<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Larrabee, own graphic chip line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:14:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SoberAddiction</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-444181</link>
		<dc:creator>SoberAddiction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-444181</guid>
		<description>They have come out w/ other form factors than ATX, but they&#039;re not popular, and I&#039;d never want a mainboard w/ everything on it. I wouldn&#039;t be able to upgrade as easily, and all the stuff is just gonna suck a little bit more power off your CPU. And Personally I don&#039;t like Intel, I doubt I&#039;ll like their GFX Cards, and their only trying to to do what AMD/ATI has done. the ability to run applications through your GPU core has been around for a while and allows you to put a little extra work into doing things like floding proteins for reaserch&gt; intel will find a market base somewhere&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have come out w/ other form factors than ATX, but they&#8217;re not popular, and I&#8217;d never want a mainboard w/ everything on it. I wouldn&#8217;t be able to upgrade as easily, and all the stuff is just gonna suck a little bit more power off your CPU. And Personally I don&#8217;t like Intel, I doubt I&#8217;ll like their GFX Cards, and their only trying to to do what AMD/ATI has done. the ability to run applications through your GPU core has been around for a while and allows you to put a little extra work into doing things like floding proteins for reaserch&gt; intel will find a market base somewhere&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asd</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425821</link>
		<dc:creator>asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425821</guid>
		<description>uhh mac guys. intel makes ur macs nowadays..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uhh mac guys. intel makes ur macs nowadays..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Costa200</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425813</link>
		<dc:creator>Costa200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425813</guid>
		<description>Screw that onboard crap. They are going to need space and it will be an excuse to avoid slots for addon hardware. Then you&#039;ll be stuck with the same machine forever or you will have to buy a whole new machine. It&#039;s the PC going Playstation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw that onboard crap. They are going to need space and it will be an excuse to avoid slots for addon hardware. Then you&#8217;ll be stuck with the same machine forever or you will have to buy a whole new machine. It&#8217;s the PC going Playstation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross kemp</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425314</link>
		<dc:creator>ross kemp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425314</guid>
		<description>#1 rule for engineers:

if it ain&#039;t broke - don&#039;t mess with it.

unless theres enough rich people to buy your broken product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 rule for engineers:</p>
<p>if it ain&#8217;t broke &#8211; don&#8217;t mess with it.</p>
<p>unless theres enough rich people to buy your broken product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johney666</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425299</link>
		<dc:creator>Johney666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425299</guid>
		<description>Now you know why the next &lt;b&gt;Doom&lt;/b&gt; is being created! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you know why the next <b>Doom</b> is being created! <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425291</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425291</guid>
		<description>#14 = tard.

Macs = use PC hardware. The components are not built into the motherboard. Fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 = tard.</p>
<p>Macs = use PC hardware. The components are not built into the motherboard. Fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425260</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425260</guid>
		<description>#13 Yes ... its called a mac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 Yes &#8230; its called a mac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425203</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425203</guid>
		<description>Will it ever be possible that you will buy a motherboard and it has everything onboard (such as GFX, CPU, RAM etc)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it ever be possible that you will buy a motherboard and it has everything onboard (such as GFX, CPU, RAM etc)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nWo</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-425082</link>
		<dc:creator>nWo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-425082</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe all the tech companies are still tied down to the archaic ATX standard. It&#039;s what, 15 years old?

Time for an upgrade amirite...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe all the tech companies are still tied down to the archaic ATX standard. It&#8217;s what, 15 years old?</p>
<p>Time for an upgrade amirite&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank hill</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-424919</link>
		<dc:creator>hank hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-424919</guid>
		<description>LOL @ the hater Sealion.  Intel LOVES to make promises, I guess we&#039;ll see eventually, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL @ the hater Sealion.  Intel LOVES to make promises, I guess we&#8217;ll see eventually, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yak</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-424698</link>
		<dc:creator>yak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-424698</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;m sure some people have been doing it for many years, it&#039;s just recently that executing non-graphics code on graphics cards has been gaining mainstream attention.

CUDA from Nvidia seems to be meant to encourage it, but I think it&#039;s only supported on the G92 and up.  Could be wrong though.

I&#039;m just looking forward to the competition and price-breaks to follow :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m sure some people have been doing it for many years, it&#8217;s just recently that executing non-graphics code on graphics cards has been gaining mainstream attention.</p>
<p>CUDA from Nvidia seems to be meant to encourage it, but I think it&#8217;s only supported on the G92 and up.  Could be wrong though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just looking forward to the competition and price-breaks to follow <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sealion</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-424695</link>
		<dc:creator>Sealion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-424695</guid>
		<description>Hank hill...
Larabee is about 400+x faster then a macs GPU.

your a tool. QQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank hill&#8230;<br />
Larabee is about 400+x faster then a macs GPU.</p>
<p>your a tool. QQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sealion</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-424690</link>
		<dc:creator>Sealion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-424690</guid>
		<description>Wrong.

Larabee isn&#039;t a GFX add in card it&#039;s a Parallel processing CPU
(16 cores+) which can handle rendering code.

Post less crap and more Scene releases please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong.</p>
<p>Larabee isn&#8217;t a GFX add in card it&#8217;s a Parallel processing CPU<br />
(16 cores+) which can handle rendering code.</p>
<p>Post less crap and more Scene releases please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hji</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-424644</link>
		<dc:creator>hji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-424644</guid>
		<description>hank, but how many games can you play on a mac compared to pc?

yeah, about 4, so stfu corksniffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hank, but how many games can you play on a mac compared to pc?</p>
<p>yeah, about 4, so stfu corksniffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank hill</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/comment-page-1/#comment-424635</link>
		<dc:creator>hank hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/intel-larrabee-own-graphic-chip-line/#comment-424635</guid>
		<description>Wow, we had onboard graphics on my amiga back in &#039;89 and have always had them on Macs. Snaps to Intel for their &#039;innovation&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, we had onboard graphics on my amiga back in &#8216;89 and have always had them on Macs. Snaps to Intel for their &#8216;innovation&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
