<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel to release faster Penryn chips in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:02:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ehime</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49322</link>
		<dc:creator>ehime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49322</guid>
		<description>@tumw tldr....

i believe they don&#039;t release a 30ghz proc 
because nothing on the market could USE it, 
things would have to be totally revamped, 
memory would have to keep up, and what do 
you rls after you drop the 30g bomb? Gimme
that proc and I&#039;m not buying another one 
for..... a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tumw tldr&#8230;.</p>
<p>i believe they don&#8217;t release a 30ghz proc<br />
because nothing on the market could USE it,<br />
things would have to be totally revamped,<br />
memory would have to keep up, and what do<br />
you rls after you drop the 30g bomb? Gimme<br />
that proc and I&#8217;m not buying another one<br />
for&#8230;.. a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49221</link>
		<dc:creator>TM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49221</guid>
		<description>http://www.altavista.com/web/results?q=apartheid+intel

http://www.google.com/search?q=apartheid+intel

http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=apartheid+intel

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=apartheid+intel


tells you all you need to know about intel as a company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.altavista.com/web/results?q=apartheid+intel" rel="nofollow">http://www.altavista.com/web/results?q=apartheid+intel</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=apartheid+intel" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=apartheid+intel</a></p>
<p><a href="http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=apartheid+intel" rel="nofollow">http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=apartheid+intel</a></p>
<p><a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=apartheid+intel" rel="nofollow">http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=apartheid+intel</a></p>
<p>tells you all you need to know about intel as a company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R1pper</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49190</link>
		<dc:creator>R1pper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49190</guid>
		<description>tumw, great speech brother. we need more people like you.
ithink that lazyness has a big part in those issu&#039;s you mention.
take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tumw, great speech brother. we need more people like you.<br />
ithink that lazyness has a big part in those issu&#8217;s you mention.<br />
take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tumw</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49183</link>
		<dc:creator>tumw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49183</guid>
		<description>Do you really want to know why they keep releasing new shit and continually change the socket formats?

It is NOT &quot;innovation&quot;. 

If you believe that, you are the world&#039;s BIGGEST gulliable retard! (A perfect speciman for Marketing Depts to abuse again and again.)...Fucking WAKE UP!

Its called &quot;planned obsolescence&quot;.

The intention is to keep getting you ALL to buy newer and newer hardware. Even when you don&#039;t need it.

Their Marketing teams will make you feel you must &quot;keep up with the times&quot;. So they release more and more new shit.

Microsoft also helps out by delibrately adding features and implementing software such that you need to upgrade your hardware to get the &quot;full experience&quot;. This is especially true with DirectX. They keep upping it so that you NEED to buy new hardware. Think about it. The software market drives the hardware.

This also has an effect on the skill of the programmers. They are molded into thinking that ever increasing computing power will compensate for inefficient coding. This is WRONG. Its amazing why software starts to get bloated after a while. What&#039;s sad, is that the typical computer user just accepts it. They accept the crap that&#039;s given to them without a thought.

Do any of you realise that you can build an entire OS with full &quot;point and click&quot; GUI that can fit into the size of a floppy and boot in less than a few seconds? No. Big software corporations don&#039;t tell you about that, because they want you to keep investing into their CRAP. Their crap has ever increasing system requirements. Which means you need to spend money!

And what about AGP and PCI-Express? Marketing and hardware companies try to make people think AGP is dead. And yet, both Nvidia and ATI will still be producing DirectX 10 cards in AGP form! Simply because there is still a strong market for it! (People aren&#039;t totally stupid)

It isn&#039;t just computers. Its technology in general. Say with mobile phones, they keep on adding more shit you don&#039;t need. For each new generation, you see they keep changing the power adapter connector delibrately. So you are &quot;encouraged&quot; to buy newer phones.

So what about the environment? What happens to the &quot;obsolete&quot; gear? Doesn&#039;t it end up in landfills? WHO CARES! Because there is a LOT of money to be made from gulliable people! FUCK the environment! Let&#039;s make MONEY!

