GB. If your eyes don’t see it then its your lack of visual perception and it is really sad that you don’t have that sense. Even more sad is you pounce on someone who does see quality. More importantly 4GB fits nicely into a DVD and most people like that.

So next time.. do think before you type your baseless ramble and shove that 12bit output up your brain, Mr. Know all Jedi!

By: Death260

Death260 — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:39:16 +0000

#28, netload parts are in #11

By: piglett666

piglett666 — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:33:29 +0000

netload 400MB parts plz & thx

By: samuralast

samuralast — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:54:10 +0000

@19 MEGASHARES MEGASHARES MEGASHARES

THANKS!! IT ON ROLLING BABY!!

By: Jason

Jason — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:47:16 +0000

MovieFan, I’m talking about image compression… nut overall compression. And yeah, I don’t know anything about it!

With your examples you just pointed out how dumb you are. FACT! )

700MB with 1.4 GB vs 2+ GB with DVD5 is not a very good comparison, Snips! Then why not release the damn thing in native H264 or VC1? Oh… cause it’s over 30GB in size!!!

Thing about CD releases is that it’s SCENE rule, and of course most iNTERNALs will be 1.4 even if the first good release was 700. That’s why it’s a bad comparison.

In this case, 2 or 3GB is suffice cause ppl today use various storage devices with various sizes. Some use HDDs, others large capacity DVDs. So the rule of the size of the release was left up to the sceners!

The larger Madagascar looks a bit better, but not enough to justify a 125% increase in file size. Grated, it might have better audio. If you want pirated content, you get what’s best… if you want to keep it for a personal collection, YOU BUY IT!

Also about the gradient… that shows how less you know about IMAGE (DUDE!!!) compression! Not the general term “compression”.
That image was done using a 12 bit output format which can be processed faster, stored using less space than RGB and is not noticeable in MOTION. True, when taking a core frame you will see the difference, but in motion… most likely you won’t. have you ever done image processing?… or opened PS? Guess not!

You have a lot to learn my young padawan!

By: lost

lost — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:12:00 +0000

@23 if you’ve got a somewhat decent (at least 1280 in horizontal resolution) display and if you’re PC is capable of playing back 720p content you’re gonna notice the difference for sure.