Comments on: Intel shipped over 1M quad core CPUs

By: Rowdy

Rowdy — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:35:16 +0000

Who cares who is better AMD or Intel, all I care for is bang for buck, if the system fails early you get another usually free chip, a few days without your precious PC (Unless like me you have multiple) and your back and killing bad guys again in the virtual world. So relax and enjoy the benefits of true competition, because if was a monopoly like you know who then you’d be paying much much more! Good luck!

By: bobby

bobby — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:17:51 +0000

I’m gonna glue two quad cores together and make myself a octacore !!! Oh man, its gonna be awesome

By: Helias

Helias — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:54:36 +0000

If there were no AMD fanboys, then we wouldn’t have no choice but an Intel proc with its bloated price. You should be thankful AMD fanboys exist.

Why are you waiting for Barcelona? Do you have servers at home? Phenom will follow (AMD Quad for desktops).

By: Bendee

Bendee — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:36:21 +0000

*what devices are the CPU’s motherboard compatible at which speed (sorry)

By: Bendee

Bendee — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:32:27 +0000

Yes, it isn’t just the Ghz, but
FSB speeds
Caches / memory subsystem
what devices are the CPU’s motherboard compatible at which
operation speeds (floating point / integer ) / bit length
speed
reliability
price
…(much more)
(some are AMD’s advantages!)

compared to this, I think Intel beats AMD at price/performance

For home use i would advice Intel…

And if someone compares, compare things that are realesed at the same time, not a product that is for sale quite a while, and a product that isn’t available yet…

By: foxtecca

foxtecca — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:41:55 +0000

i think he meant them in jest spoonfed, of course 2ghz isnt from the syone age, rocks are from the stone age.

that wasnt a very biased “article” at all. i wonder how much it cost intel to have it written.

By: spoonfed

spoonfed — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:47:07 +0000

Amd doing everything better than Intel?

2GHz (wtf that’s stone-age speeds) ?

Those two sentences show that this thread has been overtaken by the absolutely clueless.

By: andrew

andrew — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:25:02 +0000

it’s not the ghz anymore… just shows how you are a sucker for intel’s marketing. the only way intel is “on top” is cuz of it’s marketing, uneducated consumers and fanboys. Im waiting for barcelona

By: MellowB

MellowB — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:21:50 +0000

Haha that load of AMD fanboy’s above is just amazing.
I just love to read the comments here on rlslog, they are always so “funny”.

By: bballer

bballer — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:11:09 +0000

I also think AMD is in a bad position. With there new graphic cards turning out as a flop after being delayed several times and there new cpu’s with a max speed of 2GHz (wtf that’s stone-age speeds). They could better come up with something good in the near future.

By: HIV2

HIV2 — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:57:12 +0000

Intel is better,i never had any problems with intel, not a single processor gave up on me and i fucking overclocked it every time i bought a new one.I used AMD only once and i was disappointed from the performance and reliability (it burned up after two months) for fuck sake AMD make a CPU that doesn’t burn up right after the cooler stops. That shit doesn’t happen to Intel man

By: Bendee

Bendee — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:09:42 +0000

Why, 4 single core cpu-s put together are a new technology? (if 2*dual isnt’t)
AMD’s arhitecture is better, however, with the same price, you can buy an Intel CPU at much higher Mhz.

By: QuadrupelQ

QuadrupelQ — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:06:19 +0000

YES, now I can finally use all those applications optimized for the Quad Core CPUs! Oh wait, there aren’t any…

AMD toast??? Seems to me this is the first big break Intel has in years. Plus it isn’t ‘real’ new technology, but just two dual cores glued together. AMD is there to stay. Like others pointed out, they are doing everything better then Intell, only their marketing isn’t as good. So ask yourself, is it about marketing, or is it about the best technology in you system?

By: cheneyisprez

cheneyisprez — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:35:19 +0000

New barcelona, 2.0ghz max, wtf lol. I like intel’s response to that ‘native quad core’ spin by amd = “Who cares”

Anyone here buying up Intel stock? I think it’s on its way to become a monopoly this time. Amd is toast.

By: mark

mark — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:49:02 +0000

Can’t will till it’s more affordable