There&#039;s a BIG difference between &quot;innovation&quot; and &quot;planned obsolescence&quot;. Don&#039;t confuse them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really want to know why they keep releasing new shit and continually change the socket formats?</p>
<p>It is NOT &#8220;innovation&#8221;. </p>
<p>If you believe that, you are the world&#8217;s BIGGEST gulliable retard! (A perfect speciman for Marketing Depts to abuse again and again.)&#8230;Fucking WAKE UP!</p>
<p>Its called &#8220;planned obsolescence&#8221;.</p>
<p>The intention is to keep getting you ALL to buy newer and newer hardware. Even when you don&#8217;t need it.</p>
<p>Their Marketing teams will make you feel you must &#8220;keep up with the times&#8221;. So they release more and more new shit.</p>
<p>Microsoft also helps out by delibrately adding features and implementing software such that you need to upgrade your hardware to get the &#8220;full experience&#8221;. This is especially true with DirectX. They keep upping it so that you NEED to buy new hardware. Think about it. The software market drives the hardware.</p>
<p>This also has an effect on the skill of the programmers. They are molded into thinking that ever increasing computing power will compensate for inefficient coding. This is WRONG. Its amazing why software starts to get bloated after a while. What&#8217;s sad, is that the typical computer user just accepts it. They accept the crap that&#8217;s given to them without a thought.</p>
<p>Do any of you realise that you can build an entire OS with full &#8220;point and click&#8221; GUI that can fit into the size of a floppy and boot in less than a few seconds? No. Big software corporations don&#8217;t tell you about that, because they want you to keep investing into their CRAP. Their crap has ever increasing system requirements. Which means you need to spend money!</p>
<p>And what about AGP and PCI-Express? Marketing and hardware companies try to make people think AGP is dead. And yet, both Nvidia and ATI will still be producing DirectX 10 cards in AGP form! Simply because there is still a strong market for it! (People aren&#8217;t totally stupid)</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t just computers. Its technology in general. Say with mobile phones, they keep on adding more shit you don&#8217;t need. For each new generation, you see they keep changing the power adapter connector delibrately. So you are &#8220;encouraged&#8221; to buy newer phones.</p>
<p>So what about the environment? What happens to the &#8220;obsolete&#8221; gear? Doesn&#8217;t it end up in landfills? WHO CARES! Because there is a LOT of money to be made from gulliable people! FUCK the environment! Let&#8217;s make MONEY!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a BIG difference between &#8220;innovation&#8221; and &#8220;planned obsolescence&#8221;. Don&#8217;t confuse them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerqFase</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49166</link>
		<dc:creator>JerqFase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49166</guid>
		<description>I agree with deaddude...while new technology is awesome i think they throw things out a little too fast...maybe they should wait till theyve gotten it perfect and release a new line every two years or something....look at vista...to MS 5 years and they still didnt get it right...now theyre gunna make a new OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with deaddude&#8230;while new technology is awesome i think they throw things out a little too fast&#8230;maybe they should wait till theyve gotten it perfect and release a new line every two years or something&#8230;.look at vista&#8230;to MS 5 years and they still didnt get it right&#8230;now theyre gunna make a new OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49159</link>
		<dc:creator>HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49159</guid>
		<description>We need faster hard drives and memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need faster hard drives and memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeadDude</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49150</link>
		<dc:creator>DeadDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49150</guid>
		<description>actually, I wish this &quot;innovation&quot; B.S. was just released in one lump drop.

I saw a few YEARS ago Intel had a 30Gigahertz CO-PROCESSOR.

Why the hell are they dragging their feet in releasing that type of tech??

Because they make more money creating the tiny steps in between and releasing those first.

What I say is... make these little steps be larger leaps... charge more cash... give the market a chance to hit the new plateau....


It was bad enough like 3 months after Core DUO premiered there was the Core DUO 2... to give ya an idea where I&#039;m comming from.

Why not share some innovation with their mobile CPU market?  624mhz has been a &quot;barrier&quot; on PDAs for YEARS.  And the tech spec for the xScale CPUs states a theoretical max of over 1,130MHZ!  Where is the faster CPU????


sorry... I&#039;m a bit of an uber geek on multiple fronts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, I wish this &#8220;innovation&#8221; B.S. was just released in one lump drop.</p>
<p>I saw a few YEARS ago Intel had a 30Gigahertz CO-PROCESSOR.</p>
<p>Why the hell are they dragging their feet in releasing that type of tech??</p>
<p>Because they make more money creating the tiny steps in between and releasing those first.</p>
<p>What I say is&#8230; make these little steps be larger leaps&#8230; charge more cash&#8230; give the market a chance to hit the new plateau&#8230;.</p>
<p>It was bad enough like 3 months after Core DUO premiered there was the Core DUO 2&#8230; to give ya an idea where I&#8217;m comming from.</p>
<p>Why not share some innovation with their mobile CPU market?  624mhz has been a &#8220;barrier&#8221; on PDAs for YEARS.  And the tech spec for the xScale CPUs states a theoretical max of over 1,130MHZ!  Where is the faster CPU????</p>
<p>sorry&#8230; I&#8217;m a bit of an uber geek on multiple fronts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mc</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49145</guid>
		<description>@Deaddude:

Would you rather have it they stopped innovating? Nobody is forcing you to buy a new cpu every year right?! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deaddude:</p>
<p>Would you rather have it they stopped innovating? Nobody is forcing you to buy a new cpu every year right?! <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeadDude</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49136</link>
		<dc:creator>DeadDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49136</guid>
		<description>Why the hell are they releasing a new chip and architecture EVERY SINGLE YEAR?!?!

The market is flooded enough as it is.... why not just jump two or three of those &quot;releases&quot;, and knock out the best of the best and give us all a few years to get the cash to buy it?

It was bad enough when it took 2 years before all new shit came out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the hell are they releasing a new chip and architecture EVERY SINGLE YEAR?!?!</p>
<p>The market is flooded enough as it is&#8230;. why not just jump two or three of those &#8220;releases&#8221;, and knock out the best of the best and give us all a few years to get the cash to buy it?</p>
<p>It was bad enough when it took 2 years before all new shit came out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Command&#38;Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49134</link>
		<dc:creator>Command&#38;Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49134</guid>
		<description>AMD is really slow on there releases, it costing them. Assbag can you not find the caps button?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD is really slow on there releases, it costing them. Assbag can you not find the caps button?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assbag</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49133</link>
		<dc:creator>assbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49133</guid>
		<description>HMNNM???!?? IZ TAHT WAHT TEH GAMEZ HAKKERZ USED 2 HAKKZOR TEH 00.0000 SEXONDZ RELEEZES? I SUNE WILL HVAE TEH INTELECKT SOOPER CHIPZ ADN HAKKZOR TEH NEWEZT GAMEZ!!4 J00R VEWING PLEZURES!@ LOL@OL!@!! 4 SHIZZIES 4 REELZ MUH NIGGERNUGGETZ!@ ASSBAG 4 LIFESTILEZ GAINSTERAZ!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HMNNM???!?? IZ TAHT WAHT TEH GAMEZ HAKKERZ USED 2 HAKKZOR TEH 00.0000 SEXONDZ RELEEZES? I SUNE WILL HVAE TEH INTELECKT SOOPER CHIPZ ADN HAKKZOR TEH NEWEZT GAMEZ!!4 J00R VEWING PLEZURES!@ LOL@OL!@!! 4 SHIZZIES 4 REELZ MUH NIGGERNUGGETZ!@ ASSBAG 4 LIFESTILEZ GAINSTERAZ!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R1pper</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49107</link>
		<dc:creator>R1pper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49107</guid>
		<description>emm, tell me where is this technology coming from?
intel got weird names to their new advance-jusy-announced-cpu, so i found it intrigue.
;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>emm, tell me where is this technology coming from?<br />
intel got weird names to their new advance-jusy-announced-cpu, so i found it intrigue.<br />
 <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raifen</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49105</link>
		<dc:creator>Raifen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49105</guid>
		<description>Pls add LOST 14 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pls add LOST 14 <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackhole</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49090</link>
		<dc:creator>blackhole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49090</guid>
		<description>Intels Nephalem is out in 2008/9. This will use a new socket, will have an integrated memory controller, it won&#039;t have a Front side bus anymore but a serial point to point interconnect, it will have a hypertransport type of system. and Simultaneous Multi-Threading. Intel are clearly not resting on their laurels this time. 

Prediction for this year : AMD win back performance crown with Barcelona in the fall, then Intel steal it back at the end of the year with Penryn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intels Nephalem is out in 2008/9. This will use a new socket, will have an integrated memory controller, it won&#8217;t have a Front side bus anymore but a serial point to point interconnect, it will have a hypertransport type of system. and Simultaneous Multi-Threading. Intel are clearly not resting on their laurels this time. </p>
<p>Prediction for this year : AMD win back performance crown with Barcelona in the fall, then Intel steal it back at the end of the year with Penryn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagle_Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-49086</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagle_Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-to-release-faster-penryn-chips-in-2007/#comment-49086</guid>
		<description>Well here is hoping that they stay with waking them in 775 MOBO&#039;s. isn&#039;t technology just mind boggling. Blows me away thinking about technology in the future!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here is hoping that they stay with waking them in 775 MOBO&#8217;s. isn&#8217;t technology just mind boggling. Blows me away thinking about technology in the future!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
